1 The question put forward as this paper’s premise is whether (or not) The United States should not be allied with Israel. In the course of this written presentation, I will submit some accepted academic and mainstream arguments against this allyship, as w ell as some more controversial claims and evidence. It can be argued , for example, that Israel played a significant role i n the a ttack s on the United States on 9/11/2001 1 American Jews are also alleged to be complicit in these events 2 . Israel attacked the USS Liberty in a war crime, false flag event in 1967 3 , setting a modus operandi precedent for Israeli involvement in 9/ 11. The Lavon Affair of 1954 4 also illustrates this point of Israel being a n underhandedly hostile nation - state Furthermore, thi s presentation will necessitate some acknowledgement that Israel and Jews , generally, are closely - linked concepts. Ideas and agendas such as the Greater Israel 5 project and Zionism 6 make adherents to these concepts and ideals, which will include dual - citi zen American and Israeli Jews 6 , potentially suspect in the minds of many critical thinkers. The over - re presentation of Jews in American media 7 and government 8 , along with the powerful Jewish and Israeli - interests lobbying groups, such as the American Isra el Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) 9 , the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) 10 and the Anti - Defamation L eague (ADL) 11 represent a few of the more egregious examples of Jewish supremacy , dominance and posturing in the power - centered spheres of influence and control in the American empire and society today. Despite these and other facts and arguments 12 , the United States and Israel have had a long - standing allied partnership , and Jews and Israel enjoy a favorable relationship by many non - Jewish Americans (ma inly fundamentalist Christian organizations 13 ). In terms of financial aid, the state of Israel h as received “$142.3 billion (current, or noninflation - adjusted, dollars) in bilateral assistance and missile defense funding” 1 4 from the United States to dat e . The 2 Congressional Research Service (CSR) goes on to state that, “[a]lmost all U.S. bilateral ai d to Israel is in the form of military assistance, although from 1971 to 2007 Israel also received significant economic assistance” 14 . In 2016, the Obama Ad ministration oversaw the “Memorandum of Understanding ... on military aid” 14 in which the U.S. “pledges to provide $38 billion in military aid...to Israel” from 2019 through to 2028 1 4 . It is true that the Defense Industries in the United States benefits from th is transaction, and subsequently there exists an argument that the U.S. economy benefits relative t o this relationship. Of course, there exists significant debate as to whether this sum of monies couldn’t be better spent elsewhere in national program prio ritizing, or even saved/used to pay down the national debt. Donald Trump is also an enthusiastic supporter of Jews and of Israel 15 . In 2019, the so - called ‘ Dolan Heights ’ were established 15a , which was preceded by the lon g - in - wait transfer recognition by the United States of Israeli’s capital city from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem 15b Trump also has a Cabinet and Administration that is figuratively spilling over with Jews. His daughter, Ivanka, has also converted to Judaism, in accordance with religious trad ition since her husband, Jared Kushner, i s Jewish. One can begin to see a trend developing ; one that is significantly pro - Israe l and pro - Jewish peoples and faith . The Judaic beneficence narrative , therefore, is conventional , established and ‘official’. The U.S. State Department website stat es: “Israel has long been, and remains, America’s most reliable partner in the Middle E ast. Israel and the United States are bound closely by historic and cultural ties as well as by mutual interests ” 16 . The U.S. h as remained in a ‘special relationship’ 17 , a phrase first used by John F. Kennedy in relation to the U.S.’ relationship with Israel , since the very beginning . I n fact , even before the creation of the state of Israel in 1947, the Dulles brothers, Allen and John Foster (who would later become Secr etary of State in the 3 Eisenhower administration) , who worked from their respective high - ranking posts in the State Department and the Office of Strategic S tudies/CIA (and later as Secretary of State) , in the develop ment of Balfour declaration 18 a : a 1917 do cument which established the intention of the creation of a “ natio nal home for the Jews” 18b A n argument often brought forward i n favor of the United State s ’ aid - benefactor relationship with Israel is: ‘Israel is t he only democracy in the Middle East’ 19 ( Lebanon is not a democracy ? 19a ) To quote ‘20 - plus year CIA veteran Michael’ Scheu rer in his remote interview with Bill Mah er on HBO’s Real Time , “So what” 19 Scheurer goes on to elaborate , “Israel is not worth an American life or an American dollar” 19 S p eaking anecdotally and from observation, Scheuer ’s opinion on this is widely sha red. To quote an anonymous source from / pol/: “[w]e consider Britain a democracy, dont [sic] we? Even though its [sic] a totalitarian monarchy and an oppressive police state? [Redacted] that entire continent America has ZERO[sic] business there. None. At a ll.” 20 A very similar opinion , ind eed, with that of Scheurer’s Everyone has an opinion, of course - even academia ! T he form of government that Israel has or doesn’t have 21 , however, has little overall bearing ( much like the hyper - focused narrative misdirection of the Israeli - Palestinian conflict) on the arguments to be put forward in this paper The loaded terms of ‘quality’ and ‘reputable’, as put forward in this assignment’s grading rubric relating to the substance of ‘ sourc es’ for th is assign ment, is subjective. To my critical thin king and informed worldview, I can find orders - of - magnitude better, more encompassing and more accurate worldview information and opinion on dissident Right sites or other alternative media relating to the Jewish Qu estion 22 and various ancillary subtopics therein (including the ‘conspiratorial worldview’ [hereafter cw ] ) - than I can find in the academic journal databases available through the college. To be fair, there are some (relatively minor) criticis ms to be seen 4 in top search results 23 , however these u ltimately are unsatisfying and, like Chomsky’s critiques ( further on ), amount to little more than academic pilpul when compared with what I would submit are the more cutting - edge and relevant (in terms of influence percentage and in disregard for the perfu nctory subservience to an elite in - group 24 preference) discussion variance found on free - speech boards, social media and websites. At the heart of this concern for quality and objective truth likely li es in the fun ding and make - up of the networks and inst itutions who fund and support the publishers, the researchers and institutes, et cetera. It has been documented a number of times that academia is hardly above suspicion when it comes to publishing the ir alleged fi ndings 25 , and indeed more in - depth resear ch into this area of so - called academic validity is warranted. The arguments not only for false flag terror events, but of World War II/ Holocaust revisionism 26 (including proven anti - Semitic hate crime hoaxes , lies or questions relating to the veracity of suc h claims 26a ) ; or white racial genocide and demographic replacement agendas 27 , to name just a few , will never , I predict, be addressed in any serious or objective manner by academ ic journal s , or by the ‘reputable’ print media publishers that academia - and in particular social science academia - deem worthy of inclusion into t he echo chamber of higher learning in the se and other fields . Academia 28 is not alone in this coordinated censorship enterprise , either. T he extension of th ese thought - crimes and dialogue taboo s to the Jewish - domin ated mainstream news and culture media 29 , as well as to the heavily inundated Z io nist Occupied Government 30 (ZOG) influences with in the U.S. should also be noted . Academia is a gatekeeping element in many regards, but when it comes to criticism (or to cer tain alleged crimes and maleficence ) of Israel, and of Jews, it is all too freque ntly unconscionably duplicitous 28a , inauthentic 28b and ebullient ly Philo - Semitic 28c 5 6 7 To wit, academic gatekeeper Noam Chomsky 31 , in his book Fateful Triangle: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinians 32 set s forth perfectly tepid arguments, vis - à - vis incursion into Palestinian lands and other regional (middle eastern) military and political conflicts. In the opening chapter, entitled ‘Fanning the Flames’, Cho msky writes: “It is surely hyp ocritical to conde mn Israel for establishing settlements in the occupied territories while we pay for establishing and expanding them. Or to condemn Israel for attacking civilian targets with cluster and phosphorus bombs ‘to get the maximum kill per hit, when we provide th em gratis or at bargain rates, knowing th at they will be used for just this purpose. Or to criticize Israel’s ‘indiscriminate bombardment of heavily - settled civilian areas or its other military adventures, we not only provide the means i n abundance but we lcome Israel’s assistance in testing the latest weaponry but welcome Israel’s assistance in testing the latest weaponry under live battlefield conditions - to be sure, against a vastly outmatched enemy, includ ing completely undefended targe ts, always the saf est way to carry out experiments of this sort ... 32 Perhaps, if I were an affected Palestinian (or other Israeli - neighboring nationality who has been in conflict with Israel ) , Chomsky could surely seem like a sincere advocate, as this rhe toric is not exact ly ‘tepid’ compared with much that is hea rd by the fawning and submissive U.S. media and its government spokespersons (often an incestuous relationship - particularly within th e intelligence services 3 3 ) , as relates to Israeli affairs and pu blic relations , ge nerally. Compared with the propositions put forward already in this paper, however, namely , that: Israel and American Jews were and are complicit in 9/11 events and a false narrative cover - up 1,2 , and Israel’s false - flagging of the USS L iberty 3 , t he La von Affair 4 and other instances of Israel i and Mossad terror events and false - flags 35 , the merits of Israeli incursions into Palestinian territory, humanitarian crises a nd human rights violations and even war crimes are comparatively trivial - especially fro m an ‘America - first’ or nationalistic wor ldview . When one weighs in with the even more inflammatory rhetoric (rhetoric that is, nevertheless, being discussed with a high d egree of urgency , seriousness and candor, while also being supported with a fair amo unt of convincing memetic 36 and other arg umentative evidence and supposition, in non - mainstream 8 codified sub - cultures ) and accusations that: Israel’s and Jews are lying and have lied about World War II ‘Holocaust’ claims 26 ; that this era of historical re co rd (the Holocaust) is woefully disingenuo us and suspends belief in a variety of arenas 26 ; or that Israel and Jews are playing a centerpiece, “leading role ” in the subversion and demographic replacement of European nations and their peoples t hrough mass - mig ratory ‘ refugee ’ facilitation 27 , then we can really appreciate the restricted information limitations of the academic gatekeeping premise To what extent Israel and Jews are culpable in promoting targeted race - mixing p ropaganda 27a by incu lcating youth, female and other demographics through adv ertising 27a and other powers of c ultural influence they hold sway over ; or to what extent Jews and/or Israel are responsible in the shaping of open - borders U.S. immigration polic ies, which has had an d is having dis astrous immediate as well as long - term co nsequences for Americans and for the United States according to many U.S. citizens who strongly disagree with the levels of demographic replacement and other immigration - related concerns (i.e. economi cs) , are hot to pics in the current cultural and politica l climates Motives ascribed to these actions and agendas by either Israel or Jews are perhaps more nebulous, theoretical or even occult ed . Whether the ‘chosen people’ of the Jews desire a more hete rogenous geneti c make - up for a Jerusalem - centered New Wo rld Order p aradigm 37 for reasons relating to those specific characteristics of mixed - race peoples who presumably would be second - class or subservient to Jews 38 ; or if a more racially homogeneous and n ationalistic id eology - driven population with militarizat ion potenti al poses a threat to Jews in the way that Germany’s Third Reich did (regardless of the specific validity of the ‘Final Solution’ or debate revolving around the Holocaust narratives); or if there are some alternative theories or explanations for these trend s and behaviors relating to population replacement (racial demographic replacement) that I am unaware of, are tangential area s of 9 research and speculation that stretch the scope and limits of this already exceeded - maximum capacity paper. The abo ve argument s do not represent the totality of the arguments against a U.S. - Israeli alliance that I am aware of, but perhaps they do include several of the more contentious and most egregious ones, how ever If more time and space were allotted, an examin at ion of how Ghislaine Maxwell (a Mossad operative, and Epstein’s handler 39 ) and Jeffery Epstein 40 , a Jew, trafficked underage girls to Little St. James Island 40 , providing sexual excursions (and allege d much worse) v ia the ‘Lolita Express’ 40 to influential and powerful Americans and other ‘elites’ , for example, could and should be further explored . The views religious Jewish leaders 38 and Rabbinical Talmudic text 38 have stated regarding the goyim (non - Jews) can perha ps illuminating and conne cted with how th ese types of humanitarian crimes can be casually dismissed as inconsequentia l It should be noted that a number of the infographic material 12 presented as supporting evidence for a variety of claim s made thus far , and which will likely i ncorporate addit ional supporting evidence references in the paper , are often comprised of , amongst other potentially offensive characterizations or content, variations of offensive caricatures ( e.g. ‘merchant memes’ 4 1 ) . Some attem pt at selective editing i n presenting som e of this content which might contain some of the aforementioned content were initially considered, however, in the pursuit of relaying as much potentially persuasive argumentative evidence as possibl e, then I opted to include the memetic o r pictorial info rmation. The intent and purpose, I would hope it should go without having to say (but I am saying it in the event that it does need to) , in presenting this material is not to offend, but to inform The author ackn owledges that a whole slew of arguments p ut forward in this presentation thus far, including the informational graphics in the 10 supporting content ‘drive’ folders, are controversial, distasteful and even taboo or verboten by the ‘ mainstrea m ’ , by or to Jews, and by or to many liberally - aligned indi viduals, et cetera. Nevertheless, and to reinforce th e point addressed earlier , these admittedly controversial and/or offensive - to - some - or - many worldviews do exist. Furthermore, t hese worldviews a nd ideologies , I s urmise, are also growing and gaining trac tion amongst a number of subcultural enclaves, including youth demographics and men ( admittedly, and in particular , ‘white’ men of European heritage and genetic legacy), although one will likely fi nd dissenting opin ion as to the exact trajectory or ‘number s’ which comprise these political affiliations (the ‘alt - right’, or the ‘dissident’ right, being one such label). Whether or not an individual or group may agree or disagree with the merits put fo rwa rd in some or a ll of the evidence, arguments and other p resentations in the course of this paper , I can assure the reader that the majority - if not all - of the claims addressed here are subscribed to by a sizeable contingency of persons, albeit, depending on the specific w orldview make - up, it may still constitute a minority as relates to the entire population of the U.S., or European nation, or elsewhere, as applicable. Therefore, these arguments and the ‘counter - propaganda’, if you will, are highly relev ant to discussions centering around public policy and polit ics - especially wherein Jews and Israel are connected - despite, or perhaps in spite , of their controversial composition. Returning briefly to what might , for the purposes of this paper, be referred t o as the ‘ Choms kyan academic dialectic ’; s etting aside N oam Chomsky’s internal and personal motivations , and setting aside Chomsky’s Ashkenazi - Jewish heritage 42 (which arguably should be noted if one is being objectionable as relates to the i dentification of the source a nd the specifics of said source’s critici sms of Israel, the United States, and other related areas); and, furthermore, setting aside an entire sidebar of Jewish ancestry questions , like the Khazar 11 hypothesis of Ashkenazi ancest ry 43 , or what exactly constit utes a ‘ Jew ’ i n either cultural or orthod ox contexts ( the 12 Tribes of Israel, et cetera) - all of which are, of course, relevant to the paper discussion but are nevertheless such broad areas of discussion that it is impractical to attempt to delve into any real detail here . L et us define, then, f or the purpose s o f this paper and in very general terms, the terms United States and Israel. Contextually, Israel is a Jewish nation. Th is will be a basic premise or assumption of this paper, howeve r, I will ackno wledge that there is debate to be made he re as how secular and multicultural Israel could be defined 44 , as well as acknowledging that there may exist further debate and opinion as to what Israel is that go beyond this basic assumption . Juda ism and the Jud aic character (what constitutes being ‘Je wish’) can also b e dissected ad infinitum, but will not be, also for reasons of brevity, here . There are specific and relevant religious and spiritual differentiations, however, within broader religi ous Judaism tha t we should at least acknowledge, without going too far do wn these respective rabbit holes. The mainstream ‘Judaic - Christian values’, the Old Testament/Torah relationship the West has with religious Jewry can be contrasted with the less mai nstream Abraham ic faith - associated constructs such as th e Talmud, and the more occult and esoteric Kabbalah. With regards to meta - political conclusions and eschatological references, these religious, ethnic and cultural frames - of - reference as relates to b roader Judaism and Jews are of some import. The United States, in contra st, is not a Jewish or Israeli vassal state (well, it is, many will argue, but it’s not supposed to be, it wasn’t set out to be, and/ or it isn’ t advertised to much of its citizenry as such). Whethe r t he U.S. is a religious (Christian) nat ion, or if the U. S. is a secular nation 45 ; if the U.S. was founded by Freemasons and there fore this body represents a subversive or fifth column in United States 46 , comprised of government apparatchik s within agenci es and administration s since the Revoluti on 46 (certainly since the Truman administration 46 ); if the 12 United States is a country founded by and for white Europeans of good moral character 47 and their white ancestors 47 ; or if the United States is a multi - cult ural melting - pot 48 , wher ein (Sephardic) J ewish poet Emma Lazarus implores the huddled masses of refugees, asylum - seekers and other migrants to North America’s shining shores ; these are certainly debatable interpretations of the American etho s and defining characteristics To simplify, and f or th e purpose s of this paper, the U.S. is, should not be, was not intended to be a Jewish or Zionist ideologue - dominated state, or a Gollum for the state of Israel. If one wants to investigate further as to why the U nited States might be conflated with an I sraeli or Jewish - controlled or dominated nation - state (ZOG), the pro - Israel lobby AIPAC 9 , the AD L 11 and SPLC 10 are probably worthy jumping - off points for research. The SPLC ’s (recently former) presi dent Mark Potok 10a (a Jew), for example, was shown to ha ve lists on his wall denoting the declining racial demographics of the United States (with specific reference t o 1965, the year the Immigration and Nationality Act “abolished an earlier quota system b ased on nationa l origin and established a new immigratio n policy based on reunited immigrant families and attracting skilled labor to the United States” 10b ) and Europe 10a The ADL, in turn, has been actively working to suppress political thought and discu ssion, impressi ng social media ‘public square’ corporati ons to censor individuals and independent media (including search and queue algorithmic malfeasance 11b ) , as wel l as pressuring payment processors for many popular independent news media analysis and p olitical channe ls or individuals who present a threat to Jewish hegemonic power monopoly and the aims of the Zionist takeover of American political discourse 11b O ur political elite class also contribute to concerns relating to a ZOG conspiracy and und ue influence. Senator (D - NY) Chuck Schumer (Jewish), Se nate Minority Leader (and Select 13 Committee for Intelligence member) stated at a 2019 speech at AIPAC: “You can be a Jew and lobby for Israel and it does not make you any less American...You can be, all at once, comple tely Jewish, completely pro - Israel and co mpletely American” 49 ; "Anyone who aspires to the highest office in the land should not be afraid to stand with the strongest supporters of Israel in America," 49 Pence said. "It is wrong to boycott Isr ael and it is w rong to boycott AIPAC" 49 . In a 2010 addr ess to AIPAC, he stated: "Now let me close by telling you about my name. As some of you know, my name is a Hebrew word. "Schumer" comes from the Hebrew word "Shomer," which means "guardian," "watchma n." My ancestor s were guardians of the ghetto wall of Ch ortkiv, in Galicia. And when they came to Ellis Island, they said their name in Yiddish, "Shoymer". And it got written down as "Schumer." To you I say this: that name was given to me for a reason. F or as long as I live, for as long as I have the privileg e of serving in the Senate from New York, I will unflinchingly, unstintingly and with all of my strength be Shomer Yisrael, a guardian of Israel. Ladies and gentlemen, Am Yisrael Chai, in Israel and A merica, the Jew ish nation lives now and forever." 49 The re are several additional choice quotes from Senator Schumer one could highlight that are either of a questi onable or outright suspicious nature to one who has a skeptical or antagonistic position tow ards dual - loyal ty. Time and space concerns preclude muc h more exposure of the Senator’s biases, however. One example, however , of Senator Schumer ’s true allegianc e could be his pro - choice stance on abortion issue as U.S. Senator , despite also allied with Erfat, an orga nization which “seeks to reduce abortions of Israeli Jews” 49 O ne might be compelled to make an inference, here, that the Senator is ‘okay’ with go y babies being aborted (perhaps and even especially fetuses of the European, non - Jewish stoc k variety 27 ) , w hile simultaneously want ing the Jewish ‘r ace’ to grow and thrive This may be an unfair aspersion, but when Israeli Sephardic leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, makes statements to the effect: “Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they h ave no place in the world; only to serve the People of I srael,” he said during a p ublic discussion of what kind of work non - Jews are 14 allowed to perform on Shabbat.” And “Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit l ike an effendi and eat." 27 ; or quotes from the Talmud e xhibit rank Jewish supr emacy and hate for the ‘other’ 27 , one has to wonder. 15 Beyond Schumer’s dual - loyalty question are 45 Senators who support a bill that would make the boycott of Israel a crime 50 . And don’t expect hurricane relief fu nding if you boycott Israel and you are an American 51 To be fair to the ACLU, here, they seemed to have sensible positions on these last two ZOG cases - in - point. As illustrative as it would be to con tinue with furt her ZOG evidentiary exhibits within the p olitical elit e and boilerplate politics , ‘9/11’ can provide its own, metapolitical window into a Jewish and Israeli agenda and complicity : “On the morning of September 11, 2001, 19 men armed with b oxcutters direc ted by a man on dialysis in a cave fortre ss halfway around the world using a satellite phone and a laptop directed the most sophisticated penetration of the most heavily - defended airspace in the world, overpowering the passengers and the mil itary combat - tr ained pilots on 4 commercial aircraft bef ore flying those planes wildly off course for over an hour without being molested by a single fighter interceptor. These 19 hijackers, devout religious fundamentalists who liked to drink alcohol, snor t cocaine, and live with pink - haired strippers, managed to knock down 3 buildings with 2 planes in New York, while in Washington a pilot who couldn’t handle a single engine Cessna was able to fly a 757 in an 8,000 foot descending 270 degree corskscrew turn to come exactl y level with the ground, hitting the Pent ago n in the budget analyst office where DoD staffers were working on the mystery of the 2.3 trillion dollars that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had announced “missing” from the Pentagon’s coffers in a press conf erence the day before, on September 10, 2 001 ... ” 52 There are sixteen source hyperlinks to sources in just that select excerpt, incidentally, from James Corbett’s highly popular 5 minute tour - de - force, “9/11: A Conspiracy Theory” 52 Relatin g to the thesis points in this paper and the specific Is raeli and American Jew s, w e can begin by looking at Jewish and Israeli intrigue where that line of questioning by Corbett ends, namely (then - Israeli Prime Minister) Ehud Barak’s pronouncement of 9/11’ s culpability s hortly after the events unfold ing pointed to terrorism 53 . The psychological term for this is projection 54 ( a term codified by Sigmund Freud, a Jew, who’s nephew Edward Bernays [also Jewish] , 16 incidentally, also factor heavily into questions and concerns re lating cultural control throug h mass medi a and the psychological aspects of advertisin g 5 5 ) Further examples of alleged complicit Jews in 9/11 include Larry Silverstein’s highly suspicious ‘Pull It’ comment - itself a loaded term, possibly d enoting demolit ion terminology - on PBS’ 2002 special 56 Am erica Rebuilds: I remember getting a call from the Fire Department Commander, telling me that they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire, and I said 'You know, we've had such t errible loss of lif e, maybe the smartest thing to do is, is pull it' And they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse .. ." 56 Silverstein’s daughter, son, personal assistant , publicist and others close to Silverstein were also n oticeably absen t from the WTC complex on the day or at t he time of the attacks, despite otherwise having been scheduled to be in the North Tower 56(GD) Former Senator and 17 U.S. democratic Presidential candidate John Kerry would later seemingly confirm a f oreknowledge of intentional demolition of Building 7 in a public question and answer forum in Austin, Texas in 2007 57 . Silverstein was also eventually awarded the largest s ingle insurance settlement ever, to the tune of $4.55B 58 , despite asking for $7.1B. This is quite an initial return for a total investment of $14 million in his own money 59 Silverstein’s weekly phone calls with “good friend” Benjamin Netanyahu is a not - overlooked fact by many in the cw camp, either 56 Building 7 of the World Trade C enter complex i s arguably a lynchpin of 9/11 conspiracy or truth research, but since this paper will necessitate only the most cursory of overviews of the Israeli and/or Jewish connections to crimes such as 9/11, much will be lacking to complete a fuller p icture from whi ch to compare with the official conspirac y narrative, namely the ‘findings’ of the 9/11 Commission Report 60 The BBC’s alleged referencing of Build ing 7’s collapse on air prior to the event 61 , various expert and other opinion relating the c ollapse of Buil ding 7 18 Of course, there are numerous la yers to the 9/11 cw that cannot be explained strictly through a Jewish and Israeli - centric conspiratorial t hesis. There are a multitude of ‘internecine’ arguments one could spend an inordinate amount of time on jus t on the collapse (or disintegration) of the Towers 62 , relating to planes versus a ‘no - plane theories’ 62 (CGI video analysis opinion), the ‘melting point of steel versus jet fuel temperature’ debate 6 2 , ‘mini - nukes’ and the twin tower bathtub s 6 2 , nano - therm ite findings 6 2 , or even direct energy or other exotic weaponry 63 used in New York ( perhaps even utilizin g hurricane Andrew 6 2 ) speculation, et cetera Other 9/11 conspiracy debates relating to the Pentagon strike 63 , the absence of lawn debris 63 , the size of the hole (missile strike v. plane strike allegation s 63 ) relative to a 7 5 7 ; the absence of debris Shanksville , PA and other Flight 93 anomalies 64 ; the near - intact passport of Satam al - Suqami ’s ‘found’ in Manhattan near Ground Zero 65 (or the other question able three alleged terrorists’ passports found during the course of the PENTT BOM investigation 65 ) ; the dubiousness of certain alleged ‘eyewitnesses’ 66 ; the ‘missing 2.3 Trillion’ fr om the Pentagon budget which Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was testifying before Congress as to the location , or allocation , of on September 10 th , 2001 67 ; NORAD war games like Operation: Able Danger 68 that were operating concurrently with the events of September 1 1 th 2001 ; the destruction of WTF evidence , such as the steel and other trade center complex debris that was immediately sent to China for recycling 69 ; or any of the numerous other fractal insi ghts into the events relating to 9/11 are worth mentioning for context of the vastness of conspiracy res earch and speculation, but ultimately are footnoted side - conversations for the purposes of this paper (particularly to the extent that they do not invo lve either Israel of Jews directly , or indirectly ). 19 20 Did John McCain Meet with Abu Bakr al - Baghdadi ( s ource )