1 SEPTEMBER 2021 By Simon Dubé Maria Santaguida Dave Anctil Sex Tech in Space? The relevance of s exual w ellness and intimate products for space agencies and the public EROBOTICS Ψ Research Consulting 2 Please note that this is a copy of the first part of the report, comprising about half of its total length and focusing on establis hing the relevancy of sex tech and sexuality in space . We - Vibe will release the re st of the report in upcoming months as the sexual wellness brand steps up efforts to bring awareness about sexuality in space. Please check with We - Vibe at press@we - vibe.com for further details. Table of Contents Introduction ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 3 I . To the Final Frontier ................................ ................................ ............... 3 II. Humans Living in Space: A Paradigm Shift ................................ ............. 4 1. Sex in Space: General Discussion ................................ ................................ ........ 7 1.1. Why Sex and Coupling in Space Are Not Easy.......................................... 7 1.2. Sex Tech and Masturbation: A More Practical P roposition ................. 8 1.3. Masturbation as Self - Care ................................ ................................ .. 9 2. The Challenge of Promoting Wellness Through Technology - Mediated (Solitary and Partnered) Sexuality ................................ ................................ ............................ 12 2.1. The Benefits of Sexuality ................................ ................................ .. 13 2.2. T echnological Possibilities: From Sex Toys to Erobot s ...................... 15 2.3. The Challenge s ................................ ................................ ................. 16 Contributors ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 17 References ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 18 3 Sex Tech in Space? The relevance of sexual wellness and intimate products for space agencies and the public I ntroduction We are entering into a new age of space travel and exploration: the age of spatial colonization. Our satellite, the Moon, and our neighbo u ring planet, Mars, are humanity’s next frontiers. Beyond the International Space Station (ISS), several missions are c urrently in the pipelines of national space agencies and spatial private companies, engaging an exponential global race for investments and innovation I . To the Final Frontier Missions to Mars On July 30 th , 2020, the National Aeronautics and Space Admi nistration (NASA) launched the Mars rover mission, the first phase of its Mars Exploration Program ( NASA Science – Mars E x ploration Program, 2020 ). Conjoint exploratory missions to Mars have also been launched this year by the United Arab Emirates (Hope or biter; Bartels, 2020 ) and China (Tianwen - 1; Wall, 2020 ). The three missions are set to arrive in February 2021. They bring with them a plethora of satellites, robots, and drones to explore further the red planet, and will search for extraterrestrial life a nd bring back precious information for future colonization ( Wan, Wang, Li , & Wei , 2020). These three missions will soon be followed by ExoMars, the conjoint astrobiology program of the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Russian space agency, Roscosmos ( ESA , 2020 ). Missions to the Moon N ASA is also currently working on the Artemis p rogram. This massive endeavour will, amongst many other things, land women and men on the Moon by 2024. The first phase of the program is set to begin in 2021, while the second phase is anticipated to begin in 2022 or 2023 ( NASA, 2019 c ). The Chinese Lunar Exploration program has also been conducting missions to the Moon since 2007, placing orbiters and landi ng rovers on the moon surface. The last phase of the program entails at least three missions, which will land and install many sophisticated and automated machines on the Moon, between 2023 and 2027 ( Yongchun , Ziyuan , Chunlai , Jianzhong , & Yongliao , 2008 ). The long - term goal of the Chinese government is to establish a fully functioning, permanent research station on the Moon by 2030. Many more countries are currently embarking in the race to the Moon, like Japan and India ( Bartels, 2019 ). Rise of the S patial P rivate S ector Private space companies are also profoundly transform ing the economy of space exploration, bringing huge capital from investors, 4 increasing competition , and driving down the costs . This is a game changer. On May 31 st , 20 20, SpaceX achieved a major milestone by successfully launching astronauts to the ISS ( Chang, 2020 ). The American giant Boeing is developing its Crew Space Transportation ( CST ) - 100 Starliner spacecraft and aims to bring both astronauts and civilians at the ISS by 2021 ( Boeing, 2020 ). Companies like Blue Origin (Blue Origin, 2020) and Virgin Galactic (Virgin Galactic, 2020) are also building commercial, suborbital missions, designed for space tourism and short distance spaceflight. Many other companies, big and small, are entering the new markets and promises of space exploration (Reason Foundation, 2019). II Humans Living in Space: A P aradigm Shift While space exploration is set to experience an incredible boost in investment s, innovation, and opportunities, its outlook partly remains stuck in the 20 th century. Space exploration is a prisoner of an old paradigm set forth by the dominating fields of engineering, physics, and mathematics. That is, s ince the 1950s, space exploration has been m ostly Rocket Science and Astrophysics. The human side of our expansion into the solar system has been, to say the least, comparatively neglected by current trends of spatial Research & Development (R&D). In the very near future of space travel, exploratio n, and colonization, the fields of life and social sciences will become extremely important. That is, b ecause while space agencies and companies know a whole lot about how to successfully launch spacecrafts, satellites, probes, and robots, and even build f ully functioning habitats in space (and eventually on the Moon and Mars), they know a whole lot less about living in space. In other words, the work of engineers, physicists, and mathematicians taught us how to reach space and survive in space. But, the next chapter of space exploration will ask much more from diversified fields, researchers , and sectors of activitie s (Noonan, 1998/2001) . We will have to learn how to live , prosper , and be happy in space. Take some of the harshest known environments on our planet (i.e., our only available analogy). It took centuries for indigenous dwellers of the Saharan desert and th e Arctic freezing plains to learn how to master and live happy lives in these extreme climates and relative isolation. While there are living habitats in Antarctica, they are occupied by trained scientists, deployed for specific and limited missions (NASA, 2015) ; there are no long - term living habitats in the depths of the oceans. Living in space for extended periods of time is an even more difficult endeavour than the precedents. What we know about the biopsychosocial effects of the extreme conditions found on Earth can teach us 5 something about the challenges of colonizing space: people, even trained ones, will remain people with basic human needs and desires. No longer confined to science - fiction (Asimov, 1973), s pace colonization and long - term travel enta ils a paradigm shift Specifically, t o live healthily in space, it takes a lot more than protection from radiation, clean breathing, drinking, eating, and adapting to micro - or hyper - gravity. It entails learning how to fulfill the wide range of basic human needs and desires, or the the full spectrum of what we call human w ell - being . And, of course, sexuality is one of the central conditions of this human well - being Humans have been visiting space since 1961. During the 60 - year span of crewed space exploration, the topic of sexuality in space has been “ woefully under - examined ,” since the vast majority of “ manned missions to space have not been long enough in duration to push NASA to seriously address the question ” (Oberhaus, 2015 a ). While the sexuality of astronauts during missions remains taboo, many people are starting to question the elephant in the room. In 2015, Prof. Paul Root Wolpe, a senior bioethicist at NASA , formulated the issue publicly during an interview for Vice : Our 2020 paper “Sex in space: Could technology meet astronauts’ intimate needs? ” argued that the refusal to consider the importance of sexuality is irresponsible. We discovered that, national space agencies and private companies are still not satisfyingly addressing human sexuality in space exploration and colonization (Dubé & Anctil , 2020). W e argued that this position prevents research from examining basic questions about sexual health and well - being in space , such as: how do we deal with hygiene and the messiness of human sex in zero - gravity? How do we maintain the psychol ogical we ll - being of crews? And, is imposed sexual abstinence a reasonable solution, based on scientific evidence? Moreover , based on our previous and current research in sexuality and technology, we believe that change is coming from the social sciences and the private “ I do not know if NASA has an official policy on sex in space, [but] there will be a time when NASA needs to make some policies or understandings about those kinds of relationships. There is a point where the length of time [on a mission] becomes part of the question of whether or not it's fair to deprive people of this aspect of being human. I'm just not sure it's time yet. ” Quoted by Oberhaus , D. ( 2015 a) : “Let's Talk About Sex in Space” 6 sector, especially from the sex technology (or sex tech) industry. That is, b ecause these sectors have been facing man y similar challenges concerning the acceptance, taboos, and stigma of intimate pleasure and wellness. In light of the imminent long - duration space missions, the main objective of the present report is to help build a case for the study of sexuality and it s possible technological facilitation in space travel, exploration, and colonization. To do so, this report provides key elements for the space agencies, the private sector (e.g., sex tech and wellness industry), and the public to grasp the relevance of us ing sexual wellness and intimate products for humans living in space. Specifically, th e first section of this report introduces the general topic of sexuality in space along with some of its practical challenges. It also emphasize s the pragmatism of solita ry sexual activities (i.e., masturbation) for astronauts along with some of its main constraints ( e.g., privacy and hygiene). Following that, t he second section highlights the benefits of (solitary and partnered) sexuality in adapting to spatial environmen ts , suggests several technological possibilities that could be scientifically examined, and underline some of the challenges in accepting technology - mediate d sexuality ( e.g., sexuality and technology related stigma). The third and final section argue s that space exploration should follow a progressive agenda – i.e., an agenda which is inclusive of all sexes/genders and sexualities. More precisely, while we recognize that some progress has been made over time , we argue that it is far from being enough and that there is still enormous room for growth and improvements. W e ultimately conclude that we are still deeply in need of space programs that truly prioritize sexual health, well - being, inclusivity, and diversity 7 1. Sex in S pace: G eneral D iscussion Space is highly dangerous, hazardous, and deadly environment for humans ( Jennings & Santy, 1990; Mirsha & Luderer, 2019; Santy & Jennings, 1992; Sullivan, 1996 ) W hile some people will continue to go into space for only a few weeks or months, others will increasingly have to live ther e for longer periods of time I f current predictions hold true, the re will be thousands of space travel l ers and workers by 2040, to the extent that some may eventually live for years in habitat s on the Moon or Mars. One way or the other, t he se people will definitely aim to fulfill their intimate and sexual needs through solitary or partnered sexual activities (e.g., masturbation , interhuman erotic stimulation, and sexual intercourse ) Travel l ing and living in space for prolonged periods require the honesty of recognizing these needs While private companies are already developing plans for space tourism, hotels, and ( literal ) honeymoon plans ( e.g., Virgin Galactic ) , we must understan d better the living conditions of space, and especially the conditions of sex in space. The living conditions of space are mainly studied by the fields of B ioastronautics, A stronautical H ygiene, and S pace M edicine ( Cain, 2011; Marc v iacq & Bessone , 2009) In this section , we do not summar ize these complex technical fields , but i nstead give some key elements to understand the basics about environmental conditions of sex and masturbation in space. 1.1. Why S ex and C oupling in S pace Are N ot E asy Space can affect the sexual and reproductive functions of humans through its radiation s , p sychological and physical stress, sleep disruption, potential exposure to toxic chemicals, and change in gravity (e.g., micro - and hyper - gravity ; Jennings & Santy, 1990; Levin, 1989 ; Mirsha & Luderer, 2019 ; Ronca et al., 2014; Santy & Jennings, 1992 ; Sullivan, 1996; Tou, Ronca, Grindeland, & Wade, 2002 ). Gravity , in particular, is one of the most important difference s between Earth and the spatial environment. Without sufficient gravity, bodies are not attracted to each other. Contact between lovers require s a constant effort, causing very limited frictions, thus diminishing possibilities of pleasure for couples having sex That is, of cours e, on top of the numerous physiological effects of reduced gravity, which can also affect sexual functioning (e.g., altered fluid, cardiovascular changes, decreased bone density, and muscle atrophy; Jennings & Santy, 1990; Mirsha & Luderer, 2019 ; Santy & J ennings, 1992 ; Sullivan, 1996; Tou, Ronca, Grindeland, & Wade, 2002 ) Zero - gravity (and microgravity) is a very significant condition to understand the difficulty of space life De - adapting from a full - g and re - adapting to a 0 - g environment is a difficult process; astronauts must learn to minimize movement and work in a full three - 8 dimensional environment . By comparison, h aving sex on the Moon (0.20 - g) or on Mars (0.38 - g) would instead resemble having sex in a pool , reducing body mass and all physical effort (Stine , 1997) G ravity is very important for all animals: while the conditions of life have changed a lot during the history of life on earth, the one constant of our evolution has been gravity. It never cha nged! Hypothet ical artificial gravity (or rotational gravity) is not for tomorrow. As of now, t here is no known efficient gravity surrogate 1.2. Sex T ech and M asturbation: A M ore P ractical P roposition Masturbati on is a far more practical solution for sexual gratification in space. Mariners, soldiers , and army command ers have kn own for centuries that masturbati on is important for the morale of crew s and troops Military submarine crews deployed for months undersea are allowed to masturbate in cramped spaces, with little intimacy. Nowadays, military personnel have the right to bring and use sex toys ( e.g., dildo s , vibrators, and fleshlights) and stimulation materials (e.g., pornography) with them when they are deployed in long miss ions to insure their “personal well - being .” Spouses and friends are also allowed to send gifts to help their loved ones to endure the lack of intimacy ( Lin, 2020; Smith, 2019 ) On the topic of sexual needs and isolation, Vice reported in 2015 that: Gravity aside , t he environmental and social conditions of masturbation in spatial capsules and crafts are remarkably similar to those of military bases, warships, nuclear submari nes , and isolated research stations , w ith the two following provisions : Privacy S exual privacy is challenging in the claustrophobic environment of space stations, ships, and modules , b ut not much more than in submarines. Space , however, is Masturbation The self - determined stimulation/pleasuring of oneself or a partner through touching of the body and/or genitals (Bowman, 2017) “Informal field tests on Earth seem to buoy these results: between 1989 and 2006, Australian researchers documented seven pregnancies at Antarctic research stations, environments that are frequently used as analogues for space due to their isolation and mo derate stress levels. This staggering number suggests that dangerous environs alone aren't significant deterrents for their horny inhabitants. NASA is well aware of this.” ( Oberhaus , 2015 a) 9 silent; habitats are very small; machines and other astronauts are the only things making sound (Marc v iacq & Bessone , 2009). While any astronaut can easily masturbate discretely (out of sight) in her sleep shelter/sack, the natural noise of self - stimulatio n and the use of masturbation devices can be heard by the rest of the crew. Thus, sex toys designed for space should be especially discreet and respectful of the intimacy - etiquette prescribed by the fact of living in relatively silent environments with lim ited space. Hygiene . T he near - absence of gravity and the frailty of the artificial ecosystem s constitute a major hygiene concern (Cain, 2011) Personal hygiene is very important when groups of individuals must live and work in close proximity, especially f or prolonged periods. In space stations as well as in future long - range spacecrafts voyaging to Mars, severe rules of personal and environmental hygiene will protect the crews and systems from microorganisms, viruses, and bad odours. Astronauts are provide d with a personal hygiene (PH) kit containing objects such as razors, toothbrush, comb, nail clippers, etc. (Stine , 1997: 188 - 191). Importantly , bodily fluids ( e.g., mucus, sweat, and ejaculation ) must absolutely be contained to prevent them from flying around. These conditions also impose a rigid code of hygiene and resources management on astronauts, to protect the fragile (future) environment and minimize the waste of limited resources ( e.g., paper, condoms, et c.). Thus, intimate products designed for space should be especially easy to clean and maintain , as well as produce little to no waste. 1. 3. Masturbation as Self - Care The daily life self - care and needs of astronauts is a regular topic of discussion in the media. Astronauts are often asked how they live on a day - to - day basis in the exotic and dangerous environment of the ISS. Space agencies have released complete videos talking about the issues of excreting and cleaning (C anadian Space Agen cy (CSA), 2019). New space travelers must prepare adequately for months on how - to - live - in - space . In other words, astronautical dietetics and hygiene are an integral part of their training (Cain, 2011). The reason is simple: basic needs and everyday behavio urs on Earth – such as, drinking, eating, showering, washing clothes, and using the toilet – must be reprogrammed to integrate the delicate systems of space facilities. At NASA, research and training on food and hygiene is part of the larger Crew Systems component (Connors, Harrison , & Summit, 1994). Indeed, long duration missions require the integration of these vital human variables into the technical operations of the many subsystems that maintain the whole functioning of space habitats (NASA, 2020 c ) T he objective of Crew Systems research and training is to integrate, in a 10 harmonious manner, personal human needs and preferences with the functioning of objective electronic and mechanical systems: coordinating the functioning of basic human hygiene with t hat of machines ( Marcviacq & Bessone, 2009) In a way, t he whole (holistic) set of Crew Systems thus forms a “ cybernetic organism , ” in which the human and machine parts are in a constant relationship of mutual dependence (Connors et al. , 1994). Let us take two important examples: bodily waste and self - care. D efecating and urinating in space require special training and adaptation. Astronauts must learn to manage the need to dispose of their body waste according to a precise, fixed schedule. They mus t also learn not to urinate while defecating, since urine must be recycled by the ECLSS (Environmental Control and Life Support System), while feces are preserved in confined, sealed bags. NASA's Orion program has recently developed the Universal Waste Man agement System (UWMS), which is currently being tested in the ISS: spatial toilets currently recycle 90% of water - based liquids, but “NASA’s goal is to reach 98% recycling rates before the first human missions aboard a proposed Mars transport vehicle” (NAS A, 2020 a) . The same goes for showering, shaving, clipping nails , or cutting hairs. Astronauts are given a certain amount of leeway to master and personalize all the appropriate grooming techniques (CSA, 2019). But ultimately, they must learn to do these t hings as precisely as possible , in an extremely confined space, and using as little water and disposable items as possible (CSA , 2019). Since its first inhabitants arrived in 2000, the ISS has provided us with the necessary experience and data to build s trong research in Crew Systems and an adequate training for personalized astronautical hygiene and self - care. Yet, we could find no research and no training applied to sex or masturbation in space. This suggest that s pace agencies are either not considerin g this as a possibility ; wishing they will not have to deal with thi s; or assuming that astronauts will know instinctively how to safely and hygienically engage in intimate interactions or masturbate in space. None of these three positions is tenable, or r esponsible, in light of the present and future transformations in the nature and duration of space missions, as well as the importance of sexuality in human life Thus, similarly to how (future) astronauts must re - learn how to defecate, urinate, clip their nails, cut their hair, and wash, space agencies should explore how to facilitate masturbation as part of their Crew Systems component. In sum, pertaining to living conditions in the spatial environment, intimate space products could easily be included in the PH kits of space travel l ers Yet, designers should be mindful 11 that t hese products need to conform to four conditions: 1 ) they must be practical and small ; 2) they must be discre e t and produce little to no sound; 3) they must be fully compatible with all artificial life - support systems; and 4) they must be easily cleaned and produce little to no waste . This is crucial if we want to safely and hygienically give astronauts access to intimacy and sexuality, including mas turbation, while preserving a respectful dose of privacy between individuals living in confined environments for prolonged periods of time. 12 2. The C hallenge of P romoting W ellness T h rough Technology - Mediated ( Solitary and Partnered ) Sexuality Space missions – travel , exploration , and colonization – can be stressful , and in many ways , unnatural (Palinkas, 2001 ; Ronca et al., 2014 ; Suedfeld & Steel, 2000 ; Sullivan, 1996 ; Tou et al., 2002 ) As previously mentioned, i t can entail physical and p sychological stress due to confinement, (social) isolation, daily space - adapted life, exposure to radiations or chemicals , sleep disruption, as well as gravitational changes and its related physiological effects ( e.g., impacts on the bodily fluids, cardiovascular system, bone density, and muscles ) ( Connors, Harrison , & Summit, 1994 ; Jennings & Santy, 1990; Mirsha & Luderer, 2019; Ronca et al., 2014; Santy & Jennings, 1992; Suedfeld & Steel, 2000 ; Sullivan, 1996; Tou, Ron ca, Grindeland, & Wade, 2002 ). Technology - mediated sexuality, however, has the potential to benefi t the health of astronauts , help humans adapt to the spatial environment s , and alleviate some of t he difficult psychosocial and sexual conditions of space lif e Nonetheless, i n 2006, the Committee on Review of NASA's Bioastronautics Roadmap (BR), which encompassed the National Academies advising the U S federal government (i.e., the National Research Council , Institute of Medicine , Board on Health Sciences Policy , Space Studies Board , and Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board ), remarked that the BR did not include any reference to humans sexuality. The committee thus recommended that this major gap be addressed, particularly in th e context of prolonged space missions, such as the Mars Exploration Program Unfortunately, t his recommendation was apparently not taken seriously since, nine years later, a report by NASA’s Human Research Program (HRP) still failed to include this central aspect of human life. That is, i n 2015, a report by NAS A’s HRP compiled data from its many offices and research programs. It identified 32 Human Health and Performance Risks by Space Environment Hazard , o nly two of which were associated with the psychosoc ial isolation of astronauts in long - term missions: Adverse Cognitive or Behavioral Conditions and Inadequate Team Performance (NASA – Office of Inspect or General , 2015: 4). Still, o nce more, n one of the se risks addressed human sexuality and its asso c iated phenomena. S exual and reproductive health (including pleasure) , however, is increasingly recognized as a fundamental human right, due to its central role in our physical, psychological, emotional , and social well - being (World Health Organization, 20 15) More to the point , space missions can reduce access to sexuality by 1) reduc ing the opportunities of (available and compatible) intimate, romantic , or sexual partners and interactions , a s well 13 as by 2) heightening the risks associated with interhuman intimacy in hazardous environment s ( Longnecker & Molins, 2006) . These risks may include but are not limited to : sexually transmitted or blood - borne infections , unwanted pregnancies, sexual harassment and assault, issues related to jealousy , sexual competition, interpersonal rejection, breakups , a s well as problems associated with power dynamics, perceived inequities , conflict of interests, and favoritism amongst coworkers Just to name a few. The resulting (in)formal c ondition s (or politic s ) of sexual abstinence or celibacy imposed by space missions may affect the moral e , (sexual) health, and well - being of astronauts , as well as generat e , for instance, (sexual) frustration, stress, anxiety, and depression ( e.g., Donnelly, Burgess, Anderson, Davis, & Dillard, 2001 ; Donnelly & Burgess, 2008 ; Goel et al., 2014; Miller, Solomon, Bunn, Varni, & Hodge, 2015 ; Suedfeld & Steel, 2000 ; Ronca et al., 2014 ; Warren, 1989 ) . It may further create tensions in dangerous context s where efficient cooperation and teamwork are crucial to the survival of astronauts , the success of a mission, and our successful – healthy, safe, and fulfilling – life in space ( Longnecker & Molins, 2006) These conditions of abstinence can also deter people from contributing to present and future space endeavours Precisely , the imposed lack of intimacy may lead some people to feel that they are (or could be) missing out on fundamental and desired aspects of human existence by taking part in ( pro longed) space missions T o help build a case for the study and potential use of technology - mediated sexuality in space, t he following section will summarize some of the physical and psycho logical benefits of a healthy sexuality . It will then highlight technological possibilities that could facilitate space sexuality and , by extension, its benefits. Finally, it will emphasize the challenges of promoting wellness through technology - mediated sexuality, while simultaneously pointing out several key element s that should help space agencies, decision - makers , and the public understand its importance for our extraterrestrial life. 2.1 The Benefits of Sex uality Whether it be alone or with a partner, safe consensual sex is good for human health and well - being ( Brody, 2010; Levin, 2007, Planned Parenthood , 2020) In the context of space missions, more precisely, i t can arguably help humans adapt to the spatial envi ronment s and its difficult psychosocial and sexual conditions via 1) its health benefits and 2) by normalizing life in space Indeed, t hrough psychosexual pleasure, physiological arousal, and orgasm, sex ha s been associated with a wide range of physical an d psychological benefits. For instance , solitary and partnered s exual activities can help : 14 • relax, reduce tension or stress, and sleep ( Brody, 2006; Lastella, O'Mullan, Paterson, & Reynolds, 2019 ) ; • relieve pain ( Komisaruk & Whipple, 1995; Levin, 2007 ) ; • facilitate ( subsequent ) sexual functioning and satisfaction ( Coleman, 2003 ); • activate or boost cardiovascular and immune systems ( Charnetski & Brennan, 2004; Frappier, Toupin, Levy, Aubertin - Leheudre, & Karelis, 2013 ); • alleviate headaches and migraines ( Hambach, Evers, Summ, Husstedt, & Frese, 2013 ) ; • improve self - esteem and body image ( Coleman, 200 3 ; Kaestle & Allen , 2011 ); • and strengthen muscles of the pelvic floor ( Brody, 2010 ) M asturbation , in p articular, can act as both a substitute and complement to partnered sex. A s a healthy and empowering expression of one’s sexuality , and as an autonomous source of sexual pleasure, masturbation can help people to learn about them sel ves (e.g., their bod y , desires, erotic preferences , and agency ) and reduce some of the risks associated with interhuman intimacy during space missions , as p reviously described ( Bowman , 2014; Coleman, 20 0 3; Kaestle & Allen , 2011; Levin 2007; Onar, Armstrong , & Graham , 2020; Shapiro, 2008; Shulman & Horne , 2003 ). In addition to its health benefits, we here argue that sexuality – like leisure time s and having fun – can help normalize life in space and make it more tenable Specifically, in early space missions, astronauts were given too much work without enough recreational time to relax , play , and have fun . Many studi es made by army and navy scientists later discovered that giving recreational time increased the well - being and performance of military personnel and astronauts (Stine, 1997: 167) As such, w e here argue that, like playing games or enjoying hobbies, solitary and partnered sexuality can help : getting minds off unnatural environment ; diminish the effects of stressors and fatigue on the mind and body ; enhance sleep and recuperation; and generally improve (or maintain) the health and we ll - being of those who live in space. More to the point, since safe and healthy sex is generally considered to be a positive and natural part of human life ( i.e., beneficial or even essential ) , enabling it in the context of missions and life in space , we p ropose, can help make the journey of astronauts more enjoyable , humane, and akin to pleasurable aspects of our life on Earth . We also propose that it can help (potential future) astronauts – travellers, explorers, or settlers – feel that an extraterrestrial life is something worth living That is , making sure that people living in space for prolonged periods of time have access to sex uality can arguably make them 15 more inclined to participate i n space missions , as well as help them build meaningful extraterrestrial li ves . In this case, lives that : are compatible with human needs ; are perceived as more “normal” (i.e., meaning, similar to typical positive aspects of human life on Earth) ; and reduce the likelihood of people feel ing that they are missing out on important intimate experiences during their time in space Importantly, to that effect, we propose that technology can facilitate, enhance, and expand the (socio)sexual possibilities of astronauts as they journey to the final frontier 2.2 Technological Possibilities : From Sex Toys to Erobots Technology provides a wide range of opportunities for solitary or partnered (socio) sexual activities in space, such as : technology - mediated masturbation , remote sex , and human - machine erotic interactions For instance, astronauts could engage in a variety of interactive , immersive , and/or connected erotic experiences during space missions using combinations of: • s ex toys • erotic stimuli (e.g., digital pornography) • v irtual, augmented, or mixed reality (VR, AR, MR) • robotics • artificial intelligence (AI) • haptic equipment • teledildonics Indeed, t echnology expands the p ossibilit ies of (socio) sexual activit ies with oneself and others , proximally and at a distance (e.g., masturbation and remote sex with humans and/or machines ). This includes but is not limited to solitary and partnered body/genital stimulation and complex intimate interactions with artificial erotic agents, or erobots (e.g., virtual partners, erotic chatbots, and sex/love robots ; Dubé & Anctil, in press ) – whether th at be aboard spaceships, stations, base, or settlements . In other words , we can harn ess the potential of technolog y to help give astronauts access to sexuality , and by extension, facilitate its benefits as well as curb some of the issues or suffering related to involuntary abstinence ( Dubé & Anctil , 2020) Sex toy A ny object that is used for sexual enhancement , stimulation , or pleasure. (Döring & Pöschl, 2018) Erobot Any embodied, virtual, or augmented artificial erotic agent, as well as the technology from which it necessarily emerges. (Dubé & Anctil, in press) 16 More precisely , f or single people, technology can be used to build intimate, romantic , or sexual relationships with individuals in - and outside of the people the y work with. In fact, i ntimate relationships outside coworkers can arguably be more desirable in many situations . For example , when compatible partners are not available or when people prefer not to mix professional and personal lives. In these situations , technology can help connect astronauts with people that are no t part of their mission to satisfy their needs for erotic interactions. Additionally, in the event that people do not want to engage in intimate interactions with a coworker , but are still interested in fulfill ing their romantic or sexual needs, technology has the potent ial to provide equipment (e.g., sex toys and AI - powered products for VR, AR, MR , and cyber - or remote sex ) or artificial partner s , such as erobot s , to help mitigate the difficulties associated with solitude or lack o f intimacy. Moreover , i n the (unavoidable) event of intimate relationships between coworkers , sexual technologies can help reduce some of the risks associated with interhuman intimacy , as previously mentioned . T hey can also enhance the priva cy of intimate interactions . For instance, by using connected sex toys (with ( out ) MR ), astronauts can potentially – safely, discre e tly , and hygienically – engage in romantic or sexual activities without having other people knowing about it , while simultaneously avoiding some of the messiness of direct (zero - gravity) interhuman erotic interaction s Notably, the same technologies c ould also be applied to help couples maintain intimate, romantic, and sexual relationships while a partner is away on a space mission. That is, new sexual technologies can connect – in evermore complex, interactive, and immersive ways – intimate partners at a distance, to facilitate the maintenance of intimacy between people living in s pace and on Earth , as well as po ssibly help them ove rcome some of the hardship related to prolonged long - distanced relationships Ultimately, in addition to being fun, pleasurable, and healthy, sexual technologies can potentially complement the daily medical exams of astronauts , as well as help monitor the ir psychological, emotional, and physical health and well - being – in cluding their sexual and reproductive health – , which represents , in itself, valuable data in the context of space travel, exploration , and colonization (Dubé & Anctil, 2020) This is the end of Part 1 of the SexTech in Spa ce Report. The rest of the re port will be published in upcoming months. Please check with We - Vibe at press@we - vibe.com for further details. 17 C ontributors Simon Dubé , PhD Candidate Concordia Vision Labs | Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology (CSBN) Department of Psychology, Concordia University Research on Sex, Violence, & Personality (RSVP) Lab Department of Psychology, McGill University Contact: simondube.ta@gmail.com Maria Santaguida, PhD Candidate Concordia Vision Labs | Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology (CSBN) Department of Psychology, Concordia University Research on Sex, Violence, & Personality (RSVP) Lab Department of Psychology, McGill University Contact: maria.santaguida@concordia.ca Dave Anctil, PhD Affiliated Researcher | International Observatory o n The Societal Impacts o f A rtificial Intelligence a nd Digital Technolog y (OBVIA ) , Lava l University Full Professor | Department of P hilosophy, Jean - de - Brébeuf College (Montreal) Contact: dave.anctil@brebeuf.qc.ca 18 References Ackmann, M . (2004). The M ercury 13: T he true story of thirteen women and the dream of space flight. R andom house. Asimov, I. (197 3 ). S ex in a spaceship S exology Reprinted in science past – science future , 1975. Barrica, A . (2019). Sextech revolution: T he future of sexual wellness Lioncrest P ublishing Bartels, M. (2019, October 23). Japan Sets Sights on Moon with NASA and India. Space.com . Retrieved from https://www.space.com/japan - moon - plans - with - nasa - india.html Bartels, M. (2020 , August 18 ). UAE's Hope Mars orbiter nails first big maneuver in deep space. Space.com . Retrieved from https://www.space.com/hope - mars - mission - uae - first - course - correction.html Betson, J . R. , & S ecrest, R . (1964). Prospective women astronauts selection program: R atio nale and comments. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology , 88 (3), 421 - 423. Doi: h ttp s://doi.org/10.1016/0002 - 9378(64)90446 - 6 Blakemore, E . (2019, M arch 6). When sally ride took her first space flight, sexism was the norm. History.com. Retrieved from https://www.history.com/news/sally - ride - first - astronaut - sexism Blue Origin (2020). Our mission. Retrieved from https://www.blueorigin.com/our - mission Boeing (2020). CST - 100 Starliner. Retrieved from http://www.boeing.com/space/starliner/ Bowman, C . P. (2014). Women’s masturbation: E xperiences of sexual empowerment in a primarily sex - positive sample. Psychology of W omen Q uarterly , 38 (3) , 363 - 378. Doi: 10.1177/0361684313514855 Bowman, C . P. (2017). Masturbation. In K. Nadal (ed.), T he S age E ncyclopedia of P sychology and G ender (pp.1124 – 1124). SAGE P ublications I nc. Bradotti, R . (2013). The posthuman . Polity P ress 19 Brody, S . (2006). Blood pressure reactivity to stress is better for people who recently had penile - vaginal intercourse than for people who had other or no sexual activity. Biological P sychology 71 (2) , 214 - 22. Doi: 10.1016/j.biopsy cho.2005.03.005. Brody, S . (201 0). The relative health benefits of different sexual activities . Journal of S exual M edicine, 7 , 1336 - 1361. Doi: 10.1111/j.1743 - 6109.2009.01677.x Burbank, M. (2019, July 10). Women played cruc