-- Transcript of Romana Didulo CULT's decree. Removal of Non-Canadian Nationals 260212 Thursday 12 February, 2026 Thank you to @SMetharp.bsky.social for making this transcription! TRANSCRIPT PDF: https://pdfhost.io/xxxxxxxxxx -- Page 0 - 2/12/2026 - Removal of Non-Canadian Nationals [HRM Queen Romana Didulo The First issues Royal Decree, Divini Majores 10, 0035 (February 12, 2026) ] [Concerning the Immediate Removal of Non-Canadian Nationals Engaged in Extortion and Related Criminal Activities in The Kingdom of Canada] Grand Rising Everyone. Happy Divini Majores 10, 0035. Also known as February 12th, 2026, Royal Decree. Concerning the Immediate Removal of Non-Canadian Nationals Engaged in Extortion and Related Criminal Activities in The Kingdom of Canada. Effective date: February 12th, 2026. I, Her Royal Majesty Queen Romana Didulo The First, Queen and Commander-in-Chief of The Kingdom of Canada and the World, the Living Crown and, Custodian of Earth and Humanity, Commander-in-Chief of The United Armies of Earth under Natural Law. -Whereas public peace and safety are paramount to Her Royal Majesty Queen Romana Didulo’s subjects, The Kingdom of Canada’s Nationals, and serious criminal activity, including extortion, shootings, threats, and organized violence, directly undermines the security and welfare of communities in The Kingdom of Canada. -And Whereas provincial and municipal authorities, the Police Service, have provided evidence of an ongoing wave of extortion-related violence that has resulted in multiple shootings, public fear, and disruptions to the rule of law; -And Whereas a number of individuals suspected, charged, or found to be involved in extortion and associated violent conduct are non- Canadian citizens or non-Canadian Nationals and are currently subject to criminal investigations or proceedings, with some seeking to delay removal through refugee claims; -And Whereas it is in the sovereign interest of The Kingdom of Canada to uphold public safety while ensuring that the immigration processes do not provide undue protection for individuals who actions constitute serious criminality; now therefore, I, Her Royal Majesty Queen Romana Didulo The First, hereby proclaim and order as follows: Article I – Immediate Prioritization of Removal 1. All non-Canadian nationals who are formally charged, formally convicted, or credibly implicated by law enforcement in extortion-related offenses, violent assault, discharge of firearms, or gang-associated conduct within the jurisdiction of The Kingdom of Canada, shall be subject to priortized removal proceedings under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Law. Article II – Suspension of Asylum Appeals Where Criminality Is Established 2. Where credible and substantiated evidence exists that the individuals presence inThe Kingdom of Canada is directly linked to serious criminal conduct (including extortion, armed violence, or threats to public safety), any refugee or asylum claim shall be stayed or deferred until such time as the individual has faced criminal adjudication or has been lawfully ordered removed. Article III – Legal Framework and Due Process 3. Nothing in this Decree shall abrogate the fundamental right to a fair hearing as required under The Kingdom of Canada’s law. However, in cases involving serious offenses against persons and property, immigration adjudication timelines shall be expedited and coordinated with criminal proceedings to ensure that extortion suspects are not permitted to remain in the Kingdom solely by virtue of procedural delay. Article IV – Enforcement and Interagency Coordination 4. The Kingdom of Canada’s Border Services Agency, law enforcements, Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, and provincial law enforcement agencies shall coordinate enforcement operations to implement this Royal Decree forthwith. Article V – Reporting to Her Majesty Queen Romana Didulo The First 5. Within 15 days of issuance of this Royal Decree, the relevant Ministers shall present a joint report detailing actions taken to remove non-citizens, non-Canadian Nationals, extortion suspects and measures enacted to prevent future misuse of refugee mechanisms by those engaged in criminal conduct. Given under Royal Seal This Day, February 12, 2026 Effective Immediately. If you prefer, Effective forthwith.Here now is your High Level Analysis: Why This royal decree is Needed Now Page 1 - 2/12/2026 - Removal of Non-Canadian Nationals 1. Acute and Escalating Threat to Public Safety In Surrey, British Columbia, for example, is experiencing a sustained pattern of extortion tied to violence, including shootings, arsons, threats and intimidation of business owners. This is not isolated crime. It is systemic coercion designed to control entire commercial districts through fear when criminal activity reaches the scale and tempo. Normal reactive enforcement is no longer sufficient. Extraordinary coordination and prioritization are required to restore public order. Why now: Delay allows criminal networks to entrench, recruit and retaliate, as well as normalize fear in the community. 2. Exploitation of Legal and Administrative Lag The current framework separates criminal proceedings from immigration enforcement, often allowing non-citizens suspects to remain in The Kingdom of Canada for extended period of time due to the following: overlapping jurisdictions, sequential (not parallel) processes, and procedural backlogs. This gap is being actively exploited by organized criminal actors who understand that asylum or immigration claims can delay removal even when serious criminality is alleged. Why now: Once a system is demonstratively being abused, the sovereign has the duty. That's me. Your Queen. The Sovereign has a duty to close the gap before it becomes a standing tactic. 3. Deterrence Failure Under the Status Quo Extortion thrives where perpetrators believe the following: 1. They can operate anonymously, 2. Enforcement is slow, 3. And consequences are uncertain or delayed. When foreign nationals involved in organized crime remain physically present in the community for months or years after identification, the state unintentionally signals tolerance through inertia. Why now: Immediate visible consequences are essential to disrupt extortion, economies and deter copycat actors. 4. Protection of Law-Abiding Immigrants and Refugees Failure to act decisively harms legitimate newcomers most: -It stigmatizes the entire communities. -It fuels public resentment and misinformation. -It undermines confidence in the refugee system itself. A targeted decree focused on serious criminal conduct, not status alone, draws a clear line between: lawful migrants and refugees and those abusing The Kingdom of Canada's hospitality to commit violent crimes. Why now: Public trust in immigration system erodes quickly when criminal misuse appears unchecked. 5. Need for Centralized Authority and Direction Municipal police, provincial governments and federal immigration authorities are all involved, but no single instrument currently compels unified action at speed. A Royal Decree aligns agencies under a single priority, accelerates decision making and removes ambiguity about enforcement hierarchy. Why now: Fragmented authority is an effective against coordinated criminal networks. 6. Preventing the Normalization of Organized Intimidation Extortion is not just a crime. It is an attack on the rule of law. When businesses budget for protection payments or close out of fear, the state's monopoly on lawful authority is weakened. Unchecked this leads to: parallel power structures, loss of economic confidence, and long term community destabilization. Why now: Once normalized, extortion is exponentially harder to dismantle. 7. Preserving The Kingdom of Canada's International Credibility The Kingdom of Canada's refugee and asylum commitments are premised on good faith use, allowing serious criminal actors to leverage humanitarian protections: undermines international confidence, weakens The Kingdom of Canada's negotiating position, and risks reciprocal tightening by other nations. Why now: Safeguarding humanitarian systems requires decisive action against abuse, not passive tolerance. Page 2 - 2/12/2026 - Removal of Non-Canadian Nationals Strategic Bottom Line This decree is not about punishment- it is about restoring control, credibility and safety. It is needed now because: the threat is active, the loopholes are known, the deterrence gap is visible, and delay carries compounding costs. Next is your High Level Rationale for the Issuance of This Royal Decree I. The duty of the Living Crown, Custodian of Earth and Humanity under Natural Law to Preserve Peace and Order. The foremost obligation of the Living Crown, Custodian of Earth and Humanity under Natural Law is the protection of the realm and the peace of its people. When organized extortion, intimidation, and violence takes root within a community, the Living Crown, Custodian of Earth and Humanity under Natural Law must act decisively to reaffirm the lawful authority, not criminal coercion governs public life. This decree is issued in fulfillment of that enduring duty. II. Defense of the Social Covenants. The relationship between the Living Crown, Custodian of Earth and humanity under Natural Law and the people is founded upon a social covenant: the people obey the law, and the Living Crown, Custodian of Earth and Humanity under Natural Law ensures their safety, security and equal protection. Extortion directly violates this covenant by substituting fear for law and coercion for consent, allowing such activity to persist, particularly where perpetrators are not citizens owing permanent allegiance erodes the foundation of civil society.The decree restores balance to the covenant. III. Preservation of Sovereignty and Territorial Integrity. Sovereignty is not merely symbolic; it is exercised through control over: borders, residency and the conditions under which non-citizens may remain within The Kingdom of Canada. Those who enter The Kingdom of Canada under the protection of its laws do so on the condition that they do not bring violence, organized criminal conduct or intimidation upon the populace. When that condition is broken, the Living Crown, Custodian of Earth and Humanity under Natural Law is compelled to act in defense of its territorial integrity and internal order. IV. Protection of the Innocent and the Vulnerable. Extortion targets: small business owners, families, cultural communities and those least able to defend themselves. The Living Crown, Custodian of Earth and Humanity under Natural Law’s legitimacy is measured, not by how it treats the powerful, but by how it shields the vulnerable. This Royal Decree is a proactive instrument and protective instrument-designed to remove those who prey upon others, while preserving the rights and dignity of lawful residents and genuine refugees. V. Preservation of the Integrity of Asylum and Immigration Systems. Humanitarian protections exists to shelter the persecuted-not to shield those who persecute others. When asylum mechanisms are misused to delay accountability for serious criminal acts, the integrity of those system is compromised. The Living Crown and Custodian of Earth and Humanity under Natural Law acts here not against immigration, but in defense of its moral and legal credibility.This Royal Decree draws a necessary and principled distinction. VI. Restoration of Public Confidence in Lawful Authority Fear erodes trust when communities witness repeated violence without visible consequence. Confidence in institutions falters. By issuing this Royal Decree, the Living Crown, Custodian of Earth and Humanity under Natural Law, Her Royal Majesty Queen Romana Didulo The First signals, clearly and unequivocally: that organized extortion will not be tolerated, that criminal exploitation of legal process will not succeed, and that lawful authority remains supreme. Confidence in justice is itself a public good. VII. Proportional, Targeted and Law-Bound Action. This Royal Decree is not collective, arbitrary or indiscriminate. It is: targeted at serious criminal conduct, grounded in established legal standards, Lawful standards. And exercised within the bounds of due process. Such restraint affirms the strength and justice are not opposites, but complements Royal Conclusion.This Royal Decree is issued not in haste, but in necessity; not in anger, but in responsibility; not to punish identity, but to uphold order.Through it, the Living Crown and Custodian of Earth and Humanity under Natural Law reasserts its timeless role to guard the peace, defend the innocent, and ensure that the rule of law, rather than fear, governsThe Kingdom of Canada. Here now is the Charter Stress Test of the Royal Decree I have just issued. For those of you in statutory law, remember, this is under Natural Law. And for those who wish to do Charter Challenges. For those of you at the back of the bus come forward because this may, take a few minutes to sink in. All right. So with the Royal Decree under Natural Law, remember that that has been issued Charter Stress Test of the Royal Decree, the likelihood that the extortionists are well-oiled machines, well-funded. A. Section 7 under Natural Law, Life, Liberty and Security of the Person. he Risk level: is Very High that they will file a Charter challenge, but remember this Page 3 - 2/12/2026 - Removal of Non-Canadian Nationals Non-citizens physically present in The Kingdom of Canada are protected under the Charter.Under Natural Law, removal proceedings, detention or suspension of asylum claims engaged.So remember that the Royal Decree I've just issued is to remove asylum seekers.Those who have been charged, under extortion or criminal activities and are non-Canadian citizens.They have, in the past used the loopholes by applying for asylum while they were going through the criminal proceedings. I have just closed that loophole and they're well-funded operation will likely hire the most expensive criminal lawyer that you can find in the Kingdom. And so here's the challenge that they will likely, file. And then I'll give to you the arguments. All right. So non-citizens that will argue that non-citizens present in The Kingdom of Canada are protected under the Charter. So removal proceedings, detention or suspension of asylum claims engages liberty detention pending removal security of the person risk upon removal. They will argue these things and fundamental justice, fair hearings and their rights. If the decree, however, automatically suspends asylum claims, then they can say, you can use those excuses, but the decree doesn't automatically suspend asylum claims. Mandate’s removal without individualized assessment. Everyone is being assessed. It's not automatic. As I mentioned, the suspension is not we're not suspending their claim or simply saying that while you are going through the criminal process because you're not a Canadian citizen, we're going to wait until you finish the criminal proceedings and then we will decide the outcome. Whatever the outcome of that proceeding, we will decide whether you qualify to apply to remain in the kingdom or not. But you cannot use, simultaneously. You cannot engage immigration system, and the criminal justice system, so that you can forever stay here. Now, also, I'm quite aware that some have used this process because not only, it allows them to remain in The Kingdom of Canada, it also allows them to claim, to receive asylum money and to access our health care system while they were going through the criminal proceedings. So that kakistocracy just ended today. Okay. Mandates removal without individuals, individualized assessment limits procedural fairness. It would almost certainly be struck down as violating the Charter unless there is individualized review of each case. Evidence standards are clear and independent adjudication remain intact. For those of you at the very, very back of the bus, here's the court case, Supreme court precedent. Singh versus Canada, 1985. Refugee claimants are entitled to fundamental justice protection. Okay. Section B. Equality rights. So we're talking about the Charter now. And, we're going through this because in my own case, also, I'm in the process of filing a Charter Challenge. The difference is I'm a Canadian citizen. Okay. For those of you at the very, very back of the road, not yet on the bus, I am a Canadian citizen. Okay. Got it, got it. So the Equality Rights. Risk Level: Moderate to High (depending on the drafting). So if the Royal Decree targets “non-citizens” broadly, it must avoid: discrimination based on national origin collective punishment. However, the Kingdom of Canada's law already distinguishes between citizens or the Nationals and non-Nationals or non-citizens for immigration purposes. The key legal test is whether the distinction is: arbitrary or rationally connected to legitimate objective, and that is the legitimate objective of this Royal Decree is public safety. All right. A conduct based approach (serious criminality) is more defensible than a status based one. So under the Cruel and Unusual Treatment Risk Level is Contextual. If removal, exposes someone to torture or death, The Kingdom of Canada cannot deport them (non-refoulement principle). Any decree must preserve individualized risk assessment. Now, if you came to the Kingdom of Canada and committed extortion, it tells me that nothing in your back country, in your original country, says that you're under threat of, persecution or being, put to death. But coming to The Kingdom of Canada and being part of an extortion network, it tells me you came here, targeted a particular group of people, business owners, etc., etc. you're in no danger in your home country. Try arguing that in front of the Queen. Now, if removal, as I said, removal exposes someone to torture or death. By your action of being part of an extortion network, there's no danger back home. So off you go. See the...what is it, C-17? Section. The Justifiable Limits. Okay. Under the Charter, even if rights are infringed, the government can justify limits if they meet the Oakes test: 1. Pressing and substantial objective? Yes (organized extortion, violence qualifies) 2. Rational connection? Likely, yes. If removal is tied to serious criminality and 3. Minimal impairment? This is the vulnerable point. Blanket suspensions would fail. And 4. Proportionality? Must show public safety benefits outweigh rights impacts. Remember that if you are not a Canadian citizen and you do this in The Kingdom of Canada there is no level of appeal that you can go to. You'll be shipped to your originating country. Now, if you were a Canadian citizen, then no one can remove you. That's a whole other cow. Page 4 - 2/12/2026 - Removal of Non-Canadian Nationals But since you are not a Canadian National, you cannot use our immigration system to claim for refugee and or to claim that your life is going to be in danger back home. Because if that were true, you would not be engaged in any organized extortion network. Divisional Powers Issue is next. So immigration is primarily federal jurisdiction. That's right. So any decree must be federally grounded or it risks ultra vires challenge. Well, this Royal Decree is federal nationwide. It applies right across The Kingdom of Canada, not just to a specific community or it's not targeted, to a particular ethnic groups or ethnicity. It applies to all types. Next is for those of you under COG, come forward if you're sitting at the back of the bus because the Queen has your marching orders, right. Executive Order. The rise in organized extortion and firearm violence represents a sustained public safety threat. Evidence indicates that some individuals involved are foreign nationals leveraging procedural delays in the immigration system. The objective is not to suspend refugee protection, but to prioritize removal proceedings for serious criminality, accelerate interagency coordination, preserve the integrity of asylum systems, and maintain full charter compliance. Your Policy Rationale 1. Public Safety Priority. Organized extortion is escalating in severity and frequency. Accelerated immigration enforcement for serious criminality is a lawful and proportionate response. 2. Integrity of the Refugee System. The Kingdom of Canada's asylum framework is designed to protect the persecuted, not shield individuals engaged in organized violence. 3. Charter Compliance Strategy. To withstand judicial review, the policy must: maintain individualized hearings; preserve non-refoulement protections; avoid automatic suspensions; and be evidence-driven. Remember, under Natural Law, substance not form. 4. Operational Mechanisms. Rather than a sweeping decree: Amend IRPA those of you working in the immigration will know what this is. Regulations to expedite hearings in serious criminality cases. Expand detention, review resources; increase CBSA removal capacity and enhance data-sharing between IRCC and law enforcement. 3. Public-Facing Rationale, This is for the public. I tried to put this in a simple English language as possible. Okay, so this is for the public. Protecting Communities While Upholding the Rule of Law. The Kingdom of Canada's government is committed to ensuring the safety of residents and business owners who have been impacted by organized extortion. This initiative focuses specifically on individuals credibly linked to serious criminal conduct. It does not target communities, ethnicities, or lawful newcomers. The Kingdom of Canada remains firmly committed to: protecting genuine refugees, upholding Charter of Rights and Freedoms under Natural Law, ensuring fair and independent adjudication. However, individuals who engage in organized violence and intimidation cannot expect to use procedural delays to remain in The Kingdom of Canada indefinitely. Okay, so this is for the asylum seekers or those who were not originally seeking asylum but have entered The Kingdom of Canada, perhaps as visitors or student visa. We don't know how they entered, but they entered and then now, took part or have, participated in the organized extortion networks targeting businesses and communities. All right. However, individuals who engaged in organized violence and intimidation. So I'm repeating that last paragraph, cannot expect to use procedural delays to remain in The Kingdom of Canada indefinitely. This approach balances: public safety, constitutional protections and the integrity of The Kingdom of Canada's immigration system. Strategic Reality Check. There we go. Those of you at the back of the bus, a decree that: automatically removes suspects, suspends asylum claims categorically or bypasses hearings, would almost certainly be struck down. A decree, however, that: prioritizes serious criminality, preserves due process, maintains individualized review, has a defensible legal pathways. All right. Page 5 - 2/12/2026 - Removal of Non-Canadian Nationals Next is the Charter-Resilient Executive Order. Public Safety Prioritization in cases of serious criminality. So this is my order to the COG Council and of course to the Cabinet under Natural Law Authority, Immigration and Refugee Protection Law. Preamble -Whereas organized extortion and firearm related violence constitute a pressing and substantial threat to public safety; -Whereas IRPA already provides mechanisms for inadmissibility on grounds of serious criminality and security. -And whereas The Kingdom of Canada's government remains bound by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms under Natural Law and international non-refoulement obligations; Therefore, the following measures are enacted: Article 1 - Public Safety Prioritization. The Minister shall designate cases involving: Charges or conviction of extortion. So this applies to those who have been charged with. Those are the asylum, the non-Canadian Nationals. Okay. So charges or conviction for extortion, Firearms offenses, Participation in a criminal organization, Credible law enforcement evidence. The word is credible. Now I recognize that some will make up stories. Yeah I'm not saying that all of them. But look at what is happening in Ontario. It started in Toronto. And now the probe is right across the province. Okay. So it must be credible. Credible meaning that evidence you have evidence, not somebody’s heresay that they saw something but they can't actually describe it. Yeah, nothing like that. Not under Natural Law. All right. Evidence always substance before form. So this is for the law enforcement's credible law enforcement, evidence of organized violent conduct. That means you would have investigated. You have videos, you have photos, real evidence. Okay. Otherwise, if you don't have credible evidence, you can expect the Charter Challenge and the case will be dismissed or stayed, right. as priority public safety cases. So credible. Repeating that you must have credible law enforcement evidence of organized violent conduct. If some politician tells you that a community or a member of community, is violent and cannot produce evidence, then you might want to double check that. And for the Natural Law Crown Prosecutors and to the Attorney General under Natural Law. To make sure that your Crown, and for the Minister of Justice under Natural Law, make sure that your Crown Prosecutors constitutionally perform their duty to verify evidence before laying charges. Okay, so Priority Public Safety Cases. Remember, the Queen doesn't play politics. So you must have solid evidence. Article 2 - So that message is for the Minister of Justice under Natural Law. And of course, the Attorney General. For under Natural Law in The Kingdom of Canada and all of the sages and judges, in fact, are currently sitting, under Natural Law. Article 2 - Accelerated but Individualized Proceedings. Your Priority Public Safety Cases, also known as PPSC file shall include, the following: -Be scheduled for Expedited Immigration Division hearings; -Receive enhanced coordination between The Kingdom of Canada’s Border Services and provincial Living Crown, Custodian of Earth and Humanity under Natural Law. So the provincial ministers. Okay. And the Living Crown and then maintain full rights to counsel and evidence disclosure. So remember to, not rush, but to triple check. Quadruple check your evidence. Okay, so no automatic suspension or denial of asylum claims shall occur. And Article 3 - Serious Criminality Screening. Where an individual is found inadmissible under the IRPA (serious criminality), removal shall proceed as soon as: criminal proceedings conclude, or statutory removal threshold are met. That's Natural Law. Removal thresholds are met. Okay. Article 4 - Non-Refoulement Safeguard. This one is when someone claims that if you sent them back to their original country because they're not Canadian Nationals, they will say that, oh, if you send them back there, someone's going to kill them all, or their life will be in danger. I can, in my humble opinion, many, not all of those claimants who use that defense to try to remain in The Kingdom of Canada or who have tried to remain in The Kingdom of Canada with that argument, were well-coached, well-funded and well-trained and well- rehearsed. The the more...what is it...sad the story is, the more elaborate the story is...they played on the heartstrings of the immigration judges, the immigration refugee judges, and of course, the public. Not under my watch. So the Non-Refoulement Safeguard: Before Page 6 - 2/12/2026 - Removal of Non-Canadian Nationals removal, a Pre-Removal Risk Assessment shall be conducted where required by law. No person shall be removed to face torture, death or cruel treatment contrary to Charter of The Kingdom of Canada. The Charter of the Kingdom of Canada. Remember that it is superior. It applies superior to The Kingdom of Canada citizens or Nationals, but not to the foreigners that have no legal status in The Kingdom of Canada. You will be...you will remain safe. You'll be made sure...or the we the people will make sure...that you are safe while you're here, and we will extend that to you under Natural Law. But you cannot use that excuse when we know that you have taken part or took part in an organized extortion network to terrorize a community. It's where the....what is it they say...when you're invited, don't overstay. Right. So Article 5 - Reporting & Oversight. A quarterly report shall be tabled outlining: Number of PPSC designations, remember, those are your Priority Public Safety Cases. Right. So those are the ones member of the organized networks. They're not Canadian nationals. As I said, you cannot remove Canadian Nationals, but you can remove, non-citizens and, so permanent status individuals or a newly arrived immigrants. They're not yet Canadian citizen. You can remove them, and especially those who are just here for visitors visa or student visa and then take part in this type of criminality in our communities. So next to the number of PPSC designations you must have removal timelines. Okay. So this is your reporting and oversight. And then Charter compliance safeguard applies. Those are your quarterly reports. You must have those. So quarterly, every three months you must have that report okay. So this structure structure avoids: blanket suspension, collective punishment, elimination of hearings and refoulement violations. So we will proceed very, very carefully before we remove these individuals. But remember that, non-Canadian citizens, the priority is the safety and security of all Canadian citizens, Canadian Nationals right across the kingdom. Next is the Legal Defense Memorandum. This is for the Minister of Justice under Natural Law, the Crown Prosecutor under Natural Law, all the Judges under Natural Law and Justice Minister and Attorney General. Right. If I repeated one of those, Pardon moi. So this is the legal defense anticipating, of course, as I said, the asylum seekers who have committed or are part of the organized criminal network extortion network, and serious criminal offenses. So this is the Legal Defense anticipating litigation. So their likely claim they'll challenge the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, fundamental justice, discrimination, removal risk. Okay. The that is the refoulement risk defense abuse of this, abuse of discretion or bad faith. That's what the argument going to be one of them and ultra vires beyond authority. Well, there's nothing beyond the authority because federally, under Natural Law in The Kingdom of Canada, the safety and security of the we the people falls under the Crown, in this case, the Living Crown. And this is a National Decree. It's not targeted to one particular location or ethnicity. All right. Next is in The Kingdom of Canada Defense Strategy. So listen up. For those of you at the back of the bus, this is your Defense Strategy. I've just enumerated the likely claims that they would have filed and which Charter section they would emphasize and target to use to challenge the Charter. Now for The Kingdom Canada's Defense Strategy. Your argument will be: no deprivation without due process, uour defense full hearing preserved, no automatic removal, individualized assessments and PRRA maintained. For those of you in the immigration, you will know what that is. And key precedents: So these were cases all right. That already happened. Singh versus Canada (1985), Suresh versus Canada (2002), Medovarski versus Canada (2005) (serious criminality supports removal priority) Position: This measures reorganizes administrative prioritization, not substantive rights. Your next Defense distinction is based on: immigration status (permissible category), conduct (serious criminality), not based on race, ethnicity or religion. Rational connection equals public safety. Another Section - Justification (Oakes Test) 1. Preserving objective: Organized violent extortion 2. Rational connection: Faster removal reduces threat 3. Minimal impairment: Individual hearings retained and 4. Proportionality: Community safety versus administrative acceleration. Page 7 - 2/12/2026 - Removal of Non-Canadian Nationals And the Ultra Vires Defense where they will say you have no jurisdiction. What planet do you think you're on? We are defending and securing The Kingdom of Canada. Okay. So authority is grounded in: IRPA ministerial powers and the Living Crown’s power Existing inadmissibility framework and no new removal category is created. I have here the Risk Matrix. I will put this up on screen for you to be able to see. So this one, the risk matrix that I have, assessed to make sure that The Kingdom of Canada's Attorney General, the Crown Prosecutors under Natural Law, and of course, all of our sages, make sure that they follow these. All right? And Appellate of course, all the way to the Supreme Court of The Kingdom of Canada and the Appeals Court and after the appeals court you have the Royal Court. And that's where I sit. I will probably see majority of these cases because the Supreme Court and the Appeals Court will handle this. And the Royal Court that sits above the Appeals Court and Supreme Court representing the we the people of The Kingdom of Canada, the Justice, the Chief Justice is the Queen, and that is the Living Crown, and Custodian of Earth and Humanity. All right. So for those of you at the back of the bus, I don't handle, lower cases. Okay? I only will see cases after it has gone beyond the Appeals Court. All right. And Supreme Court. So the Risk Matrix category. The challenges that they may have. Risk level, medium, allegation of procedural unfairness, mitigation maintained full hearings and PRRA and then low to medium. They'll claim discriminatory targeting your mitigation anchor solely to criminal conduct. Risk level is low. There refoulement risk. Mandatory individual risk review is your mitigation for that. You can mitigate all these challenges by making sure that you apply these recommendations I have made. Okay. Medium risk courts may stay removal. Increase adjudication. Resources. Medium courts may stay removals or pardon me we'll go to the next one. High. Narrative of targeting immigrants. Your mitigation to for that is clear messaging and conduct based only. So focus on the actions, not on the color of their skin or where they live or where they came from. Capiche? Capiche? High risk level perception of weak enforcement. Mitigate that with transparent reporting and high level risk. For example, CBSA removal limits mitigation, budget allocation and task force expansion. Listen up. I have increased and funded very well the borders as well as The Kingdom of Canada's military. Never, ever before were you given 500 billion until I issued that Royal Decree. So there is no reason why you will create song and dance and say you couldn't, take someone who was part of the organized extortion network out of the country after they have gone through the judicial system completely? All right. The next item is How the Supreme Court Would Likely Analyze This. All right, hang on to your seats. Here you go. If challenged, here's the problem structure: The court will ask that section in this case seven apply? That is non-citizens physically present are protected. So the answer is yes. And they will say Step 2: Is There a Deprivation? Possibly liberty (detention) and security (removal). I hope everyone's taking very clear notes. And meticulous notes for this one. Step 3: Is It Contrary to The Fundamental Justice? The court may ask: Yeah. under Natural Law, is there individualized assessment? Is there independent decision making? Is there opportunity to respond? If yes likely survives the Charter Challenge. And the next one will be Equality Charter Challenged, challenging equality. The court may ask you this: Is distinction based on enumerated/analogous ground? Does it perpetuate disadvantage? Court conduct distinction tied to criminality. So long as your evidence and your conduct is based on...tied to the criminality that they have of engaged in, you will likely succeed. So I'm speaking to the Crown Prosecutors and the Attorney General and the Justice Minister. You will survive the Charter Challenge. Okay. And the Oakes Test here. I'm using as an example court case, severity of organized crime and narrow tailoring. For those of you, of course, our sages will know what these terms are and safeguards, if minimally impairing, likely upheld. Okay. The Bottom Line: a sweeping “immediate removal decree” would almost certainly be struck down. A carefully structured which this Royal Decree has been: Page 8 - 2/12/2026 - Removal of Non-Canadian Nationals Conduct-based, Individualized, Due-process preserving, Statutorily in this case under Natural Law. Grounded prioritization order has a realistic chance of surviving the Charter scrutiny or the Constitution under Natural Law scrutiny. All right. So remember that the sages under Natural Law, they are, the most that I have met, the most researched, the most knowledgeable individuals, those who are currently sitting as sages and handling court cases under Natural Law. Remember that I have sat in some of the cases, as an observer only, not as their judge, but as an observer. Okay, now, for those of you preparing litigation. So this is for the ministers. That's litigation ready. Affidavit. This is an affidavit for the Ministers or Deputy Ministers. Okay. Here it is. This is for the Assistant Deputy Minister Public Safety of The Kingdom of Canada. And, of course, for the Minister of Public Safety of The Kingdom of Canada under Natural Law. Okay, so this is your Affidavit. So it's the usual, I, so you put your full name there, the location, the province, make oath and say a position and authority that you are the Assistant Deputy Minister responsible for Immigration Enforcement Coordination within the Public Safety of The Kingdom of Canada. And to that you acknowledge of the, that you have knowledge of the matters here in except where stated otherwise. So this is a very typical affidavit. Okay. And number two is the Purpose of the Order-in- Council in The Kingdom of Canada. So the Order-in-Council (the “Order”) was enacted in response to a sustained incidence of organized extortion and firearm related violence. Okay. In the Kingdom of Canada. And next, Law enforcement identified coordinated criminal activity involving intimidation of businesses, threats and discharge of firearms. So this is very, very specific to cases that some of you may have read. Published by the mainstream media. Okay. So remember, this is an affidavit. And this can always be revised based on very specific situations. All right. The objective of the order is to prioritize administrative processing of non-Canadian citizens credibly linked to serious criminal conduct consistent with IRPA that has to do with immigration. For those of you wondering, you can research what IRPA and then the No Elimination of Due Process. The order does not: Remove access to the Immigration Division; Does not remove access to Refugee Protection Division and Does not eliminate the right to counsel. It does not eliminate judicial review; It does not eliminate Pre-Removal Risk Assessments. All individuals retain individualized hearings and the opportunity to present their evidence. So we're talking about again the non-citizens, non-Canadian citizens. And next is the Authority. The order operates within the existing IRPA provisions under Natural Law. So serious criminality, inadmissibility reports, detention review, non-refoulement and the order does not create new grounds of inadmissibility. And next is the Charter Compliance Measures. Those of you operating under COG make sure that all of the cases are Charter compliance, all of