Time is really a fourth column Strategic studies & policy I. The universe is ~5% galaxies, and ~95% vaccuum space. It is false to claim the universe would not have matter without deviations. The existence of galaxies does not require any primordial perturbations / flux density (and thus this is the gateway to which quantum theory can induct and cannibalize cosmology). We can expect uniformity at the primordial epoch because the universe today is unform. We must agree that density flux in the primordial energy would have made expansion nonuniform today because of gravitational depreciation. (We cannot claim this matter was exempt from gravitation and still claim it coalesces.) Inflation is too fast to be bound by gravity today. Expansion has been constant since the big bang and is an acceleration, not velocity. Thus, the early universe had to be small and closed such that space at some epoch extended faster than the primordial energy radiated which allowed cooling & thus density. Expansion would thus always outpace gravity in the universe to maintain stability. The entire canon of quantum mechanics is hand crafted machinations from the imaginations of derealized and egomaniacal persons and not based in science. Quantum mechanics is deliberately overly complicated to 1) seem legitimate, 2) prevent transparency, 3) maintain top-down hierarchy. I guarantee not 1 of these scientists can reproduce any "scalar tensors" regarding quantum cosmology when prompted improvisationally. (But students are committed to jumping through moving hoops with made up parameters and abstract maths which reforms them to self-depricate and accept subordination to hierarchy order). Quantum mechanics seeks to imagine the causes of the universe's parameters. It is useless to try to mechanize the universe's parameters since it will be imaginary and it is fraudulent to call it science. Scientists cannot answer important questions regarding phenomena that we have ability to answer. There is no cosmic microwave background radiation. This was microwave radiation collected from nearby sources at all points. Again, space does not have a distance-time dimension, only mass-time dimension, and simply put ~how can the primordial energy that created our galaxy just be reaching it now? ~ How did the Milky Way form faster than light travels? It is a paradox. This would be a conic universe with a distance-time dimension that wraps without boundary thus had no beginning and cannot exist. Quantum mechanicists claim to be looking through a crystal ball to reveal the universe and make it up as they go along thus can never agree without thought reform. Dark matter has evolved from a nonexistent variable of "missing mass" to the reason for the universe's entire existence. There is no dark matter, there is only the energy loss of a galaxy due to gravitational waves thus energy cannot be a measurement for mass. (I am inclined to think a primoridal galaxy formed first and stars formed within this can be simulated. We do not see stars outside galaxies. We cannot put an age on a galaxy based on star luminosity due to perpetual star formation. It is an embarrasment we have no other theories of typologies of elliptical or spiral except star formation. Every classification of galaxy characteristics is new/old. Come to find this new/old requires quantum alchemy. Neglect role of supernova and star formation such as likelyhoods of 2nd gen star typology.) If I can easily postulate a solid alternative, than the current model cannot be accepted. I am just learning that GR accounts for expansion as changing with increase of mass & energy of universe and thus adding a cosmological constant is arbitrary & used to restrict our calculation of the age of the universe. Thus, we can derive the age of the universe if we can find effect mass & energy have on expansion. (Imagine space moves like volume increase of stone in water.) "Dark energy" is a crafted machination mechanizing the parameter of expansion, but expansion rate changes and we need to abandon the added constant. If we find a relation between mass generation in universe (ie, black holes, creation of heavy elements, etc) such that spacetime adjusts to mass to increase expansion such to prevent contraction. Einstein (1915) constructing how the universe worked, understood gravity would contract the universe (meaning all galaxies would eventually merge), and thus there must be stability, so he added a cosmological constant. His equations when unpacked, then show the universe expanding. We can say Einstein's field solutions cite either an expansion or collapse, because it does not account for matter. (At the time, the constant was controversial; Einstein was accused of backward thinking of handwaving a static universe and not accepting novelty; Einstein called it a mistake; Einstein did not add the constant to keep the universe static, he added it to keep the universe from collapse; it both described the stability of the universe and when field equations are solved it predicts observed expansion). This narrative is misrepresented to make Einstein look wrong and then cannibalize cosmology with the emergent quantum mechanics. Einstein and Hawking's work are both being erased from the canon. Hawking was the patriarch of modern cosmology such to mathematically prove the big bang singularity, the age of the universe derived from the observed expansion rate, and black hole mergers. Dr. Hawking's notes at Cambridge may be a treasure trove of hidden secrets and discovery. Further, the first CMBR (1973) may have been a conspiracy, where researchers were using a microwave instrument for the US govt, and devised it so Princeton would announce the idea of the CMBR and then the instrument would prove it. Peebles in particular needs to be under investigation. II. Quantum theorists accepted "primordial perturbations" and then crafted its basis secondary. Clearly junk science. Apparently based on an obscure process from 1905 called Jeans mass treating primordial radiation like a liquified gas. So quantum theorists cannot identify the material of the big bang nor their CMBR, it must be some liquified primordial plasma that then evolved into hydrogen through quantum alchemy. Clearly quantum theorists are invalidating the scientific process to make imagining things equal to deductivism. Quantum theorists are allowed alternative science because they are genius. Schrodinger proved there is no reality thus anything a group of people believe must be a truth in its own right. Some people like Einstein Hawking, and myself can use observations to simulate a universe spatially and find testable assumptions, thus quantum theorists are allowed a crystal ball where they hear the whispers of the universe's history on the quantum level. Recombination is imaginary. Apparently unusuality must make it fact. Why would we assume the big bang was not hydrogen? Would we assume electrons, protons, and the neutron were evolved after the big bang and not also fundamental? Universities students are paying big bucks to be compelled to memorize these processes asserted as fact. Derealization disorder means there is no fact. This is the avant garde world of particle physics. Since there is no basis to this conjecture nor any necessity to explain the universe, NASA's COBE spacecraft however can prove it. Quantum theorists must devise a rationale for why the taxpayer has to subsidize their affluent lifestyle which is essentially role playing mock physics, and we expect it to be based in reality and not quantum machination land. We can assume there are elites who know of the fraud, and through indoctrination convert talent to become believers of quantum machinations thus people are on a holy grail quest for the quantum computer that is less realistic than the warp drive. (Forgive my political cynicism but I have to stay on brand.) So instead of theorizing in the beginning there was hydrogen and devising models of galaxy formation, quantum theorists had to invent all kind of processes then string them together and make it look deduced so that imaginary quantum machinations are causality. And we are supposed to believe this is too technical and elaborate (and requires too much coordination) to be false. 1933 Zwicky tried to deduce galaxy mass from the velocity of galaxies and instead of attributing the differential to gravitational effects reducing kinetic energy, assumed if the kinetically-derived mass differed from the luminosity-derived mass, then matter must be missing! Apprently no one paid attention to this absurd miscalculation at the time, and yet this was resurrected in 1980 to be a rationale for govt funding fraud, after a decade of fraudulent claims regarding proof of the big bang perpetuated by Princeton and Geneva in the 1970s, and after the 1960s decade of psychadelic derealization disorder lead by hayton ashbury Feynman. The dark matter theory solidified in 1980 (not through democraticized majority rule but through elite-driven decree). This was established with a few papers in 1970s where the usual suspects postulated that stars should fling out of a galaxy at its edges and only mass could hold them in. (Of course mass alone could not prevent this effect because increasing mass would increase kinetic energy and still fling stars). We come to find out these scientists knew gravitational waves carried away enough kinetic energy for the galaxy to stay in formation and conspired to decieve lawmakers and the general public. Thus in the 1970s, several papers in a cadence were published to set up a scientific inquiry and apparent debate, for elites to then seize authority of the field in 1980. This was the beginning of the mass delusion to erase general relativity and cannibalize cosmology worldwide with made up processes in which these elites could make vast amounts of wealth without competition and satisfy a godcomplex that they themselves created the universe. Quantum theorists also do not present information in a useful way (becuse this is too amateur and quantum overcomplicates reality in its genius) and thus need abstract schematics of a thematically morbid appeal. ongoing.. Your truly, Domi Vale Dec 2025