Before considering taking any ‘cure’ into my body, the following conditions must be met 1. What is the need? I want to read and understand the studies that show there is a need for any proposed medical intervention, and these must be independent of government scientists and they must be peer reviewed. In short, you will need to convince me, with science (proper science not SAGE science) that there is good reason why I should consider a medical intervention of any sort. 2. What is in it and what does it do? Once the need has been established, a full and detailed list of the ingredients of any medical intervention must be published. This must be combined with a detailed breakdown of exactly how these ingredients work together to produce the desired result, demonstrated with studies that have been independently verified. 3. Who is producing it, and are they liable for injuries? If we have established the need and we know what’s in it, then we need to know who is making it, and whether or not they are going to be liable for any adverse reactions - which they must be, because a company that is given freedom from liability has no real reason to ensure that a product is safe, and therefore by default, I would consider that product unsafe. 4. Who is profiting from it? This is a two part condition. Firstly, the company making the product should make zero profit on the product. If this really is a pandemic, and the health and wellbeing and safety of human nature is at stake, then this is about saving mankind, not making money. There should be no need for any company producing a world-saving medical intervention to make a profit. So long as the product covers the costs, then knowing that mankind is saved should be enough. Secondly, no member of parliament, no member of government, no official figure, body or organisation should benefit in any way from this medical intervention. Obviously if we are going by the first condition, then there are no profits to be made and therefore no benefits to politicians, however as we have seen in the past, this has not been the case. This means that if the product is being made by, let’s say Moderna, for example, and the British prime minister is thought to be involved in a company that recently purchased, let’s say £1bn in Moderna shares, then two things has to happen... 1. He has to go and 2. That company cannot be involved in saving the world You can be in politics or you can make money by investing in pharmaceutical companies. You cannot do both. 5. Is there no other viable alternative? I want to understand, by demonstrable science that there is no other safe and effective method of protecting myself from whatever this pandemic is, other than the proposed medical intervention. This means that every possible alternative must be explored before the intervention is publicly announced. This includes alternative therapies and this means the entire spectrum of the medical and health and wellbeing communities must be consulted and most importantly listened to. 6. What is the scope of the risk of the pandemic? There must be a scientifically proven risk profile which is demonstrated through studies and independently verified. That means that anyone promoting a medical intervention must be absolutely confident that the new pandemic effects everyone exactly the same, regardless of age, body mass, general health and underlying conditions - and this must be backed up by independent studies. 7. What is the scope of the risk of the intervention? Reactions to medical interventions are a very serious thing, but have not traditionally been taken seriously in recent pandemics. If we are having a new pandemic and a new medical intervention, then two things must happen. 1. We need a full and frank independent enquiry into the true scope of reactions to the medical interventions that were introduced in the last pandemic, instead of pretending they didn’t happen, pretending certain new trends are not linked to the medical intervention and silencing people who want to talk about it, and 2. We need full disclosure on all known adverse reactions to the new medical intervention, which are independently verified and publiclly available for all to access.. 8. Natural Immunity and Good Health should not be discounted We have seen from recent pandemics that the idea of being healthy and having a good strong immune system was never discussed. It must be. The focus of all public service announcements must be around good health and how to stay healthy, not simply pushing a medical intervention. We must never again see a situation where people are given zero advice on how to stay healthy, restricted from doing physical exercise and going outside and are instead only told to go and get an untested medical intervention. This goes against everything that human beings have learnt about immunity and disease and virus control for the last.... Ever. In short, we want to see that the government and politicians are concerned about the health of the nation, and we want that proven to us through the communications that we receive - what we want is proper, good quality, independently verified health and wellbeing advice, not just the pushing of one single untested product. 9. Full liability for everyone involved For this new pandemic, if indeed it does happen that the medical intervention turns out to be doing more harm than good, then everyone along the chain of command should be held liable. That means not just the company that makes the product, but every politician that promotes it, right down to the person who puts it in the arm of the consumer, should be held liable for their part. Why? Because that will ensure that all of the previous 8 points are not only taken seriously, but adhered to. Culpable responsibility will ensure vigilance on all counts 10. Unconditional recognition of bodily autonomy Finally, point 10 - the freedom to say no, with no further questions asked. This means zero mandates, zero job threats and zero stigma. And by zero I mean absolute Zero. Those are my 10 commandments which lay out the terms and conditions for my participation in future pandemics. All 10 of these must be met, otherwise, I’m afraid I won’t be able to attend your next pandemic and you’ll have to carry on without me.