A CALL TO ACTION TO GET THE AMENDMENT FOR MEDICAL PREROGATIVE (A.M.P) TO THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION ON THE NOVEMBER 2022 BALLOT A.M.P will guarantee to every Floridian the unalienable right to accept or decline any medical intervention without the fear, threat, or action of segregation, discrimination, unemployment, or denial of an education or service based on medical status. A.M.P. is currently being drafted and reviewed prior to public release, so what follows is a brief rundown demonstrating that A.M.P. will ● Offer More Protection Of Your Rights To Medical Freedom Than What The Current Florida State House And Senate Seats Will Legislate. ● Make The “Sick Until Proven Healthy” Presumption Forced On Floridians An Unlawful Act. ● Clear Up The Uncertainty In The Court System Regarding A Citizen’s Rights To Informed Consent, Autonomy, And Bodily Integrity (aka, “medical freedom”) ● Provide The Most Long Term Certainty For Guaranteeing Medical Freedom Which Will Make Decisions by Judges and Juries Less Complex To Resolve , (aka, “judicial economy”) ● Guarantee A Citizen’s Right To Medical Freedom When Faced With Another Party Offering or Requiring a Medical Intervention. ● Make The Overreach Of A Citizen’s Rights To Medical Freedom By Both The Public And Private Sectors An Unlawful Act. ● Bridle Judges Who May Have Potential To Minimize Citizens’ Rights To Medical Freedom. ● Resolve The Problem Of A Slow Court Process Which Is Due To The Complexity of Litigation For Violations Of Medical Freedom On A Citizen. ● Make The Search For Attorneys For Medical Freedom Cases Much Less Of An Issue And Litigation More Efficient and Expedient. 1 of 7 Why Floridians Should Get A.M.P on the November 2022 Ballot Attorney Jeff Childers won a trailblazing decision for medical freedom in Florida in the case, Green v. Alachua County Fla: Dist. Court of Appeals, 1st Dist., 2021. The holding is basically that mask mandates are unconstitutional due to such a mandate being a violation of the right to privacy guaranteed in the Florida Constitution Article 1 sec 23. The ruling tied this right in with the common law right to medical freedom (decisional autonomy and bodily integrity), and the right to be left alone by the government. This case should be required reading for all Floridians, if not all Americans. In order to get the full insight of the implications of this case for all Floridians’ rights to medical freedom, it is imperative to watch and listen to Attorney Childers himself explain the case in “Big Court Win On Mask Mandates - And What It Means For The Future” , found on the American Freedom Information Institute youtube channel. Although this a very strong and needed ruling, the video cast emphasizes the reasons why we need NOTHING LESS than The Amendment for Medical Prerogative (A.M.P) to be in the Florida Constitution up for vote on the Florida ballot for November 2022. A.M.P will guarantee us those same rights , and significantly expand such rights to people who could be coerced into medical interventions not only by governmental bodies, but also by private entities, and with the likelihood of zero to minimal litigation in the event of a medical freedom controversy, all backed with the power of constitutional law. A.M.P Will Offer Protection Of Your Medical Freedom Rights More So Than What The Current Florida State House And Senate Seats Can Legislate. For example, the SB2006 vaccine passport ban has gaping holes the way it is written. One is allowed entry into a business without proof of vaccination, but then the business can still discriminate and segregate an unvaccinated person as a second class citizen once admitted into 2 of 7 their premises by requiring masks, social distancing, upcharge for admission, sitting in lousy seats, etc.. The current bill doesn’t include language that a business is prohibited from treating one differently once admitted into the business, thus making the legislation weak. For a much more detailed explanation regarding how inferior this legislation is , it’s necessary to read the article, THE ISSUES WITH FLORIDA'S VACCINE PASSPORT BAN, accessed at www.amfreedomii.com Further, the bill SB 364 was drafted to prevent discrimination based on vaccination status, but it seems to have died somewhere in Tallahassee. A.M.P will plug and eliminate these legal rabbit holes , the loopholes in weak legislation , and will also cover medical freedom bills that have gone nowhere. A.M.P Will Make The “Sick Until Proven Healthy” Presumption UNLAWFUL. The language of A.M.P is clearly worded to require all public and private parties to presume that citizens are “healthy until proven sick”, or they will face legal consequences if a citizen is violated. A.M.P Will Clear Up The Uncertainty In The Court System Regarding A Citizen’s Rights To Informed Consent, Bodily Autonomy, And Bodily Integrity (aka, “medical freedom”) Florida has 5 district courts of appeal (DCA), and if this latest 1st DCA ruling was the only one regarding masks, then it would apply to the whole state. However, a conflicting opinion regarding government mask mandates exists in the 4th DCA in which the court ruled in favor of the government’s mandate. This conflict of law makes it somewhat complex in that the other three DCA’s can pick and choose which one of the two opinions they want to use as precedent as if they are in a cafeteria type restaurant, and with no reference to a single supreme law for this issue, which can then cause many conflicted case law precedents. Alachua County who lost in the 1st DCA could also take it to the Florida Supreme Court to have them affirm that the 4th DCA which ruled in favor of Palm Beach County has the more supreme 3 of 7 precedent in order to resolve the conflict of law. However if Alachua did not prevail, then the 1st DCA case is the supreme law in Florida regarding mask mandates by the government. It is this uncertainty and conflict of law in the court systems which demands A.M.P be put on the ballot in order to resolve the legal conflicts, as well as clarify and expand law further. Citizens can not wait any longer and be at the mercy of which DCA rulings individual judges decide to pick and choose between, and should not have to pray the legislature passes better laws. A.M.P Provides The Most Long Term Certainty For Guaranteeing Medical Freedom Which Will Make Decisions by Judges and Juries Less Complex To Resolve , (aka, “judicial economy”) It is harder for a legislature to repeal a constitutional amendment more so than if they attempt to repeal a statute, and in the short run, court decisions can be superseded by other cases at a moment’s notice. A.M.P will therefore survive any legislature in the long run , barring an extreme and improbable legislative session repealing it, and also, most lawsuits involving medical freedom will likely be resolved swiftly in favor of a citizen. A.M.P Will Guarantee A Citizen’s Right To Medical Freedom When Faced With Another Party Offering or Requiring a Medical Intervention The Green vs. Alachua case is a great law which should be applicable when a government mandates a vaccine, since masks are nowhere near the level of intrusion as having foreign substances injected into one’s body. However, due to the previously disclosed issues with uncertainty on the judicial and legislative end, and how such precedent now only applies to governmental, rather than private entity violations of a person’s medical freedom, then A.M.P. is much needed. 4 of 7 A.M.P Will Make The Overreach Of A Citizen’s Rights To Medical Freedom By Both The Public And Private Sectors An Unlawful Act The strength of Green vs. Alachua is that it clarifies the right to medical freedom in the 21st Century in the wake of overreaching government restrictions, and can be relied upon as solid law precedent. However, the ruling only restricts government overreach on citizens, and does not put any controls on private entities such as employers, hence the necessity for A.M.P. The problem is that in “at will” (right to work) states, a requirement by an employer is not considered to be coerced because the employee can quit and find another job. A.M.P will solve this problem by prohibiting violations to medical freedom by private and public entities altogether. A.M.P Will Bridle Judges Who May Have Potential To Minimize Citizens’ Rights To Medical Freedom. The dissenting opinion in the Green v Alachua case stated how the laws applied by the majority opinion were misplaced because masks were merely a minor inconvenience compared to what the judge felt were more serious issues such as abortion, the right to choose a manner of death, or the right to reject a life saving treatment. If there are such dissenting judges with an opinion minimizing the seriousness of how mask mandates violate constitutional rights, then they are likely to do so for mandatory vaccines, even the experimental kind. Because there are judges who have such a perspective by arbitrarily picking and choosing what is a major or minor violation of a citizen’s right to medical freedom, then we need nothing LESS than A.M.P. Wouldn’t you rather be at the mercy of constitutional law rather than by a judge ? 5 of 7 A.M.P Will Make The Search For Attorneys For Medical Freedom Cases Much Less Of An Issue, And Litigation More Efficient and Expedient. Most big civil rights firms and big building type firms have divisions which work with local government, thus creating self evident conflicts of interest as a consequence. This makes civil liberties cases tougher to win, and worse, even tougher to find attorneys to litigate for a citizen in the first place. A.M.P. Will Resolve The Problem Of A Slow Court Process Which Will Likely Involve Complex Litigation For Violations Of Medical Freedom. Green v. Alachua was an 18 month lawsuit which ruled that medical freedom was based on laws which have been on the books since the beginning of the Florida Constitution, and even dating before to the English common law. This issue should’ve been resolved before there was even a mask mandate by the county knowing a mask mandate was unconstitutional in the first place ! Because of huge oversights due to a lack of knowledge by government officials , then a strongly worded medical freedom amendment with minimal loopholes is needed in order to make it crystal clear to judges and government officials that citizens possess these unalienable rights. The clearly worded, well defined A.M.P will spell out to governmental bodies not to violate rights to medical freedom, and also reduce the burden on the judicial system by keeping attorneys, clients, and judges from having to go back and forth on finer points of law which they may or may not be privy to. WHAT ACTIONS CAN I TAKE NOW WHILE THIS AMENDMENT PROJECT IS IN START UP ? Superman will not save you, so stop relying on him to save the day, such as trusting in a man like a president , a governor , attorneys, or a newspaper reporter. They aren’t going to fly in and save us as in Superman movies where the government corruption gets turned over to the newspaper and the movie ends happily ever after. We can’t depend on politicians to save us, and they can’t pay 6 of 7 attention to every issue every time, so it is on “we the people” more so than ever who must do much more than wave flags, repost Newsmax and OANN news clips in their feed, or post political memes. PRACTICAL STEPS 1. Just for now, in the short run, share this information and simply collect the first/last names AND emails (very important) of people in your circles of influence who may be interested in going out and collecting signatures to get A.M.P on the November 2022 ballot , while also encouraging them to do the same. Forward all names/email to or have them leave their contact info with hello@amfreedomii.com 2. Because of all of the accounting requirements and bookkeeping required, this project will need it’s own non-profit. Crowdfunding efforts for a new non-profit political committee, and volunteers will be needed. You’ll be seeing more about that movement as it comes together. A Constitutional Amendment will require a lot of signatures (about 900,000) to be obtained (on paper). It’s also going to cost some money for signature verification ($.10 per signature), printing and other costs. It’s a big job - but a Constitutional Amendment may be the most certain way to change the law. 3. On the back burner, but needed in the very near future : - We need three directors , who generally should be business people with a feel for how to make strategic decisions and be inclined to guide the project and a non-profit organization. - We also need a Treasurer who should be good at bookkeeping and record keeping. - If you know anyone with these skill sets who you think would be excited about this project which will change the law for generations to come, please have them contact hello@amfreedomii.com . - It is important for any prospective directors or treasurers to know that since this committee will be a registered non-profit , the names of the directors and treasurer will have to be publicly disclosed on the state's documents. THIS MAY BE OUR ONLY CHANCE TO TIP THE SCALES IN OUR FAVOR SINCE WE HAVE A GOVERNOR AND LEGISLATURE OPEN TO THIS KIND OF LAW MAKING, SO WE MUST SEIZE THIS OPPORTUNITY ! 7 of 7