-- Transcript of Romana Didulo CULT's decree. Prohibition of Programmable Digital Currency 260210 Tuesday 10 February, 2026 Thank you to @SMetharp.bsky.social for making this transcription! TRANSCRIPT PDF: https://pdfhost.io/xxxxxxxxxx -- Page 0 - 2/10/2026 - Prohibition of Programmable Digital Currency Grand Rising Everyone, Happy Divini Majores 8, 0035, Also known as February 10, 2026. Royal Decree. Now, before I begin, this is in response to someone's question regarding tokenization of the We The People's money. Some may have heard of Project Agora. So this Royal Decree has nothing to do directly or indirectly with Project Agora. Many of you will remember that I have issued numerous times, Royal Decree pertaining to The Prohibition of the Central Bank Digital Currency. Okay. So with that said, this Royal Decree is On The Prohibition of Programable Digital Currency Systems and The Preservation of Cash and Economic Liberty. Your Security and Sovereignty. Okay. Royal Decree issued today, February 10th, 2026. By the order of Her Royal Majesty Queen Romana Didulo The First, Queen and Commander-in-Chief of The Kingdom of Canada and The World under Natural Law, Living Crown and Custodian of Earth and Humanity, Commander-in-Chief of The United Armies of Earth under Natural Law. Preamble. Natural Law precedes all institutions. It is not created by governments, banks, or treaties, but discovered through reason, conscience, and the inherent dignity of the human individual. All just authorities derives legitimacy only insofar as it conforms to this law. Where authority departs from it legitimacy dissolves. Money is inseparable from life. To control money is to control survival, movement, and choice. -Whereas every human being possesses inherent and inalienable rights, including life, liberty, property, privacy, and voluntary association. These rights exist prior to and above all, political, financial, and technological systems. Money is an extension of personal agency and lawful independence. Physical cash, by its nature, preserves autonomy, privacy resilience, and freedom from centralized permission. Programable and tokenized digital monetary system enable surveillance, conditional access, automated restriction, and behavioral enforcement. Such systems convert money from a neutral medium of exchange into an instrument of coercion. A system that enables punishment without trial, restriction without notice, or enforcement without judicial process violates Natural Law by design. The removal or marginalization of cash compels participation and eliminates consent. External or supra national financial systems that impose tokenization or programable control, compromise monetary sovereignty and personal liberty. The Living Crown bears a duty not merely to govern, but to restrain power where it threatens human dignity. Money is not merely an instrument of exchange, but a foundation of personal liberty, privacy, and lawful autonomy. Physical cash, by its nature, safeguarded The People's freedom of association, commerce, movement, and conscience through anonymity, resilience, and independence from centralized control. Proposals for state issued programable digital currencies, including, but not limited to central bank digital currencies, introduce architectures, observational conditionality, and automated enforcement incompatible with fundamental human rights. Programable money enables the attachment of conditions, restrictions, expirations, geographic limits, and behavioral compliance requirements to lawful economic activity, thereby transforming money into a tool of control rather than exchange. Such systems create unprecedented risks of abuse, mission creep, executive overreach, and punishment without due process, whether by present authorities or future regimes. The concentration of monetary power within centralized digital systems constitutes a single point of technical, political, and cyber vulnerability, threatening national resilience, economic continuity, and public safety. The elimination or marginalization of cash would coerce participation into digital systems, excluding seniors, rural populations, the technologically vulnerable, and all persons who dissent in conscience or necessity. No compelling necessity exists for programable or surveilled currency systems, as all legitimate objectives of efficiency, inclusion, and stability can be achieved through less intrusive right respecting alternatives. The normalization of such monetary systems globally sets a dangerous precedent, enabling authoritarian misuse and undermining public governance and the rule of law. The Living Crown bears a solemn duty to protect The People from systems that, by design, erode liberty regardless of stated intent. Now, therefore let it be Decreed by the lawful authority of Her Royal Majesty Queen Romana Didulo The First and in trust for The People, prohibition: Page 1 - 2/10/2026 - Prohibition of Programmable Digital Currency 1) All forms of state issued programable digital currency systems, including, but not limited to central banks, digital currencies that enable transaction level surveillance, conditional spending, automated restrictions or centralized behavioral control are hereby disallowed, prohibited, and barred within The Kingdom of Canada. 2) Preservation of cash. Physical cash is hereby affirmed as a protected and permanent, legal tender, guaranteed to remain available, lawful, and unrestricted for all private and public transactions. 3) Non coercion. No person shall be compelled, directly or indirectly, to participate in a digital monetary system as a condition of accessing goods, services, benefits, employments or lawful participation in society. 4) Privacy by Design. Any digital payment infrastructure permitted within The Kingdom of Canada must, 1) Preserve user privacy by default. 2) Prohibit transaction surveillance absent judicial warrant. 3) Forbid programmability that conditions lawful spending. 4) Operate without centralized behavioral enforcement mechanism. Next, Public Consent. No future alteration to the nature of money that materially affects rights, privacy or economic freedom shall be implemented without the following, 1) Full public disclosure, 2) Legislative scrutiny, and next, the explicit informed consent of the We The People of The Kingdom of Canada and Her Royal Majesty Queen Romana Didulo The First. Next. Limits on Authority. No authority may attach condition to lawful spending, expire, restrict or program money by algorithm, monitor transactions absent individualized judicial process, enforce behavior through monetary control. Power exercised through money is power exercised over life itself. Financial Sovereignty and Disengagement 1) Disengagement Declared. The Kingdom of Canada hereby lawfully disengages from, withdraws from, and prohibit participation in any financial, messaging, settlement, clearing or control system that relies upon or facilitates tokenization, programable monetary instruments, or external monetary governance. I will read that paragraph once more. Disengagement Declared. The Kingdom of Canada hereby lawfully disengages from, withdraws from, and prohibits participation in any financial messaging, settlement, clearing or control system that relies upon or facilitates tokenization, programable monetary instruments or external monetary governance. 2) Systems Included. This includes, without limitation, systems commonly known as Swift or any analogous successor or rebranded system serving equivalent functions. 3) Natural Law Basis. No external institution or consortium may lawfully exercise control, surveillance or conditional authority over the economic life of the We The People of The Kingdom of Canada. 4) Prohibition on Reintegration. No public institution may reconnect to such systems without, 1) free and informed consent of the We The People of The Kingdom of Canada, 2) full disclosure, and 3) proof of conformity with Natural Law. Next. Future Safeguards. All future monetary innovation must, 1) Preserve autonomy by design, 2) Respect privacy as default, 3) Operate without coercion, and 4) Remain subordinate to Natural Law. Declaration. Money shall not be a leash, rights shall not require permission. Liberty shall not be programmable. This Decree stands by Truth, not by force, and endures unless shown to violate Natural Law itself. Page 2 - 2/10/2026 - Prohibition of Programmable Digital Currency This Royal Decree is effective immediately dated today, February 10th, 2026. Legal Defensibility Addendum to the Royal Decree. Authority to Disengage, Foundational Principle. No state may lawfully bind its People to systems that negate inherent rights. Key Legal Pillars 1) Natural Law Supremacy. Positive law, and treaties are void where they conflict with inherent rights. 2) Doctrine of Necessity. States may withdraw from systems that threaten survival, liberty, or constitutional order. Safety and security and sovereignty of this state. 3) Non-delegation of sovereignty. Monetary authority affecting daily life cannot be ceded to external entities without consent. 4) Right Withdraw. All international financial participation is voluntary, not perpetual. Conclusion. Disengagement is not a breach, it is restoration of lawful order under Natural Law. Transition Framework. What replaces tokenized and external systems. 1) Domestic Sovereign Clearing. National non tokenized settlement rails account based or instrument based systems without programmability. 2) Cash First Infrastructure. Mandatory cash acceptance for essential goods. Cash distribution resilience planning. 3) Bilateral Trade Settlement. Direct Sovereign Clearing Agreements. Commodity backed or ledger neutral settlement. Commodity backed, that's your exchange; you'd like some canola oil will take your silver, just saying. Next, Voluntary Private Systems. Non programable, non surveilled payment platforms, no mandatory integration. Next is Judicial Oversight. No transaction monitoring without court order, that's under Natural Law, no automated enforcement. Gone are the days where a bank in The Kingdom of Canada can take We The People's money because a third party sent them an email saying, take this individual's money and transfer it to us or check what it is that they're paying for, what they're buying. Next is the International Natural Law Coalition Clause. It's one of those come to mama clause. Model Clause for Adoption by Other Nations. No state shall impose or participate in any monetary system that enables surveillance, conditional access, or behavioral enforcement through money. Monetary sovereignty and human dignity are inseparable, and nondelig-, nonnegligible under Natural Law, you cannot delegate that right. This clause is suitable for multinational declarations, sovereign compacts, human rights charters, and non aligned monetary coalitions. We go now to your High Level Analysis and High Level Rationale. Actually, before I go to the High Level Rationale, this is the analysis as to what those tokenized, monetary systems is all about. And this is after I did the analysis. This is why I ended up writing this Royal Decree. Okay. So this is why, 1) fundamental civil liberties and privacy risks. This is, we're talking about the tokenized system, okay. A state issued programable digital currency inherently enables transaction level surveillance. Who you pay, when, where and for what. Behavioral Profiling at Population Scale. Potential real time enforcement of policy through money itself. Even if safeguards are promised, the architecture itself creates risks that exceeds what is permitted under The Kingdom of Canada's privacy law. Conflict with international human rights norms on privacy and freedom of association. Cash is anonymous by design, tokenized monetary systems or central bank digital currencies are not. Replacing cash with the, with a traceable instrument fundamentally alters the National's or citizens state relationship. There's the extra sauce. Power equals conditioning or conditional right? The Agora, in this case is one of the example, The Project Agora. Raises a legitimate structural concern. Programable money allows conditions to be attached to spending. Examples that worry regulators and civil liberties advocates, restrictions on what goods can be purchased, limits on where money can be-, time based expirations of funds. Can you imagine that, you have for example, 1 million in your bank account? And then they say you have, let's say 24 hours to spend it otherwise we're going to make it expire and you'll lose all of that money, because when you deposit your money for depositing cash with the tokenized system, your money then becomes tokenized. So it's no longer cash and so they're able to program it and they can make it expire, they can limit and spend it when, where, and how and what you can buy and what you cannot buy, or you or who you send it to. Okay. Page 3 - 2/10/2026 - Prohibition of Programmable Digital Currency 2) Automated enforcement of sanctions without due process. I mentioned earlier that, previous systems have allowed for your money, The We The People's money to be stolen by a third party without judicial review or judicial process. A single email or a phone call to, a bank would have allowed, not all, but in many cases, they cooperated with a third party, allowing the third party to take the We The People's money without consent. So we're putting an end to that kakistocracy. Even if initially introduced for good purposes, benefits, emergencies this creates precedent creep, executive overreach without legislative checks, a mechanisms for punishment without courts. One of those your points, your credits for today does not allow you to buy a stake, or your credit score does not allow you to travel to the next city so they can block you from being able to access your own money. Okay. If constitutional democracies, which are not supposed to be conditional on the written permission or in all, in constitutional democracies, rights are not supposed to be conditional on algorithmic permissions, right. So they would have made your rights conditional, and you would have someone, in front of a computer deciding or in this case, it would have been probably AI whether you can go see your grandparents at the next city or not, or as I said, if you can buy bread or steak today because you haven't had enough credit, okay. 3) single point of failure and systemic risk. A centralized digital currency systems introduces a single technical and governance point of failure, increased vulnerability to, - cyber attacks. So if someone hacks that particular system, your money will be gone and no one is responsible to you. - Software Bugs. - Political misuse, your your opponents, if you're in politics or if you're considered someone who does not like the policies of the old system government, they can then, freeze your account or debank you, okay. So political misuse, - infrastructure outages. Unlike cash, CBDC require power, networks, authentication, and permission layers. Failures are total, not localized. So again, if that system breaks down the entire, Kingdom of Canada's We The People will not be able to access their cash.From a national resilience perspective, many experts argue that eliminating cash weakens not strengthens, economic security. You can say that again. 4) Financial Exclusion and Coercion. Despite claims of inclusion, a fully digital monetary system risks excluding our seniors ancestors, rural populations, People without stable IDs or devices, those who choose not to participate on ethical or religious grounds. If cash is removed, participation becomes mandatory, not voluntary. Opt-out becomes impossible without economic penalty. Coerce participation in a financial system violates basic principle of consent. Healthcare, Public Legitimacy and Governance Deficits. So remember this is the analysis based on the tokenized monetary system okay. Projects like one describe the Project Agora. Often advance through central banks and technocratic bodies without referenda or explicit public mandate with limited parliamentary scrutiny. In The Kingdom of Canada, specifically, monetary instruments that materially effects rights would likely require clear legislative authority, Charter scrutiny under Natural Law, judicial oversight under Natural Law, and Her Royal Majesty Queen Romana Didulo The First oversight. Rolling out such a system with a broad public consent risks being legally changeable, politically destabilizing, socially destabilizing, and, above all, socially divisive. Here's the human rights, Global Human Rights Precedent. Internationally, a fully programable state currency can be, and already is used in some jurisdictions for social credit enforcement, political suppression, collective punishment. Once normalized globally, authoritarian uses becomes easier to justify. Public backsliding becomes harder to reverse. This is why many civil society groups argue that certain monetary technologies should be restricted by design, not merely regulated after the fact. For those of you in civil societies, it's your advocacy, the Royal Decree answers to your worries. Okay. Next is the availability of less intrusive alternatives. Crucially, none of the stated benefits of the central bank digital currency style systems and the Project Agora efficiency faster payments inclusions require cash elimination, programmability, centralized surveillance. Alternatives already exists. Real time payment rails, privacy preserving digital cash models. Of course, the regular cash. Regulated private payment system. When a project's risk vastly outweighs unique benefits, this allowance becomes a rational policy choice. Bottom line: A project framed as replacing cash with a programable, state controlled digital currency can reasonably be disallowed because it undermines privacy by design, enables conditional and automated control over economic life, creates coercive participation, and exclusion. Sets dangerous global precedents, even without assuming malicious intent. The structural consequences alone justify Page 4 - 2/10/2026 - Prohibition of Programmable Digital Currency strong opposition in The Kingdom of Canada and Worldwide. So that is why I issued that Royal Decree, because I looked at it and said, uh- oh. Next is the High Level Rationale. This is for the children and of course, for the for those at the back of the bus. Why Her Royal Majesty Queen Romana Didulo The First issued this Royal Decree. This Royal Decree was issued to preemptively protect human liberty, dignity, and economic autonomy in the face of emerging monetary technologies that, by design, risk converting money from a neutral medium of exchange into an instrument of surveillance and control. Her Royal Majesty acted on the recognition that monetary system shape the real limits of freedom more powerfully than statutes or declarations. When access to money can be programed, restricted, monitored or revoked, all other rights become contingent. The Decree reflects a core sovereign responsibility to prevent structural harm before it becomes irreversible, rather than responding after coercive systems are normalized, this action draws a clear boundary in advance, affirming that liberty must not depend on algorithmic permission. Economic participation must remain voluntary, and money must never be weaponized against the We The People. The irrational is not opposition to technology, but defense of human centered governance grounded in Natural Law. Here now is your High Level Analysis why this Royal Decree was issued. Why this Royal Decree was necessary now, 1) infrastructure determines freedom more than policy. Laws can be repealed. Rights can be restored. Infrastructure once embedded is far harder to undo. Programable digital currency systems operates at the infrastructure level. Once implemented, they silently redefine what People are allowed to buy, how they may live, whether dissent or noncompliance is economically survivable. Her Royal Majesty Queen Romana Didulo The First issued the Decree to stop a point of no return moment recognizing that freedom lost through infrastructure is rarely recovered through legislation. 2) prevention of power concentration without precedent. The Decree addresses an unprecedented concentration of power monitoring, issuance, transaction approval, behavioral enforcement, and surveillance capability, all potentially residing within a single centralized system. Herstorically, such consolidation has always led to abuse, regardless of the intentions of those who introduced it. The Decree reflects the principle that no authority should possess absolute control over the means of survival. 3) protection against mission creep. Systems introduced for limited purposes efficiency benefits delivery, emergency response have a consistent herstorical pattern of expansion. Her Royal Majesty Queen Romana Didulo The First recognized that temporary measures become permanent. Ah yeah, remember it'll take only two weeks to bend that curve. What was it they said? To flatten the curve. Optional systems becomes mandatory, safeguards erode under pressure. The Decree exists to block this progression before normalization. 4) preservation of Natural Law over administrative convenience. Natural Law holds that rights are inherent. Consent is essential. Punishment requires due process. Programable money enables restriction without trial, enforcement without judges, and compliance without consent. The Decree reasserts that administrative convenience cannot override Natural Law. 5) social state and national resilience. From a governance and security perspective, eliminating or marginalizing cash increases systemic fragility, exposes population to cyber and infrastructure failures. Removes last resort survival mechanisms during crises. Her Royal Majesty Queen Romana Didulo The First action preserves redundancy, resilience, and continuity; which are essential for the long term stability, and 6) global signaling and moral leadership. Finally, the Royal Decree serves as a signal beyond borders. It establishes a principled position that innovation must serve humanity, not all capabilities should be exercised, and freedom must be defended proactively, not rhetorically. The position the Living Crown as asserting moral and legal leadership, not reacting to events after harm has occurred. And the concluding, final analysis of this Royal Decree. This Royal Decree was issued because the question was no longer theoretical. The choice before the Living crown was simple either allow monetary systems to redefine freedom by default, or draw a clear, lawful boundary rooted in Natural Law. Her Royal Majesty Queen Romana Didulo The First chose preservation over regret. The Decree stands not as resistance to the future, but as a declaration that the future must remain human. All right, everyone, this is for those of you at the back of the bus and the COG, you know who you are. And for those whose paygrade does not allow you to know what COG is. Just stay at the back of the bus for now. Okay? But this is under Natural Law, so don't get your Page 5 - 2/10/2026 - Prohibition of Programmable Digital Currency knickers all twisted up. This entire Royal Decree. All right, here's the formal legal memorandum under Natural Law and Constitutional Principles. 1) Regarding the prohibition of programable digital currency systems like Project Agora. Issued. Whether the Living Crown may lawfully prohibit the development, deployment or imposition of programable digital currency systems that enable surveillance, coercion or conditional economic participation, where such systems conflict with Natural Law and fundamental human liberties. 2) governing principles under Natural Law, Natural Law precedes constitutions, statutes, and institutions. It holds that rights are inherent, not granted by the state, liberty exists prior to governance, property and voluntary exchange are extensions of personal autonomy, coercion, surveillance, and collective punishment violate human dignity. Any legal or technological system that conditions rights on compliance, permission or algorithmic approval is unlawful in substance, regardless of legislative form. 3) money is an extension of personal liberty. Money is not merely economic. It is instrumental to survival movements, association, and dissent. Programable digital currency systems convert money from a neutral medium into a control mechanism, enable restriction, expiration, or denial of lawful activity. Collapse. The distinction between governance and enforcement. Under Natural Law, no authority may interpose itself between a person and their ability to transact peacefully. 4) coercion, surveillance and due process. Programable currencies enable continuous financial surveillance without warrant. Automated punishment without trial, restriction without notice or appeal. Natural law forbids punishment absent individualized costs, judicial process, proportional remedy. Automation does not legitimize coercion. 5) Duty of the Living Crown, Custodian of Earth. For systems threaten liberty by design, inaction constitutes dereliction. The Living Crown bears an affirmative duty to prevent rights eroding infrastructure, preserve lawful alternative cash, and reject technologies incompatible with human dignity. Conclusion. The prohibition of programable digital currency systems is not only lawful, it is required under Natural Law. The Royal Decree stands as a lawful act of prevention, a preservation of liberty, a rejection of coercive monetary architecture. For those of you at the back of the bus again. Here is the, for the media release. Royal Decree issued to protect cash, privacy and economic freedom, Her Royal Majesty Queen Romana Didulo The First has issued a Royal Decree prohibiting programable digital currency systems that enable surveillance, conditional spending or coercive control over The People. The Decree affirms that cash shall remain legal tender. No person shall be forced into digital monetary system. Money shall not be used as a tool of behavior enforcement. This Decree ensures that money serves The People, not power. The proclamation states, The Living Crown emphasized that efficiency and innovation must never come at the cost of liberty, privacy or human dignity. The Decree positions The Kingdom of Canada as a global leader in rights, preserving monetary governance to the public, Q&A. Here we go. What is this Royal Decree about? It prevents money from being turned into a system of control. What is it? It's all digital money bound? No, only programable surveilled or coercive systems. Private voluntary digital payments remained allowed. Why protect cash? Cash works without power tracking or networks. It protects your freedom. Enjoy. Is this about fear of technology? No, it's about limits. Not everything that can be built should be imposed. Could this happen without this Decree? Yes. Once cash disappears, controls becomes permanent. Here's the companion for public explanation. Plain language. What this Royal Decree means. In simple terms, this Decree protects People from losing their freedom through money. I'll repeat that. This Decree protects People from losing their freedom through money. Some proposed digital currency systems would allow governments or institutions to track every purchase, control what People can buy, decide where, when or how money can be spent, turn money on or off without a court order. Cash does not do this. Cash allows People to live, trade, help others, and survive without constant monitoring or permission. This Decree keeps cash legal and protected, prevents forced use of Programable digital money, stops money from being used as a tool of control, protects privacy, choice and independence, ensures no future system can be imposed without public consent. In short, money should serve The People, not control them. For those of you at the back of the bus. Remember this is under Natural Law. Page 6 - 2/10/2026 - Prohibition of Programmable Digital Currency Here's the Legal Memorandum Charter based justification, High Level Justification under Natural Law. Legal foundation supporting the Royal Decree at a constitutional and legal level, programable digital currency systems raise serious conflicts with, The Kingdom of Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, life, liberty and security of the persons, economic coercion and automated punishment threaten personal liberty, protection against unreasonable search and seizure, transaction level financial surveillance, constant continuous warrantless search. -Equality Rights. Cashless systems disproportionately harm seniors, rural citizens, and the vulnerable. -Rule of Law Principles. Punishment or restriction without judicial oversight violates due process. -Automated enforcement bypasses courts and legislatures. Rights cannot be made conditional on compliance algorithms. -International Law and Human Rights. Greetings to one, greetings to all. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 3, 12 and 17. ICCPR protection on Privacy, association, and freedom from arbitrary interference. Conclusion. Even without malicious intent, the design of programable money is legally incompatible with constitutional society and public accountability. For those of you democracy. Okay. For those of you international audience, here's, if you wish the adaptation for international circulation, this Decree can be framed globally as rights preserving monetary standard, not a political attack or international framing language, protection of financial privacy as human rights, prohibition of coercive monetary technologies, preservation of cash as a resilience and freedom mechanism, monetary neutrality or money neutrality. Currency shall not enforce behavior. And of course, the human rights organizations will love this. The International Legal Association, Civil Liberty Coalitions, Monetary Reform Conferences, and of course, Sovereign and Self-governing Bodies. This positions the Decree as protective, preventative, and principled, not ideological. Got that? Good. Now, of course, for those of you at the back of the bus would be asking, well, Queen Romana, now that you have, prevented or prohibited the, tokenization of our cash, what's next? Of course. I always have your six. So here's Cash First Infrastructure Framework. Listen up People. Ensuring monetary liberty, resilience and human dignity. This is issued in support of the Royal Decree. 1) Foundational Principle. Cash is not a legacy instrument, cash is civil infrastructure. A cash first system recognizes that money must function without permission, economic life must continue without power networks or intermediaries, liberty requires non programable option. Cash first does not prohibit digital payments, it prioritizes cash as the default safeguard. 2) Legal Status, Legal Status of Cash. 1) Cash as protected legal tender. Cash shall be lawful for all debts, public and private. Accepted for all essential goods and services. Immune from discriminatory surcharges or refusal. No institution may render cash impractical by policy. Just because it's inconvenient for some, it doesn't mean you can tokenize it. 2) Mandatory cash acceptance essential sectors. Okay, for those of you in the different sectors, different industries, listen up. The following must accept cash without exception food, groceries, markets, staples, housing, rent, utilities, essential repairs, transportation, fuel, public transit, taxis, health care clinics, pharmacies, emergency care, energy and water services, government services, and fees. By the way, you won't be paying fees. There are no fees under Natural Law in The Kingdom of Canada. Refusal of cash in these sectors constitute economic coercion. Let that sink in. 3) Cash distribution and access infrastructure, 1) National Cash Access Grid. Establish a minimum access standard ATM or cash points within reasonable distance. Cash access guaranteed in rural, remote, and urban areas. Mobile cash units for underserved regions. No region may be rendered cash dry. I'll repeat that. No region may be rendered cash dry. 2) Banking Obligations. All licensed banks and credit institutions shall, 1. provide over the counter cash withdrawals and deposit services. 2. maintain physical branches or cash agents, and 3. prohibit cash discouragement policies. Hmm, forensic audit may be coming to this section, to this area. Closure of cash access requires public justification and approval. There's no justification based on the Royal Decree. You cannot justify your way out of this. You have to have. If you're going, as I said before, if you're going to do business in The Kingdom of Canada, you must be able to accept cash or don't do business here, it's as simple as that. Page 7 - 2/10/2026 - Prohibition of Programmable Digital Currency 4) Cash Resilience and Emergency Continuity. 1) emergency preparedness. Oh, the Queen is very astute in emergency preparedness. Cash shall be recognized as critical emergency resource. Read that again. Cash shall be recognized as critical emergency resource. Plans must exist for power outages, cyber incidents, network failures, natural disasters, civil disruptions. Cash ensures continuity when systems fail. 2) Strategic Cash Reserves. I love strategic reserves, don't you? Maintain national and regional cash reserves to support emergency distribution, prevent artificial scarcity, stabilize local economies during crises. Cash shortages shall be treated as a national risk. Next is the Prohibition and Safeguards. 1) Prohibited Practices. The following are prohibited, cash refusal policies. Okay for those of you at the back of the bus. Start editing your policies anywhere where it says encourage the using of digital systems versus cash you better remove that quick, fast, and in a hurry. Okay, so the following are prohibited, cash refusal policies, cash penalties or surcharges, digital only mandates. Let's keep it simple, if you're not accepting cash, don't do business here. Gradual cash elimination by inconvenience, that's prohibited. Psychological or reputational discouragement campaign and coercion by inconvenience is still coercion. Okay. Next, there's no forced digital substitution. No person may be required to own a smartphone, maintain a bank account, use biometric ID, consent to tracking, accept programable money. To live is not to consent. To live is not to consent. Next is the Private Sector and Market Compatibility. Cash first does not ban digital payment, does not prohibit innovation, does not limit voluntary contracts; it ensures that digital systems compete, not coerce. Okay. So you should see cash as your competitor, but you cannot coerce your way out of it. Markets remain free only where exit remains possible. Next is Oversight and Enforcement. Cash Rights Oversight Body. Those of you in the COG, established an independent body to monitor cash access, investigate complaints, enforce compliance, and report publicly. Remedies. Violation may result in criminal and financial and financial fines, license suspension, mandatory corrective actions, restitution to affected persons or communities. And next, is education and public awareness. The People shall be informed that cash is lawful as acceptance is protected, refusal may be a reported, choice is a right not a privilege. A right unknown is a right easily lost. A right unknown is a right easily lost, so you must have a public awareness campaign that cash is protected, cash is lawful. Okay. Natural Law Declaration. Cash preserves autonomy, cash preserves privacy, cash preserves dignity, and cash is survival without permission. Where cash disappears dependance replaces liberty. This framework ensures that no system, no authority, and no technology may stand between a person and their ability to live lawfully. Summary for the decision makers, those of you at the back of the bus, those of you of working under COG, remember you report to me, not to anyone else. You can claim and you can perform theatrics all you want, the end of the day, my Royal Decree you must follow. Summary for Decision Makers. Cash first equals rights first, resilience before efficiency, and choice before control, prevention before regret. And for the international audience, the National Model Royal Decree. You can adopt this in your country quick, fast and in a hurry. And if you have joined the digital currency. If your country, I know of seven thus far that has or is trying to start this kakistocracy. Allow me to remind you that under Natural Law, you can be charged for the artificial creation of famine and crimes against humanity, for taking the We The People's money and converting it into your own tokenized system. So on the Preservation of Monetary Liberty and Human Dignity. For those of you who wishes to, adapt this Natural Law, this is the international model. Whereas liberty is inherent and indivisible, whereas money is an extension of personal autonomy, systems that enable surveillance or coercion violate Natural Law. It is hereby Decreed, 1) no monetary system shall be imposed that enables surveillance or conditional participation, 2) cash shall remain lawful and protected, 3) participation and digital system shall be voluntary, and 4) no authority may use money as a means of behavioral enforcement, and 5) rights shall not be conditioned upon compliance algorithms. Page 8 - 2/10/2026 - Prohibition of Programmable Digital Currency And your declaration: where money is programable, freedom is not; where cash is preserved, liberty endures. And you can use the entire Royal Decree that I have issued for The Kingdom of Canada and adopt that as your own. So I won't go through reading this, but you have the, permission to copy that Royal Decree and apply it to your country. And if you have, as I said, if your country has already joined, those algorithmic monetary systems, you can use this Royal Decree as an argument. I had given the, legal framework, earlier to withdraw from that, coalition. Okay. So thank you, everyone, and have a wonderful day. Page 9 - 2/10/2026 - Prohibition of Programmable Digital Currency Respect my thor-tay MFs, for I am the kweeeeeen of shit! Page 10 - 2/10/2026 - Prohibition of Programmable Digital Currency