“ Torah - Based Psychoanalysis For Life - Literacy ” ( Original Torah - Revolutionary Psychoanalytical Treatises Ably Decoding Function) All Original Pioneering Science Work In Psychoanalysis By Jolivette Bodon Gonzalez Alvarado Dedication: I D edicate this book above all TO THE G - D OF ISRAEL HASHEM WHO Has Given me all of my talents and my rightful intellect level , and WHO Miraculously Sustains Me, that this Holy Science Work Of Inspired Enlightenment m ay come to full light , and be accessed by many who have true need of this work. Afterwards , I de dicate this book to my factual ly native and ancestral Great Britain , and to our Most Illustrious Queen Elizabeth Windsor , Long may she Reign! Afterwards, I dedicate this book , t o my factual G - D Appointed Mentor who is widely known (especially within the United States) as Dr. Peter Damian Richardson May he successfully fulfill all of G - D ’ s True Purposes For his exalted p erson w ith C omplete genuine obedience Afterwards, I dedicate this book to my e arthly father , who has taken for mainstream purposes the Hebrew name Shelomo (Solomon) Ben David, b ut whose mainstream known name before was Hermes Gonzalez Kilikimakos. Centre Painting on front co ver: "A Gemorrah Lesson". By Zalman Kleinman Kohelet/Ecclesiastes 1:18 (A Prophecy Truly Fulf illed) Caution Given : This is a Holy S cience Book containing Holy Biblical P assages , Inspired Information, and the frequent Respectful USE OF THE G - D OF ISRAEL ’ s NAME. Please take care of this book properly, an d do not take this book into unclean places, and treat this book with gre at respect because of the Holy T hematic C ontent within!!! This is a REAL science book giving you access to revolutionary Torah - Based science. My Original Torah Psychoanalytical Work – Part Two --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Reality Of What Is Alternate (Written: February 18 th 2017 - 38 Years Of Age) By Jolivette Bodon Gonzalez Alvarado Alternate is a term sorely abused and grossly misunderstood. Alternate automatically factually implies choice, and choice cannot exist as a possibility - defined state without the act of sele ction , giving identifying - status to a particular selected - choice. The prelude of a selected choice is always diversity of consciously determined outcomes. From a plurality of choices , a conscious choice, exercising the act of selection, forms a determined outcome , represented by a selected choice. That which is fixed in the unchangeable nature of its truth - defined state can never be alternate, for alternate implies the realistic possibility of choosing something else without causing a cessation of tr uth. Facts, for an example, must have fixed nature - revealing elements pertaining to the realistically - identifying state which is manifesting the genuine truth of what a fact reveals. One cannot choose preference over fact as a replacement for that fact. O ne can, however, choose to do things which can lay the existence - forming - groundwork of future facts (any evolving future state which then truly becomes factual). Example: A person who now knows two languages can learn three more languages, therefore in th e future it will be a fact that the person knows five languages. The five fixed nature - revealing elements of any fact are : 1) truth of cause, 2) truth of functional state , of what is being assessed to determine the fact 3) truth of activity order 4) truth of activity orientation 5) sequence of verifiable manifestation - effects Facts are recognized as facts, greatly in part, due to the verifiable effects of that which has been manifested, which makes that fact realistically - recognizable. A fact ex ists impacting a dimensional - space of time as a fixed testament to the reality of what truly occurred, of how something truly operates, or of anything highlighting the truth of a series of manifested outcomes which formed the fact being rightfully acknowle dged, and thus cannot be replaced by preference seeking to vainly negate that fact! An “alternate fact” fallibly implies replacing an authentic fact with a convincing preference - based falsehood , submitting to the manipulation of that preference. Theref ore, we can sanely conclude for the worthy love of logic that there is no such thing as an alternate fact! The term alternate fact is a mind - conditioning - fallacy utilized by those who hate the reality of something, and who wish to hoodwink others into thin king that their denial of that truth i s “respectable”. A fact is the product of stably - identified fixed outcomes. That which is still not resolved by an outcome is still not a fact. All that is manifested triggers activity which leads to an outcome. The n ature of an outcome , and its genuinely related factors (manifested elements truthfully associated to what leads to an outcome) clarifies the truth of whatever state is really represented by a fact. Reality is never fickle, because what is real in its mani fested state must give substantial - structure to that fixed (yet ongoing purpose) of what is accomplished comprehensively through actual truth. Finality is never the goal of fact, but realistic evolution, because depending on what the nature of a fact is, a ctions are taken to shape an ongoing path of outcomes. Alternate can credibly exist, not as fact, but as a descriptive component accurately defining a reality - based system of possibility - selection. -------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What Is Emotion? (Written: February 19 th 2017 - 38 Years Of Age) By Jolivette Bodon Gonzalez Alvarado Emotion is daily experienced by most people on earth (there are some people who consistently feign emotion for public perception , rather than to genuinely feel emotion). Emotion, based on rational awareness , is an absolute health n ecessity. To be aemotional is psychologically and spiritually unhealthy, and eventually leads to immorality. The constant truthful exhibition of genuinely manifested Biblical - morality is based on rationally - oriented emotion, which varies in response to non - imaginary experiences encountered. Self - restraint does not in any way imply lack of emotion, but the proper guidance of emotion - exhibition according to moral - propriety, in order to facilitate the truly psychologically/spiritually healthy and socially - productive expression of the person exhibiting the emotion. Emotions have to be expressed in a way which promotes Biblically - based morality and candid progressive interaction between people for the purpose of collective societal - health. Most virtues requ ire for authentic emotions to be genuinely expressed in order for those virtues to truly exist within the person who authentically possesses them. Emotions exist in varying intensities of expression, ranging from mild to almost forceful, within the emanated purpose expressing a personal/social demand. Therefore, what is emotion? Most people feeling emotion do not fully understand what emotion is in the absolute sense, or the structured - manifestation - modes of emotion in variable stages of display , fo r necessary social purposes of both an individual and collective nature. For “No man is an island” as the old adage goes, and what impacts one individual will inevitably affect at least a small group of other individuals. One has to understand and promote emotion in order to analyze correctly, because emotion expressed, and also documented , is a main component of the conscious recognition, and of the responsive resolution - activity , of all reality. There are only two virtues which do not require in any m andatory way that emotions be expressed as a requirement for those virtues to truly exist. All other virtues absolutely require , in a mandatory w ay , the expression of authentic emotions in order to truly exist. The two virtues which can exist without emotion expression are: 1) Industrious - drive/hard - working nature : One can engage in the active manifestation of the virtue of industry (being genuinely hard - working) without expressing emotion. However , the emotion - expression requirement is optional, and emotion can be expressed or not. 2) Tidiness : One can be tidy and extremely organized without having to express emotion. Emotions are not really the basis of deeds, but rather the vivi d recognition of a reality is the basis of all deeds, which also simultaneously causes the stage of emotion being expressed as a response Emotion is the following: Emotion is a conscious and vibrant acknowledgment - response, in an individually - perceived way, for the purpose of collectively - inclined progressive changes in people/situation interactions All emotions that we express are responses indicating that we acknowledge the situation , portraying a state of reality , which causes that response. A respo nse which is expressed in any of the various variable stages , according to how we have understood that state of reality! Sit uations occur in Paradise (and A ngels react to them) , just as situations occur on earth. However, the nature of a place , in which a situation truthfully originates , affects the probability factor of positive productivity resulting from that situation. There are seven variable stages of emotion - expression , and all diverse emotions (whether they be rational or not) correspond to either of these seven stages: 1) Minor - demand - response : The low - intensity display of a preference , or of a dislike , in order to implement a desired change. 2) Neutral - harmony - response : The high - intensity display of an altruistically - inclined response in order to promote a neutralizing effect on negative factors shaping the identified - mechanics of a given situation 3) Force - demand - response : The high - intensity display of physically - inclined responses in retaliation (whether that retaliation be morally - justi fied or not) towards an unpleasant reality. 4) Passive - suppressed - response : A high - intensity display response which is not easily perceivable by others , due to a suppression of any outwardly - visible expression of that very response 5) Positive - Acknowledgment - Response : A variable - intensity display response in order to acknowledge a perceived positive state of reality which is pleasing to the person displaying that response. 6) Intense - demand - response : A high - intensity display resp onse in order to implement a desired change, and that response can be expressed without additional physically - accompanied expression - enhancements, or with those additional physically - accompanied expression - enhancements. This response can be directed towa rds either a perceived positive , or a perceived negative state of reality. 7) Peer - pressure - response : A variable - intensity display response which is externally - induced by the foreign perceptions of others (whether those foreign perceptions be morally - d ysfunctional, or even morally - functional) , which are exerting from considerable to great persistent pressure upon the individual , who is then displaying the response in compliance to that foreign - perception - based pressure. Rat ional emotions interact with authentic states of reality in order to serve as a social impetus for the morally - inclined evolution of diversely - impacting reality - formation (in reference to the reality of a future dimension). Logic is the identifier of all veritable states of reality , as the factual recognition of anything must make systematic conscious morally - inclined usage of rationally applied associative - connections with a valid knowledge referential - base , in order to constitute the active formation of logic (in a truly functional sense). True logic (as opposed to qua si - logic ̧ or the dysfunctional - semblance of l ogic , sadly hoodwinking the naïve) has to be based on rationally applied associat ive - connections with a valid knowledge referential - base Therefore, logic must be a moral art, because Biblically - based morality exists for the promotion of high - level - functionality, and all that is functional has to be rational. The functional has to be rational, because the rational is the progressively - evolving factual awareness - based structure , providing the viable stability of all that functions for a valid purpose, in order to increase the positive attributes of reality through our productive - knowledge of that very reality. What is wicked is automatically immoral, and what is wicked is always destructive, therefore, what is wicked can never be rational . There is absolutely no rationality in wickedness, thus wicked people cannot co mpetently apply true logic, and wicked goals are never associated with logic, even though true logic can be used by truly moral people to identify the wicked goals of the wicked as factually being wicked , and to realistically recognize the destructive nature of those evil goals , for protective - preventative purposes Logic is a rationally - structured awareness - tied prioritizing process , for the positive promotion of truth, in order to consistently advocate authentic function. Bible - morality is the gu ide to proper awareness in enabling us to associate things competently within the enlightened spirit of truth, therefore logic has to be a moral art. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- Reality Detachment Tendency (Written: February 20 th 2017 - 38 years of age) By Jolivette Bodon Gonzalez Alvarado Detaching is not automatically at taching unto anything else, but rather refusing to submit to those binding links which require conditions for the success of that bond to be realistic. Without a submission to those binding links which require (for them to be actively real) rationally nece ssary conditions to realistically sustain that bond, a genuine state of attachment cannot truly exist! Attachment always signifies submission to a bond, and a functional bond must espouse interactively - determined behaviours which solidly profess a long - te rm goal. A hook which is used to hang things upon it, cannot be attached to the air, in like manner nothing can be attached to a non - reality and truly be attached, for there can be no bond with what does not exist, due to a lack of rationally - orien ted functional substance. A true bond is comprised of three identifying traits : 1) Professed long - term goal : Bonds are shaped by duration, and that which is fickle and fleeting cannot realistically contribute to bond - function. 2) Reality - acceptance - commi tment : In order to truly bond to something , one must accept the reality of what one is bonding oneself to, in order to establish a stable commitment. 3) Non - escapist - intent : Bonds which are the inevitable product of a true attachment , cannot be cause d in their inception by a desire to escape something else, which is then seeking to use that proclaimed bond as a remedy to erase that which one is escaping from. Bonds must be caused by a genuine pro - union desire , overwhelmingly dependent on earnes t logically - feasible pro - and - cons - possibility - considerations , which prove that the desire for that bond is genuine. Before speaking about reality detachment tendency, it is first necessary to boldly clarify that to attach to reality requires at least a d esire to know what is true, for attachments exist at varying levels of depth , and of strength of commitment. Reality attachment is the norm of existence’s basic functional unions. Unity holds together what is really there to be held together. Example : 1) One cannot form a friendship - bond with The Three Little Pigs of fictional folklore, because The Three Little Pigs do not exist. They are not a functional reality in vital existing relations with reality - based - goal - assessments. Whether The Three Little Pi gs , symbolically , may perhaps represent (in abstract - mode) an indirectly portrayed message of lesson - endowed - reality or not, in literal representation of character - identity - analysis the characters in question cannot rationally be factual. Therefore, no tru e bond can be made with the fictional, and this is because factual existence is a requisite for the participating components of any genuine bond formation! 2) One cannot truly attach, in any bonding attempt, to a situation that is not there (even if it i s made to popularly seem as if it is really there), whereas one can indeed attach, in a realistic bonding attempt , to a situation that is truly there (even if that situation has not been competently perceived by most, and erroneously appears not to be the re). If someone lives exclusively within a one - bedroom apartment (flat), they cannot truly attach themselves to the situation of living exclusively within a two - floor - house as long as the exclusive apartment - residing persists! Reality attachment is the st urdy glue holding functionally together all various forms of attachments, and this is why reality attachment is the key success factor to bonds , attaching an individual to G - D, to a person, to a situation, to valid abstract - knowledge concepts enhancing exi stential - function, or to a collectively - identified - entity (such as a nation, an ethnic group, or a race). For a state of reality detachment (whether it was long - term or short - term) to finally revert back to an initial state of genuine reality at tachment, does not in any way nullify the reality of what has just been factually reclaimed , in the re - acquisition of true reality - bonding - operation. Example : If an individual was living a destructive sinful life - style due to reality - detachment issues , and as a result of accepting the actual reality with regard to that lifestyle, realizes a radically progressive transformative change to a factually non - destructive lifestyle, that individual has reverted back to a healthy state of reality attachment! To correct blunders, reality attachment is needed, and thus the correction of blunders is the very antithesis of reality - detachment! Realit y detachment implies a willful ( and often stubborn) denia l of reality, and not simply an unconscious lack of awa reness pertaining to a given reality , due to genuine non - desired confusion. Such an individual, who is unconscio usly not aware of the reality pertaining to something, has still not engaged in reality detachment until they are made aware, and then resist th at authentic awareness in order to avoid progressive changes. An individual always seeks to be voluntarily detached from what they, of their own accord, consciously do not accept, and that natural tendency can be either productive or counter - productive. In the particular detrimental case of reality - detachment, that natural tendency which I have just described is most destructively warped, and thus the individual who willfully denies a truthfully - confirmed, credibly presented, and rationally - explained state of reality made known unto them, as part of their willful denial, will obviously strongly refuse to accept what they willfully deny, therefore leading to a detachment from the voluntarily unaccepted. ------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Conditioning Unmasked Opus (Written: February 20 th 2017 - 38 Years Of Age) By Jolivette Bodon Gonzalez Alvarado Conditioning is the greatest threat to progressive evolution, and the eroding force negatively affecting continuously sustainable Biblically - based morality. Conditioning destroy s Biblically - centred , free - will , independent - thought capacity, and even the functional state of critical logic - based thinking skills. Conditioning inputs pre - formed conclusions within the usually stagnant minds of the woefully conditioned, who accept those conclusions without any responsible independently - thought, adhered to, process of rational assessm ent. Popularity - indicator - factor alone, is not rational assessment! Conditioning is always anti - rational in its authentic manifested state, which is why instead of convincing people through rational explanations, and appealing to the people’s potential for an enlightened love of truth during the course of the factual logically - presented explanation, conditioning is instead required , in order to utterly hoodwink those who are susceptible for varying reasons , into accepting what is functionally - unacceptable. For disguised lies would never be accepted by critically - thinking rational folk making responsible assessments. Conditioning always , in a disguised way, seeks to demean the dignity and potential of those who are conditioned, by negating their valid rig ht to sincerely attempt earnest engagement in morally - guided autonomous reasoning - processes , to make their own responsible decisions about profoundly complex issues which require critical awareness, in order to be realistically appreciated within a factor - linked, cause - driven, activity - sphere of event - option - impact identified reality manifestation. Conditioning always appeals to the biases and to the known desires o f the chronically - conditioned in order to manipulate their perceptions into a vulnerable mental state of willing perceptive - compliance , in the expectation of having their biases and desires supposedly supported by the the always deceitful conditioning entity. Conditioning relies exclusively on image - manipulation in order to tyrannically replace the con cealed state of a dysfunctional - lack of substance with a vi sually - appealing dominant distortion, seeking to exploit , on an often collective - scale , the shared flaws of the targeted conditioned group. Image, like no other manifeste d perception - inducing - component, is tied to both individual and collective aspiration. Therefore, those who dominate how others perceive image, frequently dominate their aspirations. Im age is the outermost operative - layer of a manifested reality, being the most quickly perceivable aspect of that reality. Image can also be the warped reflection of a substance - free fantasy, elaborately orchestrated to lure the manipulated deceived into a false interaction with the details of vast perceptively - beautified deception. Truth is never solely image, even if truth does require accurately portrayed image for its more easily comprehensible beneficial propagation, for in order for something to perceptively expand, it must be successfully detected by the willingness of those knowingly participating in the expansion of that awareness - enhancing perception. Conditioning always espouses how something appears to be, rather than what something actually really is, because truth is never the goal of any conditioning Conditioning is always anti - knowledge , therefore it seeks to replace true knowledge with bias - promoting stereotypes which further exploit the biases of those who are woefully uninf ormed through their crippling conditioning. Conditioning requires a consistent negation of the truth within the interval of time in which it successfully operates, and once the truth is massively accepted conditioning cannot endure. Conditioning often invo kes popularity as its sole justification, because conditioning can never be successfully implemented promoting authentic facts. Popularity always reflects what is most accepted by a group , rather than what the factual state of that which is being accepted truly is. Conditioning follows a destructive path of ten demonic manipulative implementation - steps: 1) Collective - mood - assessment : To figure out the most popularly pervading sentiments among a group which is to be targeted for potential conditioning, in order to exploit those collectively - shared sentiments for the gradually increasing implantation of conditioning - causing pre - formed conclusions, deceitfully formulated by the conditioning entity. 2 ) Image - appeal - agenda : To construct a plan of desired gradual image - popularizing , of any desired image that is required for conditioning purposes in order to enforce, in an undetected way, an image as a substitute for a suppressed - reality, through popular - perception - engineering, upon the conditioned group. 3) Hood - winked - utopian - expansive - appeal : To exploit the known biases and desires most widely shared by the group targeted for conditioning , in order to hoodwink them into mindlessly accepting fallacies which have already been pre - popularized by the condit ioning entity, while making the hoodwinked conditioned group form strong expectations of desire - gratification, as well as expectations of an approving confirmation of their biases, in exchange for accepting the popularized fallacies as “fact”. 4) Group - identity - mandatory - view : Imposing upon the conditioned group the tendency to view almost everything (if not absolutely everything) from a group - based - view , rather than from an individual - view, lest any of the individuals within the conditioned group should attemp t independent - thinking - activities which may possibly lead to their eventual de - conditioning. Harsh penalties are often enacted , by the conditioning entity , against those within the conditioned group who seek to depart from the popularly - held group - view! 5) Popularity - solution - doctrine : T he conditioned concept, used to quell possible resistance from a conditioned group, in which those individuals who are conditione d are induced to believe that only tha t which is popular can solve situations ( because of its vast acceptability ) in a pleasantly - oriented way! This destructiv e doctrine makes people deceive themselves into t hinking that only what is easily accepted by many , in a hugely popular way , is a viable solution for a situation r equiring a remedy. In reality, sometimes the authentic solution for a given situation can be very unpopular, because people do not have the enlightenment and the discipline to successfully implement that solution, and as a result an earnest viable solution may sometimes take much time in order to receive a majority acceptance. 6) Closed - eye - delight - state : The irrational belief implanted in any conditioned group, that it is often preferable not to know what is going on, and just allow the conditioning entity to deal with what is unknown to that conditioned group, that in this way the conditioned group may supposedly enjoy the “prosperity and safety” which comes from adhering , in morally - unjustified obedience , to the conditioning entity’s mandatory group - based - view. Thus, from this sixth demonic implementation - step in the c onditioning process, destructive pseudo - witty sayings such as “Ignorance is bliss” have emerged to condition the masses into an ignorance - veneration - caused compliance with those tyrannical measures , which would never acquire acceptance from the functionally - knowledgeable. 7) Values - ambiguity - stance : The conditioning - entity knows that a solidly fixed Biblical - moral value system , which is strongly adhered to by a group, makes the dishono urable task of conditioning that group extremely difficult. Therefore, the conditio ning - entity first gradually erodes a stable moral value system with the preceding implementation steps already described, and then impl ants the pre - formed conclusion within the conditioned group that “values change with time” according to evolving circums tances, and that all interpretations of “values” which are accepta ble to the conditioning - entity are “good”, as long as the conditioning - entity is recognized as “the final credible authority”. 8) Collective - “joy” - enigmatic - regression : The i ncredibly ignorant supposition that is conditioned into a conditioned group, through which the conditioning - entity makes them accept (as imposed belief) that as long as a collaborating oligarchy within the conditioned group receive co mplete desire - gratification , the entire conditioned group is “experiencing progress”. 9) Authority - way - zone - concepts : Pre - formed concepts that are input within a conditioned group, which are meant to collectively keep that group, as much as possible, wit hin a n unlawful domination - zone marked by gradually - engineered mental attitudes that must be absolutely compatible with the agenda promoting the conditioning - entity’s domination - schemes. 10) Gradual - loss - denial : The co nditioned group reaches such a point of chroni c habitual condition ing , that all truthful credible evidence of a gradual loss of the valuable is intensely denied by the conditioned group , who ironically really did experience the loss (and its effects), because the conditioning – entity denied that the loss occurred to the conditioned gr oup (who really did experience the loss’ effects ! !)! Therefore, loss is, at this appalling stage of hard - core conditioning, perceived not through an actually - felt experience of the eff ects of loss, but through an official proclamation made by the conditioning - entity stating that there has been loss! In this way , the conditioned group’s perception of experiences now depends upon the conditioning - entity’s confirmation of those experience s! Conditioning, whether implemented on a single individual, or upon a large group of individuals, is a very great threat to the dignified quality of life of all individuals, and to proper societal functioning! What Is Primitive? (Written: February 21 st 2017 - 38 years of age) By Jolivette Bodon Gonzalez Alvarado The state of being primitive rightfully carries a negatively - implied reality of limited function, disheartening , with unavoidable vexed dissatisfac tion , the better genuine comparisons of the authentically - advanced. Primitive is a realistically - defined state of inferiority - centred - neutrality within the a ctive sphere of genuine efforts driving any necessary ongoing development , causing then a stagnant developmental - state with regard to functional - potential. Not all neutral - states, of course, are primitive , and indeed sometimes a state of neutrality is actually necessary in order to hinder certain negative processes in their possibility of becomin g continuous, and thus, through that valid beneficial - neutrality, preventing damage to the worthy. However, all primitive states signify that a neutrality with regard to truly progressive activity has been adopted , due to non - enlightened motivations which are destructively - fused with inferior concepts that are advocating resistance to morally - comp atible improvements within any valid area of functioning which is necessary , for an area in which developmental growth can continue. What is primitive stand s still , even if it may conceptually - interact on a limited plane with that which does not share its developmentally - stagnant nature. All primitive states have three identifying components : 1) Inferiority - centred - neutrality : What is inferior? Anything wh ich rejects a truth genuinely leading to progress at a higher le vel, is inferior, as that rejection will inevitably prevent the eventual forging of a state which is realistically more functional than other manifested states, of varying levels of authentic functioning. All real progress that is authentic, has to be actively - linked to a truth, and all truth , which is genuine truth , is valid, for all that is truly positive is valid , existing for a substantial purpose governed by truth, and all real betterment has to be true in order to accurately express a genuinely better state. 2 ) Non - rational state of category - association : What is primitive will always choose to espouse an identity associated ( What is identity ? I dentity being a factual form of personal or group representation , for healthy differentiation purposes which are functionally - supporting the knowledge - structure of a realistically - diversified plurality, for you need plurality in orde r for identity to conceptually be functionally - defined amid that very plurality!) with a compatibly - advocating group of image - alliance that is linked to non - logical beliefs defining that state, which is supposed to be for recognition purposes. 3) Future - enig matic - denial : All truly primitive states have the woeful characterizing factor of denying the healthy challenges beckoning a developmental - path - of - growth , to morally - contemplate applying competent functional attributes of system - enhancement operations , wit hin potentially unknown aspects of future dimens ional - manifestation , through the rational theorizing, implementing cause - and - effect awareness assessments, of what possible future outcomes may actively yield within always evolving existenti al - function. To vigourously preserve the functionally - ancient (which indeed becomes classic timeless) for Biblical - moral aspiration sustenance, and virtue - heightening purposes linked likewise to valid knowledge - protec tion, but while also accepti ng and contributing to ongoing developmental growth which expansively increases, and realizes function - potential, is not at all to abide within a primitive state, but actually serves as an opposing active - path of time - blended function - promoting operat ions , which resists what is truly primitive! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- The Troubling Make - up Of Psychopathy (Written: February 22, 23 rd , 25 th , 2017 - 39 years of age) By Jolivette Bodon Gonzalez Alvarado The greatest horror is when breakdown is falsely glorified through distortions in order to render contrary states “interchangeable”, without any sane regard for what rationally entails the consequence - system of wrongly forming ambiguously oriented (a pat h of non - defined diversity) fixed positions of activity - representation , within the morally - judged spectrum of behavioural selections (a potential option for a behavior - pattern choice, as a desired response for effecting an impact upon an event). Troubling is always trouble leni ently seen as the “liberal risk of societal experienc e” in the medley - outcomes of supposedly necessary diverse social - integrative - challenges, incompetently perceived as the “inevitable adverse - reality” alternatively - defining large groups of reaction - prone individuals! Behav ioural expectations must morally - reflect intensity of stability , rather than numbers for massive - excused enigma. Behaviour is the time - portion - defined pattern of desire - structured - reaction, seeking a recognition - based course of impact. All behaviour (wh ether highly moral or downright sinful) reacts according to desire’s structure for its manifested, and genuinely - perceivable duration. Psychopathy marks the completely wasteful departure from all morality - acknowledging behavio u r, that is ofte n heavily characterized by persistent crime - invoking dispositions as the principal means for desire - fulfillment. Psychopathy desirously targets more impact rather than goal - based - gratification, until the gratification itself solely becomes the very impact that is provoked by the psychopathic behavior, as the egocentric means of increasing dominance - affirmation without having to be considerably restrained by the moral - expectations of the disciplined - acquisition of a dominant - role! The psychopath wants to dominate irresponsibly, without having to recognize any expectation - structure that would give a moral - justification for thei r authority, and thus demand the outline of a goal - based requirement for the continuing merit of that authority. The purpose of the psychopath’s fervent desire for non - accountable domination is the psychopath’s perceived need to show their desired authority through a lack of structure, for the psychopath views all sincere and non - feigned adherence to rational moral rules (which maintain func tional stability) as the negation of their individual person, rather than what the reality actually is, that rational and just rules do serve to affirm the contributing worth of the individual person’s obliging efforts , as a necessary component of genuine collective functioning. Structure always demands of those who accept that structure. Psychopathy refuses structure for the non - prioritized acquiring of the experienced, rather than of the understood, as understanding would require that the possibilities and limitations truly characterizing any specific pe rson, situation, or thing, be realistically acknowledged, and psychopathy always seeks to identify need, almost solely in the concept - babble - terms of the s elf , being the very need itself , for absolutely everything which the psychopath irrationally desir es, instead of need being understood to be what beneficially - impacts the self for the healthy continuation of that self, in relation to itself and to other people. Therefore , for the psychopath, the fact that their self exists (a great tragedy for the rest of sane and ever morally - aspiring - us, I should say!) is already the automatic justification for all that they want (regardless of the moral nature of what they want), as the psychopath considers their self as the very need, thus ma king them , in their own perception, entitled to all that they want , without any hindrance to their desire. Chronic amorally - inclined egocentricity is an ever - detectable trait in psychopaths, which is why psychopathy is a toxic spiritual and mental state , completely foreign in association, to the morally - healthy critical - assessment progressive function of authentic remorse, due to the psychopath’s utter incapacity to consider (at any cognitive level) personal need as a necessary state of rationally - wanti ng the functionally - important , which is likewise tied to other people’s wellbeing while the individual simultaneously benefits. Example : Non - psychopaths have a genuine altruistically - based need (which is not feigned for concealing any criminal agendas) t hat those whom they love truly be well. A psychopath only views need as acquiring only what they want, regardless of what happens to others , because to the psychopath only the self is what defines need, and thus from their perspective, need cannot be ti ed to anything outside of their self. What is outside of the self, from the psychopath’s viewpoint, is only for: 1 ) either being acquired by the psychopath’s self , or 2) for being heartlessly removed by the psychopath’s self , due to it posing a hindran ce to the psychopath’s egocentric - acquisition - mania! Psychopathy has four critical identifying stages of manifested interaction - toxicity : 1) Minor - aggressive - regressive - tendency : This is the often visibly - subdued facet of psychopathy, which is c haracterized by a chronic lack of non - feigned genuine social behaviours, detrimentally - augmented by the egocentric - tendency to non - progressively refer to the self as the all - important reason for aggressively - oriented desire - realization. 2) Wound doctrine - obstacle - foe - psychology : The more forcefully - pronounced stage of psychopathy , which is characterized by the psychopath’s constant tendency to use provoked pain as the consistent m eans of obstacle - resolution for any perceived obstacle (instead of using mor ally - oriented logic, applied through a prioritized series of procedures), reflecting a foe - figure - centred psychology in which all is primitively - associated, on the part of the psychopath, to whether anything which the psychopa