1 A nal Schwabs: A n E nviron mentally S ustainable Electronic C urrency System - Shafting the “ Great Reset ” with a move ment towards E nvironmentally a nd Ethically Sustainable Profitabili ty N atoshi S akamoto n atoshi s @ gmx .com http:// www. analschwabs.org / Abs tract. With the advent of Bitcoin and the fall of tradi tional financial systems, the world is i n need of a sustainable and environmentally friendly method s to conduct f inancial tr ansactions ; especially in light of rising transaction fees and rising energy costs associated with conducting transactions on archaic blockchains such as the Bitcoin protocol, and with conducting transactions on congested blockchains such as the E thereum main net protocol Whilst Bitcoin and Ethe reum m ay continue to serve as a st orage of value, t hey are bot h becoming unfeasible blockchains for retail investors to use on a daily basis fo r small transactions or f or conducting transactions o n decentralised exchanges , having regard to the extremely high gas transaction fees associatin g with trading during con gested periods of use of each respective b lock chain protocol ; which are only set to continue to rise in the future in an exponenti al manner as the adoption of cryptocurrency technology by large r numbers of both institutional and re tail investors continues to occur New currency systems must therefore be ad op ted by the diversi fication of retail investors, in order to reduce the con g estion of the current e sta b lished block chain networks to make them more affordable to use. 1. Introducti on In 200 9 the whitepaper b ehind the first mass - adopted digital currency based o ff cryptographica l ly signed digital s ignature s was released as “ Bitcoin: A Peer - to - Peer Electronic Cash System ” , by S Nakamoto [1] , which was the very first generation of blo c kchain technolog y as we know it t oday Although there are modern implemen tation s of generation 3.0 blockchain te chnologi es such as Car dano , which is being de veloped by Charles Hoskinson [2], a s well as Polkado t which is being developed by Gavin Wood , who are both e x Ethereum d evelop ers ; In this authors view despite the fact both Cardano and Polkadot are protocols built by credible deve lopers , and despite the fact both protocols have low trans action fee costs, n ei ther Cardano nor Polka dot currently has a f ully developed ecosystem which can fac ilitate trading on decentr alised exch anges. This paper aims to discuss more economically s ustainable cryptocurr encies, which are fully developed a nd deployed , where the ecosystems and architecture exist today, and wh i ch can meet the growing need of blockchain scalability to solve con g e st ion issues , a s well as in credibly high ga s fee s which can exceed the transacted amount by a factor of tenfold for small transactions (e.g. pa ying a $100 gas fee for a tr ansfer of $10 o f wealth) T hese realities make the cur rent net w orks in this authors view, entirely uns ustainable for retail 2 investors who require a financial instrument to facilitate trading in small volumes in the current market climate, due to the older Ethereum and B itcoin networks not being able to scale up to meet t he needs of the current market size. Both the Ethereum network and the Bitcoin protocol have scalability problems, largely in part to the fact that both are built on old technology which was not bui lt t o support the current volu me of users , and built on concepts that were still in their in fancy. This means t hat these networks are both not ideal for the daily transfer of wealth , as the fees can be quite high at peak usage times, and th e transaction time s can be quite long, and the fee amount and transaction times of bo th protocols are only set to become expon entially higher and longer as the adoption curve co ntinues to grow wit h exponentiality 2. Security of modern blo c kchains and inhe re nt value of secur e networ ks Bitcoin w as a technolog ical combination of a secure timesta mping method service developed by H. Massias, X.S. Avila, and J. - J. Quisquater, [ 3 ]. I n addition , the principles of sending digital cash by the way of digital transa ctions pioneered by W . Dai ’s " b - mon ey," [ 4 ] , and A. Back ’ s “ Hashcash ” [ 5 ] which involved using cryptographically signed keys attached to each unit o f currency whenever it i s exch anged from o ne d igital storage device to another (otherwise known as a private or public key) , in or d er verify the authe nticity of each unit of digitak currency and to solve the double spending problem which plagued digital currencies such as “ b - money ” , an d the pioneers who c ame even before that. Two years after pu blishing his white paper in 2013 [ 6 ], In 2015, Vitalik Buterin deployed the first version of Ethe reum after developing the protocol with Gavin Wood , and Charles Hoskinson, which was the first g eneration 2.0 blockchain technology , which was the first to add smart contract funct ionality, which i s a fu nct ion built onto all ERC - 20 and BSC - 20 compliant token s which are in circu l ation today Ethereum aimed to sol ve the p roblem of payments being made on a cond itional basis, if c ertain parameters were met. The Ethereum protocol is also x10 more energ y effi cient in terms of h ow much less energy it t akes to compute al gorithms associated with transactions compared to the Bitcoin protocol ; whilst also pr oviding a t ransaction s peed a round 15 ~ transactions per second, which is around x 3 faster than the Bit coin p rotocol ’s speed of a pproximately 5~ transactions per second. [7] Unfortunately, there is a b ig s calability problem to this day, as the protocols of Bitcoin and Ethereum were not designed to support so many users at one time. VISA networks process pay ments anyw here between 5,000 - 15,000 ~ transactions per second, and therefore are naturally built to support a much larger ecosystem Many people have raised the question as to wha t kind of inherent value a digital currency such as Bitcoin could have withou t havi ng anything tangible to back it s value Is it a n asset, and does it have any intrinsic value? With respect to Bitcoin, t he i ntrinsic value of Bitcoin comes not only from its marke t val ue, but also the security of the protocol due to each bitcoin i mprint ing a digital cryptographic signature of the last owne r onto each coin as each transaction occurs , which is a mechanism in p lace to identify each bit coins validity in terms of whether or not it belong s to the true original blockchain , by determining whether the ownership of eac h bi tcoins c an be pro perly traced back to its block of origination from th e origin al blockchain by verifying the digital signatures attached to each coin. In addition, the decentralised nature of a protocol such as Bitcoin gives it in trinsic value, meaning even people of consi d erable influence such as Satoshi Nakamoto woul d have no capacity to change t he protocol once it was deployed. No one person controls Bi t coin, but the governance system of the protocol requi re s a n almost unan imous consensus of users who use the protocol to vote in favo u r on any pro posed change , before the pr otocol could ever be changed. Non - reversible transactions are also favourable when it comes to merchants protecting themselves 3 from modern day fraud tech ni ques, such as charge back scams , which also give Bitcoin a further in trinsic value. The longer a pr o of of work p rotoc ol s uch as Bitcoin exists, the more secure it becomes Not only does a malicious actor hav e to have over 51% of the total computational po wer in the entire Bitcoin network to have any cha nce at forking the B itcoin protocol with a fa lse bl ockchain which may include a giant false transaction or double spend , but the longer the Bitcoin proto col exists and the real Bitcoin blockchain is not compromised by attac kers, the more secure the Bitco in network becomes due to the nature of the poo led co mputational min ing of transactions w hich occur within th e Bitcoin protocol , and the fact the Bitcoin blockchain increases in size the longer it exists means that any attacker must have enough computational power to write a fake blockchain , which exce eds th e collective computational power of 51% of the Bitcoin network , in addition to th e entire len gth of the Bit coin proto col ’ s exist e nce. Hacker s also have an in centive not to attack the Bitco in network wh ere they own the sup ply of th e currency in quest ion, a s public knowledge of such a network attack could quickly devalue such a currency to an attackers own Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency assets may become extre mely devalued as a result, due to the fact that m ost other cryptocurre ncies have their pr ice pegge d, in m ost part, to t he value of Bitcoin. These same security advantages, also exist in modern g eneration 2 .0 blockchain technol ogies such as ETC, ETH, ERC - 20 and BSC - 20 ; as well as for g eneration 3 .0 blockchain technolo gies such as ADA and DO T De spite the fact generation 3 blockchain technol ogies such as ADA (Cardano) and DOT (Polkadot ) exist and can be t raded with low fees , neither gener ation 3 p rotocol has a fully established e cosystem for trading on decentralised exchanges , no r a decentralised e xchange with a ny considerable liquidity. 3. High t ransact ion fee co sts and confirm ation times using con gested networks to trade on decentralised exchanges Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 1. ab ove - $60 - $100 g as fees on a conjected Figure 2. a bove - $6 - $7 Gas fee s on a ERC - 20 ne twork tr ading on U niswap, which will congested BSC - 20 network trading on likely only continue to rise in price as the Pancakswap which will likely a lso adoption curve of Uni swap continues upwards c ontinue to rise in price as adoption of expone ntially. Pancake swap increa ses , but likel y not as quickly or at such an unaffordable rate for retail inves tors. 4 Cu rrently a large proportion of trading vo lume occurs on decentralised e xchange s, above is a figure of the gas fees associa ted with a transaction on the Ethereum M ainnet (Figure 1) and on the Binance S mart Chain (Figure 2) This author asserts that if the total tr ad ed liqu idity volume was shared even ly between the Ethereum m ain net and the Bina nce S m art Chain ; then the transaction fees on the E thereum main net , and confirmation times for tran sactions, would both reduce consi derably. In addition, retail invest ors and traders can currently benefit from the low tradin g fees associated with confirmi ng transac tions on the Binance Smart C hain. It therefore reasonably follows, that due to the high waiting times for con firmation of transactions during con gested network periods at pea k usage times, and due to the ext remely hi gh transaction fees associate d with usi ng the Ethereum main net to trade on decentralised exchanged ; that both the ERC - 20 protocol in its current state do es not have the capa city to provide retail investo rs who require a decentralised platform to conduc t large quantities of small trad e volume t ransactions , due to the high volume o f users exceeding the capacity of what the ERC - 20 blockchain infrastructure w as built to support The ERC - 20 network is not ideal for near instantaneous transact ions a t low costs when the network usage is hig h, and the refore it may be concluded that distrib uting the con gestion l oad across different networks is essential to achieve lower transaction costs , which may be done by retail investors diversifying th eir holdings outside of the ERC - 20 n etwork. The Bitc oin protoc ol and the Ethereum main net a re not inherently scalable p rotocols, conducting transactions at approximately 5 - 7 ~ Transactions pe r second for Bitcoin [ 7 ] and between 10 - 15 ~ Tr ansactions per secon d for the Ethereum protocol s (ERC - 20, E TC and ETH) [ 7 ] , and th ere fore this author holds the view that the B itcoin proto col is better suited as a longer term storage of value in the c urrent circumst ances due to its low transactio n speed , due to the widespread adoption of both aforementioned protocols in conj unction wi th the inherent scalability limitation s of both protocols , as well as due to t he securit y benefits of both protocols as discuss ed earlier in this paper T he Binance Smart Chain B SC - 20 protocol , is built as an identi cal fork of the E RC - 20 protoco l , and c urrently has extremely low gas fees which mak e smaller tra nsactions affordable , as transactions conduc ted on the Ethereum main net on decentralised exchanges are currently fluctuating bet ween $60 - $100 USD for an individual transact ion, which can ex ceed the price and volume of the transaction itself b y a factor of 10 - 100 for a significan t portion of the developing world and the lower and middle class retail investors and traders. The BSC - 20 protocol is p seudonymous like the B itcoin and Ethereum prot ocols , and it also bec omes more resistant to blockchain double spending hacks the longer it exists , due to the nature of blockchains growing in size over time. It also has very low gas fees compared to the Ethereum network at th is moment in time , despite t he fact that BSC - 20 is a fork of the ERC - 20 protocol. Referr ing to Figure s 1. and 2. a bove, it can be seen that the Binance S mart Chain BSC - 20 protocol pro vides a co st - effective alternative to the ERC - 20 network when enga ging in Decentralised Finance app lications, w ithout los ing the benefits of security or the benefi ts of using an establ ished protocol. In terms o f traders engaging with de centralised exchange ap plications such as Uni s w ap and Pan cake s wap , in this author ’ s view at this present moment in time t he BSC - 20 protocol i s proving to be not only a sustainable protocol for traders interested in the decentralised f inance tra ding ecosystems , but also a reliable and trustwort hy ecosystem There is a disc laimer to be sa id that not all ERC - 20 and BSC - 20 to kens a re crea ted alike , but neither is any currency or team. The US Government is now co nsiderin g minting another 2 trillion Uni ted States Dollars. 5 Whilst some may consider both Uni s wap and Pancake s wap to have very dub i o u s names and jocular ima gery ; whic h may put off some les s experi enced dece ntralised fi nance traders The fact remains that Uni s wap is currently the largest decentralised exchange by tradi ng volume, and Pancake s wap is owned by the largest decentralised exchan ge owner , Chang p eng Zhao , the founder of Binance [ 9 ] , so in this authors eyes the pla tform Pancake s wap mo st definitely ha s merit when it comes to its trust and credibility as a plat form. 4 Opportunity for growth and economic redi strib ution What sets ANL T oken ap art from others is that it provides the c ommuni ty with an opportunit y f or growth due to i ts inherently limited supply volume if they belie ve in the protocol , and as the protocol itself i s fully developed there is no risk of AN L Token ever experienci ng a fork of protocol due to an update On Dece mber 6 2013 ; The Dogecoin protoco l was deployed as a token fork of the Litecoin protocol [ 10 ] , although this model, due to the currentl y extremely large total supply volum e of 130,000,000,000 out of a n infinit e un mined supply, hardly a n asset which can be c onsidered scarce s uch as gold ; b itcoin , or a nal s chwab token s (anal schw abs) A total supply volume of even 130 billion, notwithstanding the fac t that supply is forever increasing, is sadly not a good model to provide th e public an o pportunity for the economic redistribution for wealth. Thi s author like s to think of Dogecoin as a raft in the ocean, trying to travel great distances but not getting very far, compared to th e structure of Bitcoin which makes it a s a ship in t erms of how far it can travel The c apacity for growth of any currency is inherently dependant on a currency ’ s current market cap, it ’ s fully l iquidated market cap, and its total supply volume 24 h our trading volume is a tool in this writers view which is bett er us ed to identify opportunit y in the sense of whether or not act ivity, and mom entu m, exists in a market The same can be said for Cardano’s protocol with respect to its total supply volume of 45,000,000,000 and its market cap, the leftover opportunity f or ec onomic redistribution and growth i s not as great as it onc e was. In fa irness to Cardano, they have solved the problem of scalability with their Hydra network and also achieved minimal fees whilst doing so, which is proving to be an ecosystem which ca n sup port the world economy with minimal transac tion fees. T he community they alre ady have, in absence of a fully worki ng ecosystem is commendable to say the least. T he visions that Cardano has encroaches upon what Satoshi originally envisione d with res pect to truly decentralised and autonomously ope rating financial sys tems which are above the influence of even the most influential in dividuals , and the Cardano community it s elf is larger than most others to t he point that Cardano has become much more than a n t echnology asset like most other centralise d virtual c urrencies are , but rather a whole ecosystem which can govern itself, support and fund itself and the users of its e cosystem , and therefore i n th is auth or ’ s view the Cardano protocol is largely becom ing i ts own ecosystem , which could wage r that of a country , with a n entirely decentr alised and autonomous operation of banking, governance and investment systems. Economic reality dictates that institutional invest ors will adopt major currencies like Cardano, due t o its uninflatable nature, as well as any other currency that proves to provide additional merit and benef it over traditional financial instruments which are d erived from fiat syste ms. The same can be said about ANL Token, a s the world needs more e conomically and environmentally sustainable currenc ies now which they can trust to use as a storage of value , no t wit hin the next 2 - 3 years , and in this author ’ s view the ANL token built on the BSC - 20 protocol is fit to achieve that purpose 5 Anal Schw ab Token eco n o m ic s and a llocation 6 A nal S chwab tokens (al so known as ANL token , or Anal Schwabs if referred to i n mu ltiple ) are an environmentally friendly cryptocurrency with minimal transaction fees due to it existing on an uncongested network. Anal Sch wab s are an env ironmentally friendly currency as they be nefit from the same energy costs to conduct transactions a s Ethereum [7] , as ANL token is based on the ERC - 20 and BSC - 20 protocols [8] There is a fixed maximum supply of 19,000,000 of Anal Schwabs (AN L tokens) which cannot be mined or minted, which i s based on the BSC - 20 an d ERC - 20 protocols and therefore shares the same value p ro positions of security a s a s tor age of value , however it comes with minimal trading fe es which encour ages widespread adoption A nal Schwabs are a “ meme - curren cy ” , which funct ions exactly like a regular currency, similar to Dogecoin - but with a total sup ply volume similar to Bitcoin, and is compliant with the World Economic Forum ’s Great Reset aspirations of bringing a new, mor e sustainable global economic system to the wor ld. Anal Schwab tokens are divisible to 18 decimal places , and the smallest unit of an Anal Schwab is known as a Natoshi. ( the smallet unit is 1 Natoshi = 10 - 1 8 ANL). 1.000000000000000000 ANL Token = 1 A nal Schwab 0.000000000000000000 ANL Token = 1 Natoshi A nal Schwab token s exist on the Binance Smart Chain under the token ticker “AN L” and the name “ Ana l Schwab ” Storage of A nal Schwab occurs in a Binance Smart C hain compatible wallet, such as MetaMas k, also known as an ANL cavity. A nal Schwab , o therwise known as ANL Token; is an autonomously operatin g protocol, and a fork of t he fully developed Binance Smart Chain prot ocol, making the ANL token protocol fun ction as a decentralised autonomously run or ganisation, or DAO. A nal Schwab token s are de signed to be dis tributed in a n equitable manner , entirely to the public, as well as being designed to be a scar ce resource like gold, whilst existing in enough quantity to have utility as a currency, simil ar to bitcoin 80 % of all ANL t ok ens which will ever exist are avai lable to buy on Pancake s wap starting at 20c per token in BNB token in Q1 2021, in a completely pub lic offering with no private allocations to ven ture capital firms, launc hpads or to private in vestors. The remaining 20 % of the total supply volume of ANL tokens have bee n allocated between a developer w allet for the d evelopment fees and operational costs inv olving social media platforms ( 5 % of total ANL ) , and to a treasury wallet ( 1 5 % of to tal ANL ) which are allocated for funding airdrops to build and grow a community There are no frozen assets for future listings or development contract s for external decentralised applications , listings on centralised exchanges may occur naturally in time w ith enough community adoption Ticker: ANL Smart Contract link: B SCS can B lockchain E xplorer 7 Inflation mechanism s The market cap of A nal Schwab token will be a lmost entirely fully diluted at launch, with 8 0 % of the to tal supply of coins being made available to trade on Pancake s wap, w hich ensures a minimised impact of infl ation and market manip ulation over time The treasury wallet of 1 5 % of the total fund s will decrease over time as they are earned through community participation, however the a llocati on of coins by the way of will d ecreas e in quantity 7 in a manner most similar to the halving me chanism which occurs with Bitcoin ’ s protocol, in accord ance with how m any treasury coffer coins are left to be earned Despite the fact the number of coins allocat ed to individual airdrop rewards will decrease over time as the protocol grows, the quantity o f persons who are given airdrop rewards will increase as adoption incr eases. 8 Airdrops and Treasury – Proof of Adoptio n incentive and rew ard model 1 5 % of the total supply volume of A NL to kens have been allocated to a treas ury wallet for the community to earn ANL t oken by the parti c ipation in free community airdrop , s and referral based airdrops , wh ich anyone can beco m e eli gi ble for by providing enough social me dia shares and retweets or proof o f adoption through referral , or otherwise by showing they are ma king an effort to grow the ANL ecosystem and comm unity. These airdrop programs are planned to occur on the official T witter, Telegram and Discord on a fortnightly - monthly basis. The rewards allocated in individual airdrop rewards from the treasury wallet containing 1 5% of the total supply of ANL tokens will diminish over time as adoption of ANL token continues, i n a halving mechanism sim ilar to what is seen in the Bitcoin protocol. Winners of ANL Token airdrops allocated from the community treasury in referral airdrops are given on an on - effort basis , a lthough some airdrops with no conditions will occur where entrants are selected on a random basis. In referra l - base d airdrops e ntries are ranked in accordance with how much exposure t he ecosystem receives a r esu lt of the shared informa tion , in order t o determine the selected winners of the airdrop. T his including sharing information made from official social media han dles regarding any official airdro ps , news or other ways to encourage engagement with the protocol. The more users that interact with share d links or posts in relation to Anal Schwab tokens , the higher ranked an ind ividual ’ s entr y will be in the referral based air drop s ; and the winners of referral based airdrops ar e determined by the qua lity of expo sure they hel p to create for the A NL to ken protocol ’s ecosystem. The eligibility cri teria to receive airdrops in referral - based airdrops is solely dependent on providing proof of a doption , by shari ng social media or bene fitting the community in s ome way. Rewards are allocated on a case - by - case basis depending on the proportion of benef it given to the community by any individual The schedule for th e distribution and vesting of ANL tokens wi thin the treasury wallet by the way of community aird rop s will vary de pending on the speed of adoption , and the frequency and size of tokens supplied in air d rops will increase as adoption sp eed and community size incr eases , and will s tart occurring on a fortnightly - monthly basis in Q1 2021. As the adoption of ANL t oken increases, the amount of ANL t ok ens di strib uted in each airdrop as well as each individual airdrop reward will decrease , however the amount of rewards will increase and a mount of airdrops will i ncrease There is no limit to how many entries o r airdrop allocations any one person can win in any r eferra l based or free airdrop event. This helps to ensure that early adopters are rewarded in proportion to their trust and effort , a nd the frequency may begin to decrease however ANL Token aims to facilitate economi c dis tr ibution of airdropped tokens in a capacity which wouldn’t adversely affect the market price. When the total supply volume of ANL tokens in the treasury wallet reduce by half, the awards allocated in the community airdrops will also hal ve ; howe ver, as the adoption of ANL token 8 continues to grow, the amount of airdrops will decrease but the size of allocations in airdrops will increase to accommodate for the new volume of community members. 8 Halving mechanism and airdrop vesting schedu l e The halving mechanism o n co mm unity treasury coins dedicated fo r airdrops will work in the following stages: | Stage | Tokens in treasury | Individual airdrop a llocations | Dis tribution of allocations 1 2 ,8 5 0,000 ANL 300 AN L per drop reward 100 drops per event in 47 airdrop events (30,000 ANL per event ) HA LVING OCCURS 2 1 , 4 40 ,000 ANL 1 50 A NL per drop reward 200 drops per event in 24 airdrop even ts ( 30 , 0 00 ANL per event) HALVING OCCURS 3 7 2 0 ,000 ANL 75 ANL per drop reward 200 drops per event in 24 airdrop events (15,000 ANL per event) HALVING OCCURS 4 36 0 ,000 ANL 37 5 ANL per drop reward 3 00 drops per event in 1 6 airdrop eve nts (1 5 ,000 ANL per event) HALVING OCCURS 5 180 ,000 ANL 1 8. 7 5 ANL per drop reward 4 00 dr ops per event in 1 2 airdrop events ( 7,5 00 ANL per event) HALVING OCCURS 6 90 , 000 ANL 9.3 75 ANL per drop reward 500 drops per event in 8 airdrop events ( 4 , 697.5 ANL per event) HALVI NG OCCURS 7 45 ,000 ANL 4. 6 875 ANL per drop reward 6 00 drops per event in 8 airdrop events ( 1875 A NL per event) HALVING OCCURS 8 22,500 ANL 2.343 AN L per drop reward 800 drops per event in 6 airdrop events (1874 ANL per event) HALVING OCCURS 9 11,250 ANL 1.171 ANL per drop reward 100 0 drops per event in 5 airdrop event s (1,1 71 ANL per event) HALVING OCCURS 10 5 , 395 ANL 0.5 ANL per drop reward 1 000 drops per event in 1 1 airdrop events ( 5 00 ANL per event) 9 9. Conclusion With regard s to the im pending co llapse of the current fin ancial system s, Klaus Sc hwab o f the World Economic Forum has prom pted for a “ Great R eset ” of the current financial systems , where we own nothing a nd we will be happy about it. In this author ’ s view he is correct in the s ense that there is a great reset o f the financial systems prompted by the collapse of those systems, and a huge econom ic re distribution of wealth occurring now as ins titutions move their assets from fiat - based currencies into cryptocurrencies , and those who come along for the ride on the n ewer metaphorical “ bo ats ” will likely be very happy. In this authors view, A N L t okens ha s the cap acity to provi de the world with a great b oat of opportunity, to “ sail ” the market same len gths as Bitcoin did This occurs if the public metaphorically “ buil d s a new boat ” which they can all collectively belie ve in and ride together , w hich we can only do by spreading the wor d about an eco sys t em and currency , and believing in what a c urrency and protocol stands for Bitcoi n ’ s boat sailed away all the way from $ 0.05cents to $60,000 USD. It is ulti mately the public an d a n ecosystem ’ s community ’ s strength, that deci des the success o r failure of that system , even for syst e m s that ha ve pro ven p otential t o work. T he an swer to the woes of capitalism is not a socialis tic or communistic future where all own n othing, as the W orld Economic Forum envisioned, but rather a capitalism where the re cannot be m onop olies or c ompanies which grow s o large that they become too big to fail Adam Smith, who is regarded as the father of m odern capitalism, actuall y pr oposed and envi sioned th at there be a limit to how big a company c an grow in order to prevent marke t monopolies. This reality however was not the impl ementation of capitalism humanity received , and therefore in this author ’ s conc lusion the diversification of attention and investments and a free ma rket essential in order to prevent further monopolies in any indu stry, and to reduce the control that current monopolies have If humanity still values freedom and free ma rkets , diversifying our attention to new comp etitors instead of buying goods or using monopolies such as Amazon , G oogle, You T ube or Faceb ook can benefit humanity by mini mising the control that corporate mono polies have , a s was truly envi sioned by the inventor of modern capitalism Adam Smith , and this author asserts that th e only way to make that happen is to co ntinue to build and support decentralised protocols and f inancial instruments which have th e capacity to provide opportunity , due to the economics of the currency in question ANL t oken is built on an e c os ystem that alr eady has proven potential (ERC - 20 and B SC - 20 ) , the benefits of s ecu rity of those proto cols Considering t he fact that Do ge co in in 2021 currently has a $ 7 .5 bill ion dollar market ca p italisation , it may be conclude d t hat people will in vest in and believ e in anyth ing they want . A s long as pe ople believe in something , there is some poten tial fo r success. In addition, the BSC - 20 protoc ol is proving itself to not onl y be a n establ ished ecosystem for decentralised finance and trad ing , but also a safe and reliable financial instrument with a credible and reputable owner, with significantly lower fees ; which may be more suit able to meet the needs of retail in vestors in this given moment in time by facilit ating a finan cial instrument for inexpensive transaction costs in an e cosystem w hich is developed an d trustworthy ANL token s eeks to provide even better op portunity than Do gecoin and ADA considering it ’ s limited and scarce supply ANL token is highly resistant to in flation as the total supply volume which can ever exist al ready exists, and , there is no risk that ANL token will ever be forke d int o a newer pro tocol due to an u pdate ; or due to d isagreeing developers , as ANL token already does all that it needs to do 10 T he re is a potential for gr eat community which could come fr om the wide spread adoption of ANL token, which is in this author ’ s view the most vital component for any coin, token or stock ’ s success or failure In this authors view, the wor l d re quires equal prop erty ownership opportunities, economic redistribution, and ethical and sustainable profitability , eith er mandated by law or imposed with very lucrative tax conc essions in o rder for ethical and sus tainable profit to be more profitable than unsustainable and un ethical profit ; rather than a “ Great Reset ” which entails no property ownership for the middle and lower class, and all property owned by institutions and ba nks which are period ically leased to the middle and lower classes. The only way the lower and middle class will achieve th is, is by choosing and bel ie ving in newer currencies to invest in in , but s uch currencies must have economic properties which are con ducive to growth and opportunity, which is not possible concerning currenc ies with an infinite potential supply and circulating supply volume in the billions such as Dogecoin By collective mass a doption, humanity can force institutions to move in the sa me direc tion the public collectively desires the market direction of tra ded finances to go in If this was no t true, then Dogecoin would have never been listed on the inst itutional investing platfo rm Robin h oo d ’s exch a nge [11] ; B y picking , believing and b acking the right currencies , and b uilding their communities, humanity can also experienc e major e conomic redistribution of wealth in the process , which is inherently not possible for a Litecoin token such as Dogecoin due to its inherent token eco n omi cs and its infinite supply. If enough people were to adopt ANL token as a currency and help to gr ow and build its community , then the institutional investors will have no choice but to rec ognise it , just as they did for Dogecoin in 2018. If you think of Bitcoi n as a ship, and Dogecoin as a raft, then you might appreciate t hat the token econ omics of ANL Token means it has the capacity to go a very long way, in ad dition to the fact that they could become quite popular once a community exists which acts as a drivi ng force for ad option. R eferences [1] S. Nakamoto , “ Bitcoin: A Peer - to - Peer Electronic Cash System ” , 200 8 [2] C. Hoskinson, “ WHY ARE WE BU ILDING CARDANO? A Subjective Approach. ” , 2020 [3] H. Massias, X.S. Avila, and J J. Quisquater , "Design of a secure time stampi ng service with minima l trust requirements," In 20th Symposium on Information Theory in the Benelux, May 1999 [4] W. Dai , "b - mon ey," http: //www.weidai.com/bmoney.txt, 1998. [5] A. Back , "Hashca sh - a denial of service counter measure," http://www.hashcash.o rg/pap ers/hashcash.pd f , 2002. [6] B . Vitalik , “ Ethereum White Paper: A NEXT GENE RATION SMART CONTRACT & DECENTRALIZED APPLICATION PLATFORM ” , 201 8 [Accessed 2 6 March 2021 ] [7] Medium . 2017. Proof of Work vs. Proof of Stake: the Ecolog ical Footprint. [ONLINE] Availa bl e at : https://medium.com/t qtezos/proof - of - work - vs - proof - of - stake - the - ecological - footprint - c58029faee44 , TQ Tezos [Acces sed 28 March 2021] [8] Def iprime . 2021. “ From Ethereum to Binance Smart Chain. ” Available at: https://defipri me.com/binance - smart - chain , 2021, W . M. Peaster [Accessed 28 March 2021]. [9] ccnworldtech. 2020. “ Pancakeswap Review. ” Avai lable at: https://ccnworldtech.com/pancakeswap - review/ . [Accessed 28 Marc h 2021] [10] B . Markus, P. Lodder , “ Dogecoin Core [DOGE, Ð] ” . [ONLINE] Available at: https://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin/blob/master/README.md , 2013 [Accessed 28 March 2021]. [11] Dogecoin Robin h ood exchan ge listing . Available at: https://robinho od.com/cr ypto/D OGE , listed in 2018 [Accessed 28 March 2021]