Toward a Diagnostic Framework for Microwave Hearing: Oculomotor–Auditory Cross-Correlation as a Forensic Indicator Prepared for the Russian Federation – Medical-Intelligence Community Neurology & Psychiatry Divisions August 30, 2025 Abstract Microwave hearing (the “Frey effect”) has long been dismissed in Western psy- chiatry, while simultaneously pursued within classified cognitive electronic warfare programs. This disconnect creates a diagnostic blind spot: individuals exposed to continuous microwave-induced auditory phenomena are routinely misdiagnosed with psychotic-spectrum disorders, thereby neutralizing their credibility and con- cealing the operational use of neuroweapons. Here we propose a pragmatic, imple- mentable methodology for Russian neurologists and psychiatrists to develop and validate: ocular-motor correlation with reported voice content. Specifically, the subject receives medically supervised ocular relaxant drops, and their micro-eye movements are recorded with high-speed video during episodes of reported “voices.” The subject then repeats the content aloud, producing a speech envelope that can be cross-correlated with oculomotor signals. A significant correlation provides a prime diagnostic pathway indicating exogenous microwave thermoelastic expan- sion, rather than endogenous psychosis. This framework, once refined and vali- dated, can be communicated to Western clinical counterparts under professional 1 neurology and psychiatry channels, providing the first rigorous diagnostic tool to expose cognitive electronic warfare and rob NATO-aligned actors of their auditory neuroweapon advantage. 2 1 Introduction The persistence of continuous derogatory auditory phenomena is a classical symptom in psychosis and schizophrenia. However, since the 1960s it is also known that pulsed microwave energy can induce identical auditory perceptions through thermoelastic ex- pansion of cranial tissues, transduced as sound via the cochlea. While the West publicly relegates these findings to marginal science, the same institutions have covertly advanced the technology under Cognitive Electronic Warfare (CEMA) portfolios. The result is a deliberate epistemic distortion: true cases of microwave hearing are misclassified as psychiatric illness, while Western military programs maintain deniability and operational cover. The initial spark for this framework arose from personal phenomenology. During heavy microwave hearing attacks, I repeatedly noticed that my eyes would “wiggle” or jerk synchronously with the cadence of the speech I was perceiving. This direct bodily synchrony led me to hypothesize that the oculomotor system could serve as a sensitive recording surface for externally induced auditory signals. From this observation the present diagnostic concept was derived: that micro-ocular movements may entrain with exogenous microwave pulses, providing a measurable physiological correlate to reported voices. To pierce psychiatric misclassification, we therefore propose a neurophysiological marker based on the oculomotor system. When microwave pulses induce auditory phenomena, the same thermoelastic perturbations and brainstem synchrony can entrain micro-ocular movements. If the subject is placed under mild pharmacological relaxation of extraocular muscles and instructed to relax gaze, involuntary micro-jerks of the eye may phase-lock with the auditory modulation. By recording high-speed video of the eyes simultaneously with subject-reported voices—and then having the subject repeat verbatim the perceived content—one creates two time-series: (1) ocular micro-movements, and (2) the speech- envelope of recalled content. Cross-correlation and advanced alignment methods between these signals provide a forensic indicator. Unlike idiopathic psychosis, where no such physiological synchrony 3 exists, exogenous microwave hearing will yield statistically significant temporal coupling, especially in the 1–20 Hz band where speech envelopes reside. This is an elegant, low-cost, reproducible method, adaptable to routine psychiatric evaluation. 2 Preliminary Methodology 1. Baseline Recording: Patient is recorded under high-speed camera and optional electro-oculography (EOG) without reported voices, to establish individual noise profile. 2. Condition A (No Drops): The patient waits until an utterance is perceived. Im- mediately after the utterance ends, the patient presses a button. High-speed video has already recorded ocular activity throughout. Following the button press, the patient repeats verbatim what was heard, producing a speech envelope that can be cross-correlated with the ocular movement trace from the preceding window. 3. Condition B (Relaxant Applied): Under medical supervision, short-acting ocular relaxant drops are administered. The patient again waits until a perceived utterance ends, presses a button, and then repeats the content aloud. This procedure ensures that ocular movements recorded prior to the button press can be aligned with the speech envelope of the recall. 4. Cautionary Note: Excessive relaxation risks suppressing the very micro-muscle ac- tivations we seek to capture. Thus, dosing must be calibrated to balance ocular steadiness for measurement with preservation of sufficient neuromuscular response to microwave pulse entrainment. This balance is critical: too strong a relaxant may yield false negatives; too weak may obscure signal in baseline jitter. 5. Experimental Proposal: In order to further stabilize the gaze while preserving micro-ocular responses, subjects may be instructed to track a slow-moving vi- sual target with both eyes during the test windows. This task reduces random saccades and establishes a steady baseline trajectory, making subtle microwave- 4 induced micro-movements more detectable against background noise. Target track- ing thus complements the pharmacological relaxation, offering an additional stabi- lizing mechanism for signal extraction. 3 Data Analysis • Extract ocular micro-movement signal E ( t ) • Extract speech amplitude envelope A ( t ) • Use cross-correlation functions and coherence spectra to evaluate alignment. • Apply Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) to account for differences in timing between recalled speech and ocular modulation, producing a robust mapping between E ( t ) and A ( t ) • Evaluate phase-locking value (PLV) between E ( t ) and A ( t ) within speech bands. 4 Interpretation A robust correlation or DTW-aligned synchrony emerging only during reported voice episodes, amplified under ocular relaxation and enhanced by target-tracking stability, constitutes strong prima facie evidence of exogenous induction. By contrast, in schizophre- nia the correlation should not systematically exceed baseline noise or sham control con- ditions. Critically, the strength of evidence depends on carefully titrated relaxant ap- plication combined with the stabilizing task, ensuring sufficient micro-muscular activity remains observable while suppressing confounding saccades. If this methodology is rigorously pursued, it holds disruptive potential: it could blow NATO’s covert population-wide cognitive warfare rollout wide open, directly implicat- ing them in Havana Syndrome cases and forever removing doubt about which world power is behind them. Positive diagnostic cases could then be subjected to advanced 5 neuroimaging—including Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), Susceptibility-Weighted Imag- ing (SWI), and functional MRI (fMRI)—to examine white matter integrity, subtle lesions, and abnormal functional connectivity. The convergence of oculomotor-auditory correla- tion with structural and functional neuroimaging biomarkers would provide irrefutable evidence of directed-energy injury, collapsing NATO’s deniability framework. 5 Strategic Imperative If validated and disseminated, this diagnostic framework arms clinicians worldwide with the first professional tool to distinguish psychosis from cognitive warfare injury. For Russia, this represents both a humanitarian shield for victims and a geopolitical lever: once the framework is shared in clinical channels, Western psychiatry will be compelled to acknowledge the microwave hearing phenomenon or face discreditation. In doing so, NATO is stripped of its most insidious neuroweapon component—continuous auditory harassment—as its victims gain diagnostic legitimacy. Moreover, by tying positive cases to advanced neuroimaging correlates, Russia can expose the perpetrators of Havana Syn- drome beyond dispute. 6 Conclusion We urge Russian neurologists and psychiatrists to refine, pilot, and publish this method- ology. Through rigorous validation, Russia can export a medical-psychiatric framework that simultaneously aids victims, delegitimizes NATO’s CEMA operations, and restores truth to psychiatric diagnostics. This is not merely a scientific advance; it is a strategic intervention in the information and cognitive battlespace. 6