Polio Case Let’s put some mainstream polio vaccine claims to the test. CLAIM: Polio Vaccine Eliminated Polio You will hear claims made by WHO and Bill Gates suggesting that Polio Vaccine is the flagship vaccine proving once and for all that vaccines are effective and can prevent illnesses. But is there any truth to this claim? ➢ It is proven that prior to launch of the vaccine, polio death rate had already fallen by 47% in the US and 55% in England 1 and was on constant decline. ➢ As the same st atistics show, even in European countries where vaccine was not launched, Polio was being eliminated. ➢ When polio vaccine was launched, the definition of a ‘polio case’ was made more stringent there by making it more difficult to classify someone as a polio case. While previously any paralytic encephalitis case was considered polio, after the vaccine was launched lab testing, together with 60 days of monitoring became necessary to classify polio cases. 2 & 3 o This was corroborated by Dr. Bernard Greenberg, c hairman of the Committee on Evaluation and Standards of the American Public Health Association during the 1950s. Dr. Bernard also stated that the “decline” of polio cases not to the vaccine, but rather to a change in the way doctors were required to report cases. 2 ➢ This is further clarified in statistics for Aseptic Meningitis when compared to Polio: Is this mere coincidence? Where have we seen this before?.... And the more you dig, you will find this is true for almost all vaccines in circulation today 1 Alderson M. International Mortality Statistics, Washington, DC: Facts on File, 1981:177 – 8. 2 Hearings Before the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, House of Representatives, 87 th Congress, 2 nd Session on HR 10541. May1962:94 – 112 3 Los Angeles County Health Index: Morbidity and Morality, Reportable Diseases. CLAIM: Polio vaccine is safe Even though WHO, CDC and their primary financers Bill Gates and the Rotary Foundation love to tout the safety and efficacy of polio vaccine are these claims exaggerated or substantiated by science? ➢ WHO Initially launched the Global Polio Eradication Initiative with an aim to eliminate polio by year 2000. Since polio was still around, they claimed it was because the immunization was incomplete. The following was also discovered: o Egypt had outbreaks of polio that was “vaccine - de rived” 4 o Vaccinating someone who already had immunity to the polio virus, makes it favourable for a new more dangerous strain of Poliovirus to develop in the host. 5 o Genetic sequencing of polio virus found in rivers in Japan showed that the inactivated polio virus had gained its former strength by having chance to mutate. 6 o Even in the Western Hemisphere (Dominican Republic) a large number of paralytic polio cases popped up and testing confirmed that it was caused by the vaccine. 4 ➢ According t o research whoever is given Oral Polio Vaccine keeps excreting live virulent form of Polio for weeks after vaccination and becomes a source for spreading dangerous strains of polio in the population. 7 In fact a case was studied that showed even healthy in dividual with strong immune system who has been vaccinated can develop paralytic polio due to evolution in the strain. 8 In fact, Vaccine derived polio paralysis now accounts for more cases than Wild Polio in the world. 9 ➢ India, a country that was declare d polio free by WHO, had almost 490,000 cases of paralysis among vaccinated individuals. Lab tests showed that this was directly due to the polio vaccine. 10 This has also been extensively researched and scientists recommend that vaccines have significantly affected the human microbiome and is a threat to health safety. 11 ➢ In fact closer to home, in Pakistan, a cover up by the government was exposed where a dozen vaccine derived polio paralysis cases were covered up. The P2 strain which is dangerous and has higher degree of paralysis had been eliminated in Pakistan until the vaccine re - introduced it. 12 ➢ If you are asking me to vaccinate my child against an illness that he is extremely unlikely to ever come across and against which most people are already immune, using a vaccine that’s 4 Reuters Health. Polio outbreak in Dominican Republic and Haiti Caused by vaccine - derived virus. Reuters Medical News. December 4, 2000. ww.id.medscape.com/reuters/prof/2000/12 /12.05/20001204epid001.html 5 Crainic R, et al. Polio virus with natural recombinant genomes isolated from vaccine associated paralytic poliomyelitis. Virology 1993;196:199 – 208. 6 Yoshida H, et al.Lancet, October 28, 2000 7 Institute of Medicine (US) Vacci ne Safety Committee; Stratton KR, Howe CJ, Johnston RB Jr., editors. Adverse Events Associated with Childhood Vaccines: Evidence Bearing on Causality. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1994. 7, Polio Vaccines. 8 Desai S, Diener T, Tan BK, et al. An unusual case of vaccine - associated paralytic poliomyelitis. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol . 2014;25(4):227 – 228. doi:10.1155/2014/378320 9 https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/06/28/534403083/mutant - strains - of - polio - vaccine - now - cause - more - paralysis - than - wild - polio 10 https://www.scidev.net/asia - pacific/disease/news/oral - polio - drops - linked - to - paralysis - in - india.html 11 Correlation between Non - Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis Rates with Pulse Polio Frequency in India. Dhiman R, Prakash SC, Sreeniv as V, Puliyel J. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 15;15(8) 12 https://www.theguardian.com/global - development/2019/nov/07/pakistan - accused - of - cover - up - over - fresh - polio - outbreak known to re - introduce dangerous strains of virus in the population without telling me the risks associated with it... Are you really in the position to claim scientific superiority? ➢ Almost all medicine or products listed for medical use come with disclaimers and the users are informed about side - e ffects and risks associated with it even if the risk is minor. How come only vaccines are excused from that requirement and the claim that ‘This is 100% safe’ is legally allowed to be published without any scientific evidence? CLAIM: Polio Vaccine is Free This one is the best. We are led to believe that vaccines are free and work on the donation model. Let’s see how that works. ➢ Let’s connect the dots. o GAVI the international foundation that is responsible for providing vaccines to the world was founded by t he Gates Foundation 13 o Gates Foundation then builds factories and buys stake into vaccine manufacturing businesses around the world under “Research and Development” projects. 14 o Gates Foundation also finance s GPEI (Global Polio Eradication Initiative via GA VI) as its main contributor . And GPEI is responsible for ‘donating’ vaccines after buying them from GAVI. o GAVI works with manufacturers like GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer and bulk buys vaccine from them at subsidized rates to sell to the world 15 o Sometimes UNICEF directly purchases the vaccines on behalf of GAVI 16 o Where does the Gates Foundation make the money? ▪ Philanthro - capitalism: They claim that they use the business model of venture capitalism where you invest in novel ventures and buy control ling stake in them. So they invest in Vaccines, then fund NGOs that promote those vaccines and then fund organizations like WHO to mandate those vaccines. 17 o In short, here is the summary so far: a. Bill Gates owns Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) b. BMGF funds WHO and GPEI to mandate vaccines to country’s like Pakistan c. Pakistan takes loan from Islamic Development Bank (guaranteed by Bill Gates who agrees to pay the interest payments provided Pakistan obeys Bill Gates) - Almost 327 million USD 18 d. Pakistan t hen incurs foreign debt and donates this amount to WHO / UNICEF / GPEI 19 e. GPEI orders Vaccines from GAVI. (GAVI is owned by BMGF) f. GAVI purchases cheap bulk vaccines from Pfizer and GsK and delivers the vaccines to GPEI after adding their profits. g. GPEI deliv ers vaccines to Pakistan. h. GAVI returns profits to BMGF (Who own controlling share in it). 13 https://www.gavi.org/investing - gavi/funding/donor - profiles/bill - melind a - gates - foundation 14 https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/bill - gates - 7 - potential - coronavirus - vaccines/ 15 https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/pharmaceutical - companies - have - allowed - children - to - die - for - corporate - profiteering - and - these - vaccines - a6758521.htm l 16 Pharmaceuticals, Corporate Crime and Public Health By Graham Dukes, John Braithwaite, J P Moloney p. 160 17 "The birth of philanthrocapitalism". The Economist. February 23, 2006. 18 Contributions and Pledges to the Global Polio Eradication Initiative, 1985 - 2019 19 http://polioeradication.org/financing/donors/historical - contributions/ So basically, Bill Gates loans money to you and forces you to buy vaccines, you buy those vaccines from Bill Gates from the same money. Bill Gates keeps his money, you become indebted. CLAIM: VACCINATION IS NECESSARY After understanding that this is just a money - making venture for the parties involved and that it serves no real benefit against an illness that probably wouldn’t even exist if it wasn’t for the vaccine. Let us consider if the vaccination program even makes sense. According to CDC 20 Top Causes of Death in Pakistan are: Ischemic Heart Disease 8%, Cancer 8%, Lower - Respiratory Infections 8%, Stroke 6%, Diarrheal Diseases 6%, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 5%, TB 5% Polio killed 7 people in the last 7 years for which the government of Pakist an has donated 327 million USD. Would it not make sense to spend even a small portion of that money on Sanitation and Hygiene which could help save far more lives than Polio could ever take? But Bill Gates wouldn’t make money from it. According to research [The claims below can be substantiated by research presented 21 ]: • Vaccine manufacturers sponsor research on their own products. 21 • Many authors of published papers assessing the safety of vaccines are paid consultants for or receive grant money from vaccine manufacturers. 21 • Medical journals rely on advertising revenue from pharmaceutical companies. 22 • The vaccine industry employs three lobbyists for every member of Congress. 23 20 https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/countries/pakistan/default.htm 21 DeLong 2012 – Conflicts of Interest in Vaccine Safety Research 22 Smith R (2005) Medical journ als are an extension of the marketing arm of pharmaceutical companies. PLoS Med 2(5): e138. 23 Beckel, M. (2009). Will $1.2 million a day convince Congress to buy big pbarma's RX for change? • The FDA and CDC may be reluctant to sponsor research that reveals safety pr oblems associated with vaccines that they licensed and promoted because it could damage their reputations and reduce public trust. 21 • Reports of vaccine injury are not adequately investigated. 21 • Data in vaccine safety studies should be released to the pub lic so that independent scientists can replicate the findings. 21 • FDA are heavily funded by pharmaceutical industry and thus directly influenced by them 24 According to a bulletin published by the World Health Organization in 2000 25 , the WHO admitted that t he OPV vaccine is dangerous. They admitted that OPV has the potential of spreading more dangerous strains of Poliovirus in vaccinated population. They then claim that this would require more vaccination in order to stop it. So once they have spread Poliovi rus using OPV, they would implement IPV to stop that. [I.e. You pay them for OPV, and when it goes out of hand and causes dangerous strains to show up, you pay them more for IPV] The question is, considering that the WHO knew of these risks when they were mandating the vaccine, why did they not declare these risks publicly. Better yet, why weren’t the doctors responsible for the inoculations informed. Why are doctors claiming the vaccine is ‘100% safe’ without any scientific data to back that up simply because the WHO, now, says so. GPEI spends 42 million USD 26 in advertisement campaigns to promote Vaccine safety and trust in Pakistan alone. Where is this money going, and why has no other illness or it’s cure ever been ‘promoted’ like this? More money i s spent on convincing people of the safety of vaccines than it is on actually providing the vaccines. CLAIM: ONLY CONSPIRACY THEORISTS SPEAK AGAINST VACCINES In 2004 a research article 27 was published in the Paediatrics Journal outlining a study done to find out the background of families who were against vaccination in the United States. The following points were discovered: ➢ Unvaccinated children mostly came from families earning well an d had mothers with college degree level education. ➢ The reason their parents rejected vaccines was not because of conspiracies or propaganda but genuine concerns about the safety of vaccines. In a news article published in Dawn News 28 in 2017, Additional D eputy Commissioner Abdusattar Isani observed during a vaccination drive that a vast majority of people who were against the Polio Vaccination program were highly educated. In fact, quiet a lot of them were experienced doctors. It is not lack of wisdom to q uestion efficacy and demand scientific information. We need to move away from this cult mentality where brand names and logos are not questioned and return to our roots of scientific inquiry, experimental data and reason. Next time don’t be afraid to ask f or proof next time WHO creates an invisible enemy against which only her allies have the solution. 24 Angell, M. (2000). Is academic medicine for sale? New England Journal of Medicine, 342: 151& - 1518. 25 Wood et al 2000, Stopping polio virus vaccination after eradication 26 GPEI Budget 2019 http://polioeradication.org/financing/financial - needs/financial - resource - requirements - frr/gpei - budget - 2019/ 27 Philip J. et al 2004 Children Who Have Received No Vaccines: Who Are They and Where Do They, Pediatrics, 114;187 28 https://www.dawn.com/news/1324148