The grand larceny and delusion of particle physics Domi Vale Nov. 2025 Stratefic Studies & Policy Physics as a discipline has been conquered by a cabal of cult like particle physicists, who reject basic laws of physics that have created the atomic bomb and microchip, and have instead imagined a surreal world that has no basis in mathematics or basic laboratory science. Particle physicists have not only collected hundreds of billions of dollars in taxpayer money to fabricate an imaginary and absurd world of particle physics, but have begun to replace observational astrophysics with their fraudulent canon. Ideas like the CERN hadron collider, quantum computers, and mechanical nuclear fusion are all based on an imaginary and absurd canon. In Hawking's (2001) book Universe in a Nutshell, Hawking covertly points out the gross errors and absurdities of particle physics and explains he could not challenge this cabal and still maintain his position at Cambridge, censored like Soviet scientists by the EU establishment and their US partners. It must be understood that Hawking mathematically conceptualized and proved the idea of the big bang (1970) and has been academically suppressed and marginalized to prevent exposure of the particle physicists' conspiracy and monopoly. The corruption of the field has become politically established. This paper will expose the gross absurdities of particle physics since Feynman and Caltech in the 1940s and demonstrate how this ideological canon is conquering physics and astronomy, syphoning taxpayer funds, and stagnating technological development. Thus far this year, the Trump administration has spent $700+ million dollars in taxpayer funds to the rebranded "quantum information science," which is a gross abuse of taxpayer funds and incredibly deceptive and fraudulent research. Particle physics has conquered material science and chemistry such that US academics are being paid $800,000 for pseudoscientific research into "attochemistry" or "quantum speed" or "vortex quantum states" and other nonsensical chemistry simulations which baselessly promise "emergent technology" and are funded through the DOE and NSF. Nonsense "neutrino" DUNE program costs taxpayers $5 billion dollars. Particle physicists in the US are paid more in grant funding per year than G15 public officials at top positions in the government. Particle physics has been coordinated as a massive conspiracy to defraud the United States. The Trump administration must not only demonstrate austerity and cut this wasteful spending, but also have DOJ investigate to what degree US institutions have been engaging in criminal grand larceny. I. Hawking's (2001) book is filled with images that are standard concepts of particle physics and it is clear the unusuality and absurdity of the schematics. Hawking (2001) makes it clear that a) time is a property dependent on gravity and the velocity of light, thus time may have different rates depending on gravity and velocity, and technically black holes would stop time since black holes stop light, and b) that nothing can by definition exist before the big bang. This is as surreal as cosmology gets observationally, but Hawking (1974) is trying to push the theoretical envelope and suppliment Einstein's theories, using the properties of black holes such as mass, spin, charge, and temperature to probe what is geometrically beyond a black hole's horizon. Particle physicists take Hawking's formulas, mischaracterize, and make the universe some surreal, psychidelic fantasy scape. Physics is realistic in measurements such as distance, time, mass, velocity, and energy, and straight forward in how this can be conceptualized in rare and complex astronomical events. The particle physicists have incredulous ideas of multiverses and time dimensions that have no basis in mathematics, nor observation, and are pure imaginary conjecture almost as if crafted while taking hallucinogenic drugs. Hawking (2001) points out the corruption of this regime is so established, there is no public dissent exposing how particle physics foundations not only are not mathematically based but can be blatantly disproven with basic experiments. Particle physics is not just uncertain or flimsy concepts that keep stacking like a house of cards, but the foundational concepts are wacky notions that grow in canon to a multitude of erratic, conflicting, and nonsensical ideas. Hawking enjoyed entertaining fictional concepts to demonstrate and reinforce why he is confident in modern cosmological models, and explains the Academy of Geneva, Cambridge, Caltech, and MIT failed to appreciate and comprehend the scientific falacies and instead marketted the fictions as fact. II. Matter in the universe is either light photons or elements. Elements are distinct by their atoms. Elementary particles that comprise the atom are electrons, protons, and neutrons at a negative, positive, and neutral electric charge. This is the extent of particle physics phenomena. The idea of a quark is solely theoretical, used to categorize an elementary particle moments after the big bang before an elementary particle was assigned a charge, and given that particles can change charge, the idea of a quark as the blank slate of an elementary particle is useful (such that quark plus negative is an electron, quark plus positive is a proton), noting that quarks only existed for a moment during the big bang and now only electrons, protons, and neutrons exist in the universe. All other particle categorization are pure conjecture and CERN is lying that their machines prove all these other particles exist. We can see that they 1) conjured these ideas without any basis in math or physics, then 2) use the hadron collider to claim they have proof. All the physics behind computing, nuclear energy and weapons, and everything from tvs to surveillence satellites comes from physics established before WWII and all of the physics advances we have made have been harnessing these basic concepts. In cosmology, we have yet to understand why the universe expands, why galaxies can stay in formation, or how elements such as gold and uranium form in a supernova. Our concepts of physics have changed very little: after general relativity and all the predictions of the big bang and black holes, all physics discoveries are either observing phenomena in outer space, or using pre-WWII quantum mechanics and electromagnetic theory to push the envelope of what types of instruments we can build. The scientific framework has not changed since WWII and all our developments have been in utilizing these frameworks. Particle physics and CERN are complete nonsense similar to medieval alchemy (particle physics claim that neutrino particles can turn lead into gold), and investing in an idea like quantum computing is like chasing unicorns. III. Electromagnetism, classic and modern physics covers electromagnetic radiation, magnetism, light photons and electron behaviors that are the basis for complex instrumentation today. Quantum mechanics such as the exclusion principle and uncertainty principle may predict the behavior of light photons and electrons to a likelihood and is useful in designing computers and other equipment. Quantum mechanics is a limited framework, and most quantum mechanics innovations are proprietary patents in labs such as Nvidia and AMD conducted through experimenting and production. The academic quantum mechanics since WWII is entirely fabricated. Here is a short list of the extremely incompetant frameworks in particle physics that became the basis for the expansive nonsense canon marketted today-- vaccuum energy; dualities; entanglement; bosons, fermions, axions, gluons, neutrinos, supergravity, negative time, superstates, cosmic strings, branes-- It is important to note the language is crafted to sound plausible. Hawking (2001) charts where these notions come from and how the particle theories evolved over time. Wormholes were introduced as a concept to prove how abstract math can state certain geometric possibilities, but this may have no basis in reality; and yet particle physicists like Kip Thorne ignored the point made and postulated wormholes as a real phenomena, as well as the warping of space and multidimensions. Hawking (2001) pointed out the wormhole idea was just a point made about fallacies of mathematics, and showed wormholes and other fantasms are actually physically impossible in physics. For a wormhole or warping to exist, matter in the universe would have to be negative, meaning wormholes may be possible if matter in the universe did not exist. Kip Thorne and Richard Feynman of Caltech fancied themselves real trailblazers in cosmology and failed to grasp basic principles of gravitational law. Lab experiments working with hydrogen can show a phenomena of positive and negative particles popping in and out of space, the lamb shift, and this has 0 affect on technology, and this is as far as quantum mechanics goes into the surreal. This particle, antiparticle concept may be significant around black hole phenomena, and Hawking's work in the 1970s was trying to understand black hole geometry and what causes its gravitational effects. Hawking's work has become a muse for pseudoscientific fantasms by physicists who want to be celebrities and they cannot even understand his or Einstein's work. Caltech and MIT particle theorists such as Brian Greene, Michio Kaku, and Sean Carroll are savants of pseudoscience and have made millions with books and tv appearances preaching the canon of quantum conjecture. The understanding here is that quantum physics after Heisenberg's uncertainty and Pauli's exclusion (1930s) is imaginary and financially fraudulent, and must be distinguished from CERN particle physics, string theory, and this contingent quantum information theory. All of our instrumentation and technological development of the static 1950s and computer age 2000s has come from harnessing photons, electrons, and atoms, and contemporary technological innovations in instrumentation will occur through strategic and economic testing and fabrication, not fantastic promises of tech revolutions. IV. To reiterate, particle physicists bastardize Hawking's theoretical work into the frankenstein quantum gravity theories & get billions of dollars in taxpayer funding for it. We have limited knowledge of, for example, the sun's behavior and how solar radiation may affect circuitry in satellites, but we can understand what materials satellites can be made of to limit solar interference or damage to systems. The CERN hadron collider promises insights into the atoms of elements (on the periodic table) or photons (which is light on the electromagnetic spectrum), but CERN has supplied 0 insights. All technological development is through testing materials, again, the concepts have not been modified or supplemented since WWII. It is concerning particle physic's conquest into chemistry may suffocate developements in material science that requires chemistry and electromagnetic physics, such as in development of fuels, metals, magnets, wires, lenses, etc of which breakthroughs vastly shape our technological advancements such as in national defense, infrastructure, and finance. Physics can be separate into studies of 1), gravity, 2) electrictity and magnetism, and 3) nuclear physics, throughly covering all the forces in the universe. Particle physics stated agenda is to unify these theories, and so the canon is a piecemeal conjecture trying to cannibalize disciplines into a "grand unified theory." It is unclear to what degree the EU and US academic institutions became aware of particle physic's deception and whether these persons have been consciously engaging in taxpayer funding fraud. Particle physicists may be making groundbreaking discoveries in orchestrating financial crime. IV. Underground neutrino detectors have coordinated a fraudulent result after the 1987 supernova was observed optically with telescopes. The neutrino detectors did not report their findings until prompted and claimed they were not looking at their detectors while the supernova occured. Compare with the LIGO and Virgo gravity wave detectors that reported their separate findings immediately of a neutron star merger in 2016 and were coorborated by several optical observatories. It is clear light propagates through the universe and can reach our instruments and gravity too has a propagation we can observe. Neutrons exist, but neutrinos are a fabricated concept crafted from particle theorists and are used to handwave an explaination of supernova element creation (such that neutrinos convert iron to platinum in a strange alchemy) rather than have scientists investigate through what processes energy may create exotic elements in a supernova burst (that thus lead to our solar system's formation). The DUNE project has cost the taxpayers $5 billion in development and will cost many hundreds of millions to pay scientists to "pour over" the alledged collected data. Cosmologists and electromagnetic engineers should not have their disciplines called into question based on the ability of particle physicists to commit fraud, and the proof is in the production, however this deceit does call into question to what degree the US taxpayer should finance science on such as scale that has no relevancy to life quality and only serves as socialist subsidies to affluent academics. Academics are collecting millions each over the course of their careers from public funding meanwhile there is a talent shortage in chemical, hardware and computer systems engineering. Perhaps stopping grand public subsidies on irrelevant sciences will then sheppard engineers into the private sector where skills are paid based on relevancy and return. Fantastic and emergent promises such as mRNA vaccines and AI have thus syphoned funding into improving current cancer treatments and innovations in electromagnetic devices. The pattern exhibitted is the lure of fantastic quick fixes to societal challenges and the massive reallocation of taxpayer wealth into institutions creating financial bubbles with no surplus gains, meaning a vast waste of time and money that stagnates economic growth. Now "quantum information" theory is promising grand breakthroughs in chemistry and material sciences meanwhile material science has been stagnated through talent shortage. Many cutting edge scientific designs can be fabricated, permitting only there were developments in material science. Particle physics and the colonization of engineering is a threat to US competitiveness. V. Lab experiments yield consistent results and technologists have innovated technological developments based on previous experiments and likelihoods of successful designs. In fact, quantum mechanics discipline is disaggregated in the trade secrets of companies who patent technologies. Technologists can harness the atom, the electron, and the photon, however the mechanical processes cannot be observed and thus models of the "black box" such as the path of a photon or electron cannot be determined precisely only probablistically. Meaning, we know what works and what works consistently, however we are not 100% certain why it works. Particle physics tries to explain the path of a photon or electron, that we know may have a random outcome in a limited set such like a dice roll, however particle physics like Feynman's "infinite histories" make a wild and useless claim that cannot be proven and can be refuted, and to which he won a Nobel prize. Electrons and photons have spin and a trajectory and we can manipulate their path with electricity and magnetism and build microchips and satellites, although we cannot see what the path looks like and anyone's guess is as good as Feynmann's. This is the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Particle physicists strangely think of the uncertainty principle, which is an adjustment for errors, as a law of the universe. So instead of the error margin where we can either know speed or position but not both, believers claim this is a property we cannot break. It is bizarre to make an uncertainty a constraint or parameter. It would be like saying "if we know more than 90% we are breeching the laws of the universe." It is bizarre how the few quantum mechanical discoveries have become dogma. It must be understood that quantum mechanics is a pamplet compared to the study of electricity and magnetism that can fill a textbook, and experimentation yields the mathematical equations. "Quantum mechanics" was corrupted after 1930, when particle physics' pseudoscientific expansion colonized the emergent field of quantum mechanics then came after electricity and magentism. It is concerning knowing the amount of talent that may be lost to industry and invention if they are taught this absurd and fake doctrine. Cosmology is now being challenged by this cancerous particle physics cannon, and chemistry is next in line for reunification. The Trump administration and its promises to cut the size and scope of government must take this particle physics cannibalization to task and radiate it into remission like the tumor on American innovation it is. VI. Particle physics can be rebuked at its initial stage when the quark was introduced. As a joke, I should be able to introduce a concept to challenge the idea of a quark, and claim a liquid substance called a latras gives an electron a negative charge, and a substance called a matras gives a proton its positive charge, and that a neutron has a neutral charge because it is comprised of both the latras and matras which cancel out the charges. Since this theory 1) has no basis, 2) cannot be proven, 3) is unnecessary for calculation, and 4) does not interfere with calculations, then thus it has the same legitimacy as the idea of a quark. I could keep building on this theory, such to then postulate things that conflict with universal physics laws, silence any critics with social exclusion, and induct enough people to corroborate the legitimacy of this theory. We can then convince governments to spend money on machines that we can itemize as $10 billion dollars, but really cost $100 million, and the rest of the money I can divide up amongst my fellow conspirators such as the DUNE program or CERN. Regarding LIGO, LIGO should be a very simplistic design. Lazer beams are shot repeatedly at a long distance and their time of interception is recorded, and should all hit a surface at the same time interval, distance crossed at the speed of light. If a gravity wave happens to pass through our planet, the length of spacetime should increase and the time of a lazer's trajectory would be slightly delayed or increased due to an increase in distance traveled. We could then take the time difference we recorded, and if we have the mass of the gravity wave event or its distance, we can use the wave function to estimate this wave's waveform or magnitude then can corroborate the length expansion and confirm the phenomena. This does not require any more sophisticated sounding machinery, and it is questionable if the money for LIGO was itemized with unnecessary costs as a way to launder money from the US taxpayer, such that a mechanic bills you $1300 for a list of fixes when all they actually replaced was an alternator belt. VII. Hawking's (2010) book Grand Design pointed out Fehnmann's quote saying the double slit experiment "contains all the mystery of quantum mechanics" and this experiment was the catalyst for the quantum mechanics corruption. Light has a black box on its trajectory and we have a difficult time conceptualizing this geometrically or spatially. The double slit experiment counterintuitively showed that light shot through a small space has a random range where it will land on a surface. We thought it would be a straight line, consistent bullet on target. What we get is several positions in a range at random. Shrodinger did the math that allows a precise prediction of this effect and its probabilities. Thus we have been able to build incredible technology. Shrodinger's math was genius, but like Russel Crowe in the film A Beautiful Mind, Shrodinger was a little wacky, and his conceptualization was off beat and surreal. The problem here is: we have the excellent mathematical formulas but how we spatially comprehend these concepts may differ or may even be wrong. Shrodinger's wild interpretation of his wave function (Shrodinger's cat) set particle physics on a path of absurd concepts, thinking if Shrodinger's math was correct, he then has the authority on the conceptualization. Shrodinger's cat thought experiment was a morbid and elaborate way to essentially flip a coin. The notion that 1 photon of a near- negligable energy does not have the same path outcome of a non-negligable (billions of photons) propagation in which photons cover all spots on the wall, and the single photon only landed one 1 spot on the wall in a random outcome, lead German physicists to surreally believe that the photon must also invisibly be in the expected landing places, known as superposition, the photon is both there and there. Alternatively we can assume 1 photon exhibits this random behavior and photons collectively make the extensive, expected propagation. We need to understand the math is the math, but how we conceptualize its meaning may differ. Imagination helps us conjure ideas to then test mathematics formula, but the point made is that the math rules the game, not the imagination. Shrodinger's surreal interpretation of a cat both dead and alive as a model of a photon's trajectory lead particle physics to have a derealization disorder when approaching phenomena, to the point of doubting and rewriting reality to fit a concept, rather than sticking to the mathematical frameworks backed by observational evidence that we know are correct if they predict with accuracy. Meaning particle physics theorized ideas based on Shrodinger's cat conceptualization, not Shrodinger's wave function. Thus we have the surreal ideas of entanglement or superposition that particle physicists then run into brick walls in their math and accept them anyway. The purpose of physics is to build technology. We may have a philosophical interest to study the universe, but pragmatically our purposes are development. And our physics must be precise or we fail to produce. It is tragic to see Hawking (2010) repeatedly appealing that science must be in touch with reality and particle physicists' derealization disorder and fallacious math is a threat to the discipline. VII. I should reiterate all matter in the universe is made up of the elements on the periodic table, and we can include the subatomic particles, electrons, protons, and neutrons that make up the atoms of those elements. All other matter such as what we are made of or what we make, combine these elements in some combination. Light, or a photon, is hydrogen or heat from other elements. The speed of light is constant and limited, mass of objects creates gravity curves in the universe, time has a forward direction, atoms can be manipulated to create magnetic fields, forces, and energy. The universe is filled with complex phenomena we try to study to study the universe's properties and harness the universe's powers. We have limits to what we can understand and thus uncertainty but our technological development is evidence of the success of the scientific enterprise. Physicists study the universe's laws and objects in cosmology, nuclear physicists study the atoms and elements, electromagnetism studies light and subatomic particles, and particle physicists created their own imaginary doctrine and are defrauding governments in a coordinated operations. Studies have shown that ideology can cause a seemingly bright person to believe in false things-- such the mind confirms what it wants to believe to prevent discomfort-- for example liberal mathematicians have been prone to make errors in basic math problems to confirm efficacy in gun control. Particle physics and contemporary quantum mechanics is a doctrine that inducts bright minds and has them breaking their own mathematical reason to confirm the doctrine. We must 1) stop funding, 2) prosecute individuals for commiting larceny, 3) change standards in textbooks to prevent junk science indoctrination. "US govt removes string theory from college textbooks calling it science fiction." We can preserve our prestige and reputation and not cause mass mistrust in science in the general public, knowing however how serious this circumstance is and how robust our actions must be. We can suspect particle physics has been a conspiracy to limit US' future technological prowess and military power. We can also believe Europeans arejealous of US' vast innovative impact on physics and wanted a discipline where they make the mark. IX. Double slit experiment (1927) where a 1 single photon's path shocks the senses with its outcome, the single photon does not go in a straight trajectory but goes to any 1 position in a range, at an apparent accute angle from the point of entry. (We can be betting on the photon outcomes' final position and that it would be more exciting than horse races.) Fehnman was given a noble prize in the 1940s for his ridiculous interpretation of the double slit experiment such that a particle that starts in two places may wind up in any one of 10 places, to which Fehnman said there is "infinite histories" of that projectile's trajectory (opposed to maybe 1 per outcome) as if the noble committee was rewarding a physics experiment's proof of a derealized world philosophy, such that there is no objective reality, etc. It started with the German reaction to the experiment, such that Germans regarded it as a profound revelation into the nature of nature, reality, and God, (rather than a physical property of a single photon) & postulated that we cannot predict the photon path outcome because nature has no certainty and nature itself has not been determined yet. This may shock the conscious and induct a person into a dogma like Marxism, and induct others as they socially prove their brain is genius if they can accept a profound notion. I find it hard to believe that the universe is so orderly but that the vital components of the universe atoms, photons, would be crapshoots. (Germans thought god must not be real to allow such chaos.) We do not have to accept the interpretation nor dialogue of 1930s Germans despite how good their physics work has been. We do not have to treat their feedback of results as the laws or maths themselves and need to have our own views of scientific results. These Germans such as Einstein, Bohr, Shrodinger, etc may have been studying physics to find nature's deep philosophical meanings, like a crystal ball, but we are trying to build technologies not find spiritual answers. The wave function is useful, it may have taken observation of 1 photon's path x multiple times to find a light wave's behavior; we understand light has a spherical propagation at measureable energies, perhaps this probalistic outcome is a property of said effect in 1 photon; we have not seen the double slit experiment in a near vaccum space environment to eliminate atmospheric or gravitational interference or to see if our result differs to any degree. 1) We must accept we will not be able to understand the universe as if we ourselves engineered it and thus understand every causal detail. 2) We want to reduce uncertainty not accept it as a fixed parameter. We may find ourselves with a need to decrease uncertainty and need other means to find quintessential measurements thus can commission a revisitation of the wave function or uncertainty principle. To reiterate a very important point, there is no monopoly on the conceptualization or realization of a physics result & this dependency on authority has been a catalyst for indoctrination in a pseudoscientific, metaphysical organized fraud campaign challenging the legitimacy of scientific claim and threatening the posture of the US internationally.