The Consequences of “Women's Liberation” Pastor David Ministries Ezekiel 34:10, 23 www.pastordavidministries.com Revised January 2026 When the Bible says in 1Cor. 11:3 “..... the head of the woman is the man .....” KJV , it is referring to every aspect of life. Before the “women’s liberation” (feminism) movement in the 1960’s, men were in charge of almost everything that concerned the general public, in the US. Women did, however, supervise children or other women (usually under a higher supervisor man's oversight). Many businesses used to divide the laborers into sections, a woman's section with a female supervisor and a man's section with a male supervisor..... And there was another male supervisor over every- thing. For example: in the typical supermarket, every cashier was a woman, with a woman supervisor. Every stock person carrying heavy boxes and reloading the shelves was a man, with a male supervisor. And one male general manager over all of it. During the 1960's most people referred to the new changes in society as: the “women's liberation” movement. Now-a-days, most people prefer to call it the “femi- nist” movement, because they don't like the sound of the old title. However, the new title “feminist” is really misleading, because it is not the propagation of femininity, but rather, it is the training of women to take on what was previously considered to be the masculine role. (“previously considered” means that people have now gotten accus- tomed to the “new” roles for men and women, thereby rendering the changes as no longer “new”.) It is the suppression of femininity for women and the disgrace of manli- ness for men. It trains women to act like men, and men to act like women. But amaz- ingly, most men treat it as something “noble” (helping women to advance)....... which it is not. It is freak perversion, turning women into men, and men into women. If women are not permitted to take on the leadership roles that previously were only given to men, the person responsible for preventing this “progress” for women is falsely accused as though he is abusing women. However, preventing this false “pro- gress” for women is not any more abusive than to prevent uneducated people or chil- dren to take on those leadership roles. Women are not the same as men, and should not be treated as men. It is NOT in any way abusive to women to prevent them from being in a man’s position. And, it is NOT normal for a woman to be the boss of a man. The word “abusive” must be more clearly defined. If women are prohibited from being leaders of men, it is not abusiveness to women. It is not the least bit harmful for a woman to be denied leadership over men. Is it harmful (abusive) for an uneducated 1 person to be denied leadership positions just because they're uneducated? The un- educated laborers who earn reasonable wages are usually happier in life than the busi- ness managers, professional people or politicians. Being a leader is not where happi- ness comes from. (In fact, many leadership positions, especially in business manage- ment, have a certain unpleasantness about them that make everyone not want them, men or women. The only reason those businesses can get anyone to take those posi- tions is that they pay well.) Deep down true happiness is a gift from God that most people have missed out on, usually because they're more in love with money than with God. Then, when they find out that lots of money doesn’t make them happy, they don’t know what to do. Please, try to imagine for a moment, the same principles of the “women's libera- tion” movement being applied to the work place. Try to imagine an “employee's liber- ation” movement being applied to the work place the same way that the “women's li- beration” movement has already been applied to women, at work, management/pro- fessional opportunities, politics and family life. Notice that, at the beginning, the “women’s liberation” movement started by claiming that women were being abused by not permitting them to excel to higher levels of management. But, even now, since at times, there really does exist some employers who are abusive to their employees, try to imagine new employee labor laws prohibiting bosses from giving orders to employees. Generally speaking, how would most business owners or managers react to such incredible craziness? Doesn't everyone know that this could only produce uncontrollable chaos in the work place, with everyone doing whatever they felt like doing or most of the employees doing nothing at all? What would those bosses say while they were watching their businesses uncontrollably collapse? Obviously, any business owner in such a crazy situation would have a very unpleasant reaction. He might even have a heart attack or a nervous breakdown. But, in most cases he would probably react with hostility. Thus, the transitional period of the “women's liberation” movement during the 60's and 70's had a reputation of hostility, which did not exist before it or after it. After “feminism” became common place, most marriages couldn't work out, men stopped being hostile toward those changes because it was just assumed that life-long marriages were unattainable. So, they got accustomed to the new way of life which no longer seemed new anymore. And so, the hostility stopped. They were hostile at first because they knew that the changes due to “feminism” were going to ruin things. But after they got used to it, the hostility stopped. And now that so much time has passed, nobody can figure out that it was “feminism” that caused all the problems. It is now “ taboo ” even to speak against “feminism”. Anyone who speaks against it is labeled as a villain. In addition, it ought to be noticed that many men, when faced with the present lunatic arrangement now being forced on men in everyday life, (especially family life) similar to this imaginary crazy “employee's liberation” movement, usually react nega- 2 tively typically, not with hostility any more, but by shunning any responsibility or leadership for the modern irrational expectations forced on men. The modern feminist movement forces men into the same lunatic leadership role as a business manager in an “employee's liberation” movement. (An “employee's liberation” movement could never be implemented without causing a big fat disaster as a result. Why is this so well understood in business, but it is not understood that the “women's liberation” move- ment has already caused many big fat disasters?) Managers are required to lead, but in the case of husbands, they are denied the authority to give orders. If a woman is not free to do whatever she wants, then the husband is labeled as a tyrant as though he is abusing her. He is regarded as a villain if he actually attempts to do any leading, and at the same time, when he has no say in anything, treated as being responsible for every problem that exists. They talk about every problem that exists as an obvious result of mismanagement, while he has no say at all in managing anything. It is the wife who is now the manager of the marriage.... and yet, any problem due to mismanagement is never blamed on her. Any problem is blamed on the husband who has no authority whatsoever. He is accused of being a tyrant if he attempts to actually do any leadership at all. And, when he doesn’t lead, he is accused of being responsible for the negative results of the absence of proper management. This is craziness that causes mental illness. And, when the man abandons this craziness and walks out, he is then accused of being “irresponsible” or “dead-beat” husbands and fathers. Most particularly, in mo- dern society, more and more women perceive every problem under the sun to be the fault of the men. No business could function under such lunatic conditions. But, somehow men are expected to take on the responsibility of leadership, yet denied the authority that goes along with the package. How could a business manager be responsible for the chaos caused by out-of-control employees? Consequently, in everyday life, many men abandon this type of lunacy. Then they are accused of being “irresponsible”, especial- ly in family life. In reality, they're not being “irresponsible”. They are abandoning this lunacy. This type of lunacy ought to be abandoned. It causes mental illness. Now that mental illness and divorce have become an epidemic in the US, how come nobody seems to know why? The psychologists can't even figure out why. It's as simple as understanding the problems an “employee's liberation” movement would cause, yet they can't figure it out, because it is now taboo to say anything against “feminism”. Unfortunately, when children are involved, it appears as though the father is abandoning his children. The children usually don’t know that the government has given the mother the authority to charge outrageous quantities of money they call “child support”, which is usually so much money that the man couldn't pay it even if he want- ed to. Most men in America are already close to the point of bankruptcy just trying to make one mortgage payment. How could they possibly make two mortgage pay- ments? If he tried to pay it all, he would end up bankrupt and living on the street. Then, in most cases, when the father doesn’t pay, he ends up looking like some sort of 3 irresponsible “dead-beat” who won’t even visit his children. If he did visit his children, he would end up in prison, because there’s no way he could possibly pay all that money. Notice that he also has to pay for the first original living quarters for the children to live in, hoping that the children will return to live with him some day. (See article listed below on: Fatherhood.) The truth is that the children usually don’t even know that if their father was to visit them, he would end up thrown in prison for not paying the lunatic amount of mo- ney they falsely call “child support”. The mere size of the quantity they demand is proof that the true purpose of that money is not for supporting the children. Those go- vernment people know that the fortune that they charge, which they know perfectly well that the average men could not possibly pay, is for the purpose of destroying the au- thority of the men in marriage and families. “Fatherhood” In America has been completely destroyed, all with such an inno- cent and guilt misappropriating thing called “child support” or “alimony”. (See article listed below on: Fatherhood.) America is a fatherless country. The majority of the men who attempt to be “fathers” of their own children usually end up being some sort of doormat wimps, who act that way because they know perfectly well that the law is on the side of the women. The men are being disgraced in front of their own children. But, the children don’t even know that it is the government which is forcing the whole thing. There are even some men who read a warning like this and reject it. The dis- grace of being forced to be doormat wimps is too much for them. So, they sugar-coat the whole thing and call it something else. They pretend that it isn’t real. They live in a fantasy world. As a result, they end up kind of like one of those guys who have a paper stuck on their back that says “kick me” with an arrow pointed down to their rear end. It’s a strange thing about the whole concept of “management”. Normally, when something goes wrong, people blame it on the manager. The most common case is the president, who gets blamed for almost every problem under the sun. Well, what would happen if the president was a woman? All those people who have a bad habit of blaming the president for everything would have to suddenly stop themselves short. Out of automatic reflex, the words would start to come out of their mouths, but they would have to cut off their sentence in the middle. It has become taboo to say any- thing against modern feminism. Which would end up being stronger? The habit of throwing the blame on the president or the current taboo against saying anything wrong with modern feminism? I’ll bet the taboo would win out. Their constant habit of speaking against the president would somehow be completely and entirely muzzled. And, at the same time the wo- man president could start causing as many problems she wants, because she knows it’s taboo to speak against her. Normally, when a person develops a constant habit, they always do it like an automatic reflex without even thinking about it. For them, 4 quitting the habit is kind of like trying to stop smoking cigarettes. But, in this case, this taboo is so ingrained in people’s brains that it would no doubt completely overpower any other old habits. How did this taboo get to be so strong? Well, every day people are constantly observing the abnormalities, absurdities and inconveniences of putting a woman into a management position over men. And, they’re constantly lying to themselves, forcing themselves to ignore the obvious craziness of female management over men. This is a continual lie they tell themselves every day. The perpetual daily frequency of this lie is a much stronger and a more constant habit than any other habit. The strongest and most frequent habit wins out, hands down. No contest. Other habits don’t stand a chance against this one. The farfetched extreme obvious abnormal absurdly of this lie will overpower anything else. When people go to such far ludicrous lengths away from reality, the lie itself is much bigger than any other. For someone to convince them- selves of a lie this big requires the brain to falsely stretch reality to such extreme inten- sive absurdity that the brain can’t come back from it. They’ve crossed a line. Their brain can no longer perceive things correctly. It’s a waste of time trying to reason with them. Let them go their own way. They’re riding on a Titanic. And their ship is going to sink. Do not even pray for such a person. ( 1John 5:16 ) 1Sam 15:23 “For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry. Because thou hast rejected the word of the LORD, he hath also rejected thee from being king.” When it says “king”, it is talking about the spiritual promise that saved people will be kings in the next life. Mat 7:21 “Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.” But, in this case, these people are rebellious; they do not do “ the will of my Father ” ; they have lost their crowns. (See article listed below on: Salvation.) People who use the Bible regularly ought to know better. But, you can’t be prosperous in a prosperous society unless you “go with the flow”. When the “Titanic” is mentioned, most people take a light interpretation of its meaning. For whatever the reason, most people don’t think about the fact that in the Titanic disaster, most of the people on the Titanic died when it went down. Am I really saying that when this “feminism” sinks, most people in the US will die? Yes! I say the disaster it causes will make the Great Depression look like small potatoes. The “feminist” movement is anti-Biblical and it is cursed by God. Everybody knows that an “employee's liberation” movement would ruin almost every business in America. It would be a disadvantage to employees equally as much as the “women's liberation” movement has already been a disadvantage to women. An “employee's liberation” movement would cause the worst economic disaster in the history of the world. Yet, now that most marriages, romances and families have been ruined or perverted, nobody seems to know why. The taboo of speaking, or even thinking against this custom is so strong that people have subcon- sciously convinced themselves to forget that it is based on a lie. 5 Despite the modern higher education of women and the rise of advanced techno- logy, the morality and stability (emotional and psychological) of the American society, especially family life, keeps going down every year....... and the highly educated wo- men are unable to figure out that it's being caused by the “women's liberation” move- ment. (This comment is not intended to insult women. It is intended to take note that even highly educated women need loving husbands to guide them and protect them from dangerous errors. The purpose of this comment is to motivate women to over- come the deception..... and to be winners instead.) Modern education is unable to stop the rise of bad family conditions, drug addic- tion, alcoholism due to bad family conditions, mental illness and purposeless suicides; all of which, more than anything else, are the product of the “women's liberation” move- ment: “feminism”. Modern education refuses to admit that modern “feminism” has anything at all to do with those problems, which is why they are completely unable to resolve those problems. If the current trend continues, eventually, it will get worse and worse and worse until it will finally end in disaster...... definitely. Modern education is completely unable to stop it from happening. Absolutely, it WILL happen!! Disaster is coming!!! The “wo- men's liberation” movement is a big fat Titanic that MUST sink! Despite the higher ed- ucation of modern women, they can not perceive how the “women's liberation” move- ment has already been to their own disadvantage . “Feminism” is so corrupt that it doesn’t even need an iceberg to sink it. It will sink all on its own. Modern educated women have been trained (brainwashed) from childhood that if they don't get a university degree and a professional macho job like men do, then they must be some kind of losers or meaningless nobodies. They imagine that by getting a university degree and a professional macho job like men, they will be truly successful and happy! But they're not happy, (even when they have good paying jobs). But they can't figure out why. Their marriages, romances and family lives are usually rotten and they are never content with their pay. It used to be that women were not permitted in universities as students. Those days have now been forgotten. And, on those rare occasions when people are reminded of it, they can’t figure out why it used to be that way. Despite the fact that they're earning more money, they always want more, always more, always more. No quantity is ever enough. Almost our entire society has been caught up in the new religion of “ love-of-money ”, which a lot of people have become obsessed with. 1Ti 6:10 “For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.” Funny thing about this type of religion, no matter how much money they have, it’s never enough. They always want more, always more, always more. No quantity is ever enough. Meanwhile, most of the non-educated workers who make reasonable pay are usually happier in life than those educated macho professional women. Making lots of 6 money or having a prestigious professional macho job is not where happiness comes from. Happiness is a gift from God. The truth is that God designed women to be the happiest and most stable mentally, emotionally and spiritually when they have good men for leaders who treat them well, just like how employee's are happiest and most stable when they have good men for leaders who treat them well, with reasonable pay. Likewise, God designed masculinity to naturally take the leadership over femi- ninity, the same way that business management automatically takes the leadership over the workers. It was God who established this rule: Eph 5:23 “.... the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.” However, in the last 100 years or so, there has been a very large group of people “anonymously” influencing the entire world to the contrary by pumping negative propaganda into the heads of anyone they can, any way they can. (brainwashing, manipulation) They do anything they can to promote the switching of gender roles, which in turn, confuses most people's physical desires and thereby increases same gender romances and impairs normal straight romance. Men start to be more roman- tically attracted to men, instead of women. And women start to be more romantically attracted to women, instead of men. It has now become taboo for men to have normal masculinity. Any man who insists on acting manly is automatically labeled a woman abuser. Masculinity has now become deformed and it has been pushed upon the women by the modern “feminist” movement. Women are being brainwashed to act like men and men are being brain- washed to act like women. If any man tries to prohibit women from being men, he is labeled as some kind of villain, ogre and woman abuser. Women, on the other hand can act very macho and even be ogres without anyone accusing them of anything wrong. The satanic people inside the government, media, educational system and chur- ches are the ringleaders promoting this modern way of thinking that all started to make significant progress way back around 1920 when many changes were made in US law concerning women. The most publicized change was that women were permitted to vote for the first time in the US. Now that this has become a regular way of life, most people don’t know that, back then, it was common knowledge that such changes were communistic, socialistic, anti-Christian and witchcraft. In correct Christianity men are the leaders, but in satanic witchcraft women are the leaders, commonly known as “witches”. Female leaders in Christian churches are called “wolves in sheep’s clothing”. Normally, the “sheep’s clothing” is supposed to be deceptive, trying to fool people, but in this case, male leadership is so well taught in the Bible that there is no room for innocent people being deceived. This “sheep’s clothing” is so obviously contrary to correct Bible teaching that the only case scenario is that of deliberate rebellion. Maybe someone who is new to Christianity and already accus- tomed to female leadership (already brainwashed by society) might be in a position that they are unaware of this otherwise obvious rebellion. 7 A little further back, before 1920, even all the universities were exclusively for men. None of the universities even permitted women entrance as students, much less as teachers or administrators. The first few colleges that had women students were exclusively for women (like Radcliffe). Men were not allowed in them and they had much different courses of study than the universities for men. There was no such thing as a female physician, professor, engineer, lawyer, business administrator or politician, etc. (These professions must be considered “macho”, even today they are considered “macho”. Except possibly for a pediatrician, obstetrician or gynecologist. There may be a few other exception cases, too.) The only women teachers back then were teachers of children or of other wo- men, never teachers in universities over adult male students. Even Harvard didn't have women as students on the same standing as men for many years. Instead, they had a special arrangement with Radcliffe, the all women's university, to be like brother/ sister universities. Sometimes, modern men try to convince themselves that they actually like “macho” women, because they know that the “writing is on the wall”. It's on the agen- da, and it has to be that way, so they accept it willingly. And of course, they are now raised with it from early childhood. So, they have become accustomed to it. But, as a result of such irrational thinking, perversion reins. The truth is that this type of man isn't any more attractive to the average macho woman than a macho woman is attractive to the average man. Many men try to convince themselves that they like something that they really don’t like, because it’s better to accept and learn to live with the unpleasant side of life, the things that can’t be changed, rather than hating it and being miserable. But, in reality, it is less abnormal for a man to get involved romantically with another man, than it is for a man to like it when a woman acts like a man. Women in politics should be thought of in the same category and the same na- ture as same gender marriages or romances. Gender role reversal causes physical desire confusion in most people, without them ever knowing why. In the Bible, God rained fire down from heaven on Sodom and Gomorrah because of this. ( Gen. 19 ) (It should also be noticed that the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah was not as much for same gender romance as it was for same gender gang rape.) Nevertheless, the punishment for this sin is supposed to be death. Lev. 20:13 “If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.” If someone says that God is wrong, they are speaking BLASPHEMY!!! God is the one who makes the rules ! Especially what happens to people after they die. Back in the 60's, most of the people who were against the “women's liberation” movement thought that it would cause a considerable increase in “sodomy”, along with many other abnormalities. Rom 1:27 “And likewise also the men, leaving the natural 8 use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly (improper) , and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet (fitting) ” Back then, they also had a fear that God would send a horrible punishment as a result of permitting such behavior. According to professor Louis Crompton , Ph.D. on early American history, referring to this abomination....... “ in 1776 , in the original 13 colonies (this crime) was universally subject to the death pen- alty ” However, later on, the penalty for this crime was reduced to long-term imprison- ment. As time went by, little by little, the US government decreased the punishment for this crime to less and less time in prison. Eventually, they completely repealed all the laws against it. And now, it is “politically incorrect” to even speak against it. For a long time most people believed that permitting this type of corruption was a major factor in the downfall of many past great empires, like the Greek empire and the Roman empire. But, few people know how much this corruption was in practice during the downfall of the nation of Israel shortly after the time of Jesus Christ. In the book called “Wars of the Jews” or “History of the Destruction of Jerusalem”, by Flavius Josephus . (available at https://www.gutenberg.org/files/2850/2850-h/2850-h.htm ) In book 4, chap. 9, paragraph 10, Josephus says: “ ..... and indulged themselves in femi- nine wantonness, without any disturbance, till they were satiated therewith; while they decked their hair, and put on women's garments, and were besmeared over with oint- ments; and that they might appear very comely (attractive) , they had paints under their eyes, and imitated not only the ornaments, but also the lusts of women, and were guilty of such intolerable uncleanness, that they invented unlawful pleasures of that sort. And thus did they roll themselves up and down the city, as in a brothel-house, and defiled it entirely with their impure actions; nay, while their faces looked like the faces of women, they killed with their right hands; and when their gait was effeminate ...... ” (Josephus gives many more details in his history.) Shortly after this, in about 70AD, the Romans conquered Israel with a relatively small army, and the few survivors were removed from that land, and dispersed in small groups throughout the Roman Empire. (They didn’t need a large army because the Jews were not united. They had no federal govern- ment, so they could not raise a large army.) And, so they stayed scattered all over the world, prohibited from returning to their own country, until 1948 when Israel was reborn as a nation, after the holocaust in WW2. Notice that, through history, in societies that have let this type of corruption (so- domism) run wild, those people have a tendency to get very aggressive, murderous and abusive. It is a common occurrence for them to gang rape other innocent people, as they tried to do in Gen. 19:4,5 . (Note – Any person who reads this warning, and rejects it, is not “innocent”, they will deserve what they get for cooperating with this corruption.) When any society has permitted this corruption to be accepted, that type of corruption always gets out of control. As Josephus says, they even start killing people, anyone who op-poses them. No society that has ever permitted this type of corruption has ever surviv-ed,...... never ! The disaster that always goes along with the package is always severe enough to stop people from permitting it, after they see the 9 consequences of permitting it. When this type of corruption first starts, it’s about the same as with communism. As long as it’s new, and they are underdogs they seem like good people. But, it’s not until they gain power that their true colors start to show. When they are powerful, both of these forms of corruption become very abusive and tyrannical. It’s amazing how some people support things like “communism”, and they don’t know that when it gains power, it is ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS tyrannical. Every time! But, not at the beginning. At the beginning they are sweet underdogs. The subject of “same gender” romance is not necessarily about the legalization of that type of marriage. It is about the unnatural human reaction to the practice of giving women dominant positions of leadership over men , like bosses at work over men or positions in politics. (From the position of president all the way down to the driver’s li- cense clerk who gives men permission to drive.) Gender role reversal alters most people's physical desires. Most people exposed to this abnormality don't know if they are more attracted to the opposite gender, their own gender, both or neither, without ever knowing why. The whole idea of female politicians and female bosses over men goes hand in hand with raising many people's attraction to their own gender, thus increasing the quantity of same gender romances, which eventually start living together as a result. (Whether or not same gender marriages are legalized is a secondary issue. The con- tamination of same gender romances is a problem started by gender role reversal..... and is equally as damaging to society.) (It’s not until they gain power that they become abusive and murderous.) Female politicians and bosses over men are equally as abnormal and responsible for same gender romantic relationships >>> cause and effect. No society that has ever permitted same gender marriages has ever survived. Permitting that type of marriage is an absolute sure bet that the society will fall. “The writing is on the wall”. (see Dan 5 , which is the origin of the phrase of “the writing is on the wall”.) God is merciful, and gives people time to repent. But, eventually this type of corruption must be destroyed. It is a big fat Titanic. And, that baby’s going down. But really, what is the advantage to women by having them take on the mascu- line role if they have disastrous family lives or lousy romances? Modern feminism is anti-romantic! (It has a negative effect on normal straight romances) Why can't women figure out that being trained to act like men impairs normal romance? But most impor- tantly, what is the advantage to women by training them to assume the masculine role if they go to hell when they die? Science will never stop death. Heb 9:27 “And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:” Why do so many people act like they will never die? The people responsible for starting this movement did it for the purpose of setting a very deceptive trap in order to conquer and manipulate innocent and unsuspecting people. (Especially concerning anti-religious or anti-Christian brainwashing intended to 10 drag as many souls to hell as possible) Brainwashing happens very slowly and gradu- ally, and the average person doesn't even notice the changes, nor do they associate the consequences of those changes to the real causes. The most important negative consequence for this satanic “feminism” is the condemnation to burn in hell for eternity; spiritual death........ permanent death in the next life, after this life is finished. Modern “feminism” is witchcraft. Rev 20:15 “And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.” All of the first universities that permitted women as students on an equal stand- ing as men had a philosophy that was very “humanistic”, “atheistic”, “satanic”, “anti- Christian” and “socialistic”. All this started from the influence of Lenin and Marx satanic propaganda. (brainwashing, manipulation) Regardless of the fact that there are many different groups and variations of this philosophy, the rejection of God and faithful religious customs is always their first priority, unanimously . This movement has been world-wide and it is primarily anti-religious and social...... more than anything else (more than political). Most people call it “communism” or “socialism”. And the “social- ists” claim that they are not tyrants, like the “communists”. But, even the “communists” who now have a very bad reputation as tyrants and murderers, started out wearing “good-guy” masks, just like the “socialists” are doing right now, in the US. They always start out pretending to be good. It’s really hard to believe that decade after decade, gullible people continue to fall for this type of deception, over and over again. Some- how, they can’t see past the “good-guy” masks. Most especially, women cannot see past the “good-guy” masks of the communist “feminism” deception. Back in the days when communism actually gained power, it was very bad, lots of tyranny, torture and murder. But, at the very beginning they used their “good guy” mask tactic with their primary emphasis on economic changes, like sharing wealth. (The “sharing wealth” deception was primarily to get the gullible masses of poor people to assist them rise up against the government in the Russian revolution.) Make no mistake, the “feminist” movement (women's liberation) was propagated by atheistic anti-Christian communist satanic philosophy, which has successfully deceived many people into thinking it is something good. It is primarily a social and anti-Christian movement not a political movement, especially in America. Their primary purpose is to inhibit the influence of every religion in every society. Not just get rid of all the reli- gions, but also get rid of the religious influence/customs, like all-male leadership. For many years, all the countries that adopted an atheistic “communist” type of government were all very bad. The Soviet Union always had patrols around its borders to keep their own citizens from escaping. Right now, North Korea has the same type of patrols around its borders. North Korea even has electric fences to kill anyone trying to escape. From WW1 until now, the “communists” have killed more innocent people than the Nazis ever did in the Nazi death camps during WW2. (Watch documentary called: The Soviet Story. Available on YouTube.) The wars in North Korea and Vietnam (which were wars against the spread of communism), back in the 50's and 11 60's, didn't just have a lot of killing; they were full of a certain type of psychological attack that left many of the surviving soldiers mentally ill for the rest of their lives. In the US, since this satanic social propaganda started, there have never been so many cases of mental illness as a direct result of the deceptive influence of the propa- ganda of satanic communism..... and the psychologists can't figure out how to solve it. It has now become more of a social and anti-Christian movement rather than a political movement. (less political, more social, anti-religious, to drag as many souls to eternal hell fire as they can..... and cause as much mental illness as possible.) The influence of “feminism” has been so powerful that psychologists can’t figure out that it is indeed modern “feminism” which is causing the problems, especially mental illness. Because of the influence that started from Lenin and Marx, almost every modern university, in the US, has adopted an atheistic social “communist” philosophy. They don't call themselves “communists”, but they act like “communists”. They always con- tradict faithful Christian customs as much as they can by always promoting customs which are the opposite of Christianity. The most notable custom is the propagation of putting women in authority positions over men , which is gender role reversal. Likewise, almost every modern politician, in the US, has adopted an atheistic “communist” philosophy, but they don't call themselves “communists”. Do “wolves in sheep's clothing” openly call themselves “wolves”? If they did, then why would they bother wearing the sheep's clothing? (See article listed below on: Wolves In Sheep's Clothing) Notice – it is possible, in some cases, that those politicians and university leaders are not really “communists” themselves, but they have been trained (brain- washed) by an abundance of communist philosophy (propaganda, manipulation) to adopt communist habits and to go with the flow. (Especially feminism.) The worst “wolves” of all are the false leaders inside the churches, who call them- selves Christians, but secretly they are satanic spies. (See article listed below on: Wolves In Sheep's Clothing.) Make no mistake, the anti-Christian custom of putting women in positions of authority over men , in our modern society, was the result of de- cades of atheistic anti-Christian communist propaganda. (Which is very deceptively a disadvantage to women.) The poisonous communist philosophy is the most powerful media, anti-religious and educational influence in the world today, especially in Ame- rica. (It is less political, more social, more anti-religious and anti-romantic feminism.) Even the name itself, “communism”, is a lie. They teach that they will one day make the whole world one great big harmonious “commune”. Everyone will all live to- gether and share all their possessions like one big happy family in peace, love and order. They say that the government, the military and the police will eventually not be necessary, because the human race will have evolved into the highest form of living: a commune, where everyone is equal and happy. (See article listed below on: The Lie of Evolution.) (Notice – ever since this communism has ruined most families in America, the instability of family chaos has produced an extreme rise in young people who usually 12 turn out to be unstable. By destroying marriage and parenthood they have created the opposite of their theory of a harmonious peaceful “commune”. There has never been a society with more instability and criminal character than this present society which has been brainwashed by communism.) This is nothing more than a lie intended to fight against Christianity. The commu- nists have never produced a good commune with sharing wealth...... just tyranny and poverty. It is the communist leaders who get the wealth....... while they treat the poor schmucks who helped them rise to power with only tyranny, contempt and poverty. Even highly educated women can't figure out that they have been duped into going along with this deception. (This comment is not intended to insult women. It is intended to take note that even highly educated women need loving husbands to guide them and protect them from dangerous errors. The purpose of this comment is to motivate women to overcome the deception..... and to be winners instead.) The best “commune” that eve