A.M.P_Action.pdf -

Please enable JavaScript to view the full PDF

‌ ‌ A‌‌CALL‌‌TO‌‌ACTION‌‌TO‌‌GET‌ ‌THE‌‌AMENDMENT‌‌FOR‌‌MEDICAL‌‌PREROGATIVE‌‌(A.M.P)‌‌ ‌ TO‌‌THE‌‌FLORIDA‌‌CONSTITUTION‌‌ON‌‌THE‌‌NOVEMBER‌‌2022‌‌BALLOT‌ ‌ ‌ A.M.P‌ ‌will‌ ‌guarantee‌ ‌to‌ ‌every‌ ‌Floridian‌ ‌the‌ ‌unalienable‌ ‌right‌ ‌to‌ ‌accept‌ ‌or‌ ‌decline‌ ‌any‌ ‌medical‌‌ intervention‌ ‌without‌ ‌the‌ ‌fear,‌ ‌threat,‌ ‌or‌ ‌action‌ ‌of‌ ‌segregation,‌ ‌discrimination,‌ ‌unemployment,‌ ‌or‌‌ denial‌ ‌of‌ ‌an‌ ‌education‌ ‌or‌ ‌service‌ ‌based‌ ‌on‌ ‌medical‌ ‌status.‌ ‌A.M.P.‌ ‌is‌ ‌currently‌‌being‌‌drafted‌‌and‌‌ reviewed‌‌prior‌‌to‌‌public‌‌release,‌‌so‌‌what‌‌follows‌‌is‌‌a‌‌brief‌‌rundown‌‌demonstrating‌‌that‌‌A.M.P.‌‌will‌ ‌ ● Offer‌ ‌More‌ ‌Protection‌ ‌Of‌‌Your‌‌Rights‌‌To‌‌Medical‌‌Freedom‌‌Than‌‌What‌‌The‌‌Current‌‌Florida‌‌State‌‌ House‌‌And‌‌Senate‌‌Seats‌‌Will‌‌Legislate.‌ ‌ ‌ ● Make‌‌The‌‌“Sick‌‌Until‌‌Proven‌‌Healthy”‌‌Presumption‌‌Forced‌‌On‌‌Floridians‌‌An‌‌Unlawful‌‌Act.‌ ‌ ‌ ● Clear‌ ‌Up‌ ‌The‌ ‌Uncertainty‌ ‌In‌ ‌The‌ ‌Court‌ ‌System‌ ‌Regarding‌ ‌A‌ ‌Citizen’s‌ ‌Rights‌ ‌To‌ ‌Informed‌‌ Consent,‌‌Autonomy,‌‌And‌‌Bodily‌‌Integrity‌ (‌aka,‌‌“medical‌‌freedom”)‌.‌ ‌ ‌ ● Provide‌ ‌The‌ ‌Most‌ ‌Long‌ ‌Term‌ ‌Certainty‌ ‌For‌ ‌Guaranteeing‌ ‌Medical‌ ‌Freedom‌ ‌Which‌ ‌Will‌ ‌Make‌‌ Decisions‌‌by‌‌Judges‌‌and‌‌Juries‌‌Less‌‌Complex‌‌To‌‌Resolve‌‌,‌ (‌aka,‌‌“judicial‌‌economy”)‌.‌ ‌ ‌ ● Guarantee‌ ‌A‌ ‌Citizen’s‌ ‌Right‌ ‌To‌ ‌Medical‌ ‌Freedom‌ ‌When‌ ‌Faced‌ ‌With‌ ‌Another‌ ‌Party‌ ‌Offering‌ ‌or‌‌ Requiring‌‌a‌‌Medical‌‌Intervention.‌ ‌ ‌ ● Make‌ ‌The‌ ‌Overreach‌‌Of‌‌A‌‌Citizen’s‌‌Rights‌‌To‌‌Medical‌‌Freedom‌‌By‌‌Both‌‌The‌‌Public‌‌And‌‌Private‌‌ Sectors‌‌An‌‌Unlawful‌‌Act.‌ ‌ ‌ ● Bridle‌‌Judges‌‌Who‌‌May‌‌Have‌‌Potential‌‌To‌‌Minimize‌‌Citizens’‌‌Rights‌‌To‌‌Medical‌‌Freedom.‌ ‌ ‌ ● Resolve‌‌The‌‌Problem‌‌Of‌‌A‌‌Slow‌‌Court‌‌Process‌‌Which‌‌Is‌‌Due‌‌To‌‌The‌‌Complexity‌‌of‌ ‌Litigation‌‌For‌‌ Violations‌‌Of‌‌Medical‌‌Freedom‌‌On‌‌A‌‌Citizen.‌ ‌ ● Make‌ ‌The‌ ‌Search‌ ‌For‌ ‌Attorneys‌ ‌For‌ ‌Medical‌ ‌Freedom‌ ‌Cases‌ ‌Much‌ ‌Less‌ ‌Of‌ ‌An‌ ‌Issue‌ ‌And‌‌ Litigation‌‌More‌‌Efficient‌‌and‌‌Expedient.‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 1‌‌of‌‌7‌ ‌ ‌ Why‌‌Floridians‌‌Should‌‌Get‌‌A.M.P‌‌on‌‌the‌‌November‌‌2022‌‌Ballot‌ ‌ ‌ Attorney‌‌Jeff‌‌Childers‌‌won‌‌a‌‌trailblazing‌‌decision‌‌for‌‌medical‌‌freedom‌‌in‌‌Florida‌‌in‌‌the‌‌case,‌‌Green‌‌v.‌‌ Alachua‌ ‌County‌ ‌Fla:‌ ‌Dist.‌ ‌Court‌ ‌of‌ ‌Appeals,‌ ‌1st‌ ‌Dist.,‌ ‌2021.‌ ‌The‌ ‌holding‌ ‌is‌ ‌basically‌ ‌that‌ ‌mask‌‌ mandates‌ ‌are‌ ‌unconstitutional‌ ‌due‌ ‌to‌ ‌such‌ ‌a‌ ‌mandate‌ ‌being‌ ‌a‌ ‌violation‌ ‌of‌ ‌the‌ ‌right‌ ‌to‌ ‌privacy‌‌ guaranteed‌‌in‌‌the‌‌Florida‌‌Constitution‌‌Article‌‌1‌‌sec‌‌23.‌‌The‌‌ruling‌‌tied‌‌this‌‌right‌‌in‌‌with‌‌the‌‌common‌‌ law‌‌right‌‌to‌‌medical‌‌freedom‌‌(decisional‌‌autonomy‌‌and‌‌bodily‌‌integrity),‌‌and‌‌the‌‌right‌‌to‌‌be‌‌left‌‌alone‌‌ by‌ ‌the‌ ‌government.‌ ‌This‌ ‌case‌ ‌should‌ ‌be‌ ‌required‌ ‌reading‌ ‌for‌ ‌all‌ ‌Floridians,‌ ‌if‌‌not‌‌all‌‌Americans.‌‌In‌‌ order‌ ‌to‌ ‌get‌ ‌the‌ ‌full‌ ‌insight‌ ‌of‌ ‌the‌ ‌implications‌ ‌of‌ ‌this‌ ‌case‌ ‌for‌ ‌all‌ ‌Floridians’‌ ‌rights‌ ‌to‌ ‌medical‌‌ freedom,‌ ‌it‌ ‌is‌ ‌imperative‌ ‌to‌ ‌watch‌ ‌and‌ ‌listen‌ ‌to‌ ‌Attorney‌ ‌Childers‌ ‌himself‌ ‌explain‌ ‌the‌ ‌case‌ ‌in‌ ‌“B ‌ ig‌‌ Court‌ ‌Win‌ ‌On‌ ‌Mask‌ ‌Mandates‌ ‌-‌ ‌And‌ ‌What‌ ‌It‌ ‌Means‌ ‌For‌ ‌The‌ ‌Future‌”‌ ‌,‌ ‌found‌ ‌on‌ ‌the‌ ‌American‌‌ Freedom‌‌Information‌‌Institute‌‌‌youtube‌‌channel.‌‌ ‌ Although‌‌this‌‌a‌‌very‌‌strong‌‌and‌‌needed‌‌ruling,‌‌the‌‌video‌‌cast‌‌emphasizes‌‌the‌‌reasons‌‌why‌‌we‌‌ need‌ ‌NOTHING‌ ‌LESS‌ ‌than‌ ‌The‌ ‌Amendment‌ ‌for‌ ‌Medical‌ ‌Prerogative‌ ‌(A.M.P)‌ ‌to‌ ‌be‌ ‌in‌ ‌the‌ ‌Florida‌‌ Constitution‌ ‌up‌ ‌for‌ ‌vote‌ ‌on‌ ‌the‌ ‌Florida‌ ‌ballot‌ ‌for‌ ‌November‌ ‌2022.‌ ‌A.M.P‌ ‌will‌ ‌guarantee‌ ‌us‌ ‌those‌‌ same‌ ‌rights‌ ‌,‌ ‌and‌ ‌significantly‌ ‌expand‌ ‌such‌ ‌rights‌ ‌to‌ ‌people‌ ‌who‌ ‌could‌ ‌be‌ ‌coerced‌ ‌into‌ ‌medical‌‌ interventions‌‌not‌‌only‌‌by‌‌governmental‌‌bodies,‌‌but‌‌also‌‌by‌‌private‌‌entities,‌ ‌and‌‌with‌‌the‌‌likelihood‌‌ of‌‌zero‌‌to‌ ‌minimal‌‌litigation‌‌in‌‌the‌‌event‌‌of‌‌a‌‌medical‌‌freedom‌‌controversy,‌‌all‌‌backed‌‌with‌‌the‌‌power‌‌ of‌‌constitutional‌‌law.‌ ‌ ‌ A.M.P‌‌Will‌‌Offer‌‌Protection‌‌Of‌‌Your‌‌Medical‌‌Freedom‌‌Rights‌‌More‌ ‌So‌‌Than‌‌ ‌ What‌‌The‌‌Current‌‌Florida‌‌State‌‌House‌‌And‌‌Senate‌‌Seats‌‌Can‌‌Legislate.‌ ‌ For‌‌example,‌‌the‌‌SB2006‌‌vaccine‌‌passport‌‌ban‌‌has‌‌gaping‌‌holes‌‌the‌‌way‌‌it‌‌is‌‌written.‌‌One‌‌is‌‌ allowed‌‌entry‌‌into‌‌a‌‌business‌‌without‌‌proof‌‌of‌‌vaccination,‌‌but‌‌then‌‌the‌‌business‌‌can‌‌still‌‌ discriminate‌‌and‌‌segregate‌‌an‌‌unvaccinated‌‌person‌‌as‌‌a‌‌second‌‌class‌‌citizen‌‌once‌‌admitted‌‌into‌‌ 2‌‌of‌‌7‌ ‌ ‌ their‌‌premises‌‌by‌‌requiring‌‌masks,‌‌social‌‌distancing,‌‌upcharge‌‌for‌‌admission,‌‌sitting‌‌in‌‌lousy‌‌seats,‌‌ etc..‌ ‌The‌‌current‌‌bill‌‌doesn’t‌‌include‌‌language‌‌that‌‌a‌‌business‌‌is‌‌prohibited‌‌from‌‌treating‌‌one‌‌ differently‌‌once‌‌admitted‌‌into‌‌the‌‌business,‌‌thus‌‌making‌‌the‌‌legislation‌‌weak.‌‌For‌‌a‌‌much‌‌more‌‌ detailed‌‌explanation‌‌regarding‌‌how‌‌inferior‌‌this‌‌legislation‌‌is‌‌,‌‌it’s‌‌necessary‌‌to‌‌read‌‌the‌‌article,‌ T ‌ HE‌‌ ISSUES‌‌WITH‌‌FLORIDA'S‌‌VACCINE‌‌PASSPORT‌‌BAN‌,‌‌accessed‌‌at‌w ‌ ww.‌amfreedomii.com‌.‌ ‌ Further,‌‌the‌‌bill‌‌SB‌‌364‌‌was‌‌drafted‌‌to‌‌prevent‌‌discrimination‌‌based‌‌on‌‌vaccination‌‌status,‌‌but‌‌ it‌‌seems‌‌to‌‌have‌‌died‌‌somewhere‌‌in‌‌Tallahassee.‌‌A.M.P‌‌will‌‌plug‌‌and‌‌eliminate‌‌these‌‌legal‌‌rabbit‌‌ holes‌‌,‌‌the‌‌loopholes‌‌in‌‌weak‌‌legislation‌‌,‌‌and‌‌will‌‌also‌‌cover‌‌medical‌‌freedom‌‌bills‌‌that‌‌have‌‌gone‌‌ nowhere.‌ ‌ A.M.P‌‌Will‌‌Make‌‌The‌‌“Sick‌‌Until‌‌Proven‌‌Healthy”‌‌Presumption‌‌UNLAWFUL.‌ ‌ The‌ ‌language‌ ‌of‌ ‌A.M.P‌ ‌is‌ ‌clearly‌ ‌worded‌ ‌to‌ ‌require‌ ‌all‌ ‌public‌ ‌and‌ ‌private‌ ‌parties‌ ‌to‌ ‌presume‌ ‌that‌‌ citizens‌‌are‌‌“healthy‌‌until‌‌proven‌‌sick”,‌‌or‌‌they‌‌will‌‌face‌‌legal‌‌consequences‌‌if‌‌a‌‌citizen‌‌is‌‌violated.‌ ‌ ‌ A.M.P‌‌Will‌‌Clear‌‌Up‌‌The‌‌Uncertainty‌‌In‌‌The‌‌Court‌‌System‌‌Regarding‌‌A‌‌Citizen’s‌‌Rights‌‌ ‌ To‌‌Informed‌‌Consent,‌ ‌Bodily‌ ‌Autonomy,‌‌And‌‌Bodily‌‌Integrity‌ (‌aka,‌‌“medical‌‌freedom”)‌‌‌.‌ ‌ Florida‌ ‌has‌ ‌5‌ ‌district‌ ‌courts‌ ‌of‌ ‌appeal‌ ‌(DCA),‌ ‌and‌ ‌if‌ ‌this‌ ‌latest‌ ‌1st‌ ‌DCA‌ ‌ruling‌ ‌was‌ ‌the‌ ‌only‌ ‌one‌‌ regarding‌ ‌masks,‌ ‌then‌ ‌it‌ ‌would‌ ‌apply‌ ‌to‌ ‌the‌ ‌whole‌ ‌state.‌‌However,‌ ‌a‌‌conflicting‌‌opinion‌‌regarding‌‌ government‌ ‌mask‌ ‌mandates‌ ‌exists‌ ‌in‌ ‌the‌ ‌4th‌ ‌DCA‌ ‌in‌ ‌which‌ ‌the‌ ‌court‌ ‌ruled‌ ‌in‌ ‌favor‌ ‌of‌ ‌the‌‌ government’s‌ ‌mandate.‌ ‌This‌ ‌conflict‌ ‌of‌ ‌law‌ ‌makes‌ ‌it‌ ‌somewhat‌ ‌complex‌ ‌in‌ ‌that‌ ‌the‌ ‌other‌ ‌three‌‌ DCA’s‌‌can‌‌pick‌‌and‌‌choose‌‌which‌‌one‌‌of‌‌the‌‌two‌‌opinions‌‌they‌‌want‌‌to‌‌use‌‌as‌‌precedent‌‌as‌‌if‌‌they‌‌ are‌‌in‌‌a‌‌cafeteria‌‌type‌‌restaurant,‌‌and‌‌with‌‌no‌‌reference‌‌to‌‌a‌‌single‌‌supreme‌‌law‌‌for‌‌this‌‌issue,‌‌which‌‌ can‌‌then‌‌cause‌‌many‌‌conflicted‌‌case‌‌law‌‌precedents.‌‌ ‌ Alachua‌ ‌County‌ ‌who‌ ‌lost‌ ‌in‌ ‌the‌ ‌1st‌ ‌DCA‌ ‌could‌ ‌also‌ ‌take‌ ‌it‌‌to‌‌the‌‌Florida‌‌Supreme‌‌Court‌‌to‌‌ have‌‌them‌‌affirm‌‌that‌‌the‌‌4th‌‌DCA‌‌which‌‌ruled‌‌in‌‌favor‌‌of‌‌Palm‌‌Beach‌‌County‌‌has‌‌the‌‌more‌‌supreme‌‌ 3‌‌of‌‌7‌ ‌ ‌ precedent‌‌in‌‌order‌‌to‌‌resolve‌‌the‌‌conflict‌‌of‌‌law.‌‌However‌‌if‌‌Alachua‌‌did‌‌not‌‌prevail,‌‌then‌‌the‌‌1st‌‌DCA‌‌ case‌‌is‌‌the‌‌supreme‌‌law‌‌in‌‌Florida‌‌regarding‌‌mask‌‌mandates‌‌by‌‌the‌‌government.‌‌It‌‌is‌‌this‌‌uncertainty‌‌ and‌ ‌conflict‌ ‌of‌ ‌law‌ ‌in‌ ‌the‌ ‌court‌ ‌systems‌ ‌which‌ ‌demands‌ ‌A.M.P‌ ‌be‌ ‌put‌ ‌on‌ ‌the‌ ‌ballot‌ ‌in‌ ‌order‌ ‌to‌‌ resolve‌‌the‌‌legal‌‌conflicts,‌‌as‌‌well‌‌as‌‌clarify‌‌and‌‌expand‌‌law‌‌further.‌‌Citizens‌‌can‌‌not‌‌wait‌‌any‌‌longer‌‌ and‌‌be‌‌at‌‌the‌‌mercy‌‌of‌‌which‌‌DCA‌‌rulings‌‌individual‌‌judges‌‌decide‌‌to‌‌pick‌‌and‌‌choose‌‌between,‌‌and‌‌ should‌‌not‌‌have‌‌to‌‌pray‌‌the‌‌legislature‌‌passes‌‌better‌‌laws.‌‌ ‌ ‌ A.M.P‌‌Provides‌‌The‌‌Most‌‌Long‌‌Term‌‌Certainty‌‌For‌‌Guaranteeing‌‌Medical‌‌Freedom‌‌Which‌‌Will‌‌ Make‌‌Decisions‌‌by‌‌Judges‌‌and‌‌Juries‌‌Less‌‌Complex‌‌To‌‌Resolve‌‌,‌ (‌aka,‌‌“judicial‌‌economy”)‌.‌ ‌ It‌ ‌is‌ ‌harder‌ ‌for‌ ‌a‌ ‌legislature‌ ‌to‌ ‌repeal‌ ‌a‌ ‌constitutional‌ ‌amendment‌ ‌more‌‌so‌‌than‌‌if‌‌they‌‌attempt‌‌to‌‌ repeal‌ ‌a‌ ‌statute,‌ ‌and‌ ‌in‌ ‌the‌ ‌short‌ ‌run,‌ ‌court‌ ‌decisions‌ ‌can‌ ‌be‌ ‌superseded‌ ‌by‌ ‌other‌ ‌cases‌ ‌at‌ ‌a‌‌ moment’s‌‌notice.‌‌A.M.P‌‌will‌‌therefore‌‌survive‌‌any‌‌legislature‌‌in‌‌the‌‌long‌‌run‌‌,‌‌barring‌‌an‌‌extreme‌‌and‌‌ improbable‌ ‌legislative‌ ‌session‌ ‌repealing‌ ‌it,‌ ‌and‌ ‌also,‌ ‌most‌ ‌lawsuits‌ ‌involving‌‌medical‌‌freedom‌‌will‌‌ likely‌‌be‌‌resolved‌‌swiftly‌‌in‌‌favor‌‌of‌‌a‌‌citizen.‌ ‌ ‌ A.M.P‌‌Will‌‌Guarantee‌‌A‌‌Citizen’s‌‌Right‌‌To‌‌Medical‌‌Freedom‌ ‌When‌‌ ‌ Faced‌‌With‌‌Another‌‌Party‌‌Offering‌‌or‌‌Requiring‌‌a‌‌Medical‌‌Intervention‌ ‌ The‌‌Green‌‌vs.‌‌Alachua‌‌case‌‌is‌‌a‌‌great‌‌law‌‌which‌‌should‌‌be‌‌applicable‌‌when‌‌a‌‌government‌‌mandates‌‌ a‌ ‌vaccine,‌ ‌since‌ ‌masks‌ ‌are‌ ‌nowhere‌ ‌near‌ ‌the‌ ‌level‌ ‌of‌ ‌intrusion‌ ‌as‌ ‌having‌ ‌foreign‌ ‌substances‌‌ injected‌ ‌into‌ ‌one’s‌ ‌body.‌ ‌However,‌ ‌due‌ ‌to‌ ‌the‌ ‌previously‌ ‌disclosed‌ ‌issues‌ ‌with‌ ‌uncertainty‌ ‌on‌ ‌the‌‌ judicial‌‌and‌‌legislative‌‌end,‌ ‌and‌‌how‌‌such‌‌precedent‌‌now‌‌only‌‌applies‌‌to‌‌governmental,‌‌rather‌‌than‌‌ private‌‌entity‌‌violations‌‌of‌‌a‌‌person’s‌‌medical‌‌freedom,‌‌then‌‌A.M.P.‌‌is‌‌much‌‌needed.‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 4‌‌of‌‌7‌ ‌ ‌ A.M.P‌‌Will‌‌Make‌‌The‌‌Overreach‌‌Of‌‌A‌‌Citizen’s‌‌Rights‌‌To‌‌Medical‌‌ ‌ Freedom‌‌By‌‌Both‌‌The‌‌Public‌‌And‌‌Private‌‌Sectors‌‌An‌‌Unlawful‌‌Act‌ ‌ The‌‌strength‌‌of‌‌Green‌‌vs.‌‌Alachua‌‌is‌‌that‌‌it‌‌clarifies‌‌the‌‌right‌‌to‌‌medical‌‌freedom‌‌in‌‌the‌‌21st‌‌Century‌‌ in‌‌the‌‌wake‌‌of‌‌overreaching‌‌government‌‌restrictions,‌‌and‌‌can‌‌be‌‌relied‌‌upon‌‌as‌‌solid‌‌law‌‌precedent.‌‌ ‌ However,‌ ‌the‌ ‌ruling‌ ‌only‌‌restricts‌‌government‌‌overreach‌‌on‌‌citizens,‌‌and‌‌does‌‌not‌‌put‌‌any‌‌controls‌‌ on‌‌private‌‌entities‌‌such‌‌as‌‌employers,‌ ‌hence‌‌the‌‌necessity‌‌for‌‌A.M.P.‌‌The‌‌problem‌‌is‌‌that‌‌in‌‌“at‌‌will”‌‌ (right‌ ‌to‌ ‌work)‌ ‌states,‌ ‌a‌ ‌requirement‌ ‌by‌ ‌an‌ ‌employer‌ ‌is‌ ‌not‌ ‌considered‌ ‌to‌‌be‌‌coerced‌‌because‌‌the‌‌ employee‌ ‌can‌ ‌quit‌ ‌and‌ ‌find‌ ‌another‌ ‌job.‌ ‌A.M.P‌ ‌will‌ ‌solve‌ ‌this‌ ‌problem‌ ‌by‌ ‌prohibiting‌ ‌violations‌ ‌to‌ medical‌‌freedom‌‌by‌‌private‌‌and‌‌public‌‌entities‌‌altogether.‌‌ ‌ ‌ A.M.P‌‌Will‌‌Bridle‌‌Judges‌‌Who‌‌May‌‌Have‌‌Potential‌‌ ‌ To‌‌Minimize‌‌Citizens’‌‌Rights‌‌To‌‌Medical‌‌Freedom.‌ ‌ The‌ ‌dissenting‌ ‌opinion‌ ‌in‌ ‌the‌ ‌Green‌ ‌v‌ ‌Alachua‌ ‌case‌ ‌stated‌ ‌how‌ ‌the‌ ‌laws‌ ‌applied‌ ‌by‌ ‌the‌ ‌majority‌‌ opinion‌ ‌were‌ ‌misplaced‌ ‌because‌‌masks‌‌were‌‌merely‌‌a‌‌minor‌‌inconvenience‌‌compared‌‌to‌‌what‌‌the‌‌ judge‌‌felt‌‌were‌‌more‌‌serious‌‌issues‌‌such‌‌as‌‌abortion,‌ ‌the‌‌right‌‌to‌‌choose‌‌a‌‌manner‌‌of‌‌death,‌‌or‌‌the‌‌ right‌‌to‌‌reject‌‌a‌‌life‌‌saving‌‌treatment.‌‌If‌‌there‌‌are‌‌such‌‌dissenting‌‌judges‌‌with‌‌an‌‌opinion‌‌minimizing‌‌ the‌‌seriousness‌‌of‌‌how‌‌mask‌‌mandates‌‌violate‌‌constitutional‌‌rights,‌‌then‌‌they‌‌are‌‌likely‌‌to‌‌do‌‌so‌‌for‌‌ mandatory‌ ‌vaccines,‌ ‌even‌ ‌the‌ ‌experimental‌ ‌kind.‌ ‌Because‌ ‌there‌ ‌are‌ ‌judges‌ ‌who‌ ‌have‌ ‌such‌ ‌a‌‌ perspective‌‌by‌‌arbitrarily‌‌picking‌‌and‌‌choosing‌‌what‌‌is‌‌a‌‌major‌‌or‌‌minor‌‌violation‌‌of‌‌a‌‌citizen’s‌‌right‌‌ to‌‌medical‌‌freedom,‌‌then‌ ‌we‌‌need‌‌nothing‌‌LESS‌‌than‌‌A.M.P.‌ ‌Wouldn’t‌‌you‌‌rather‌‌be‌‌at‌‌the‌‌mercy‌‌of‌‌ constitutional‌‌law‌‌rather‌‌than‌‌by‌‌a‌‌judge‌‌?‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 5‌‌of‌‌7‌ ‌ ‌ A.M.P‌‌Will‌‌Make‌‌The‌‌Search‌‌For‌‌Attorneys‌‌For‌‌Medical‌‌Freedom‌‌Cases‌‌ ‌ Much‌‌Less‌‌Of‌‌An‌‌Issue,‌‌And‌‌Litigation‌‌More‌‌Efficient‌‌and‌‌Expedient.‌ ‌ Most‌ ‌big‌ ‌civil‌ ‌rights‌ ‌firms‌ ‌and‌ ‌big‌ ‌building‌ ‌type‌ ‌firms‌ ‌have‌ ‌divisions‌ ‌which‌ ‌work‌ ‌with‌ ‌local‌‌ government,‌ ‌thus‌ ‌creating‌ ‌self‌ ‌evident‌ ‌conflicts‌ ‌of‌ ‌interest‌ ‌as‌ ‌a‌ ‌consequence.‌ ‌This‌ ‌makes‌ ‌civil‌‌ liberties‌‌cases‌‌tougher‌‌to‌‌win,‌‌and‌‌worse,‌‌even‌‌tougher‌‌to‌‌find‌‌attorneys‌‌to‌‌litigate‌‌for‌‌a‌‌citizen‌‌in‌‌the‌‌ first‌‌place.‌‌ ‌ A.M.P.‌‌Will‌‌Resolve‌‌The‌‌Problem‌‌Of‌‌A‌‌Slow‌‌Court‌‌Process‌‌Which‌‌Will‌‌ ‌ Likely‌‌Involve‌‌Complex‌‌Litigation‌‌For‌‌Violations‌‌Of‌‌Medical‌‌Freedom.‌‌ ‌ Green‌ ‌v.‌ ‌Alachua‌ ‌was‌ ‌an‌ ‌18‌ ‌month‌ ‌lawsuit‌ ‌which‌ ‌ruled‌ ‌that‌ ‌medical‌ ‌freedom‌ ‌was‌ ‌based‌ ‌on‌ ‌laws‌‌ which‌ ‌have‌ ‌been‌ ‌on‌ ‌the‌ ‌books‌ ‌since‌ ‌the‌ ‌beginning‌ ‌of‌ ‌the‌ ‌Florida‌ ‌Constitution,‌ ‌and‌ ‌even‌ ‌dating‌‌ before‌ ‌to‌ ‌the‌ ‌English‌ ‌common‌ ‌law.‌ ‌This‌ ‌issue‌ ‌should’ve‌ ‌been‌ ‌resolved‌ ‌before‌ ‌there‌ ‌was‌ ‌even‌ ‌a‌‌ mask‌ ‌mandate‌ ‌by‌ ‌the‌ ‌county‌ ‌knowing‌ ‌a‌ ‌mask‌ ‌mandate‌ ‌was‌ ‌unconstitutional‌ ‌in‌ ‌the‌ ‌first‌ ‌place‌ ‌!‌ ‌ Because‌ ‌of‌ ‌huge‌ ‌oversights‌ ‌due‌ ‌to‌ ‌a‌ ‌lack‌ ‌of‌ ‌knowledge‌ ‌by‌ ‌government‌ ‌officials‌ ‌,‌ ‌then‌ ‌a‌ ‌strongly‌‌ worded‌ ‌medical‌ ‌freedom‌ ‌amendment‌ ‌with‌ ‌minimal‌ ‌loopholes‌ ‌is‌ ‌needed‌ ‌in‌‌order‌‌to‌‌make‌‌it‌‌crystal‌‌ clear‌ ‌to‌ ‌judges‌ ‌and‌ ‌government‌ ‌officials‌ ‌that‌ ‌citizens‌‌possess‌‌these‌‌unalienable‌‌rights.‌‌The‌‌clearly‌‌ worded,‌ ‌well‌ ‌defined‌ ‌A.M.P‌ ‌will‌ ‌spell‌ ‌out‌ ‌to‌ ‌governmental‌ ‌bodies‌ ‌not‌ ‌to‌ ‌violate‌ ‌rights‌ ‌to‌ ‌medical‌‌ freedom,‌ ‌and‌ ‌also‌ ‌reduce‌ ‌the‌ ‌burden‌ ‌on‌ ‌the‌ ‌judicial‌ ‌system‌ ‌by‌ ‌keeping‌ ‌attorneys,‌ ‌clients,‌ ‌and‌‌ judges‌‌from‌‌having‌‌to‌‌go‌‌back‌‌and‌‌forth‌‌on‌‌finer‌‌points‌‌of‌‌law‌‌which‌‌they‌‌may‌‌or‌‌may‌‌not‌‌be‌‌privy‌‌ to.‌ ‌ WHAT‌‌ACTIONS‌‌CAN‌‌I‌‌TAKE‌‌NOW‌‌WHILE‌‌THIS‌‌AMENDMENT‌‌PROJECT‌‌IS‌‌IN‌‌START‌‌UP‌‌?‌ ‌ Superman‌‌will‌‌not‌‌save‌‌you,‌‌so‌‌stop‌‌relying‌‌on‌ ‌him‌‌to‌‌save‌‌the‌‌day,‌‌such‌‌as‌‌trusting‌‌in‌‌a‌‌man‌‌like‌‌a‌‌ president‌‌,‌‌a‌‌governor‌‌,‌‌attorneys,‌‌or‌‌a‌‌newspaper‌‌reporter.‌‌They‌‌aren’t‌‌going‌‌to‌‌fly‌‌in‌‌and‌‌save‌‌us‌‌as‌‌ in‌ ‌Superman‌ ‌movies‌ ‌where‌ ‌the‌ ‌government‌ ‌corruption‌ ‌gets‌‌turned‌‌over‌‌to‌‌the‌‌newspaper‌‌and‌‌the‌‌ movie‌ ‌ends‌ ‌happily‌ ‌ever‌ ‌after.‌ ‌We‌ ‌can’t‌ ‌depend‌ ‌on‌ ‌politicians‌ ‌to‌ ‌save‌ ‌us,‌ ‌and‌ ‌they‌ ‌can’t‌ ‌pay‌‌ 6‌‌of‌‌7‌ ‌ ‌ attention‌‌to‌‌every‌‌issue‌‌every‌‌time,‌‌so‌‌it‌‌is‌‌on‌‌“we‌‌the‌‌people”‌‌more‌‌so‌‌than‌‌ever‌‌who‌‌must‌‌do‌‌much‌‌ more‌‌than‌‌wave‌‌flags,‌‌repost‌‌Newsmax‌‌and‌‌OANN‌‌news‌‌clips‌‌in‌‌their‌‌feed,‌‌or‌‌post‌‌political‌‌memes.‌‌ ‌ ‌ PRACTICAL‌‌STEPS‌ ‌ 1.‌ ‌Just‌‌for‌‌now,‌‌in‌‌the‌‌short‌‌run,‌‌share‌‌this‌‌information‌‌and‌‌simply‌‌collect‌‌the‌‌first/last‌‌names‌‌AND‌‌ emails‌‌(very‌‌important)‌‌of‌‌people‌‌in‌‌your‌‌circles‌‌of‌‌influence‌‌who‌‌may‌‌be‌‌interested‌‌in‌‌going‌‌out‌‌and‌‌ collecting‌‌signatures‌‌to‌‌get‌‌A.M.P‌‌on‌‌the‌‌November‌‌2022‌‌ballot‌‌,‌‌while‌‌also‌‌encouraging‌‌them‌‌to‌‌do‌‌ the‌ ‌same.‌ ‌Forward‌ ‌all‌ ‌names/email‌ ‌to‌ ‌or‌ ‌have‌ ‌them‌ ‌leave‌ ‌their‌ ‌contact‌ ‌info‌ ‌with‌‌ [email protected]‌‌ ‌ ‌ 2.‌ ‌Because‌ ‌of‌ ‌all‌ ‌of‌ ‌the‌ ‌accounting‌ ‌requirements‌‌and‌‌bookkeeping‌‌required,‌‌this‌‌project‌ ‌will‌‌need‌‌ it’s‌‌own‌‌non-profit.‌‌Crowdfunding‌‌efforts‌‌for‌‌a‌‌new‌‌non-profit‌‌political‌‌committee,‌‌and‌‌volunteers‌‌will‌‌ be‌ ‌needed.‌ ‌You’ll‌ ‌be‌ ‌seeing‌ ‌more‌ ‌about‌ ‌that‌ ‌movement‌ ‌as‌ ‌it‌ ‌comes‌ ‌together.‌ ‌A‌ ‌Constitutional‌‌ Amendment‌‌will‌‌require‌‌a‌‌lot‌‌of‌‌signatures‌‌(about‌‌900,000)‌‌to‌‌be‌‌obtained‌‌(on‌‌paper).‌‌It’s‌‌also‌‌going‌‌ to‌‌cost‌‌some‌‌money‌‌for‌‌signature‌‌verification‌‌($.10‌‌per‌‌signature),‌‌printing‌‌and‌‌other‌‌costs.‌‌It’s‌‌a‌‌big‌‌ job‌‌-‌‌but‌‌a‌‌Constitutional‌‌Amendment‌‌may‌‌be‌‌the‌‌most‌‌certain‌‌way‌‌to‌‌change‌‌the‌‌law.‌ ‌ 3.‌‌On‌‌the‌‌back‌‌burner,‌‌but‌‌needed‌‌in‌‌the‌‌very‌‌near‌‌future‌‌:‌ ‌ ‌ - We‌ ‌need‌ ‌three‌ ‌directors‌ ‌,‌ ‌who‌ ‌generally‌ ‌should‌ ‌be‌ ‌business‌ ‌people‌ ‌with‌ ‌a‌ ‌feel‌ ‌for‌ ‌how‌ ‌to‌‌ make‌‌strategic‌‌decisions‌‌and‌‌be‌‌inclined‌‌to‌‌guide‌‌the‌‌project‌‌and‌‌a‌‌non-profit‌‌organization.‌ ‌ - We‌‌also‌‌need‌‌a‌‌Treasurer‌‌who‌‌should‌‌be‌‌good‌‌at‌‌bookkeeping‌‌and‌‌record‌‌keeping.‌ ‌ - If‌ ‌you‌ ‌know‌ ‌anyone‌ ‌with‌ ‌these‌ ‌skill‌ ‌sets‌ ‌who‌ ‌you‌ ‌think‌ ‌would‌ ‌be‌‌excited‌‌about‌‌this‌‌project‌‌ which‌ ‌will‌ ‌change‌ ‌the‌ ‌law‌ ‌for‌ ‌generations‌ ‌to‌ ‌come,‌ ‌please‌ ‌have‌ ‌them‌ ‌contact‌ [email protected]‌‌‌.‌ ‌ - It‌ ‌is‌ ‌important‌ ‌for‌ ‌any‌ ‌prospective‌ ‌directors‌ ‌or‌ ‌treasurers‌‌to‌‌know‌‌that‌‌since‌‌this‌‌committee‌‌ will‌ ‌be‌ ‌a‌ ‌registered‌ ‌non-profit‌ ‌,‌ ‌the‌ ‌names‌ ‌of‌ ‌the‌ ‌directors‌ ‌and‌ ‌treasurer‌ ‌will‌ ‌have‌ ‌to‌ ‌be‌‌ publicly‌‌disclosed‌‌on‌‌the‌‌state's‌‌documents.‌ ‌ ‌ THIS‌ ‌MAY‌ ‌BE‌ ‌OUR‌ ‌ONLY‌ ‌CHANCE‌ ‌TO‌ ‌TIP‌ ‌THE‌ ‌SCALES‌ ‌IN‌ ‌OUR‌ ‌FAVOR‌ ‌SINCE‌ ‌WE‌ ‌HAVE‌‌A‌‌ GOVERNOR‌‌AND‌‌LEGISLATURE‌‌OPEN‌‌TO‌‌THIS‌‌KIND‌‌OF‌‌LAW‌‌MAKING,‌‌SO‌‌WE‌‌MUST‌‌SEIZE‌‌ THIS‌‌OPPORTUNITY‌‌!‌ ‌ 7‌‌of‌‌7‌ ‌