Analysis of TikTok Video Claims “Katie Johnson” Allegation Against Donald Trump Video Overview • Source: TikTok account @boogieewomanrrae. • Content: Emotional commentary alleging Donald Trump raped a 13-year-old (“Katie Johnson”) in 1994 at Jeffrey Epstein gatherings. • Visual Elements: Flashing court documents, investigative terminology, overlays suggesting rape, trafficking, and cover-up. • Tone: Highly emotional and accusatory; presents claims as established public record. Key Claims Presented in the Video • Trump violently raped a 13-year-old identified as “Katie Johnson” in 1994, allegedly with Epstein involved. • Displayed documents are presented as evidentiary proof. • References to “syndicate,” “red team investigation,” and anticorruption efforts are portrayed as suppressed public records. • A cover-up allegedly enabled Trump to later become president. Fact-Checking & Verification (Status as of February 2026) The allegation originates from civil lawsuits filed in 2016 by an anonymous plaintiff (“Katie Johnson” / “Jane Doe”). • April 2016: Filed in California federal court accusing Trump and Epstein of rape/assault (1994). • May 2016: Dismissed for procedural deficiencies (improper statutes cited). • June–September 2016: Refiled in New York under pseudonym “Jane Doe.” • November 2016: Voluntarily withdrawn shortly before the election; no further action taken. • No trial occurred; no evidence was tested in court. Credibility and Investigative Concerns • Promoted in part by Norm Lubow (former television producer) using a pseudonym. • Linked to political activists during the 2016 election cycle. • Media investigations questioned the sourcing and factual basis of the claims. • Recent Epstein-related document releases (2024–2026) have not produced verified evidence connecting Trump to this specific allegation. • No criminal charges or corroborated findings have emerged. Overall Assessment The lawsuit was real and formally filed but remains unsubstantiated and legally unresolved. It was dismissed or voluntarily withdrawn before evidentiary review. Publicly available investigations have not confirmed the allegations. The TikTok video appears to conflate unrelated Epstein case documents with this claim. Prepared February 2026 • Structured Analytical Summary