1. The anticorrelation is not an artifact. It is in every sample even within that “stall” itself. 2: that “cart” was PCR negative and Homo Sapiens are found in the sample. 3: nobody have ever found a naturally infected r accoon dog anywhere in the world. “ Execept that in this case the fingerprints were found to be mainly of the victim, which don’t even know how to pull the trigger. https:// archive.md/yyX0Z http:// archive.md/4rVph http:// archive.md/iw1Pz http:// archive.md/DChUL Raccoon dogs and civet cats are the 2 species least susceptible to natural infections by SARS - CoV - 2. And by actually correlating with the virus on the body of the gun, the suspect’s fingerprint was found only on the trigger and while overlapping with the victim’s, the victim’s fingerptints are found where it is not possible to fire the gun — all animals other than Homo Sapiens are found on entirely dif ferent locations in that “stall” than SARS - CoV - 2. The correlation are all poor to negative. https:// archive.md/EzTib ” h ttps://archive.md/JSQvc 4: the primary confounder was that the “stall” was closest to the toilets, https:/ / archive.md/T2u0S https:/ / archive.md/LJzSO https:/ / archive.md/4cCHG h ttps:/ / archive.md/FskYn Closest to where the samplers entered and exited, and all of the samples inside was located right where sampler contamination is expected to happen. https:/ / archive.md/csYBM https:/ / archive.md/lI04H https:/ / archive.md/0A24q https:/ / archive.md/JSQvc In fact every single Q* sample came from contamination caused by samplers and cross - contamination afterward, archive.md/vlAgp https:/ / arc hive.md/0O2TN It is most likely to have sampler boots trampling the carts and kicking the cages after trampling through the toilet area, https:/ / archive.md/CTP3i https:/ / archive.md/BWZJL https:/ / archive.md/ETjzS https:/ / archive.md/2PM9Y Suits rubbing against the entrance and then against the sample tube in an awkward sampling site, and possessed specific characteristics of a contamination - induced false positivity (ORF1ab primer aligned o ver without PCR+, no positive results again despite repeated samplibg attempts). Again, NGS is known to be less sensitive and more prone to cross - contamination and process - linked contamination than PCR. A sensitive primer pair will detect the viru s before untargeted sequencing c an, is often used for gap filling in viral gen ome assembly, and while is some times susce ptible to cross - reactivity or trace contamination, is m uch less prone to cross - contamination than NGS, which have ~100 steps in library preparation which each step have an multiplicative risk of cross - contamination and contam ination than PCR with a s ensitive primer pair. Re ason why PCR is also used to val idate the presence of virus within samples espe cially with large batch NSG reactions. The re were no evidence that either raccoon dogs were infected in the market or evidence that they can be infected at all in the world. None of them are. http:/ / archive.md/csY BM http:/ / archive.md/HlJ9o http:/ / archive.md/2sAST http:/ / archive.md/vlAgp http:/ / archive.md/gvHfw In fact, raccoon dogs are not susceptible to natural infections at all — not f ound infected anywhere in the world. https:/ / archive.md/yyX0Z https:/ / archive.md/iw1Pz https:/ / archive.md/4rVph https:/ / archive.md/DChUL archive.md/n9o0f http:/ / archive.md/vL6U4 http:/ / archive.md/7doR8 http:/ / archive.md/0A24q http:/ / arch ive.md/2sAST http:/ / archive.md/JSQvc When you enter that one stall, it say Homo Sapiens the only species in positive correlation. https://www.independentsciencenews.org /commentaries/the - great - raccoon - dog - mystery/ archive.md/LJzSO http:/ / archive.md/4cCHG Cross - contamination and process(sample tube lip) - linked contamination, ultimately all derived f rom toilet area contamination of the samplers, is what all the Q* samples had. Even same correlation series between SARS - CoV - 2 and human. https://a rchive. md/ csYBM h ttps://archive.md/MtkL3 https://archive.md/8JhhAb htt ps:// archive.md/ 1K6pC h ttps://archive.md/Ttn5P archive.md/LJzSO http:/ / archive.md/T2u0S http:/ / archive.md/JSQvc there is neither evidence of an infected animal in these “wildlife stalls” nor http:/ / archive.md/4rVph http:/ / archive.md/yyX0Z http:/ / archive.md/DChUL there is any evidence that raccoon dogs can b e infected. As all of the positive samples in the market stalls came from Sampler contamination http:/ / archive.md/NeybM http:/ / archive.md/2PM9Y http:/ / archive.md/RirQ7 http:/ / archive.md/ETjzS http:/ / archive.md/CTP3i http:/ / archive.md/BWZJL and cross - contamina tion. http:/ / archive.md/LJzSO http:/ / archive.md/VNr75 Never an infected vendor or ani mal. h ttps://archive. md/ Sokty archive.md/0O2TN Not even freuling themselves managed to infect them in a second time, not even other labs anywhere else in the world. No replication of freuling et al hap pened anywhere in the world. archive.md/NeybM toilets and infected samplers. https://archive.md/CTP3i htt ps:/ / archive.md/ETjzS https:/ / archive.md/BWZJL https:/ / archive.md/KLkHS Contamination and cross - contamination. https:/ / archive.md/YGDiK All sewage well samples including those with reads say toilets not wildlife stalls. https://archive.md/RirQ7 archive.md/DChUL https:/ / archive.md/4rVph https:/ / archive.md/yyX0Z Despite surveillance in Europe and Japan, there were zero evidence of natural infections in a raccoon dog anywhere in the world. https:/ / archive.md/iw1Pz All upstream suppliers are traced and were negative. archive.md/rSaO9 https:/ / archive.md/gvHfw In both Jan 01 and Jan 12, the stall with most positive samples out of all samples is the stall with that is closest to the toilets. https:/ / archive.md/rj1pV https:/ / archive.md/FskYn As it is brought in by samplers, not vendors. archive.md/lI04H https:/ / archive.md/A892b https:/ / archive.md/7doR8 Go to W6 - 29 - 33 itself, and you will find all correlation with other animals have completely broken down. https:/ / archive.md/FyMAF h ttps://archive.md/1K6pC sciencedirect.com/science/artic l e/pii/S004896972101200 6 SARs - CoV - 2 RNA stability: Fresh PPE> New bangladesh banknotes > Old bangladesh banknotes. https:/ / nature.com/arti cles/s415 9 8 - 020 - 80098 - 3 https:/ / medrxiv.org/content/10.11 0 1/2020.05.12.20099358v 1 Wastewater from toilets>high touch surfaces in train stations. https:/ / imperial.ac.uk/news/213133/i m perial - scientists - conduct - covid - 19 - testing - londons / High touch=low stability. archive.md/NeybM http:/ / archive.md/ETjzS http:/ / archive.md/BWZJL http:/ / archive.md/KLkHS Alongside sampler contamination caused by inexperienced samplers that were ne ver trained on scene preservation, https:/ / archive.md/CTP3i https://archive.md/FskYn Reason why no everyday objects or anything a bove the waist of the samplers tested positive in the market. All they were testing is contamination caused by their own making. Also the reason behind the disparity between human cases and positive environmental samples in non - wildlife stalls and especially near the toilets. Even when the positive sample contained no wildlife DNA, even only human DNA. h ttps://archive.md/tlf N r https://archive.md/GvRcD All they were testing is contamination caused by their own making. Also the reason behind the disparity between human cases and positive environmental sa mples in non - wildlife stalls and especially near the toilets. https:/ / archive.md/FskYn https://archive.md/gvHf w (which is also closest to the main entrance of samplers into the market ). Inexperienced samplers and cleanup workers https:/ / archive.md/xGHOC is what that brought in the contamination within the market. All of it. https:/ / archive.md/FyMAF https:/ / archive.md/CTP3i https:/ / archive.md/ETjzS https:/ / archive.md/BWZJL Both sampler contamination and differential stability contribute to the pattern observ ed. https:/ / archive.md/NeybM https:/ / archive.md/2PM9Y https:/ / archive.md/RirQ7 archive.md/lhkVR https:/ / archive.md/n9o0f again, none of the species that they claim “susceptible” have even a single case of natural infection observed, and https:/ / archive.md/iw1Pz https:/ / archive.md/Ttn5P all of the “stable supply” species were traced and tested negative. archive.md/gkquN be careful when employing private contractors or volunteers when doing environmental sampling...... h ttps://archive.md/ 8 JhA b “ Sorry, but raccoon dogs were still entirely non - susceptible, and there were also no evidence any of the mammals shed the virus in those Q* samples other than Homo Sapiens. “ It turned out that not only be there no correlation between raccoon dogs and SARS - CoV - 2 reads in the market, http:/ / archive.md/yyX0Z http:/ / archive.md/iw1Pz http:/ / archive.md/4rVph http:/ / archive.md/DChUL They aren’t susceptible to natural infection s as such infections are not found anywhere else in the world. https://twitter.com/keverington/status/1674592305888780290 The most raccoon dog DNA are actually found in negative stalls and samples — it failed to correlate at all within W6 - 29 - 33 (negative c orrelation), the positive samples, or any samples. https:/ / archive.md/vlAgp https:/ / archive.md/csYBM https:/ / archive.md/svZqO# https:/ / archive.md/8JhAb When the only “reference for raccoon dog susceptibility” was still freuling et al, you know something is terribly wrong with that “raccoon dogs at the market” claim. https:/ / archive.md/GjlEx https:/ / archive.md/mwT8i https:/ / archi ve.md/0O2TN https:/ / archive.md/EzTib http:/ / archive.md/iw1Pz