@humblesci @breakfast_dogs @Biorealism the first ever ca se China admitted was moved from the lab right to the market. researchgate.net/publication/3 5 1711216_An_analysis_of_the_results_of_routine_employee_t esting_for_SARS - like _infections_within_the_WIV_and_other_Wuhan_labs_raises_serious_issues_about_their_vali dit y https:/ / researchgate.net/publication/3 7 0635299_Greater_than_the_Sum_of_its_Part s_ - _Aggregated_Wuhan_COVID - 19_case_data_points_to_the_wrong_side_of_the_Yangtze_River_ - _Rixey_ - _2023050 9 Again, This is Jiangxia residence of Accountant Chen. And even China confirm that he was sick with SARS - CoV - 2 infection in 08/12/2019. Jiangxia 1st Ren min hospital. Congratulations on China scoring an own goal. https ://archive.md/Ea0Kw https://archive.md/1x658 He lived in Shidong right next to the WIV and went to an RT - mart. His residence was forcibly moved into Jianghan like one third of all early Dec19 - Jan20 cases in Chinese official reports. youtu.be/8uIVf_o9aXM Also, students stranded in Wuhan also report that they begun receiving warnings about outbreak in November 2019. https:/ / archive.i s/Kyr1z “in November there was a major pneumonia outbreak”. https:/ / archive.md/N0hib Even more results on lipkin — it was in fact the primary EID program that messaged wit h Lipkin, which in case you don’t know, in 15/12/2019 the first sequenced market deliveryman sample wasn’t even in the hospital — and the actual sequencing and assembly would come considerably later. So what made authorities even outside wuhan aware of an ou tbreak in Wuhan before as big as a fever cluster was reported and before any of them even visit a hospital and an actual diagnosis of unusualness warranting this level of rigor was even released? archive.md/GKdtc as for the market itself the only similarity is that all major superspreading events in 2020 - 2021 Asia from a human strain occurred on a fish market that is located on a primary choke - point between international travel and population center. They tampered with the data so hard that this act of censorship and data manipulation in and of itself is argument for lab leak and against market. “Neighborhood of the Huanan market” was a criterion for case ascertainment. And massive tampering and censorship of cases leave a sudden 5 times jump in daily case onset counts at 01/01/2020. The point which the market cluster vaporized on non - WMHC data. Realize why they put an 5x jump in Jan 01 of the early cases dataset? And a gain why the “exponential growth” was much slower? Early cases data was massively tampered with. “The “release time” of Weibo help information was mainly from February 3rd to February 12th” — it mean that the data was accum ulating before and it was not specifying onset time of disease or onset time of help. And importantly that time the WIV was not yet suspicious. Again, WA1, the Wuchang cluster lineage, was invisible to the Chinese NNDRS system. https:// daoyu15.substack.com/p/study - of - the - usa - wa - 1 - case - report It behave like a more severe cold and never go above 3 days from pneumonia diagnosis before resolution. And the times they reported does in fact included December times. Ben HU also lied in front of press that he “did not work on live virus” rendering all the WIV claims entirely invalid. Shattering with the WIV claim is the sensitivity of the “test” they sent out. That “test” have never returned a positive result on a human sample. h ttps://archive.md/zUDiF https://archive.md/Pc6gp The data was not “being uploaded” from 03/02/2020 to 12/02/2020. They are accumulated data that was being released from this time. Also, the complete absence of the market cluster with the exception of only two infector reports (but with a lot more than tw o infector reports in Dec2019) Indicate that these are most likely case reports when they were rejected from the hospital. We are already seeing a spi ke of Wechat searches in 01/12/2019. Again, why always focus on the wrong part of the report? “Other rescarchers in China working with the same vaccine platform took between three to four months to develop their candidate vaccine.” Is what that matters. It cross - validates https://cart erheavyindustries.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/mace - e - pai - covid - 19 - analysis.pdf the Wechat results. Also, a lot more than 2 infectors were reported in December 2019. This is a “release time” chart as the post title and the from: results indicate it is the time of information release for public from the official handle of the channel, as opposed to the time which the information is posted. This makes it 1: later than the collection date. And 2: subjects to censorship that Chinese social media was already driving in 31/12/2019. That also included the WMHC banning any c ase reporting other than what they permitted. This date of first vaccine development appears to coincide temporally with https:// nationalgeographic.com/science/articl e/this - globetr otting - doctor - saves - lives - by - diving - into - hot - zones https:/ / archive.md/VXtu9 Callahan and https:// archive.is/2021.08.11 - 183 121/https://www.yourcentralvalley.com/news/california/sacramento - area - company - develops - antibody - test - to - detect - covid - 19 - in - minutes/ Thermogenesis group which notice of strange new virus and development of antibody test happened. SARS peak 01/12/2019. No remnants of the market cluster was present in these data or any relevant data with a Dec - Jan collection date. archive.md/6LuXg In fact, this kind of discrepancy between Dec19 and Jan20 official released “cases” also reflects itself in the “number of cases per day” data produced by China from papers that essentially underpins the China WHO report. The spat ial data show no clustering around the market at all when it is expected that if the Dec19 data is accurate, a continued cluster of infector reports around the market should show in pre - 18/01/2020 Weibo data. The temporal curve of case onsets par day was f orcibly changed that a 5x sudden increase in daily numbers is seen at 01/01/2020, a single day jump impossible with any epidemiological curve that would fit the rest of the data. This is censorship at work. @gdemaneuf archive.md/Qfu2r https:/ / archive.md/4xbEZ These major discrepancies also give clear hints — both spatial and temporal datasets are entirely different dividing by 01/01/2020. https://www. documentcloud .org/documents/6884792 - MACE - E - PAI - COVID - 19 - ANALYSIS - Redacted.html Biosafety accident is found even with private intelligence results. Again, the vaccine timeline is very valid. Also , at least three different institutions found the virus in the end of November 2019. You know where the body bags are from ? It is “outside th e WIV”. Guess who died without being mentioned and was working at the WIV? Killed because of a positive serological test? https:// knewz.com/wuhan - covid - ex periment - biologic al - vaccine - china/ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article - 12205705/Chinese - military - expert - filed - patent - Covid - vacci ne - died - mysterious - circumstances.html #7 Dr. Zhou Yusen, a former director of the PLA's AMMS Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity at the Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, filed the world's first patent application for a C OVID - 19 vaccine in China on February 24, 2020. The curve once accounting for 4/5 of all cases before 01/01/2020 being covered up, extends to 01/12/2019 – when there is an large 3 day peak in SARS searches. Even researchers know something was wrong that ear ly. In addition to data being badly tampere d with, the 2021 “all of the 92 cases they found before the market outbreak tested negative” claim is statistically impossible. You only do that if you have a lot of positives. It then invalidates the market timeline altogether. Aga in, there is no such a thing as a “symptom incompatible with Covid - 19”. A hard information cut - off at 2021 was used, and neither DEFUSE, nor Csabai et al, nor the exact cause behind the DIA/NCMI or the DOE change of assessment were given. HU lied about wor king with live virus. Again, we need the exact symptoms, and it is clear that they refuses to release any and all new information that were gathered post 2021 – no info on the 2022 changed of assessment for two agencies were given despite the changes thems elves being acknowledged. https:/ /web.archive.org/web/20230705200145/http://adeno - news.com/2022/08/09/unique - sars - cov - 2 - genomes - found - in - antarctic - samples - raises - questions - about - sars - cov - 2 - origin - lineages/ Also, remember the wordings — “Ground glass opacities and anosmia together prior to a COVID outbreak are pretty darn suggestible of COVID, however, Avril Haines can say that you might get GGOs from CMV pneumonia, and anosmia from seasonal allergies” h ttps://archive.md/zUDiF https://archive.md/Pc6gp