PSYCHOELECTRONIC THREATS TO DEMOCRACY Author: Mojmír Babáček (copyright reserved - this book or parts of it may not be sold without the consent of the author) CONTENT 1) History - Scandal in the US and electrical control of brain activity 2) Electrical functioning of the human brain 3) Scientific experiments and patents - electromagnetic effects on animal and human organisms 4) US military documents on the development of electromagnetic weapons 5) The nervous system works similarly to a radio receiver and transm itter 6) Secret arms races 7) A subdued scandal in the USSR 8) Igor Smirnov's device and control of ideas 9) A secret conference organized by the US National Laboratory in Los Alamos 10) The Russian SURA system and the American HAARP system and the possibility of a global effect on the human nervous system 11) In 1997, the United States began thinking about creating a system of totalitarian world government based on the use of remote control technology for human brains. 12) European reaction to building the American HAARP system 13) Russian reaction to building the HAARP system 14) The book by Vladimír Lopatin and Vladimír Cygankov 15) Decision of the Security Committee of the Russian State Duma 16) US bill banning the deployment of weapons in space 17) Russia has decided to keep psychotronic weapons 18) Are psychotronic weapons used? 19) Are there psychotronic weapons based on unknown physical principles? 20) Efforts to ban remote control of the human nervous system HISTORY - US SCANDAL AND ELECTRIC BRAIN CONTROL When the US Secret Service began work on the Ar tichoke project in 1951, they set the following goals, among other things: "Can we get information from a person against their will and without their knowledge? ... Can we control a human being enough to obey our orders against your will and even contrary to such basic laws of nature as the instinct of self - preservation? (1) “. This research has been kept as secret as possible from the beginning. The New York Times quoted another CIA report in 1977 as saying, "Many phases of research into the control of hum an behavior require a high degree of secrecy. The professional reputation of researchers employed outside the Agency is jeopardized because the objectives of such research are considered immoral or illegal by the general public '(2). The US press was the r esult of a scandal caused by the abuse of patients at the Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal in the second half of the 1950s. Without being informed, they were used to experiment with drugs and various drastic psychological methods, inspired by the subtl e torture of prisoners forced to confess before the Soviet trials of the 1930s and 1950s. Among other things, they were locked in complete isolation, where they were deprived of the possibility of sensory perception. Staying without external stimuli has de vastating effects on the human psyche. When the CIA concluded in 1972 that the hospital's former patients could be prosecuted, it tried to prevent the scandal by ordering the destruction of all records of the MKULTRA project, which involved torturing patie nts at the Montreal hospital. In addition to damaging her reputation, she was also threatened with disclosure of other subprojects on which she was working on the MKULTRA project. However, the order to destroy the records was not executed consistently. In 1989, Gordon Thomas published a book on the CIA's research entitled "The Road to Madness - The True Story of CIA's Secret Research on Brain Control and Medical Abuse" (3), which was also based on information made public by the financial records of the MKUL TRA project were not destroyed. This is how the world learned about experiments that used electrical brain stimulation to remotely control dogs, Scientific experiments with electrical brain stimulation have yielded remarkable results that have given the CI A much more hope of controlling human behavior than using chemicals such as drugs. Signals in the nerve fibers of the brain and the whole body take place as weak electrical impulses, which are transferred by chemical reactions as they pass from one fiber t o another. This opens the way to both chemical and electrical control of brain activity. As early as the 1930s, WR Hess introduced thin wires into the brains of animals, electrodes into which he let oscillations of a weak electric current. The result was r eactions similar to those that normally evoke sensory sensations or events taking place in the body. In 1987, the American author John Ranelagh published a book entitled "The Agency, the Rise and Fall of the CIA" (4), where he quoted a report on the progre ss of work on subproject 94 of the MKULTRA project from 1960: "The initial biological research on the techniques and deployment of brain centers necessary to influence and control animals has been completed." A memorandum to the director of the CIA in Apri l 1961 already stated: "At present, we think that we are not far from making a mistake of a prototype system that can be used to guide dogs along certain routes in the field that are under the supervision of the operator ... Dr. (name deleted) begins work to use our knowledge to develop the Agency's future tools in the general areas of influencing human behavior, indirect rewarding of subjects and tools for interrogation. " A memorandum to the director of the CIA in April 1961 already stated: "At present, w e think that we are not far from making a mistake of a prototype system that can be used to guide dogs along certain routes in the field that are under the supervision of the operator ... Dr. (name deleted) begins work to use our knowledge to develop the A gency's future tools in the general areas of influencing human behavior, indirect rewarding of subjects and tools for interrogation. " A memorandum to the director of the CIA in April 1961 already stated: "At present, we think that we are not far from maki ng a mistake of a prototype system that can be used to guide dogs along certain routes in the field that are under the supervision of the operator ... Dr. (name deleted) begins work to use our knowledge to develop the Agency's future tools in the general a reas of influencing human behavior, indirect rewarding of subjects and tools for interrogation. " In 1969, Jose Delgado, a Spanish professor of physiology at the time at Yale's top American university, published a book, "Physical Brain Control, Towards a P sychocivilized Society," (5) summarizing research by scientists working in the field of electrical brain stimulation. At that time, scientists had already managed to map the relationship of various places in the brain to the activities, functions and feeli ngs of humans and animals. The bull hummed a hundred times with a hundred electrical impulses to a given point in his brain. Irritation of the locomotor center in the cat's brain with 1.2 milliampere electric shocks caused the cat to raise its hind leg abo ve the floor, at 1.5 milliamper to raise its leg about 4 cm, at 1.8 milliamp to the top, and at 2 milliamperes. leg even during the jump and turned out badly. When the experimenters asked a man who was stimulated to bend his arm to straighten it, said, "I think your electricity is stronger than my will." The electrical stimulation of the brain centers affected the rhythm of breathing, the heartbeat (which was also stopped), the excretion of gastric juices, the function of most intestines and the size of the eye dolls. Frowning, eye and mouth opening, chewing, yawning, sleep, dizziness, excretion and epileptic seizures were induced. The transmission of electrical impulses to the brain centers also evoked purposeful behavior. When the sleeping cat was induced, she performed it only mechanically, but when awake she was looking for something to lick. functions of most intestines and the size of the eye dolls. Frowning, eye and mouth opening, chewing, yawning, sleep, dizziness, excretion and epileptic seizures wer e induced. The transmission of electrical impulses to the brain centers also evoked purposeful behavior. When the sleeping cat was induced, she performed it only mechanically, but when awake she was looking for something to lick. functions of most intestin es and the size of the eye dolls. Frowning, eye and mouth opening, chewing, yawning, sleep, dizziness, excretion and epileptic seizures were induced. The transmission of electrical impulses to the brain centers also evoked purposeful behavior. When the sle eping cat was induced, she performed it only mechanically, but when awake she was looking for something to lick. When electrical stimulation of the brain was directed to more superior brain centers, whole complexes of movements were induced. The stimulated monkey got up from the food and began to walk, sitting down to eat again whenever the stimulation began and whenever it was interrupted. Another monkey repeated the same sequence of activities 20,000 times. Stimulating places in the brain where emotions a nd feelings are concentrated has led to decisions. A passive, depressed woman, stimulated by a rage center, tore a piece of paper, then said, "I wanted to get up and tear. I didn't control myself. " Anxiety was caused in the same way, and its strength coul d be controlled by turning a knob that controlled the intensity of the electric current. The monkey's maternal behavior towards her newborn was also stopped. Patients offered marriage to therapists by encouraging pleasure centers. When the limbic system in the brain was stimulated, patients lost their alertness, lost sight and ability to think. They often began to undress or grope and did not remember it after the stimulation. The fact that it is easy to connect human inventions to living organisms is docum ented by an experiment in which electrodes were placed in the cat's inner ear and connected to an amplifier and speakers. The cat's inner ear then acted as a microphone, and words came from the speakers, whispered into the cat's ear. John Stanton Yeomans, in his 1990 book The Basics of Brain Stimulation (6), described the opposite procedure, where the visual perceptions of Braille, which they had learned to read, were transmitted via electrodes to the brain's center of vision of the blind. John Stanton Yeom ans wrote in the book that electrical stimulation of the brain can trigger hundreds of reactions, including complex thoughts. In 2016, scientists were able to change the memory of mice by sending signals to the brain through electrodes. They were able to t urn on and off memories in their brains that evoked fear in them and changed negative emotional memories into positive ones and vice versa (107). Jose Delgado gained world fame by standing up against a bull with a small black box and first infuriating him enough to attack him, and when he ran almost to him, he stopped him by pressing the other button. At the end of his book, he wrote: “The hope that the new power gained by behavioral science will be limited to scientists or some charitable elite is aroused by neither the ancient nor the recent past .... control of hazel behavior will move forward rapidly, both in methodology and in the possibilities of use ’. He himself suggested the use of this new knowledge to create a "psychocivilized society." Gordona Th omas used interviews with former CIA staff to obtain information for his book, in addition to documents released under the Freedom of Information Act. He learned that at the end of June 1972, the head of the CIA's research department was excited to tell it s director that a long - term answer had been found to the problem of controlling the human brain, that electrical stimulation of the human brain was key not only to controlling the individual but to creating a "psychocivilized society." to a world where eve ry emotion, feeling, desire, can be controlled by electrical stimulation of the brain (7). However, such a vision could not be based on the insertion of electrodes into the brain. According to Gordon Thomas, the CIA developed the so - called Schwitzgebel dev ice as early as 1972. The antenna was a so - called "transmitter - behavior enhancer", attached to a belt, which received signals from the radio module, transmitted them to the brain and sent back signals from the brain. The signal flow was controlled and repo rted via a computer. The device was able to record all physiological and neurological signs in humans up to 400 m away. During President Reagan's reign, the future use of the device with greater range to monitor released prisoners was reportedly considered . But this was definitely not about inserting electrodes into the brain. Schwitzgebel's device apparently picked up electromagnetic waves emanating from the brain as a result of its activity and sent waves into it to correct its activity. People, In 1995, the son of US Congressman Nick Begich and journalist Jeane Manning published a book on the US HAARP antenna system (22). They quoted in it as a report on a conference convened in 1986 by the US Attorney General, issued by the US National Institute of Justi ce. Among other things, the report wrote: “Participants also discussed the use of different wavelengths and forms of electromagnetic energy as non - lethal weapons. Extensive preliminary research has been carried out in this area ... One participant in the c onference stated that scientific knowledge of human physiology has reached such a level that it will soon be possible to hit specific physiological systems with specific frequencies of electromagnetic radiation to achieve much finer and more accurately cal culable effects than which have so far been achieved by photographic stimulation '(9). The idea that electromagnetic radiation can achieve the same effects as electrical brain stimulation is frightening because it means that any person can be attacked and deprived of their freedom of choice at any time or even killed at a distance by electromagnetic energy. Let's see how high the probability is that such attacks are feasible. ELECTRICAL FUNCTIONING OF THE HUMAN BRAIN Everyone today knows that an electroe ncephalograph captures major brain frequencies that change as a person sleeps or watches or concentrates on a job. The changes in neuronal polarization that the electroencephalograph detects on the skin surface are caused by the activity of neurons in the brain. However, the electroencephalograph only captures the frequency that currently predominates in overall brain activity. When nerve impulses, which repeat less than four times per second, predominate in the activity of neurons, mainly on the surface of the brain, the electroencephalograph captures the frequency of 4 Herz and the person sleeps. When a person closes his eyes and does nothing, the electroencephalograph captures frequencies from 8 to 13 Herz and the man rests, while concentrating on some ac tivity, frequencies from 14 to 40 Herz predominate in the brain. We said that the electroencephalograph captures the activity of neurons in the brain. The source of changes in the polarization of neurons that the electroencephalograph captures are the memb ranes of neurons. During nerve excitation on them, the electrical voltage changes between their inner and outer surface. Inside neurons is a fluid in which particles move that have either received or delivered an electron and therefore have either a positi ve or negative charge. These particles are called ions, and the liquid filled with them is called an electrolyte. The change in tension between the membrane surfaces of neurons occurs by the transfer of positively charged ions from the membrane surface, wh ere a positive charge predominates, to the inner part of the membrane, where a negative charge predominates. During nerve excitation, a flow of negatively charged ions spreads across the neuron, which can cause further nerve excitations on the membranes of other neurons. In 2014, Chinese researchers Shuo Li, Sucheng Li, Anwar, Shahzad, Fa Tian, Weixin Lu and Bo Hou published an experiment in the Academic Journal, in which they emphasized the importance of their experiment in studying “the interaction betw een electromagnetic waves and biological tissues that have high water content and significant ion concentration ". They used saline for the experiment. The salt has the chemical name NaCl and therefore contains chlorine and sodium atoms. The ions of both o f these atoms play an important role in inducing nerve impulses. The experiment showed that this electrolyte is conductive for microwaves (76). Thus, if microwaves, pulsed at the frequency of nerve activity, penetrate into the "electrolyte" in the nerve fi bers, there will be axon membranes in the nervous system, which have a controlling function in the nervous system and react to a change in electrical voltage by causing nerve impulses Thus, the "electrolyte" in the nerve fibers, if the waves penetrate it, will act as an antenna. This was confirmed in its study on the sensitivity of the human body to electromagnetic radiation, published on the Internet, by the American organization MCS America, which fights environmental pollution. Her study states: “The b ody can receive a signal and convert it into electrical currents just like the antenna of a radio receiver or a mobile phone. These currents are carried by ions flowing through living tissues and veins... When these currents strike cell membranes that are no rmally electrically charged, they try to vibrate at the same time as the current ”(77). SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS AND PATENTS - ELECTROMAGNETIC ACTION ON ANIMAL AND HUMAN ORGANISMS Microwaves have been decided by scientists who have begun to study the eff ects of electromagnetic radiation on human and animal organisms for their experiments. Evidence of the effects of electromagnetic signals on individual neurons was published in 1975 by H. Wachtel in the journal "The Chronicles of the New York Academy of S ciences." This entire volume of more than 500 pages is dedicated to the conference on "Biological effects of non - ionizing radiation". The opening speech at the conference was given by Captain Paul Tyler, who was the Director of Electromagnetic Research of the US Navy from 1970 to 1977. Among other things, in his speech, he persuaded scientists to add psychologists to their research teams. In H. Wachtel's experiment, microwaves induced the activity of individual neurons (10). Robert Becker, in the book "Cros sing Currents", cites the work of A. Liboff, according to which it is possible to stop the process of cell division by electromagnetic radiation when the two cells separate (17). Microwaves also managed to influence the basic brain rhythms, which are capt ured by an electroencephalograph. Many scientists have repeated the same experiment in which microwaves caused a desynchronization of basal rhythm in the brain in dogs, cats, rabbits, rats and frogs (11). The 1981 World Health Organization publication on the effects of microwaves on living organisms (16) provides a number of examples of the effects of this radiation on the secretion of internal glands, blood chemistry, genetics, the development of organisms and animal behavior. The publication states that the first studies on the effects of these frequencies on humans were conducted in the 1950s in Poland, Czechoslovakia and the USSR. The research was conducted in clinics and in the industrial work environment, and its authors (Baranski, Czerski, Marha, Pre sman) concluded that microwaves can cause headaches, physical weakness, dizziness, unbalanced mood, confusion and insomnia in humans. In his 1968 book "Electromagnetic Fields and Wildlife" (23), Russian academic AS Presman cited S. Turlygin's 1937 experime nt in which microwaves evoked feelings of drowsiness and weakness in humans. Ross Adey, one of the most respected experts on the effects of electromagnetic signals on the brain, who refuses to talk about the military research in which he is involved (he a dmitted this during his visit to the Czech Republic), published in 1974 the results of 147 microwave microwaves. MHz, pulsed at 6 - 10 Hz, and 450 MHz microwaves pulsed at 16 Hz increased calcium excretion from nerve cells (25). The experiment was then repea ted by different scientists with results in which the effective pulse frequencies differed only according to the different intensity of the Earth's magnetic field at the locations where the experiments were performed. Robert Becker, who has twice been nomi nated for the Nobel Prize for his work in this field, wrote in his book "The Electric Body, Electromagnetism and the Fundamentals of Life" (20) that Ross Adey publicly expressed his expectations, that this loss of calcium should make it impossible for peop le to concentrate on complex tasks, cause sleep disorders and otherwise change the functioning of the brain. British scientist Andrew Goldsworthy warned, in a study published on the Internet, that calcium leaching from neurons and thus reduced ability to c oncentrate, due to excessive activity of neurons, can, among other problems, cause radiation from mobile telephone networks The ability of electromagnetic signals to overcome the effects of drugs or chemicals in the brain is evidenced by Mc Affee's experi ment of 1961, 1962 and 1971, in which irradiation of rat heads with microwaves led to their awakening from anesthesia after five minutes. His experiment was quoted in 1978 by James C. Lin in his book "Hearing Effects of Mirrors and Applications." At a conf erence on "Emerging Electromagnetic Medicine" in 1990, B. Servantie presented his 1984 experiment, in which he found that rats exposed to microwaves pulsed at 500 Hz for 10 to 15 days were significantly more resistant to paralyzing curare toxins. (12). US military researchers have also focused on the interaction of chemicals and electrical currents in the brain caused by microwaves. A 1982 report on US Air Force biotechnology, quoted in a book by Nick Begich and Jeane Manning, (22) states: “Using relativel y low levels of radio frequency radiation, it may be possible to expose large military assemblies to extremely dispersed amounts of biological or chemical radiation. substances to which the non - irradiated population would be immune ’. Thus, the report appa rently assumed that radiofrequency radiation could amplify the action of chemical or biological agents in the body. Allen Frey's knowledge, written in Robert Becker's book The Electric Body, that electromagnetic radiation can weaken the brain - blood barrier that prevents toxins from entering the brain, could also be used to make this assumption. In 1985, Captain Paul Tyler told the editor of OMNI: "Many things that can be done chemically can probably be done electromagnetically. With the right electromagnet ic field, you could produce the same effects as psychoactive drugs ”(21). It was probably based on the work of English Dr. Patterson, whom he spoke about in his lecture at the conference on Emerging Electromagnetic Medicine. Dr. Patterson used a cranial el ectrical stimulator that was fully programmed and automated for various groups of drugs, their combinations, and longer - term withdrawal syndromes such as depression and insomnia. Russian academician Presman, in his book Electromagnetic Fields and Living N ature, expressed the theory that electromagnetic signals have "informational significance" for living matter. He wrote: "A signal carrying information only causes a redistribution of energy in the system, it controls the processes that take place in it." H e suggested that it is possible to achieve the same effects by electromagnetic radiation as by electrical stimulation of the brain. Jose Delgado also focused on the electromagnetic control of brain activities in his further work. In 1985, Kathleen McAulif fe, editor of OMNI magazine, showed in his laboratory in Spain, where he returned from working in the United States, how he can put electromagnetic signals to put him to sleep or wake up a monkey or calm a fish in the middle of a fight (21). In his book, AS Presman also presents the development of scientific knowledge about the induction of visual hallucinations by electromagnetic radiation. As early as 1893, the Frenchman D'Arsonval (24) noticed that the effect of an electromagnetic field can give a perso n the impression of a flash of light. In the following years, a number of other scientists came to the same conclusion. In 1960, T. Jaski caused microwaves to cause simple visual hallucinations in humans. (24) In 1985, American scientists William Van Bise and Elisabeth Rauscher applied this technology to the host of the American television station CNN on television. In 1961, American scientist Allan H. Frey published the results of experiments with transmitting sounds to the brain via microwaves at a dista nce of up to several hundred meters. These sounds were heard by both healthy and deaf people. The sounds heard - buzzing, ticking, hissing or knocking - varied as the transmitter parameters changed - especially the frequency of the transmitted pulses and t he duration of the individual pulses. Commenting on A. Frey's experiment, he wrote that by further changing the parameters of the transmitter, he evoked in people the sensation of a sharp blow to the head or a feeling of tingling (27). His experiment was t hen repeated by a number of other scientists with the same results. WA Guy, JC Lin, CK Chou and D. Christensen published an experiment in 1975 in the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, in which they extended this experiment to include an experimen t with cats. The cats were put to sleep, paralyzed with medication, and connected to a respirator. When their nervous systems were sterilized in this way, the electrodes recorded the reactions of the neurons in their brain to normal sounds and "electromagn etic" sounds. These reactions coincided and disappeared when the connection between the cochlea and the rest of the brain was broken (29). Thus, the "electromagnetic" sounds probably evoked reactions in the so - called head neuron in the cochlea of the cat After these discoveries, the US military and secret services realized their possible military and civilian uses, and further research in this field was kept secret. The publication of a more advanced attempt to send "electromagnetic" sounds to the brain was only inadvertently made. In an article on the effect of microwaves on the behavior of living beings in American Psychologist in 1975, Don R. Justesen used the results of an experiment told by telephone by his colleague JC Sharp, who was working on a U S Navy military project called Pandora, which was officially designed to radio frequency research, which was broadcast to the US Embassy in Moscow from the 1960s to the 1980s. In his article, Don R. Justesen wrote that Joseph C. The fact that the system o f microwave speech transmission to the brain was later perfected is evidenced by a document that appeared in 1997 on the website of the US Department of the Environment. The site described the project "Communication through microwave hearing effect" as a " revolutionary technology that offers radio frequency communication with low probability of capture" and stated that "the feasibility of the system was confirmed using both low - intensity laboratory systems and high - performance transmitters “(149). In Janua ry 2007, the topic even appeared in the US government newspaper Washington Post, which wrote in the article Games with the Brain (79) that in 2002 the US Air Force Research Laboratory patented technology that allows words to be transmitted to the brain via microwaves and that requests under the Freedom of Information Act, it was revealed that the patent was based on experiments with humans in which scientists, in 1994, transmitted difficult - to - understand sentences to human heads. According to the Washington Post, the research continued until at least 2002 and is subject to the State Secrecy Act. US MILITARY DOCUMENTS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ELECTROMATGNET WEAPONS In 1986, the US Air Force published the book "The Low - Intensity Conflict and Modern Technolog y" (19). In a preface, then - Congressman Newt Gingrich wrote: "The United States is on the brink of dramatic change in its ability to cope with a low - intensity conflict ... This book is a serious effort to ensure that our understanding and management of the low - intensity conflict is easier, more comprehensible and more effective ". The chapter on the "electromagnetic spectrum of low - intensity conflict" was written by Captain Paul Tyler. At the beginning of the chapter, he quotes the "Final Report on Biotech nology Research Requirements for Aeronautical Systems up to 2000", published in 1982: "Currently available data suggest that specifically generated RF fields may pose powerful and revolutionary threats to military personnel. .. the growing understanding of the brain as an electrically mediated organ has suggested a high probability that forced electromagnetic fields can disrupt purposeful behavior and may be able to control and interrogate such behavior. In addition, the passage of 100 milliamperes through the myocardium can lead to cardiac arrest and death ... A rapidly scanning system can provide the ability to stun or kill in a large area. The efficiency of the system will be a function of the waveform, Robert Becker published a report in the book Cross Currents from the Walter J. Reed Army Microwave Research Department. The report discusses the effects of pulsed microwaves on the nervous system and describes the breakdown of the test program, which began in 1986. It was broken down as follows: 1) Quick numb ing effects 2) Fast stimulation with auditory effects 3) Obstruction at work - retention effects 4) Effects on stimulus - driven behavior The report translates the conclusion: "Microwave pulses probably connect to the central nervous system and induce stimulation si milar to electrical stimulation ...". Robert Becker cited the "Biolelectromagnetics Society Newsletter" as a January and February issue in 1989. Robert Becker lost scientific research grants as a result of his testimony against the US construction of a 9 0 Hz submarine communications antenna and his publications. indicating the possibility of controlling the activity of the human brain by pulsed microwaves. Nick Begich and Jeanne Maning quoted the same US Air Force report as Paul Tyler in "Angels don't pl ay this HAARP" and said that radio frequency weapons research was divided into three areas: 1) Pulsed effects of radiofrequency radiation on living organisms - this research was to begin in 1980 and to be completed in 1995. 2) Mechanisms of the effect of radiof requency radiation on living organisms - this research was to take place from 1980 to 1997 3) Phenomena imposed by radiofrequency radiation - this research was planned from 1986 to 2010 (22). In the mid - 1990s, the second volume of the "Final Reports on Biote chnological Research Requirements for Aeronautical Systems by the Year 2000" was published. In this volume, it was stated that work on research into the effects of radiofrequency radiation is proceeding according to plan or in advance. The last project fro m the first volume was written in the second volume: While the original attention should be focused on the degradation of human abilities ... further work should focus on the possibilities of controlling and interrogating mental functions using externally applied fields. " This was a very complicated plan to transfer ideas between two or more brains. Although some documents on US military research into the effects of electromagnetic waves on the human brain are publicly available, the findings are seldom p ublished in the US media. Most recently, in January 2007, The Washington Post published an article, Mind Games, in which it published a 2002 U.S. Air Force experiment attempting to send difficult - to - understand sentences to microwaves in human brains (79). It is possible that the intent of these publications is to prepare the publication in such a way as to ensure that the American public will ultimately accept the use of these funds by the American secret services. THE NERVOUS SYSTEM WORKS LIKE A RADIO RE CEIVER AND TRANSMITTER In his contribution to Newt Gingrich's book, Paul Tyler wrote that the effectiveness of a system acting on the human nervous system will be "a function of waveform, field strength, pulse width, repetition rate, and carrier frequency ." It is well known that information within the brain is transmitted by the number and frequency of nerve impulses, with the intensity of sensation usually corresponding to the intensity of an electric current. Another phenomenon that is widely accepted in the modern scientific literature is the synchronization of the frequencies of transmission of nerve impulses in different parts of the brain in response to stimuli that become important in the brain. Per E. Roland of the Brain Research Laboratory at the K arolinska Institute in Stockholm, described in 1993, his book Brain Activation (35), how he monitored the influx of blood that brings nutrients to areas of the brain that are currently in operation. and found out that in response to various stimuli, column s of active neurons form in the brain. During their study, he came to the conclusion that according to the layout of these columns, he is able to determine what kind of ideas one is currently dealing with. He then wondered whether the neurons in these so - c alled metabolic columns have the same electrophysiological properties, or in other words, whether the activity of the neurons in these columns takes place at the same frequencies of nerve impulses. As early as 1981, Schopman and Stryker wrote that "in the cat's visual cortex, the metabolic columns corresponded to electrophysiologically defined columns in which neurons had an orientation specificity for the stimulus used" and, conversely, that "metabolic columns appeared only in those parts of the cortex whe re neurons electrophysiologically defined functional properties related to the stimulus' (37). Walter J. Freeman, who had been studying the electrical activity of the brain for decades by simultaneously inserting a number of microelectrodes into different parts of the brain, confirmed that the same frequency of nerve impulses was transmitted. In the book "Mass Action in the Nervous System". nervous system) hypothesized that transmissions in the brain "take place at a certain characteristic frequency and tha t reception occurs in systems ... tuned to that frequency" (38). From the point of view of the effects of transmitted electromagnetic waves on the activity of the human brain, in 1982, in a lecture at a symposium entitled Coherent Excitation in Biological Systems (39), H. Frohlich from the Department of Physics at the University of Liverpool stated: To sum it all up, then each of our perceptions, feelings or thoughts in the brain has its electromagnetically defined form. Thus, all events in the brain take p lace as specific frequencies or sequences of frequencies of electrical impulses, which according to Faraday's laws cause electromagnetic waves, and these events in the brain can also be induced synthetically, by a suitably coded electromagnetic signal. In the experiments of Allan Frey and W. Guy, the electromagnetic signals initially probably hit the snails in the brain and from there spread to other parts of the brain, replacing normal auditory perceptions. There was also a feeling of a sharp blow to the h ead or a feeling of tingling. The electromagnetic signal replaced the nerve excitement in the brain, which would be caused by a sharp blow to the head or an influx of blood into the depressed blood vessels. The changed parameters of the transmitter caused that the areas of reception of electromagnetic signals in the brain have changed and the synchronization in their activity has caused a feeling of a sharp blow to the head or tingling. Captain Paul Tyler's remark that normal breathing is possible only at c ertain frequencies of electromagnetic radiation and not at others was related to the same phenomenon. When we think of the attempt to send whispered words to the speakers through the cat's inner ear, it is clear that the human nervous system is comparable to a radio transmitter or receiver. If we want to achieve a certain response, we only need to know the technical parameters of the "receiver" and send a signal to which the receiver is "tuned", similar to when tuning a radio receiver select the frequency a t which its internal circuits will resonate and we hear the selected station. I Jose Delgado, who moved from the United States to a Spanish laboratory, switched from electrical stimulation of the brain to stimulation with radiofrequency signals. This time, however, the only time his attempts were made public was an interview with OMNI journalist Kathleen Mc Auliff, a friend of Robert Becker, whom R. Becker had instructed Jose Delgado before asking in Spain. One of the prepared questions was whether, in addi tion to frequencies, other parameters of the transmitter also play a role. But Jose Delgado did not answer most of the prepared questions. The frequency, as it is at least written in a document of the US Air Force, is not the only parameter of the transmit ter that needs to be set. Waveform, electric current intensity, pulse width, and carrier frequency also frequently appear in published scientific research. In his contribution on the electromagnetic spectrum of low - intensity conflict, Captain Paul Tyler ci ted scientific work that provided evidence that the biological effects of millimeter waves depend on the frequency used and concluded: “Thanks to the many parameters at play and the obvious specificities. each parameter, it is possible to prescribe a speci fic response. The ability to have this kind of flexibility gives the user a huge choice of options. It makes it possible to secure the necessary response, whether in a conventional or unconventional war. " Captain Tyler did not disclose the results of secr et military research, on the basis of which he could only present a similar conclusion. Captain Tyler often attended scientific conferences on the effects of electromagnetic radiation on human and animal organisms, but he always lectured there on the resea rch of other scientists. This is not common at scientific conferences. On the other hand, it is understandable that he could not publish the results of secret research that scientists conducted for the US military. If it seems to the reader that the range of frequencies in which the human nervous system operates (mostly up to 100 Hz) is too small for such a wide range of possibilities, Paul Tyler wrote in his article that, according to unconfirmed reports, 0.01 Hz can make a difference, which causes a diffe rent reaction. In an interview with Kathleen Mc Auliff and OMNI magazine in 1985, Jose Delgado said that electromagnetic signals that cause reactions in the brain produce several hundred times less electrical current than would be needed to cause nerve exc itation. How is it possible that these signals still affect the brain? Captain Tyler answered this question as follows: "internal electromagnetic fields play a key role in a large number of biological functions including ... information transmission and st orage, especially in the central nervous system" this leads to a quantum mechanical understanding of nerve signal transmission through the synapse that is induced not only electrically, but also by the action of electromagnetic waves coming from surroundin g neurons and perineuronal cells. This is also the view of Ross Adey, which also supports it by measuring electromagnetic