Chris Weisdorf Slam dunk expert evidence to officially call out, counter and destroy the Great Lie Chris Weisdorf Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 9:18 PM TO all supporters and haters, alike, of the truckers in the Freedom Convoy 2022; all local, state/provincial and federal legislators; all law enforcement officers; all members of the military; all judicial officials and their administrations; all doctors, nurses and healthcare professionals; all educators; all business owners, land owners, executives and corporate directors; all parents; all people who were coerced or fired for asserting their bodily autonomy and exercising their longstanding right to informed consent; and to all the vaccine-injured: Before you is the most definitive account of irrefutable scientific evidence submitted to date in a court challenge to the COVID-19 lockdowns, and related emergency measures. This includes masking and distancing, along with reasonable alternatives to said measures. By law in Ontario and Canada, as well as United States federal law, the existence of reasonable alternatives to emergency measures necessarily renders said measures invalid, inoperable and illegal. To date, no one has challenged the narrative that COVID-19 is one of the most deadly pandemics in human history that can be spread by completely healthy people showing no symptoms, that the virus causing it is "novel" and can evade immunity, and that the virus can similarly adapt as variants to become far more infectious and deadly. Anything and everything is "reasonable" under this narrative, has been upheld as legal, and will continue to be upheld as long as the narrative remains intact. This is the Great Lie and it remains completely unchallenged and untouched. Unchallenged in Canada. Unchallenged in the United States. Unchallenged across North America and the entire continent. Until now. As many of you know, the City of Toronto and Province of Ontario came down on Adam Skelly like ten tonnes of bricks. For daring to dissent, attempting to make a living, employing many at his three Adamson Barbecue restaurants and engaging in civil disobedience, the government brought six, separate legal proceedings against him: Provincial Offences Act tickets a section 22 order under the Health Protection and Promotion Act the illegal seizure of his property and premises, and invocation of the Trespass to Property Act the deployment of 250 police officers, with cavalry, to arrest and criminally charge him with trespassing on his own property, mischief and obstruct peace officer a section 9 injunction under the Reopening Ontario Act many more POA offences against him and his father for operating his Leaside location without a business licence Why? To single him out. To make an example of him. To punish him for just saying NO. Adam was the first person in North America to be arrested for disobeying public health orders. In the age of COVID-19 tyranny and totalitarianism, dissent and debate are no longer permitted. The government hit. And we hit back. After going through weeks of having no representation at all, Adam retained a new legal team. We countered the section 9 Order of the Superior Court with a constitutional challenge. We were not permitted to be heard, but were not dismissed. The courts are slow. And expensive. After our challenge was kicked like a can down the road, we retained new counsel last year. We are determined to be heard and will be heard. We retained six experts to submit evidence that strongly challenges the Great Lie. This evidence has yet to be heard in court and it is irrefutable. Our experts and their reports are summarized as follows: 1. Dr. Joel Kettner, former Chief Medical Officer of Health of Manitoba, and professor at the University of Manitoba. He has submitted evidence concerning the following: The principles and strategies of public health, in conjunction with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms The lockdowns, transmission in various settings, mortality rates and ICU capacity On reply: public health strategy, epidemiological methodology, the rationality and proportionality of the lockdowns, definitions, and risk factors 2. Dr. Douglas Allen, professor of economics at Simon Fraser University. He has submitted evidence concerning the following: A critical economic assessment of nearly 90 lockdown cost-benefit studies An analysis of predictive mathematical models, the value of a statistical life, and voluntary versus mandatory lockdown behaviour The costs of lockdowns and an alternative cost-benefit methodology On reply: an analysis of all costs and benefits was never conducted by the government, almost no evidence has been provided in support of the lockdowns, no recognition of endogenous human behaviour, and a misrepresentation of of excess mortality 3. Dr. William Matt Briggs, former professor of statistics and biostatistics at Cornell , and co-author of The Price of Panic: How the Tyranny of Experts Turned a Pandemic into a Catastrophe. He has submitted evidence concerning the following: Misunderstandings and misnomers in the definitions of cases, hospitalizations and deaths The woeful inaccuracy of predictive mathematical models All-cause mortality and COVID death statistics Worldwide statistical analysis of lockdowns Comparison to other pandemics On reply: no evidence that mask mandates or lockdowns work, putting COVID-19 in perspective with other causes of death, and more on ICU capacity 4. Dr. Gilbert Berdine, Harvard Medical and MIT educated pulmonologist and professor at Texas Tech University. He has treated COVID patients and has submitted evidence concerning the following: Criticisms of COVID-19 diagnosis and PCR test inaccuracy/invalidity Pathology of exposure, infection, disease and death Mortality curves and effects of interventions, including herd immunity A comparison between Canada and other countries Reasonable alternatives to emergency measures and proper metrics Variants of concern, their transmissibility and mortality rates An look at Texas and how their cases, hospitalizations and deaths plummeted On reply: a visual comparison of cases, mortality and fatality rates in different settings; the lack of asymptomatic transmission; more on variants of concern; no evidence and egregious use of statistics; and further mention of Texas 5. Dr. Harvey Risch, professor of epidemiology at Yale and author of over 300 peer reviewed papers. He has submitted evidence concerning the following: Outpatient usage of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with zinc and ivermectin An analysis of treatment benefit versus mortality Studies of safety and adverse endpoints with HCQ Said treatments are reasonable alternatives to emergency measures 6. Dr. Byram Bridle, professor of virology and immunology at the University of Guelph. He had a COVID-19 vaccine candidate in development and has submitted evidence concerning the following: An analysis of the population dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 virus The virus is not a problem of pandemic proportions requiring emergency measures The inaccuracy and invalidity of PCR tests An immunological analysis of asymptomatic transmission and re-transmission of the virus being either negligible or nonexistent An analysis of the variants of concern An analysis of the effectiveness of masking and PPE containment of the virus Prolonged isolation and masking of children can cause irreparable harm Ivermectin is a reasonable alternative to emergency measures On reply: people are losing confidence in public health authorities due to the misrepresentation of facts and data; many physicians and scientists have operated in an extremely oppressive environment where dissent and debate are forbidden; the government expert's report is devoid of evidence; more on PCR tests; the rationale for emergency measures are flimsy, not peer reviewed or nonexistent; "cases" are not documented by severity; approximately as many people die with COVID in low-risk demographics as those who are killed by lightning strikes; a look at Texas; more on variants of concern; vitamin D is a reasonable alternative to emergency measures, backed by 77 studies cited; more on immunity and asymptomatic transmission; the futility and lack of efficacy of low-cost masking; the aerosolization of the virus makes all non-pharmaceutical intervention measures moot With respect to our expert reports, these are ten of our evidentiary planks in a nutshell: the total lack of efficacy and irreparable short- and long-term harms of the lockdowns the economic costs (i.e. pecuniary and non-pecuniary "misery" costs) of the lockdowns on a microeconomic basis the invalidity and inaccuracy of the RT-PCR tests, especially with a cycle threshold value of 34 or greater the minimal driver of asymptomatic transmission of the virus, let alone its link to actual sickness, hospitalizations and deaths the role of immunity and the minimal impact of re-transmission of the virus the lethality of SARS-CoV-2 compared to other coronaviruses (ex-SARS and MERS), and influenza viruses the pathology- or lack thereof- between the virus and COVID-19 tying overall all-cause mortality to the statistical classification and re-classification of deaths attributed to COVID-19 the variants of concern (VOCs) are a minimal driver of sickness, hospitalizations and deaths compared to the original virus numerous reasonable alternatives to emergency measures have long existed, which preclude the enactment of said measures The two links to all of the legal documents, including the expert evidence, are as follows: https://fearlesscanada.org/Skelly-vs-ROA/ https://weareallessential.ca/adamson_vs_roa/ We are challenging the Reopening Ontario Act , its lockdown regulation 82/20, and Toronto's Medical Officer of Health authority on legal and constitutional grounds. These include: they breached the exclusive federal quarantine powers under section 91(11) of the Constitution Act, 1867 they breached the exclusive federal criminal law power under section 91(27) of the Constitution Act, 1867 they breached the equal opportunities provision of section 36(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982 there are, and have long been, reasonable alternatives to emergency measures, which breaches section 7.0.2 (2)(b) of the Emergency Management and Civil Protection Act they breached sections 2(b), 2(c), 7, 8, and 15(1) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and cannot be saved by "reasonable limits" under section 1 Toronto's Medical Officer of Health, Dr. Eileen De Villa, breached said Charter rights and acted beyond her legal powers as delegated by the province Here is a link to our Notice of Application: https://pdfhost.io/v/tvIE3~IXd_Notice_of_Application_Form_14E We are looking to raise $50,000 in total to see this challenge through, and to counter and prevail against the Great Lie. This consists of the following: Costs ordered of $15,000 on the original injunction Costs ordered of $15,000 on the failure to be heard on June 28th, 2021 Security for costs of $15,000 to proceed with this challenge $5000 for our experts to submit their replies Former counsel did not follow our instructions, cost $30,000 more than expected, and did not compensate our experts as agreed upon in writing. We were forced to cover these costs and we have in full. Unfortunately, the clock is ticking and we are nearing the two year expiration of the statute of limitations for us to re-file our legal challenge. Time is of the essence. As Winston Churchill exclaimed during Dunkirk regarding negotiating with the Nazi's: "You cannot reason with a tiger when your head is in its mouth!" Nothing short of the unconditional and permanent removal of all COVID-19 measures will suffice to the point that their justification has been utterly obliterated and they can never be imposed again. Don't settle for anything less. As long as the Great Lie remains, these measures can easily be resurrected now that they have become a precedent and backed strongly by governments worldwide. There are some strong, new legal challenges that have been brought against the remaining measures, but unfortunately none of them take aim at the narrative. None of them challenge the Great Lie. It must not and cannot be allowed to stand. This must never be allowed to happen again. The only way to guarantee Never Again is to challenge the Great Lie officially in court. That will be the only way to Never Forget . Don't you dare let them. Freedom isn't free. Privacy isn't free. The truth isn't free. And justice isn't free. We must fight to defend it. And we must fight it to the end. Do not consent. Do not comply. Do not obey. NEVER GIVE IN. Thank you for your defiance and godspeed, Chris Weisdorf Director, Concerned Constituents of Canada Advisor and Coordinator of Evidence, Adamson Barbecue v. Ontario