The United States should not be allied with Israel.pdf - anon

Please enable JavaScript to view the full PDF

The question put forward as this paper’s premise is whether (or not) The United States should not be allied with Israel. In the course of this written presentation, I will submit some accepted academic and mainstream arguments against this allyship, as well as some more controversial claims and evidence. It can be argued, for example, that Israel played a significant role in the attacks on the United States on 9/11/20011. American Jews are also alleged to be complicit in these events2. Israel attacked the USS Liberty in a war crime, false flag event in 19673, setting a modus operandi precedent for Israeli involvement in 9/11. The Lavon Affair of 19544 also illustrates this point of Israel being an underhandedly hostile nation-state. Furthermore, this presentation will necessitate some acknowledgement that Israel and Jews, generally, are closely-linked concepts. Ideas and agendas such as the Greater Israel5 project and Zionism6 make adherents to these concepts and ideals, which will include dual- citizen American and Israeli Jews6, potentially suspect in the minds of many critical thinkers. The over-representation of Jews in American media7 and government8, along with the powerful Jewish and Israeli-interests lobbying groups, such as the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)9, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC)10 and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL)11 represent a few of the more egregious examples of Jewish supremacy, dominance and posturing in the power-centered spheres of influence and control in the American empire and society today. Despite these and other facts and arguments12, the United States and Israel have had a long-standing allied partnership, and Jews and Israel enjoy a favorable relationship by many non- Jewish Americans (mainly fundamentalist Christian organizations13). In terms of financial aid, the state of Israel has received “$142.3 billion (current, or noninflation-adjusted, dollars) in bilateral assistance and missile defense funding”14 from the United States to date. The 1 Congressional Research Service (CSR) goes on to state that, “[a]lmost all U.S. bilateral aid to Israel is in the form of military assistance, although from 1971 to 2007 Israel also received significant economic assistance”14. In 2016, the Obama Administration oversaw the “Memorandum of Understanding…on military aid”14 in which the U.S. “pledges to provide $38 billion in military aid…to Israel” from 2019 through to 202814. It is true that the Defense Industries in the United States benefits from this transaction, and subsequently there exists an argument that the U.S. economy benefits relative to this relationship. Of course, there exists significant debate as to whether this sum of monies couldn’t be better spent elsewhere in national program prioritizing, or even saved/used to pay down the national debt. Donald Trump is also an enthusiastic supporter of Jews and of Israel15. In 2019, the so- called ‘Dolan Heights’ were established15a, which was preceded by the long-in-wait transfer recognition by the United States of Israeli’s capital city from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem15b. Trump also has a Cabinet and Administration that is figuratively spilling over with Jews. His daughter, Ivanka, has also converted to Judaism, in accordance with religious tradition since her husband, Jared Kushner, is Jewish. One can begin to see a trend developing; one that is significantly pro- Israel and pro-Jewish peoples and faith. The Judaic beneficence narrative, therefore, is conventional, established and ‘official’. The U.S. State Department website states: “Israel has long been, and remains, America’s most reliable partner in the Middle East. Israel and the United States are bound closely by historic and cultural ties as well as by mutual interests”16. The U.S. has remained in a ‘special relationship’17, a phrase first used by John F. Kennedy in relation to the U.S.’ relationship with Israel, since the very beginning. In fact, even before the creation of the state of Israel in 1947, the Dulles brothers, Allen and John Foster (who would later become Secretary of State in the 2 Eisenhower administration), who worked from their respective high-ranking posts in the State Department and the Office of Strategic Studies/CIA (and later as Secretary of State), in the development of Balfour declaration18a: a 1917 document which established the intention of the creation of a “national home for the Jews”18b. An argument often brought forward in favor of the United States’ aid-benefactor relationship with Israel is: ‘Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East’19 (Lebanon is not a democracy?19a). To quote ‘20-plus year CIA veteran Michael’ Scheurer in his remote interview with Bill Maher on HBO’s Real Time, “So what”19. Scheurer goes on to elaborate, “Israel is not worth an American life or an American dollar”19. Speaking anecdotally and from observation, Scheuer’s opinion on this is widely shared. To quote an anonymous source from /pol/: “[w]e consider Britain a democracy, dont [sic] we? Even though its [sic] a totalitarian monarchy and an oppressive police state? [Redacted] that entire continent. America has ZERO[sic] business there. None. At all.”20 A very similar opinion, indeed, with that of Scheurer’s. Everyone has an opinion, of course-even academia! The form of government that Israel has or doesn’t have21, however, has little overall bearing (much like the hyper-focused narrative misdirection of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict) on the arguments to be put forward in this paper. The loaded terms of ‘quality’ and ‘reputable’, as put forward in this assignment’s grading rubric relating to the substance of ‘sources’ for this assignment, is subjective. To my critical thinking and informed worldview, I can find orders-of-magnitude better, more encompassing and more accurate worldview information and opinion on dissident Right sites or other alternative media relating to the Jewish Question22 and various ancillary subtopics therein (including the ‘conspiratorial worldview’ [hereafter cw])-than I can find in the academic journal databases available through the college. To be fair, there are some (relatively minor) criticisms to be seen 3 in top search results23, however these ultimately are unsatisfying and, like Chomsky’s critiques (further on), amount to little more than academic pilpul when compared with what I would submit are the more cutting-edge and relevant (in terms of influence percentage and in disregard for the perfunctory subservience to an elite in-group24 preference) discussion variance found on free-speech boards, social media and websites. At the heart of this concern for quality and objective truth likely lies in the funding and make-up of the networks and institutions who fund and support the publishers, the researchers and institutes, et cetera. It has been documented a number of times that academia is hardly above suspicion when it comes to publishing their alleged findings25, and indeed more in-depth research into this area of so-called academic validity is warranted. The arguments not only for false flag terror events, but of World War II/Holocaust revisionism26 (including proven anti-Semitic hate crime hoaxes, lies or questions relating to the veracity of such claims26a); or white racial genocide and demographic replacement agendas27, to name just a few, will never, I predict, be addressed in any serious or objective manner by academic journals, or by the ‘reputable’ print media publishers that academia-and in particular social science academia-deem worthy of inclusion into the echo chamber of higher learning in these and other fields. Academia28 is not alone in this coordinated censorship enterprise, either. The extension of these thought-crimes and dialogue taboos to the Jewish-dominated mainstream news and culture media29, as well as to the heavily inundated Zionist Occupied Government30 (ZOG) influences within the U.S. should also be noted. Academia is a gatekeeping element in many regards, but when it comes to criticism (or to certain alleged crimes and maleficence) of Israel, and of Jews, it is all too frequently unconscionably duplicitous28a, inauthentic28b and ebulliently Philo-Semitic28c. 4 5 6 To wit, academic gatekeeper Noam Chomsky31, in his book Fateful Triangle: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinians32 sets forth perfectly tepid arguments, vis-à-vis incursion into Palestinian lands and other regional (middle eastern) military and political conflicts. In the opening chapter, entitled ‘Fanning the Flames’, Chomsky writes: “It is surely hypocritical to condemn Israel for establishing settlements in the occupied territories while we pay for establishing and expanding them. Or to condemn Israel for attacking civilian targets with cluster and phosphorus bombs ‘to get the maximum kill per hit, when we provide them gratis or at bargain rates, knowing that they will be used for just this purpose. Or to criticize Israel’s ‘indiscriminate bombardment of heavily- settled civilian areas or its other military adventures, we not only provide the means in abundance but welcome Israel’s assistance in testing the latest weaponry but welcome Israel’s assistance in testing the latest weaponry under live battlefield conditions-to be sure, against a vastly outmatched enemy, including completely undefended targets, always the safest way to carry out experiments of this sort…32 Perhaps, if I were an affected Palestinian (or other Israeli-neighboring nationality who has been in conflict with Israel), Chomsky could surely seem like a sincere advocate, as this rhetoric is not exactly ‘tepid’ compared with much that is heard by the fawning and submissive U.S. media and its government spokespersons (often an incestuous relationship-particularly within the intelligence services33), as relates to Israeli affairs and public relations, generally. Compared with the propositions put forward already in this paper, however, namely, that: Israel and American Jews were and are complicit in 9/11 events and a false narrative cover-up1,2, and Israel’s false-flagging of the USS Liberty3, the Lavon Affair4 and other instances of Israeli and Mossad terror events and false-flags35, the merits of Israeli incursions into Palestinian territory, humanitarian crises and human rights violations and even war crimes are comparatively trivial- especially from an ‘America-first’ or nationalistic worldview. When one weighs in with the even more inflammatory rhetoric (rhetoric that is, nevertheless, being discussed with a high degree of urgency, seriousness and candor, while also being supported with a fair amount of convincing memetic36 and other argumentative evidence and supposition, in non-mainstream 7 codified sub-cultures) and accusations that: Israel’s and Jews are lying and have lied about World War II ‘Holocaust’ claims26; that this era of historical record (the Holocaust) is woefully disingenuous and suspends belief in a variety of arenas26; or that Israel and Jews are playing a centerpiece, “leading role” in the subversion and demographic replacement of European nations and their peoples through mass-migratory ‘refugee’ facilitation27, then we can really appreciate the restricted information limitations of the academic gatekeeping premise. To what extent Israel and Jews are culpable in promoting targeted race-mixing. propaganda27a by inculcating youth, female and other demographics through advertising27a and other powers of cultural influence they hold sway over; or to what extent Jews and/or Israel are responsible in the shaping of open-borders U.S. immigration policies, which has had and is having disastrous immediate as well as long-term consequences for Americans and for the United States according to many U.S. citizens who strongly disagree with the levels of demographic replacement and other immigration-related concerns (i.e. economics), are hot topics in the current cultural and political climates. Motives ascribed to these actions and agendas by either Israel or Jews are perhaps more nebulous, theoretical or even occulted. Whether the ‘chosen people’ of the Jews desire a more heterogenous genetic make-up for a Jerusalem- centered New World Order paradigm37 for reasons relating to those specific characteristics of mixed-race peoples who presumably would be second-class or subservient to Jews38; or if a more racially homogeneous and nationalistic ideology-driven population with militarization potential poses a threat to Jews in the way that Germany’s Third Reich did (regardless of the specific validity of the ‘Final Solution’ or debate revolving around the Holocaust narratives); or if there are some alternative theories or explanations for these trends and behaviors relating to population replacement (racial demographic replacement) that I am unaware of, are tangential areas of 8 research and speculation that stretch the scope and limits of this already exceeded-maximum capacity paper. The above arguments do not represent the totality of the arguments against a U.S.-Israeli alliance that I am aware of, but perhaps they do include several of the more contentious and most egregious ones, however. If more time and space were allotted, an examination of how Ghislaine Maxwell (a Mossad operative, and Epstein’s handler39) and Jeffery Epstein40, a Jew, trafficked underage girls to Little St. James Island40, providing sexual excursions (and alleged much worse) via the ‘Lolita Express’40 to influential and powerful Americans and other ‘elites’, for example, could and should be further explored. The views religious Jewish leaders38 and Rabbinical Talmudic text38 have stated regarding the goyim (non-Jews) can perhaps illuminating and connected with how these types of humanitarian crimes can be casually dismissed as inconsequential. It should be noted that a number of the infographic material12 presented as supporting evidence for a variety of claims made thus far, and which will likely incorporate additional supporting evidence references in the paper, are often comprised of, amongst other potentially offensive characterizations or content, variations of offensive caricatures (e.g. ‘merchant memes’41). Some attempt at selective editing in presenting some of this content which might contain some of the aforementioned content were initially considered, however, in the pursuit of relaying as much potentially persuasive argumentative evidence as possible, then I opted to include the memetic or pictorial information. The intent and purpose, I would hope it should go without having to say (but I am saying it in the event that it does need to), in presenting this material is not to offend, but to inform. The author acknowledges that a whole slew of arguments put forward in this presentation thus far, including the informational graphics in the 9 supporting content ‘drive’ folders, are controversial, distasteful and even taboo or verboten by the ‘mainstream’, by or to Jews, and by or to many liberally-aligned individuals, et cetera. Nevertheless, and to reinforce the point addressed earlier, these admittedly controversial and/or offensive-to-some-or-many worldviews do exist. Furthermore, these worldviews and ideologies, I surmise, are also growing and gaining traction amongst a number of subcultural enclaves, including youth demographics and men (admittedly, and in particular, ‘white’ men of European heritage and genetic legacy), although one will likely find dissenting opinion as to the exact trajectory or ‘numbers’ which comprise these political affiliations (the ‘alt-right’, or the ‘dissident’ right, being one such label). Whether or not an individual or group may agree or disagree with the merits put forward in some or all of the evidence, arguments and other presentations in the course of this paper, I can assure the reader that the majority-if not all-of the claims addressed here are subscribed to by a sizeable contingency of persons, albeit, depending on the specific worldview make-up, it may still constitute a minority as relates to the entire population of the U.S., or European nation, or elsewhere, as applicable. Therefore, these arguments and the ‘counter-propaganda’, if you will, are highly relevant to discussions centering around public policy and politics-especially wherein Jews and Israel are connected-despite, or perhaps in spite, of their controversial composition. Returning briefly to what might, for the purposes of this paper, be referred to as the ‘Chomskyan academic dialectic’; setting aside Noam Chomsky’s internal and personal motivations, and setting aside Chomsky’s Ashkenazi-Jewish heritage42 (which arguably should be noted if one is being objectionable as relates to the identification of the source and the specifics of said source’s criticisms of Israel, the United States, and other related areas); and, furthermore, setting aside an entire sidebar of Jewish ancestry questions, like the Khazar 10 hypothesis of Ashkenazi ancestry43, or what exactly constitutes a ‘Jew’ in either cultural or orthodox contexts (the 12 Tribes of Israel, et cetera)-all of which are, of course, relevant to the paper discussion but are nevertheless such broad areas of discussion that it is impractical to attempt to delve into any real detail here. Let us define, then, for the purposes of this paper and in very general terms, the terms United States and Israel. Contextually, Israel is a Jewish nation. This will be a basic premise or assumption of this paper, however, I will acknowledge that there is debate to be made here as how secular and multicultural Israel could be defined44, as well as acknowledging that there may exist further debate and opinion as to what Israel is that go beyond this basic assumption. Judaism and the Judaic character (what constitutes being ‘Jewish’) can also be dissected ad infinitum, but will not be, also for reasons of brevity, here. There are specific and relevant religious and spiritual differentiations, however, within broader religious Judaism that we should at least acknowledge, without going too far down these respective rabbit holes. The mainstream ‘Judaic-Christian values’, the Old Testament/Torah relationship the West has with religious Jewry can be contrasted with the less mainstream Abrahamic faith-associated constructs such as the Talmud, and the more occult and esoteric Kabbalah. With regards to meta-political conclusions and eschatological references, these religious, ethnic and cultural frames-of-reference as relates to broader Judaism and Jews are of some import. The United States, in contrast, is not a Jewish or Israeli vassal state (well, it is, many will argue, but it’s not supposed to be, it wasn’t set out to be, and/or it isn’t advertised to much of its citizenry as such). Whether the U.S. is a religious (Christian) nation, or if the U.S. is a secular nation45; if the U.S. was founded by Freemasons and therefore this body represents a subversive or fifth column in United States46, comprised of government apparatchiks within agencies and administrations since the Revolution46 (certainly since the Truman administration46); if the 11 United States is a country founded by and for white Europeans of good moral character47 and their white ancestors47; or if the United States is a multi-cultural melting-pot48, wherein (Sephardic) Jewish poet Emma Lazarus implores the huddled masses of refugees, asylum- seekers and other migrants to North America’s shining shores; these are certainly debatable interpretations of the American ethos and defining characteristics. To simplify, and for the purposes of this paper, the U.S. is, should not be, was not intended to be a Jewish or Zionist ideologue-dominated state, or a Gollum for the state of Israel. If one wants to investigate further as to why the United States might be conflated with an Israeli or Jewish-controlled or dominated nation-state (ZOG), the pro-Israel lobby AIPAC9 , the ADL11 and SPLC10 are probably worthy jumping-off points for research. The SPLC’s (recently former) president Mark Potok10a (a Jew), for example, was shown to have lists on his wall denoting the declining racial demographics of the United States (with specific reference to 1965, the year the Immigration and Nationality Act “abolished an earlier quota system based on national origin and established a new immigration policy based on reunited immigrant families and attracting skilled labor to the United States”10b) and Europe10a. The ADL, in turn, has been actively working to suppress political thought and discussion, impressing social media ‘public square’ corporations to censor individuals and independent media (including search and queue algorithmic malfeasance11b), as well as pressuring payment processors for many popular independent news media analysis and political channels or individuals who present a threat to Jewish hegemonic power monopoly and the aims of the Zionist takeover of American political discourse11b. Our political elite class also contribute to concerns relating to a ZOG conspiracy and undue influence. Senator (D-NY) Chuck Schumer (Jewish), Senate Minority Leader (and Select 12 Committee for Intelligence member) stated at a 2019 speech at AIPAC: “You can be a Jew and lobby for Israel and it does not make you any less American…You can be, all at once, completely Jewish, completely pro-Israel and completely American”49; "Anyone who aspires to the highest office in the land should not be afraid to stand with the strongest supporters of Israel in America,"49 Pence said. "It is wrong to boycott Israel and it is wrong to boycott AIPAC"49. In a 2010 address to AIPAC, he stated: "Now let me close by telling you about my name. As some of you know, my name is a Hebrew word. "Schumer" comes from the Hebrew word "Shomer," which means "guardian," "watchman." My ancestors were guardians of the ghetto wall of Chortkiv, in Galicia. And when they came to Ellis Island, they said their name in Yiddish, "Shoymer". And it got written down as "Schumer." To you I say this: that name was given to me for a reason. For as long as I live, for as long as I have the privilege of serving in the Senate from New York, I will unflinchingly, unstintingly and with all of my strength be Shomer Yisrael, a guardian of Israel. Ladies and gentlemen, Am Yisrael Chai, in Israel and America, the Jewish nation lives now and forever."49 There are several additional choice quotes from Senator Schumer one could highlight that are either of a questionable or outright suspicious nature to one who has a skeptical or antagonistic position towards dual-loyalty. Time and space concerns preclude much more exposure of the Senator’s biases, however. One example, however, of Senator Schumer’s true allegiance could be his pro-choice stance on abortion issue as U.S. Senator, despite also allied with Erfat, an organization which “seeks to reduce abortions of Israeli Jews”49. One might be compelled to make an inference, here, that the Senator is ‘okay’ with goy babies being aborted (perhaps and even especially fetuses of the European, non-Jewish stock variety27), while simultaneously wanting the Jewish ‘race’ to grow and thrive. This may be an unfair aspersion, but when Israeli Sephardic leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, makes statements to the effect: “Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world; only to serve the People of Israel,” he said during a public discussion of what kind of work non-Jews are 13 allowed to perform on Shabbat.” And “Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat." 27; or quotes from the Talmud exhibit rank Jewish supremacy and hate for the ‘other’27, one has to wonder. 14 Beyond Schumer’s dual-loyalty question are 45 Senators who support a bill that would make the boycott of Israel a crime50. And don’t expect hurricane relief funding if you boycott Israel and you are an American51. To be fair to the ACLU, here, they seemed to have sensible positions on these last two ZOG cases-in-point. As illustrative as it would be to continue with further ZOG evidentiary exhibits within the political elite and boilerplate politics, ‘9/11’ can provide its own, metapolitical window into a Jewish and Israeli agenda and complicity: “On the morning of September 11, 2001, 19 men armed with boxcutters directed by a man on dialysis in a cave fortress halfway around the world using a satellite phone and a laptop directed the most sophisticated penetration of the most heavily-defended airspace in the world, overpowering the passengers and the military combat-trained pilots on 4 commercial aircraft before flying those planes wildly off course for over an hour without being molested by a single fighter interceptor. These 19 hijackers, devout religious fundamentalists who liked to drink alcohol, snort cocaine, and live with pink-haired strippers, managed to knock down 3 buildings with 2 planes in New York, while in Washington a pilot who couldn’t handle a single engine Cessna was able to fly a 757 in an 8,000 foot descending 270 degree corskscrew turn to come exactly level with the ground, hitting the Pentagon in the budget analyst office where DoD staffers were working on the mystery of the 2.3 trillion dollars that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had announced “missing” from the Pentagon’s coffers in a press conference the day before, on September 10, 2001...”52 There are sixteen source hyperlinks to sources in just that select excerpt, incidentally, from James Corbett’s highly popular 5 minute tour-de-force, “9/11: A Conspiracy Theory”52. Relating to the thesis points in this paper and the specific Israeli and American Jews, we can begin by looking at Jewish and Israeli intrigue where that line of questioning by Corbett ends, namely (then-Israeli Prime Minister) Ehud Barak’s pronouncement of 9/11’s culpability shortly after the events unfolding pointed to terrorism53. The psychological term for this is projection54 (a term codified by Sigmund Freud, a Jew, who’s nephew Edward Bernays [also Jewish], 15 incidentally, also factor heavily into questions and concerns relating cultural control through mass media and the psychological aspects of advertising55). Further examples of alleged complicit Jews in 9/11 include Larry Silverstein’s highly suspicious ‘Pull It’ comment-itself a loaded term, possibly denoting demolition terminology-on PBS’ 2002 special56 America Rebuilds: I remember getting a call from the Fire Department Commander, telling me that they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire, and I said 'You know, we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is, is pull it' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse..."56 Silverstein’s daughter, son, personal assistant, publicist and others close to Silverstein were also noticeably absent from the WTC complex on the day or at the time of the attacks, despite otherwise having been scheduled to be in the North Tower56(GD). Former Senator and 16 U.S. democratic Presidential candidate John Kerry would later seemingly confirm a foreknowledge of intentional demolition of Building 7 in a public question and answer forum in Austin, Texas in 200757. Silverstein was also eventually awarded the largest single insurance settlement ever, to the tune of $4.55B58, despite asking for $7.1B. This is quite an initial return for a total investment of $14 million in his own money59. Silverstein’s weekly phone calls with “good friend” Benjamin Netanyahu is a not-overlooked fact by many in the cw camp, either56. Building 7 of the World Trade Center complex is arguably a lynchpin of 9/11 conspiracy or truth research, but since this paper will necessitate only the most cursory of overviews of the Israeli and/or Jewish connections to crimes such as 9/11, much will be lacking to complete a fuller picture from which to compare with the official conspiracy narrative, namely the ‘findings’ of the 9/11 Commission Report60. The BBC’s alleged referencing of Building 7’s collapse on air prior to the event61, various expert and other opinion relating the collapse of Building 7 17 Of course, there are numerous layers to the 9/11 cw that cannot be explained strictly through a Jewish and Israeli-centric conspiratorial thesis. There are a multitude of ‘internecine’ arguments one could spend an inordinate amount of time on just on the collapse (or disintegration) of the Towers62, relating to planes versus a ‘no-plane theories’62 (CGI video analysis opinion), the ‘melting point of steel versus jet fuel temperature’ debate62, ‘mini-nukes’ and the twin tower bathtubs62, nano-thermite findings62, or even direct energy or other exotic weaponry63 used in New York (perhaps even utilizing hurricane Andrew62) speculation, et cetera. Other 9/11 conspiracy debates relating to the Pentagon strike63, the absence of lawn debris63, the size of the hole (missile strike v. plane strike allegations63) relative to a 757; the absence of debris Shanksville, PA and other Flight 93 anomalies64; the near-intact passport of Satam al- Suqami’s ‘found’ in Manhattan near Ground Zero65 (or the other questionable three alleged terrorists’ passports found during the course of the PENTTBOM investigation65); the dubiousness of certain alleged ‘eyewitnesses’66; the ‘missing 2.3 Trillion’ from the Pentagon budget which Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was testifying before Congress as to the location, or allocation, of on September 10th, 200167; NORAD war games like Operation: Able Danger68 that were operating concurrently with the events of September 11th 2001; the destruction of WTF evidence, such as the steel and other trade center complex debris that was immediately sent to China for recycling69; or any of the numerous other fractal insights into the events relating to 9/11 are worth mentioning for context of the vastness of conspiracy research and speculation, but ultimately are footnoted side-conversations for the purposes of this paper (particularly to the extent that they do not involve either Israel of Jews directly, or indirectly). 18 19 Did John McCain Meet with Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (source) 20 To be sure, there are as many or more ‘debunking’ websites and opinions online, in print and in other media as there are for those who doubt the official narrative or story (‘OS’)70. This presentation, therefore, cannot be all-inclusive in the examination of all the particular viewpoints relating to the 9/11 OS vs cw debate, and will likely result in an unsatisfying conclusion as to a definitive causation or culpability relating to 9/11-to the extent that this is even possible at all (this caveat, too, can and should be extended to other debatable historical events of record discussed in this paper). It should also be noted, despite its obviousness, that this presentation is admittedly biased in favor of a cw, and will not go out of its way to ‘carry water’ for the OS worldview, as the premise of this presentation essentially requires such a stance. One cannot, in complete good faith, say for a certainty that the opinions and worldviews set forth by the cw (as opposed to an OS one) is necessarily the accurate or even a more accurate one. Despite this, the intent of attempting to persuade the reader that many, if not all, of the thesis arguments are valid or at least have some legitimacy within an argumentative construct. With this in mind, it bears repeating that various iterations of the cw have a place in the broader discussion surrounding disputed events or historical record, regardless of the comfortability spectrum these topics may have for some who are averse to any social normative deviation. Controversial information and informed opinion deserves an opportunity to be expressed in open, honest and frank terms for, or with the intent, of reciprocal dialogue and debate-particularly in a tax-payer funded institution within a liberal educational mandate71. Experts, ‘experts’, lay researchers and casual observers on both sides of these Os/cw debates can be found, alternatively, presenting such terms as: ‘shills’72 (or shilling), ‘sheeple’ (‘blue-pilled’, ‘normies’), ‘normalcy bias’73, ‘cognitive dissonance’74, etc. (those terminologies and partisan-speak used most often by the OS deniers); which in turn gives way to language as 21 ‘crackpot’, ‘tinfoil hat’, or even ‘enemy combatants’ (“domestic terrorists”75). This variety of enhanced rhetoric being employed by governmental powerbrokers (who inform and espouse their status quo worldview and talking points to the majority opinion, vis-a-vis OS promotors in media and elsewhere), is neither new nor lacking in shame. To wit, here is a quote from former President George W. Bush (and Skull & Bones member77) who admonished in his address before the United Nations on November 11, 200176: “Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty...” Like grandfather77, like Father77, like son… 22 During those intervening days, months and years after 9/11, these sentiments were expressed from other government officials78 and parroted by scripted mockingbird79 news and other culture-directing media figures78. Of course, Bush 43’s National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice also said there was no way the DoD could have predicted an airborne attack like 9/1180, a claim that makes her, and others in the Bush Administration80 who acquiesced a “failure of imagination”81, either liars or criminally negligent due to their allegedly uninformed status: Was, like Peral Harbor is alleged to have been by some historians and interpretations82, 9/11 allowed to happen (but not orchestrated, necessarily, by fifth column actors within various ‘deep state’ positions within the United States government, military and intelligence services); was it the proverbial ‘inside job’, or was 9/11 in fact a surprise attack by outside interlopers, whether they be Saudi, Egyptian, Al Qaeda operatives, Israeli Mossad or a combination of these or other state or rogue element actors? Was 9/11 a combination of any or all of these interpretations? These are valid questions and should be pursued, or at least considered, however: the one definitive conclusion one can surmise after any investigative work outside a passive inculcation of official and mainstream sourced narrative is that the official 9/11 narrative is rife with inconsistencies, mis and disinformation. To the cw convert, the OS, ad advertised, is 23 likely untrue, and to the extent that there is some accurate or impossible-to-disprove83 information embedded within the official narrative, the cw explanation(s) is (are), for many, far more logical and plausible. Furthermore, the 9/11 cw does not operate within a bubble or vacuum. Rather, it works best as a key yet still smaller aspect to a fairly large, complex and informed worldview that is typically dismissed and marginalized by the mainstream84. This worldview may vary by interpretation, however, but by-and-large there are broader conspiratorial and adjacent themes that many or most share. Furthermore, it is an often a jarring and exceptionally uncomfortable worldview to acknowledge or to come to terms with85, and many likely never do-even when confronted with striking and glaring elements of the cw. 9/11 was just such a ‘worldview shatterer’, or ‘awakening catalyst’ for many. While the debunkers and OS adherents will often insist that the burden of proof is on the OS denier86, one could argue that the OS purveyors themselves ought to be the party to adequately explain the myriad of errors and inconsistencies pointed out by deniers in the OS (to date, this has not been the case for many OS deniers). If the burden of proof is going to be placed on the OS denier, admittedly they are already at a disadvantage as they do not have the luxury of powerful government agencies and their bully-pulpits, or government’s and the intelligence communities’ bedfellow, the media monopoly, to assuage (and condition) a traumatized public and support an OS which could very well be an elaborate-although not foolproof-concoction of falsehoods and plausibility. Ultimately, of course, the OS denier may not persuade a given audience with their constructed narrative(s) or explanations, given oftentimes their lone and miniscule-by-comparison resources (the internet and social media has leveled this playing field to an extent, however). This is the nature of the predicament truth and truth seekers find themselves in, however, in a post-1941, 1963, 1969, and so on, cw paradigm. 24 Nevertheless, questioning power and publicly disagreeing with controversial claims or positions in accordance with one’s conscience sits very much at the heart of the American value and Constitutionally protected idea of free speech. If this ability to dissent peaceably and publicly is stymied and suppressed, then American liberties and civil rights are infringed, and the revolutionary spirit is galvanized87. One almost hates to misappropriate an apropos quote88 here, especially since the cw (or ‘the truth’, as the cw adherents would call it) faces such an uphill struggle against much resistance. One also hopes there is applicable truth to that sentiment, in any case. Ironically, the term ‘fake news’ was developed by the mainstream media (which has always had a close relationship with the intelligence services89 [which, according to ex-KGB officer Yuri Bezmenov and others is primarily an apparatus designed to manipulate and control the masses90]) to be used against the conspiratorial worldview/OS deniers, and this in turn has, for all intents and purposes, backfired stupendously on them. How much of this could be contributable to ‘political outsider’ President Trump’s twitter account, or perhaps to the studies that show that percentages of Americans in the high minorities, or even majorities, don’t trust in or believe the mainstream media or official government positions91 is probably of some dove- tailing contention. Perhaps there is a civilian grassroots-military hybrid ‘patriot’ resistance front against an entrenched ‘deep state’, with dueling intelligence agencies (NSA v. CIA) and all manner of digital cloak & dagger spookiness permeating the culture war, à la Q Anon92, that is also factoring into this psychological warfare being conducted in the 21st century. How much of any of this relates to Israel or Jews93 would be relevant to the thesis of this paper, and perhaps more will be revealed in this arena in time. 25 2019 grassroots TPUSA Q&A infiltration and disruption# (Google ‘Dancing Israelis’) The so-called ‘Dancing Israelis’ are another prime example Jewish connectivity to-at the very least-Israeli foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks. Sivan Kurzberg, Paul Kurzberg, Oded Ellner, Yaron Shimuel and Omar Marmari were the only suspects arrested for the events of 9/11/2001 for this crime#. The Israeli nationals worked for Urban Moving Systems, a Mossad front#, and were witnessed documenting the event from a rooftop in New Jersey on the morning of September 11th. Dan Rather, then-CBS news anchor, as a guest on David Letterman’s Late Night program-would also confirm this hostile ‘cell’ allegation on September 17th#. 26 The information of the Israelis’ arrest was reported the next day (September 2nd) by journalist Paulo Lima in The Record, the newspaper of Bergen County in New Jersey#. At least one of the Israelis, Paul Kurzberg, was a ‘hit’ on a CIA-FBI database search for Mossad operatives, and Oded Ellner later stated on Israeli television that “they were there to document the event”#. According to government documents, the Israelis were pictured hugging, ‘high- fiving’, smiling, laughing and even holding a lighter up to the camera for frame. Further conflicting and incriminating evidence can be discovered on these Israelis in various web sources, including Corbett’s 9/11 Suspects series, but this exercise can, again, serve merely an introduction to the Israeli and Jewish links to terrorism and broader Zionist agenda. Other threads to suggest for ‘pulling’, as Larry Silverstein so aptly stated, should or could include: Senator Al Franken’s reference to a ‘Jew call’ warning him to stay away from the World Trade Center complex on 9/112; Israeli commando# (Sayeret Matkal) Daniel Lewin who allegedly perished on Flight 11 as a ‘hero’ (posing here posing with Swiss watch ‘Hijacker’ brand, with hour flight 11, minute and second hands at ‘11’), praised for his heroism for allegedly attempting to prevent the hijackings, but who is also alleged to have been a terrorist hijacker of the plane himself#; Pentagon comptroller Dov Zakheim; or either Jewish, dual-citizen or alleged Zionist neoconservatives who served in or during the Bush Administration (Michael Chertoff, Paul Wolfowitz), who were on the 9/11 Commission (Philip Zelikow), or who had been in key and high-ranking intelligence, State and other governmental agencies and related services (think tanks and policy institutes) during, prior or even after 9/11/2001. Artistic rendition of Urban Moving System’s alleged/reported truck mural# 27 28 29 The so-called ‘Jew call(s)’, referenced earlier by former Minnesota Senator Al Franken, may not have much counter-narrative traction. It is curious, though, why a Jewish humorist writer and comedian with political ambitions would want to make light of allegations that Jews were notified before the attacks on the WTC complex on 9/11/2001 less than 2 years after the attacks. Beyond Franken’s questionable choice of ‘too-soon’ material, if there was actual foreknowledge or a forewarning by or for Jews or any parties regarding terrorism-related events that were to take place at the Trade Center tower complex on September 11th, then clearly this warrants an awareness and further investigation. The problem here, as with so much of 9/11 truth and investigation, is bias and complicity after-the-fact by an untrustworthy media, government and other institutions (including academia) charged with public trust responsibility, yet failing disastrously, and arguably criminally, in this regard. 30 The neoconservative Project for A New American Century (PNAC)’s reference of the need for a “new Pearl Harbor event”# should raise an eyebrow, as should Patrick Clawson, Director of Research at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP),’s statement at a Q&A following a 2012 speech entitled, “How to build U.S.-Israeli Coordination on Preventing an Iranian Nuclear Breakout”. Clawson remarks: “One can combine other means of pressure with sanctions. I mentioned that explosion on August 17th. We could step up the pressure. I mean look people, Iranian submarines periodically go down, some day one of them might not come up, who would know why? We can do a variety of things if we wish to increase the pressure... We are in the game of using covert means against the Iranians. We could get nastier.” Spoken like a true chickenhawk. When, as General Wesley Clarke confirmed#, the United States goes to war with Iran, it will be in no small part due to the thanks of neoconservative think tanks and analysts like Patrick Clawson…or Paul Wolfowitz, John Bolton, Dick Cheney: none of whom served in combat, let alone the military. Of course, U.S. military veterans such as John McCain, Dan Crenshaw, or even Henry Kissinger are not immune to Zionist enthrallment and other ‘deep state’ shenanigans. And make no mistake-Israel views Iran as a threat. Any U.S. military intervention or ‘response’ to an ‘act of aggression’ by Iran should be first considered to be a false flag attack by Israel before other conclusions are considered (cui bono?). 31 This is an opportunity to point out that the 9/11 cw (OS denial) is not wholly an Israeli- Jewish contrivance. It surely contains actors from the U.S. and elsewhere who are not Israeli, (ostensibly) not Jewish, and-unless being a Zionist qualifies (and maybe it does# [Joe Biden])-not Crypto-Jewish#. As Chris Bollyn points out in the preface of his book, 9/11: The Deception that Changed the World, “If it is True that Israelis and Zionist partisans are indeed behind 9-11, it does not mean that all Jews are guilty by association”. Nevertheless, Israeli and Jewish participation allegations for 9/11/2001 is significant. Extending this thread into the broader cultural reaches of the Jewish community into the media, Hollywood#, et cetera, lends itself to the phenomenon known as predictive programming (pp). If, in fact, 9/11 was a mega-ritual event, which by necessity would require foreknowledge, then this would explain the statistical improbability of the myriad of evidentiary examples one can point to relating to pp. The premise of whether or not there was a Jewish ‘tribal’ effort 32 (through their monopolization in media cultural institutions) to insert this type of subliminal and overt advertising, media and narratives into the psyche of the popular culture further begs the question as to the “Jewish” relationship to the 9/11 attacks. Whether or not this premise reflects religious Judaism, or some offshoot or adjacent branch of the Abrahamic faith, is debatable. 33 The alleged infiltration of Dutch art student groups Gelatin and E-Team (art project entitled ‘B- thing) by Israeli demolition experts are also suspect saboteurs in the opinions of many#. 34 Of course, many ‘loose threads’ relating to a 9/11 conspiratorial area of speculation or research could ultimately be proven to be dead ends. Still others will likely never end up providing ‘smoking gun’ evidence trail to provide proof-positive results of a conspiracy involving a definitive cabal of actors. There is also the possibility that, given sufficient resources, an impartial panel of investigators invested in the truth as well as legal and Department of Justice or military tribunal teeth behind investigative inquiries, the American people might actually get a more accurate analysis or picture of the events of 9/11, or other significant events in the American timeline with substantial anomalies. Of course, this will almost certainly involve a gutting of various governmental agencies-particularly the CIA and FBI-as well as a complete dismantling of the American media due to their incorrigibly co-opted and compromised status. Some occult aspects# of 9/11, too, can be analyzed through an occulted Judaic lens. While this truly does stretch the more grounded political intrigue and conspiracies relating to events like 9/11, it does nevertheless fit into an overall, ‘big-picture view’ of explaining why 9/11 occurred, and perhaps why Israel and religious Judaism, kabbalism, and/or Zionism contributed to this ‘catalyzing event’. Whether or not the reader wishes to entertain such concurrent eschatological notions or beliefs, presumably outside of Ground Zero and other 9/11 real estate, such as the construction of the Third Temple in Jerusalem plans#, the prophecy of the popes#, the blood moon# and the red heifer prophecies# or another flavor in a probable litany of religious End Times conceit, is completely optional. The general openness to some degree of consideration for the metaphysical worldview, however, does help to create a contextual framework from which one can greater appreciate the gravity of occult narratives relating to the events of 9/11/2001, a highly specific timeframe which marked the millennium’s ‘entrance’#. 35 Despite the fact that predicting the end of the world has, historically, a pretty poor track record, this worldview does nevertheless fit into a schema of understanding the possible Judaic and Israeli roles in End Times prophecies, which very well could relate to the geopolitical moves being made currently, and which in turn further bolsters the thesis of disengagement. The “One World” Trade Center (now ‘Freedom’#) tower, with it’s as-above-so-below# structural design#, it’s 1776’ height#, as well as its replacement of the Twin Towers are but a handful of the occult symbolism and speculations surrounding the 9/11 events, and those in lower Manhattan, specifically. These and other occult and ritualistic markers# add further fuel to the fire in support of the 9/11 cw, albeit with a next-level, meta-interpretation of the events. The WTC Towers 1 & 2, for example, have a high degree of analogous representation to both the Freemasonic tracing board pillars of Jachim & Boaz#, which in turn has a comparable relationship to the Kabbalah’s Tree of Life (or ‘Return’ [Safed])#. These two polar archetypes signify universal concepts of duality, such a “mercy and severity… Jachim represents the male polarity of the universe, light, motion, activity, the electron. Boaz represents the female polarity of the universe, darkness, passivity, receptivity, and silence”#. The destruction of this ‘duality’, therefore, along with its replacement of a single skyscraper with occult symbolism associated with it could arguably be considered a ritualistic analogy for the creation of a one-world governmental system#, which would likely (and prophetically) have a religious or spiritual component attached to it. The arguable trends# and the admitted desires by the elite and ruling classes# away from the concepts of nationalism and ethnic homogeneity and towards a more cohesive unity construct in both governance and in cultural or co-racial terms does tend to fit into this paradigm. 36 The year 1776 coincided with the creation of Francis Bacon’s New Atlantis# in the North American continent, as well as the creation year of the Bavarian Illuminati#. Adam Weishaupt#, the founder of this secret society, has both Jesuit and Jewish# connections to his biography. Both of these religious and religious order affiliations figure prominently, although perhaps not always in concert, to some interpretations of the cw. Without getting too much further into the weeds with further conversations revolving around pentagons#, black cubes#, Mecca# or Saturnalia#; or religious-oriented debates about the comparable strangeness of Judaic religious deities (Yahweh) or even dark occult ritualism allegations within Jewish historical record (the Canaanites and Moloch#, blood libel#), it is enough to at least acknowledge that these are tangential, yet still relevant, frameworks for connection in the minds of many which ties in the events of 9/11 with Israel and the Jews, or at least Jews or Judaism with the occult. This framework, without putting too fine a point on it, can be viewed as a New World Order (Novus Ordo Seclorum [NWO]). This conceptualization, in which ‘Jewish’ racial supremacy centers from Jerusalem and Israel, can be viewed from a either a secular framework, or alternatively as one in which the NWO it is interpreted to be aligned with, or directed by, ‘dark occulted powers’#. Regardless, the thesis arguments, one hopes, would still be self-evident in favor of disengagement from the Israeli state and Jewish power monopolization by an independent American society and government. 37 38 The transition from Israel’s and Jewish purported roles in the formation of a prophesized New World Order to the false flag attack on the USS Liberty and Operation Susannah/the Lavon Affair may seem small-time in comparison. But, like Israeli war crimes and other atrocities in Palestine and this relationship to more global-focused and Western impacted Jewish-Israeli machinations, they are micro-templates and necessary cogs in the Zionist machine that is Greater Israel. Officially, the attack is considered an error by the Israeli government, but this conclusion is almost surely a lie. A more accurate assessment of the events of June 8, 1967 would probably involve a scenario like this: Israel intentionally attacked the US spy ship the USS Liberty in a deliberate attempt to sink it and leave no survivors. Israeli fighter jets strafed and motor torpedo boats launched munitions upon the allied ship over the course of two hours leaving 34 dead and 174 wounded US Navy sailors-70% of the crew. The Johnson Administration obfuscated the true facts from the media, threatened survivors into silence and covered up the war crime aggression. Whether or not one wants dismiss this attack as ‘ancient history’ or events of 50 years ago is subjective pilpul# (Shapiro), but for many these are still relevant crimes and acts of war and aggression. There are two explanations for the attack. As Washington has blocked every attempt at an investigation, we do not know which one is correct. Perhaps both are the reasons for the attack. One is that Israel, which was committing a war crime by mass execution of Egyptian prisoners of war, was fearful that the USS Liberty’s surveillance had discovered the crime. The other is that Israel fearing an unfavorable outcome of the war that Israel had initiated intended to blame the attack on the USS Liberty on Egypt, thus bringing the US into the war on Israel’s side.# Israeli fighter jets made passes over the USS Liberty for 8 hours, passing within 200 feet of Liberty. Positive identification of the Liberty-then off the coast of Egypt in international 39 waters-was made according to witnesses. Israeli military jammed distress frequencies of the USS Liberty in violation of international law, and a torpedo attack damaged vital communications which would have alerted U.S. ships from the 6th fleet in the area sooner. It was only after a sailor risked his life (and suffered multiple strafing fire) by repairing a damaged antennae on board the vessel that an emergency signal was able to be dispatched. After life rafts were dispatched into the waters to save men overboard, Israeli fighter jets returned to strafe the life raft survivors. Allegations that Israel used unmarked aircraft and ships also speaks to a false flag effort. 40