Before the Narrative Solidified 1 Copyright © 2026 by Peter Kent All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the author, except for brief quotations used in reviews and scholarly publications. This book is a work of nonfiction. Names, characters, businesses, places, events, and incidents are either the products of the author’s imagination or used in a fictitious manner. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events is purely coincidental. The information contained in this book is provided for informational and educational purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the author makes no representations or warranties with respect to the completeness or reliability of the content and assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from the use of this information. Year of Publication: 2026 Independently published via Amazon Kindle Direct Publishing Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this book are solely those of the author and do not represent any organization, institution, or government. 2 Table of Contents Copyright © 2026 by Peter Kent................................................................................................. 2 Table of Contents.........................................................................................................................3 Preface.................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction: Why January 15 Still Matters.............................................................................. 7 Nigeria on the Eve of Collapse................................................................................................ 8 The Officers and the Moment.................................................................................................. 8 Chukwuma Nzeogwu: Formation of a Revolutionary Mind......................................................8 Intent Versus Execution........................................................................................................... 8 January 15, 1966: A Reconstruction........................................................................................8 Consistency and Collapse....................................................................................................... 8 The Vacuum of Meaning.......................................................................................................... 8 The State Responds................................................................................................................ 8 Ethnicity, Fear, and Political Utility........................................................................................... 9 From Event to Myth................................................................................................................. 9 Historiography of the Coup...................................................................................................... 9 Archival Evidence and Oral Testimony.................................................................................... 9 Revolutionary Theory and Military Intervention....................................................................... 9 Comparative Case Studies...................................................................................................... 9 January 1966 and the Road to War......................................................................................... 9 Reassessing Nzeogwu.......................................................................................................... 10 Narrative Power in the Digital Age.........................................................................................10 Conclusion: Toward a Plural Nigerian History........................................................................10 Primary Source Archive......................................................................................................... 10 Methodological Appendix.......................................................................................................10 Bibliography........................................................................................................................... 10 Advanced Tips, Hacks, and Professional Techniques........................................................... 10 Professional Publishing and Research Hacks....................................................................... 10 Resources for Further Study.................................................................................................. 11 Index...................................................................................................................................... 11 Research Guide..........................................................................................................................11 Writing Roadmap....................................................................................................................... 12 Preface........................................................................................................................................12 Why This Book Had to Be Written......................................................................................... 13 Between Silence, Propaganda, and Simplification................................................................ 14 Method, Evidence, and Intellectual Honesty..........................................................................15 Introduction: Why January 15 Still Matters.............................................................................18 January 1966 as a Turning Point in Nigerian History.............................................................18 The Problem of Singular Narratives.......................................................................................19 Perspective, Power, and the Construction of Truth................................................................20 3 Nigeria on the Eve of Collapse................................................................................................. 23 Post-Independence Governance and Institutional Weakness............................................... 23 Political Violence, Electoral Crisis, and Public Disillusionment..............................................24 Civilian-Military Relations Before 1966.................................................................................. 25 The Officers and the Moment................................................................................................... 28 Social Origins and Military Formation.................................................................................... 28 Political Consciousness Within the Armed Forces................................................................ 29 Ideology, Frustration, and Moral Justifications.......................................................................31 Chukwuma Nzeogwu: Formation of a Revolutionary Mind................................................... 34 Early Life, Education, and Military Training............................................................................34 Political Thought, Discipline, and Personal Ethics.................................................................35 Nzeogwu’s Vision of National Renewal................................................................................. 36 Intent Versus Execution............................................................................................................ 38 Revolutionary Claims and Stated Objectives.........................................................................38 Planning, Coordination, and Structural Weaknesses............................................................ 39 Where the Line Was Held—and Where It Broke................................................................... 40 January 15, 1966: A Reconstruction........................................................................................42 Prelude to January 15, 1966..................................................................................................42 The Coup Begins: January 15, 1966..................................................................................... 42 Regional Timeline of Events.................................................................................................. 43 Northern Region...............................................................................................................43 Lagos and Western Region............................................................................................. 43 Eastern and Mid ‑ Western Regions.................................................................................. 43 Operational Decisions and Consequences............................................................................44 Target Selection and Command Disruption..................................................................... 44 Fragmented Control and Military Authority...................................................................... 44 Legal and Structural Transformation................................................................................44 Civilian Impact and Immediate Confusion............................................................................. 45 Shock and Disruption.......................................................................................................45 Regional Perceptions and Ethnic Tension....................................................................... 45 Social Anxiety and Rumours............................................................................................45 Displacement and Uncertainty......................................................................................... 46 Aftermath and Escalating Crisis.............................................................................................46 Consistency and Collapse........................................................................................................ 47 Nzeogwu’s Conduct Under Pressure.....................................................................................47 Retreat, Arrest, and Responsibility........................................................................................ 48 The Cost of Ideological Fragmentation..................................................................................49 The Vacuum of Meaning............................................................................................................51 Absence of a Unified Post ‑ Action Narrative...........................................................................51 Institutional Silence and Strategic Ambiguity.........................................................................51 How Failure Enabled Reinterpretation...................................................................................53 4 The State Responds.................................................................................................................. 56 Military Consolidation and Power Reconfiguration................................................................ 56 Official Statements and Media Framing.................................................................................57 Early Narrative Fixation......................................................................................................... 59 Ethnicity, Fear, and Political Utility.......................................................................................... 62 How Ethnic Explanations Replaced Structural Analysis........................................................ 62 The Role of Elite Interests..................................................................................................... 63 Simplification as a Tool of Control..........................................................................................64 From Event to Myth................................................................................................................... 67 How January 15 Was Frozen in Public Memory.................................................................... 67 School Curricula and Textbook Politics..................................................................................67 Journalism, Rumor, and Repetition........................................................................................69 Historiography of the Coup...................................................................................................... 71 Early Scholarly Accounts....................................................................................................... 71 Cold War Contexts and External Influences.......................................................................... 72 Revisionist and Contemporary Scholarship...........................................................................73 Archival Evidence and Oral Testimony................................................................................... 75 Nigerian Military and Government Records...........................................................................75 Foreign Archives and Diplomatic Cables...............................................................................76 Memory, Trauma, and the Limits of Testimony...................................................................... 77 Revolutionary Theory and Military Intervention..................................................................... 80 What Constitutes a Revolution?............................................................................................ 80 Failed Revolutions and Partial Transformations.................................................................... 81 Military Ethics and Political Legitimacy.................................................................................. 82 Comparative Case Studies....................................................................................................... 85 African Military Interventions of the 1960s.............................................................................85 Ideology Versus Opportunism................................................................................................86 Why Some Narratives Survived and Others Did Not............................................................. 87 January 1966 and the Road to War.......................................................................................... 89 The July Counter ‑ Coup..........................................................................................................89 Institutional Breakdown and Mutual Suspicion...................................................................... 90 Structural Continuities Leading to Civil War...........................................................................91 Reassessing Nzeogwu.............................................................................................................. 93 Patriot, Idealist, or Tragic Figure?..........................................................................................93 Popular Memory Versus Documentary Evidence.................................................................. 94 The Problem of Moral Consistency in History........................................................................95 Narrative Power in the Digital Age........................................................................................... 97 Social Media, Memory Wars, and Generational Shifts.......................................................... 97 Archival Democratization and Misinformation........................................................................98 New Opportunities for Historical Correction...........................................................................99 Conclusion: Toward a Plural Nigerian History......................................................................101 5 Holding Multiple Truths Without Relativism......................................................................... 101 Ethics of Remembering and Forgetting............................................................................... 101 What an Honest History Demands Today............................................................................102 Primary Source Archive.......................................................................................................... 104 Selected Speeches, Orders, and Communications............................................................. 104 Nzeogwu’s January Broadcast...................................................................................... 104 Government Communication to Foreign Powers........................................................... 104 Transfer of Authority Announcement............................................................................. 105 Orders and Internal Military Communications................................................................105 Chronological Tables........................................................................................................... 105 Key Biographical Notes....................................................................................................... 106 Major Chukwuma Kaduna Nzeogwu..............................................................................106 Major Emmanuel Ifeajuna.............................................................................................. 106 Major Chris Anuforo....................................................................................................... 107 Major Donatus Okafor....................................................................................................107 Major Humphrey Chukwuka...........................................................................................107 Major ‑ General Johnson Thomas Umunnakwe Aguiyi ‑ Ironsi..........................................107 Lieutenant Colonel Yakubu Gowon................................................................................107 Lieutenant Colonel Theophilus Danjuma....................................................................... 108 Methodological Appendix....................................................................................................... 109 Research Ethics in Politically Sensitive History................................................................... 109 Evaluating Bias and Silences.............................................................................................. 109 Triangulating Conflicting Sources........................................................................................ 110 Documentary Triangulation............................................................................................ 110 Temporal Triangulation................................................................................................... 111 Cross-Disciplinary Triangulation.....................................................................................111 Digital Triangulation........................................................................................................111 Practical Example...........................................................................................................111 Bibliography............................................................................................................................. 112 Archival Collections..............................................................................................................113 Books and Peer ‑ Reviewed Articles......................................................................................114 Media and Oral Sources...................................................................................................... 115 Advanced Tips, Hacks, and Professional Techniques......................................................... 117 Conducting High ‑ Stakes Oral History Interviews................................................................. 117 Detecting Propaganda Patterns in Official Texts..................................................................118 Using Comparative History to Break Ethnic Frames............................................................119 Digital Tools for Archival Organization................................................................................. 120 Fact ‑ Checking Politicized Narratives................................................................................... 121 Professional Publishing and Research Hacks......................................................................123 Writing for Academic and General Audiences Simultaneously............................................123 Structuring Arguments That Survive Peer Review.............................................................. 124 6 Working With Editors on Politically Sensitive Manuscripts.................................................. 124 Navigating Censorship, Pushback, and Public Debate....................................................... 125 Turning Historical Research Into Long-Term Influence........................................................126 Resources for Further Study.................................................................................................. 127 Nigerian and International Archives.....................................................................................127 Research Institutes and Libraries........................................................................................ 128 Digital History Platforms...................................................................................................... 129 Index: Ethnicity, Fear, and Political Utility.............................................................................131 Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 131 Historical Context and Structural Conditions....................................................................... 131 Strategic Deployment of Ethnic Narratives.......................................................................... 132 Popular Reception and Media Reinforcement..................................................................... 132 Ethnicity as a Substitute for Structural Analysis.................................................................. 133 Elite Interests and the Politics of Fear................................................................................. 133 Consequences for Public Discourse and Historical Memory............................................... 134 Comparative Perspectives...................................................................................................134 Analytical Summary............................................................................................................. 134 Research Guide....................................................................................................................... 135 Nigerian National Archives (Ibadan, Kaduna, Enugu)......................................................... 136 British National Archives (Colonial and Commonwealth Records)...................................... 137 Declassified Diplomatic Cables........................................................................................... 138 Oral History Interviews With Contemporaries......................................................................139 Comparative Military History Databases..............................................................................140 Writing Roadmap..................................................................................................................... 140 Phase One: Evidence Collection and Source Mapping....................................................... 141 Phase Two: Argument Structuring and Narrative Balance.................................................. 142 Phase Three: Peer Review and Sensitivity Testing............................................................. 143 Phase Four: Public-Facing Revision Without Dilution......................................................... 143 Phase Five: Long-Term Archival Contribution..................................................................... 144 Integrative Considerations Across Phases.......................................................................... 144 7 Preface Why This Book Had to Be Written This book exists because silence has consequences, and simplification distorts reality. For more than half a century, the events of 15 January 1966 have occupied a central but unsettled place in Nigeria’s historical consciousness. The date is frequently invoked, rarely examined with care, and almost never approached with methodological balance. What survives in popular memory is not a carefully reconstructed account of intentions, actions, failures, and consequences, but a compressed narrative shaped by political necessity, ethnic anxiety, and institutional self-preservation. The persistence of this distortion has practical implications. Nigeria’s political history did not simply pass through January 1966; it was reoriented by it. The erosion of trust between regions, the militarisation of political authority, and the subsequent descent into civil war cannot be understood without confronting how that moment has been narrated and renarrated. Yet most existing accounts fall into predictable patterns. Some reduce the coup to a crude ethnic plot. Others sanctify it as an aborted moral cleansing without examining its internal contradictions. A third category avoids serious engagement altogether, preferring silence to controversy. None of these approaches satisfies the basic demands of historical inquiry. This book was written to address that failure. It does not seek to rehabilitate myths, nor does it aim to replace one rigid narrative with another. Its purpose is narrower and more demanding: to separate intention from outcome, consistency from opportunism, and evidence from repetition. That distinction matters because historical judgment requires proportion. An event may be morally motivated and strategically flawed at the same time. Individuals may act with discipline while participating in a collective failure. Multiple truths may coexist without canceling one another, provided they are anchored in verifiable facts. The figure of Chukwuma Kaduna Nzeogwu occupies a particular place in this work not because he should be idealized, but because his conduct exposes a contrast that later narratives often conceal. His actions, restraint, and refusal to disown responsibility stand in tension with the behavior of other participants whose retreat, silence, or accommodation created the conditions under which propaganda flourished. That contrast is not an emotional claim; it is a historical observation grounded in documented behavior before, during, and after the events in question. This book also had to be written because generational distance has not produced clarity. On the contrary, the passage of time has allowed repetition to masquerade as evidence. Many contemporary discussions rely on second- and third-hand assertions that trace back to politically motivated interpretations produced in the immediate aftermath of the coup. The availability of archival material, memoirs, declassified foreign records, and oral testimonies now makes it possible to revisit those assertions with 8 greater precision. Ignoring that opportunity would amount to an abdication of scholarly responsibility. Finally, this book responds to a broader problem in Nigerian historiography: the reluctance to treat military intervention as a subject of rigorous analysis rather than moral panic or ideological comfort. Military coups are neither inherently redemptive nor inherently conspiratorial. They are political acts carried out by institutions with their own internal cultures, hierarchies, and contradictions. Any serious account of January 1966 must engage that complexity rather than bypass it. Between Silence, Propaganda, and Simplification The historical space surrounding 15 January 1966 has been shaped less by careful scholarship than by three dominant forces: silence, propaganda, and simplification. Each has played a distinct role, and together they have narrowed public understanding to a point where nuance is often treated as provocation. Silence emerged first. In the immediate aftermath of the coup and the subsequent counter-coup, institutional incentives favored restraint. The new military leadership had little interest in reopening questions that might undermine its legitimacy or expose internal fractures. Civilian elites, many of whom had survived the political crises of the First Republic, were equally reluctant to encourage scrutiny that might implicate them in the conditions that preceded military intervention. Silence became a strategy of stabilization, reinforced through official statements, selective prosecutions, and the absence of transparent inquiries. That silence was not neutral. It created a vacuum that propaganda quickly filled. Simplified explanations, particularly those emphasizing ethnic motive over structural context, proved politically useful. They redirected attention away from corruption, electoral violence, and institutional decay and toward identity-based suspicion. Once embedded, these explanations were reproduced through speeches, newspapers, educational materials, and later through popular culture. Over time, repetition hardened them into assumed fact. Propaganda does not require fabrication to succeed. Selective emphasis is often sufficient. By highlighting certain victims while ignoring others, by foregrounding some actions and omitting others, a narrative can achieve emotional force without analytical depth. In the case of January 1966, the failure to distinguish between individual conduct and collective outcome allowed a single frame to dominate: the coup as an ethnic project rather than a fractured intervention shaped by uneven commitment and execution. Simplification completed the process. Complex sequences of events were reduced to slogans. Ambiguous motivations were flattened into singular intent. Contradictions were treated as inconveniences rather than evidence. This simplification proved durable because it aligned with existing fears and political incentives. It also required minimal engagement with primary sources, making it easy to reproduce across generations. 9 The cost of this process has been high. Simplification obscures responsibility by dissolving it into collective blame. It discourages institutional learning by treating failure as inevitable rather than contingent. It also distorts moral judgment by conflating discipline with success and inconsistency with intent. A serious historical account must resist these tendencies, even at the risk of discomfort. This book positions itself deliberately between these forces. It refuses silence by engaging evidence directly. It challenges propaganda by tracing claims to their sources and testing them against available records. It resists simplification by allowing contradictions to remain visible rather than forcing them into a single explanatory frame. That approach does not produce comforting conclusions, but it does produce a more honest account. Importantly, rejecting simplification does not mean denying harm or minimizing consequence. The deaths, disruptions, and subsequent violence associated with 1966 are not abstract matters. They are documented realities with enduring effects. Acknowledging them does not require accepting every narrative constructed to explain them. Historical responsibility lies in distinguishing between what happened, why it happened, and how it was later interpreted. The persistence of propaganda also explains why this book treats memory itself as a subject of analysis. Public memory is not a passive repository of facts; it is an active process shaped by power, fear, and repetition. Understanding how January 1966 has been remembered is inseparable from understanding the event itself. Silence, propaganda, and simplification are not peripheral issues; they are central to the story. Method, Evidence, and Intellectual Honesty Any attempt to revisit a contested historical event must begin with methodological clarity. This book adopts a deliberately conservative approach to evidence, favoring corroboration over speculation and documented behavior over inferred motive. Where sources conflict, those conflicts are presented rather than resolved through assertion. Where evidence is incomplete, the limits of inference are stated plainly. The primary sources used in this work fall into several categories. These include contemporary newspaper reports from Nigerian and foreign outlets, official military communiqués, court records, memoirs by participants and observers, declassified diplomatic correspondence, and oral testimonies collected by historians and journalists over several decades. No single category is treated as definitive. Each carries its own biases, constraints, and silences. Memoirs, for example, are invaluable for understanding self-perception and retrospective justification, but they are also shaped by memory, reputation, and later political developments. Official statements reflect institutional priorities rather than comprehensive disclosure. Foreign diplomatic records offer external observation but are filtered through the interests and assumptions of their authors. Oral testimonies provide texture and personal detail but require careful cross-checking. 10 Intellectual honesty requires acknowledging these limitations without retreating into relativism. The existence of bias does not render all accounts equally unreliable. Patterns emerge when independent sources converge. Discrepancies become meaningful when they align with institutional incentives or personal interest. The task of the historian is not to eliminate uncertainty, but to manage it responsibly. This book also draws on established scholarship in political science, military studies, and memory studies to frame its analysis. Concepts such as revolutionary legitimacy, military professionalism, and narrative construction are not imposed retroactively; they are used to clarify dynamics that were present at the time. The goal is explanation, not abstraction for its own sake. Particular care has been taken to distinguish between intent and outcome. The failure of a political intervention does not automatically negate the sincerity of its stated goals, just as the presence of sincere actors does not redeem a flawed strategy. This distinction is often blurred in popular accounts, leading to moral shortcuts that obscure more than they reveal. By treating intent and execution as analytically separate, the book avoids both romanticization and dismissal. The treatment of Chukwuma Nzeogwu follows this principle. His discipline, restraint, and acceptance of responsibility are documented facts, not inferred virtues. They are examined in relation to the broader failure of coordination and commitment that characterized the coup as a whole. Recognizing his consistency does not require ignoring the consequences of the action, nor does it absolve others by association. Equally important is the refusal to read later events backward into January 1966. The civil war that followed has understandably colored interpretation, but causation must be demonstrated rather than assumed. This book traces continuities where evidence supports them and avoids deterministic claims where it does not. The aim is to show how decisions created conditions, not to suggest inevitability. Throughout the writing process, particular attention has been paid to language. Loaded terms are used sparingly and defined where necessary. Ethnic labels are treated as historical categories rather than explanatory shortcuts. Moral judgment is grounded in documented behavior rather than assumed allegiance. This restraint is not stylistic; it is methodological. Intellectual honesty also involves recognizing what this book does not do. It does not claim access to hidden archives or undisclosed confessions. It does not resolve every debate surrounding January 1966. It does not offer a single authoritative narrative to replace all others. Its contribution lies instead in narrowing the space for distortion by clarifying what can be said with confidence and what remains uncertain. The standard applied throughout is simple but demanding: claims must be traceable, distinctions must be maintained, and conclusions must follow from evidence rather than sentiment. In a historical environment shaped by silence, propaganda, and simplification, that standard is not merely academic. It is necessary. 11 This preface sets the terms under which the rest of the book should be read. The chapters that follow do not ask for agreement in advance. They ask only for attention to evidence, patience with complexity, and a willingness to separate what is known from what has been repeated. 12 Introduction: Why January 15 Still Matters January 1966 as a Turning Point in Nigerian History The events of 15 January 1966 did not merely interrupt Nigeria’s post-independence political trajectory; they altered its direction in ways that remain visible decades later. That date marked the first direct intervention of the military into Nigeria’s political life, ending the First Republic and initiating a cycle of military involvement whose effects extended far beyond the immediate seizure of power. Institutions were reshaped, political norms recalibrated, and public expectations redefined. To understand modern Nigeria without grappling seriously with January 1966 is to accept an incomplete account of how authority, legitimacy, and national cohesion were transformed. Before January 1966, Nigeria’s political system, though deeply flawed, still operated within a civilian constitutional framework inherited from British colonial administration. Federalism, parliamentary governance, and regional autonomy were contested but intact. The crises of the early 1960s—electoral manipulation, political violence, emergency rule in the Western Region, and the breakdown of trust between political elites—did not yet imply the inevitability of military rule. The armed forces were constitutionally subordinate, professional in structure, and publicly regarded as a stabilizing institution rather than a governing one. The coup disrupted that equilibrium. Its immediate consequence was the collapse of civilian authority, but its deeper significance lay in normalizing the idea that political failure justified military correction. Once that threshold was crossed, it could not be easily reversed. Subsequent interventions—July 1966, 1975, 1983, 1985, and beyond—each drew legitimacy, implicitly or explicitly, from the precedent established in January. Even the eventual return to civilian rule was shaped by frameworks designed under military supervision, embedding legacies of command culture and centralized authority into civilian institutions. January 1966 also altered the moral vocabulary of Nigerian politics. Prior to the coup, corruption, electoral fraud, and regional domination were contested within civilian discourse. After it, these failures were reframed as justification for extraordinary measures. The language of national salvation entered political argument, often detached from democratic accoun