TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 The Purpose of This Document 5 2 Why Is It People Do Not Often Heal? 7 2.1 The Picture of Historical Disease 9 Native Disease Analyzed 10 Nelson Rockefeller and the “Sciencification” of Medicine 11 The 1918 Spanish Flu 14 DNA and RNA . 16 3 Giving People a Chance to Heal 25 3.1 People Coming In To a Healing Store... 27 Then, Suddenly, the Tax Man... 28 At About the Same Time As The Taxes... 29 A Slow Online Trickle . 30 Where There Is Resistance 30 Social Media Attack 31 4 Targeting Conservative Business and Religion 35 4.1 We Also Know A Shame... 37 4.2 And We Also Know a Tragedy 37 5 The Need for a Class Action 39 5.1 Pieces Required for a Class Action 41 iii 6 Contact 43 iv 1 THE PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT The purpose of this document is to outline a crime against humanity. This crime concerns the United States medical system, along with portions of the US government and has deep historical roots. A specific incident concerning direct interference for alternative healing modalities will be elucidated and the historical roots will be examined. The impact and continuing consequence on humanity will be presented. The proffered solution, at least as a starting place, is to identify an attorney willing to undertake a class action lawsuit filing on behalf of all those who were and are affected by the weaponized removal of potential alternatives for medical care that are not in the so-called “mainstream” medical system. Further action toward removal of medical gate-keeping in terms of medical knowledge and treatment by doctors and the medical system who are often influenced heavily by drug lobbyists would be a long-term solution and worthwhile goal. THE PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT 6 2 WHY IS IT PEOPLE DO NOT OFTEN HEAL? Back in around 2006, the author of this paper was compelled to undertake study toward understanding the nature of human suffering—specifically why people, despite access to the most advanced medical care on Earth, often do not heal—whether that be psychologically or physically. When the term “heal” is used in the sense being explored, the term does not mean that the body stays alive alone. There are clear quality of life issues that must be applied to the outcomes a person experiences due to a given treatment. One observation that became pertinent to the posed question was how we frame the word “disease”. The Western sense of disease differs greatly from the Eastern sense of the word, although both describe the domain of symptoms in their respective ways. A Traditional Chinese Medical Doctor (TCMD) will see the same symptoms as a Western physician if someone has a rash on their skin. While the Western physician might prescribe some steroidal cream to be applied to the rash, the Chinese physician might ascribe the condition to the element of heat being too high, and suggest an herb that aligns with the element of water to be taken as a tea or tincture by the patient. Still another treatment via someone like a Native American healer might involve some spiritual intercession on behalf of the patient taken by the healer along with an herb and an attendant song given to WHY IS IT PEOPLE DO NOT OFTEN HEAL? the patient. A medicine bag might be assigned with specific prayers. Not in distant memory a Catholic hospital would incense all the corridors of the building daily with the belief that certain kinds of incense promoted healing or kept a building from having a kind of negative energy buildup. The difference in treatment, in all the above scenarios, concerns how the domain of disease is being treated. In the Western sense, the idea is that reason and some scientific concoction are sufficient to bring the patient to a healed outcome. In the rest, there is a closeness to the nature and the Earth that does not exist in the same manner. Some of these treatments concern an unseen spiritual dimension—or at least the spiritual dimension is not seen by just anyone. In the Western system, so long as the body is alive and restored to its normal state, all is well. In some of these other traditions, that is not going to be enough since fixing the symptom will not fix the cause. Being alive, in these traditions, is not sufficient if you are also spiritually dead. You will not be alive for long should it be the case your soul is sick is how the thinking goes here. 8 WHY IS IT PEOPLE DO NOT OFTEN HEAL? 2.1 THE PICTURE OF HISTORICAL DISEASE When we think of the Native Americans, we generally are told in school that disease wiped them out that they had no immunity to (among other things). What we are not told, though, is that one does not need immunity to diseases that one does not get. The implication, then, is that the settlers were carrying bio-weapons within themselves cultivated by their own ways of living which were out of balance with the civilizations that existed in North American and elsewhere. The fact that these immunities were not present was because no significant case of the disease had appeared prior to the settling of the Americas by the overseas colonizing forces. This paints a radically different picture of the health of the Natives that were occupying the land. While they clearly had diseases and death, the immunity required to withstand something like a black plague was not a necessity and apparently had not been for an impressively long period of time. While the temptation to say the Natives had no cities and therefore had no disease because of this—the characterization does not hold. There were, in fact, large Native American cities in the Americas. What they did not have, to quote the influential Jared Diamond book, was the guns and steel that accompanied, apparently, certain kinds of germs. Guns and steel, of course, foment certain kinds of war which, in their turn, bring about plague, famine and death. While the Natives certainly had war and violence, they seemed to be missing a kind of savagery that the nature of European warfare had bred. The Natives, did, however, become quick studies and were soon comparable if not excelling in their ability to use rifles and other “white men” weaponry. The so-called savages, ironically, were taught to be savage. 9 WHY IS IT PEOPLE DO NOT OFTEN HEAL? Native Disease Analyzed When we examine the Native American attitude toward disease, we quickly find that it shares more in common with Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) than not. We also might be surprised to learn that in many tribes in order to be a medicine man or woman, one often had to undergo around thirty years of apprenticeship where one learned various herbs and their properties along with the proper spiritual songs or prayers as well as offerings. Herbal native knowledge was often vast . The medicine traditions had plenty of time to develop relative to the region the Natives lived in because they had lived there for a long time, and had opportunity to treat many different conditions which, as noted above, appear not to have included significant plagues of the like and kind that the European world dealt with on a regular basis. All of this knowledge was available, in various forms, to the first white settlers in America. They brought with them, of course, their own understanding of medicine and herbs from Europe and elsewhere, but as the story of Thanksgiving makes clear, the Natives had more knowledge about what could be eaten and how to survive in this region than the Europeans did. They had, after all, been living here for hundreds of years previous. There are many examples 1 of settlers learning cures or being cured by Native herbs and herbal treatments. The net result of these experiences, however, was to have the United States government clamp down on such knowledge. One person in particular went far in doing this in that he was placed at the right time and place with the kinds of necessary resources to bring a specific kind of pressure on the burgeoning field. 1 https://www.news.iastate.edu/news/19th-century-indian-remedies-new-age-spirituality 10 WHY IS IT PEOPLE DO NOT OFTEN HEAL? Nelson Rockefeller and the “Sciencification” of Medicine It is possible to spend vast amounts of time on the subject of Nelson Rock- efeller and his influence on medicine. It is sufficient, for the purposes here, to quote a few relevant sources concerning perspectives on his actions regarding natural medicine like herbal treatments: John D. Rockefeller was one of the most influential and wealthiest figures of the early 20th century, controlling Standard Oil and amassing unprecedented wealth. With such power, he sought to expand his influence into other sectors, and healthcare became a strategic target. In the early 1900s, healthcare in the United States was diverse, with herbal medicine, homeopathy, and traditional remedies being widely practiced. Physicians used a combination of treat- ments based on natural sources, including plants and minerals. However, Rockefeller recognized the potential to control the med- ical industry by promoting synthetic drugs—products that could be patented and sold at high margins. To achieve this, Rockefeller funded the infamous Flexner Report of 1910. Commissioned by the Carnegie Foundation and heavily influenced by Rockefeller’s financial backing, the report called for major reforms in medical education. The report recommended closing many natural and homeopathic medical schools while promoting universities that focused on pharmaceutical-based treatments. As a result, traditional medicine was marginalized, and synthetic drugs became the primary focus of healthcare. With Rockefeller’s powerful influence guiding medical education and funding, natural medicine faced systematic suppression. Herbalists, chiropractors, and holistic healers were gradually 11 WHY IS IT PEOPLE DO NOT OFTEN HEAL? pushed to the fringes of society. Doctors who practiced alterna- tive medicine were discredited, and the medical establishment began to favor pharmaceutical treatments as the gold standard. Meanwhile, pharmaceutical companies flourished, developing patented drugs that generated immense profits. Rockefeller’s investments ensured that these companies thrived, creating a medical monopoly that relied on synthetic solutions rather than holistic healing. The shift away from natural remedies was not merely about improving healthcare—it was about building a profit-driven industry that Rockefeller could dominate. A crucial element in Rockefeller’s strategy was the Flexner Report, commissioned in 1910 and funded by the Rockefeller and Carnegie foundations. The report evaluated medical schools across North America, promoting those that emphasized pharmaceutical-based treatments while condemning institu- tions that taught holistic medicine. As a result, medical schools that practiced traditional or alternative medicine were forced to close or adapt to Rockefeller’s pharmaceutical-centered model. This shift fundamentally altered medical education, ensuring future doctors prioritized prescription drugs over alternative therapies. The Flexner Report’s impact extended beyond medical schools, in- fluencing healthcare systems and policies across the continent. By promoting a standardized, scientific approach to medicine, it contributed to the rise of large pharmaceutical companies and their dominance in the medical field. However, this reform also marginalized alternative medicine and holistic approaches, narrowing the scope of medical practice and shaping the way future generations of doctors viewed patient care. The long-term effects of this shift are still evident today in the prioritization of pharmaceutical interventions over other forms of healing. 12 WHY IS IT PEOPLE DO NOT OFTEN HEAL? 2 One can, of course, find many other sources that say that John D. Rockefeller had nothing to do the changes that happened in the medical field, but these assertions fail to account for the evidence of what happened to medical schools across the country after the report was released. Another source puts the situation laconically: Rockefeller’s next move was to flood medical schools with $$$. He gave over $100M to universities and hospitals to only teach drug- based medicine. Overnight, the U.S. healthcare system became a factory for Big Pharma. 3 Rockefeller, of course, would have been alive during the moments when Native American cures along with European herbal traditions and alterna- tive health were more accessibly practiced. Was Flexner unbiased against these modalities? The answer seems to be a resounding “no”: Using political influence and fake “science”, the Flexner Report la- beled homeopathy, herbal medicine, and nutrition-based healing as “quackery.” Doctors who resisted were mocked, demonized, and even jailed... sounds familiar, doesn’t it? 4 If someone wishes to exonerate Rockefeller, they would have a Herculean task of explaining the nature of his later actions in context of the results of the Flexner report which he solicited. What is abundantly clear is from this point forward medicine took on a different tone in the West. Patent- ing medicine is still an expensive, lucrative endeavor that rewards major companies to this day. However, owning the patent on medicine was not sufficient. The next step in this progression was to investigate DNA which would ultimately result in patents of a different kind. What became a more “niche” market was herbal medicine, although many sources suggest Rock- 2 https://theworldhour.com/the-dark-origins-of-big-pharma-rockefellers-empire-and-the- fall-of-natural-medicine/ 3 https://hindupost.in/world/how-john-d-rockefeller-poisoned-medicine-for-profit-by- pushing-patented-oil-based-drugs-at-expense-of-natural-cures/# 4 ibid 13 WHY IS IT PEOPLE DO NOT OFTEN HEAL? efeller continued to avail himself of the benefits of those treatments well into his old age. 5 The 1918 Spanish Flu Eight years after Rockefeller, the Spanish flu breaks out. Or does it? History tells us that the 1918 Spanish Flu killed between 50 – 100 million people. At the time, medical and pharmaceutical sources described it as THE MOST horrific disease process since the Black Plague of 1347, which killed an estimated 25-30 million people. In the book, Vaccination Condemned, by Eleanor McBean, PhD, N.D., the author describes, in detail, personal and family experi- ences during the 1918 “Spanish Flu” pandemic. McBean’s coverage of the 1918 “Spanish Flu”, as a reporter and an unvaccinated survivor, requires that the historical basis of the event needs to be revisited, not as a “conspiracy theory” but with evidence that will “set your hair on fire”. A few years ago, I came across another book by Eleanor McBean: “Vaccination...The Silent Killer”. McBean provides evidence that not only were the historical events of the 1918 “Spanish Flu” com- promised, but also those of the Polio and Swine Flu epidemics. Spain was neutral during WW1 and did NOT censor its press, unlike the combatting countries. As a result, Spain was the first to report the 1918 Flu epidemic and the world “scapegoated” Spain as the source. Thus, the “Spanish Flu” is born. The First Case: Military Vaccination Experiments in Fort Riley, Kansas 5 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12318542/ 14 WHY IS IT PEOPLE DO NOT OFTEN HEAL? In preparation for WW1, a massive military vaccination experi- ment involving numerous prior developed vaccines took place in Fort Riley, Kansas- where the first “Spanish Flu” case was reported. WW1 Draft = Human Test Subjects The fledgling pharmaceutical industry, sponsored by the ‘Rocke- feller Institute for Medical Research’, had something they never had before – a large supply of human test subjects. Supplied by the U.S. military’s first draft, the test pool of subjects ballooned to over 6 million men. Autopsies after the war proved that the 1918 flu was NOT a “FLU” at all. It was caused by random dosages of an experimental ‘bacte- rial meningitis vaccine’, which to this day, mimics flu-like symp- toms. The massive, multiple assaults with additional vaccines on the unprepared immune systems of soldiers and civilians created a “killing field”. Those that were not vaccinated were not affected. So... How did Civilians Die? 1. WW1 ended sooner than expected, leaving HUGE quantities of unused experimental vaccines. 2. Fearing that soldiers coming home would spread diseases to their families, The U.S. government pushed the largest vaccine ‘fear’ campaign in history. They used the human population as a research and development lab to field test experimental vaccines. 3. Tens of millions of civilians died in the same manner as did the soldiers. 4. Instead of stopping the vaccines, doctors intensified them, calling it the great “Spanish Flu of 1918”. As a result, ONLY THE VACCINATED DIED. 15 WHY IS IT PEOPLE DO NOT OFTEN HEAL? “Seven men dropped dead in a doctor’s office after being vac- cinated. Letters were sent to their families that they had been killed in action.” Eleanor McBean Minnesota Wellness Directory http://www.mnwelldir.org/docs/vaccines/vaccinations_condemned_McBean.htm WW1 U.S. soldiers were given 14 – 25 untested, experimental vaccines within days of each other, which triggered intensified cases of ALL the diseases at once. The doctors called it a new disease and proceeded to suppress the symptoms with additional drugs or vaccines. 6 DNA and RNA With James Watson’s recent death 7 , there is an abundance of material on his work concerning DNA. What is relevant, for this paper, however, is the role RNA plays in the creation of DNA, at least potentially. DNA normally tells RNA how to build what the body needs. It does this by virtue of an intermediary—so-called mRNA or messenger RNA. MRNA might ring some bells as being the way be which certain retroviruses were known to work in the 90’s and 2000’s by hijacking the molecular machinery to pump out copies of a virus instead of the normal progression that DNA dictates: Retroviruses belong to the viral family Retroviridae and are de- fined not by the diseases they cause, but by how they replicate. Most living organisms use DNA to store genetic information and RNA to carry that information to make proteins. Retroviruses flip this process on its head. 6 https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/health-healing/the-1918-spanish-flu-only-the- vaccinated-died-1/ 7 https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1962/watson/biographical/ 16 WHY IS IT PEOPLE DO NOT OFTEN HEAL? Their genetic material is stored as RNA, not DNA. But unlike typi- cal RNA viruses, retroviruses don’t simply use this RNA to make proteins. Instead, they carry a special enzyme called reverse transcriptase that allows them to convert their RNA into DNA once inside a host cell. This backwards flow of genetic informa- tion—RNA to DNA—is the hallmark of a retrovirus and is what gives it its name. Once converted, this viral DNA is inserted into the host cell’s own DNA by another enzyme, integrase. From that point onward, the host’s own cellular machinery reads the viral DNA and begins producing viral proteins. The virus has essentially hijacked the cell’s identity. In some cases, this process is quiet and slow; in others, it leads to aggressive replication and the death of the host cell. Retroviruses are enveloped viruses, meaning they have a lipid membrane surrounding their protein shell, or capsid. This enve- lope is stolen from the host cell during the budding process and is studded with viral glycoproteins that help the virus recognize and bind to target cells. The entire structure is geared toward one purpose: infiltration and replication. 8 A virus can come and cause the DNA to be changed by way of RNA altering retroviri. Genetic engineering makes use of a similar process to make patentable sequences of DNA so certain kinds of plants and tomatoes theoretically impervious to various diseases and climatic issues can be produced. There is a direct link from “medicines which are patentable via Rockefeller” to owning various strands of genetic code changes—which are also patentable. Of course, since nobody made DNA besides God, it seems like a clear case of infringement. If I make a product with Legos, for instance, Legos is still going to sue me—even if the pirate ship design I make is unique. 8 https://www.sciencenewstoday.org/what-are-retroviruses-and-how-do-they-work 17 WHY IS IT PEOPLE DO NOT OFTEN HEAL? Vaccines The word “vaccine”, comes from the Latin word for cows: 1800, “action or process of preventing smallpox by injecting peo- ple with cowpox virus (variolae vaccinae),” used by British physi- cian Edward Jenner (1749-1823) for the technique he publicized; from vaccine (adj.) “pertaining to cows, from cows” (1798), from Latin vaccinus “from cows,” from vacca “cow,” a word of uncertain origin. 9 Webster’s agrees, but gives some historical background information that sheds more light on how the word came to be: As the 18th century was winding to a close, an English physician named Edward Jenner set about to determine whether there was any truth to an urban legend of his day: milkmaids who got cowpox (a disease that causes ulcers on cows’ teats and can be spread to humans at the site of a scratch or abrasion) didn’t get smallpox. This was a big deal, because a case of cowpox would typically leave a person with a self-contained and localized ulcer or two, usually on a hand, while a case of smallpox would likely cause disfiguring scars at best and full-on death at worst. In a process that likely would not get FDA approval today, Jenner inoculated an eight-year-old boy (one James Phipps) with ma- terial taken from a milkmaid’s cowpox sores. (We warned you.) After the boy contracted and recovered from cowpox, Jenner went on to inoculate him with smallpox. The boy was, to our great relief, immune, and did not contract the disease. Jenner repeated this process with 22 more lucky folks and published his documenta- tion of it all in 1798, in a slender volume called An Inquiry into the Causes and Effects of the Variolae Vaccinae, using the Latin term that charmingly translates as “cow pustules.” 9 https://www.etymonline.com/word/vaccination 18