Web: www.solution2pass.com Email: support@solution2pass.com Version: Demo [ Total Questions: 10] IIC C130 Essential Skills for the Insurance Broker and Agent IMPORTANT NOTICE Feedback We have developed quality product and state-of-art service to ensure our customers interest. If you have any suggestions, please feel free to contact us at feedback@solution2pass.com Support If you have any questions about our product, please provide the following items: exam code screenshot of the question login id/email please contact us at and our technical experts will provide support within 24 hours. support@solution2pass.com Copyright The product of each order has its own encryption code, so you should use it independently. Any unauthorized changes will inflict legal punishment. We reserve the right of final explanation for this statement. IIC - C130 Pass Guaranteed 1 of 7 Only Solution2Pass for Any Exam A. B. C. D. A. B. C. Category Breakdown Category Number of Questions Claims 1 Property Insurance—Wordings 2 Liability Insurance 1 Sales 1 Property Insurance—Exposures 1 Automobile Insurance 2 From Quote to Policy 2 TOTAL 10 Question #:6 - [Claims] Trevor is cutting down a tree in his backyard. The tree accidentally falls onto his neighbour’s shed, destroying the roof. Two weeks later, Trevor receives a document from his neighbour suing him for the damages to the shed and its contents. Which document has Trevor received? Judgment notice Statement of claim Damages attestation Statement of defence Answer: B Explanation Trevor has received a statement of claim. A statement of claim is the legal document that starts a civil lawsuit and sets out the claimant’s allegations, the facts relied on, and the damages being sought. In this scenario, the neighbour is suing Trevor for damage to the shed and contents allegedly caused by Trevor’s negligent tree- cutting activity. A judgment notice would come later, after a court has made a decision or entered judgment. A statement of defence is the responding document filed by the defendant after being sued; it is not the document Trevor receives from the claimant to initiate the action. “Damages attestation” is not the standard legal pleading in this context. From a claims-handling perspective, Trevor should immediately forward the statement of claim to his insurer or broker and avoid admitting liability or negotiating independently. Liability policies typically require prompt notice and cooperation when legal proceedings are received. References /topics: Claims; statement of claim, liability lawsuit, legal documents, notice to insurer, defence obligations. Question #:40 - [Property Insurance—Wordings] What type of insurance policy would a life lease holder require? Condominium insurance Personal liability package IIC - C130 Pass Guaranteed 2 of 7 Only Solution2Pass for Any Exam C. D. A. B. C. D. Tenants package insurance Mobile home and liability policy Answer: C Explanation A life lease holder generally requires tenants package insurance because the person has a right to occupy the dwelling but does not own the building in the same way as a freehold homeowner or condominium unit owner. The policy should protect the occupant’s personal property, additional living expenses, and personal liability exposures. It may also include tenant’s legal liability for damage caused to the rented or occupied premises, depending on the wording. Condominium insurance is not the best answer because a condominium unit owner has a distinct ownership interest in a unit and may need coverage for unit improvements, loss assessments, and condominium-specific obligations. A personal liability package alone is inadequate because it would not properly insure personal property or additional living expenses. Mobile home and liability coverage applies to mobile homes, not ordinary life lease occupancy. The key technical point is that the insurance must match the legal interest in the property: occupancy rights and contents exposure, not building ownership. References/topics: Property Insurance—Wordings; tenants package, life lease occupancy, personal property, tenant’s legal liability. Question #:52 - [Liability Insurance] Which statement describes the reimbursement of voluntary medical payments under a personal liability policy? The insured is required to provide written proof and medical documentation. The third party will be reimbursed solely for direct damage to their property. The insured and the third party must live in the same household for there to be payment. The injured party is required to prove that their injuries occurred as a result of negligence. Answer: A Explanation Voluntary medical payments coverage is designed to reimburse reasonable medical expenses incurred by an injured third party, subject to policy limits and conditions, without requiring the injured party to prove negligence. That is why option D is incorrect; negligence proof is normally relevant to legal liability, not voluntary medical payments. Option B is incorrect because voluntary medical payments deal with bodily injury expenses, not direct property damage. Option C is also incorrect because household members are usually not the intended third-party claimants for this type of coverage; the coverage is typically aimed at persons outside the insured household who are injured in circumstances connected to the insured premises or activities. The insurer still needs documentation before payment is made, so written proof and medical documentation are required to establish the injury, expense, timing, and eligibility under the policy. This coverage has practical value because it may resolve small injury incidents quickly, preserve goodwill, and prevent escalation into formal liability disputes. References/topics: Liability Insurance; voluntary medical payments, personal liability, bodily injury expenses, proof of loss documentation. IIC - C130 Pass Guaranteed 3 of 7 Only Solution2Pass for Any Exam A. B. C. D. Question #:45 - [Sales] Lindy, a new producer, has a robust client list and has struggled to find time to acquire new customers. To meet her aggressive sales goals, she has decided to pivot to increasing revenues primarily from her current clients. Discuss the TWO techniques that will allow Lindy to grow her business mainly from within. See the solution in Explanation below: Explanation The two techniques Lindy should use are cross-selling and upselling. The first technique is cross-selling. Cross-selling means offering existing clients additional insurance products that meet needs they may not yet have insured through Lindy. For example, if a client already has automobile insurance with her, Lindy may review whether they also need homeowners, tenant, condominium, umbrella liability, travel, business, or recreational vehicle coverage. This allows Lindy to grow revenue from her existing client base without having to find completely new customers. It is also a strong service technique because it helps identify gaps in the client’s insurance program. However, cross-selling must be based on a proper needs analysis, not pressure selling. Lindy should review the client’s lifestyle, property, family situation, business activities, and liability exposures before recommending additional products. Cross-selling is specifically recognized as a sales/prospecting concept in the course question set. The second technique is upselling. Upselling means encouraging an existing client to improve, broaden, or increase the coverage they already have. This may include higher liability limits, lower deductibles, broader policy forms, enhanced endorsements, guaranteed replacement cost, sewer backup, identity theft, scheduled personal articles, legal expense coverage, or umbrella liability. Upselling is different from cross-selling because Lindy is not necessarily selling a separate new policy; she is improving the quality or amount of coverage already in place. This can increase commission revenue while also improving client protection. Like cross-selling, it must be ethical and needs-based. Lindy should explain the benefit, cost, limitation, and risk of not purchasing the enhancement. She should document the recommendation and the client’s decision, especially if the client declines broader coverage. Question #:74 - [Property Insurance—Exposures] Why would an intermediary want to know if a client is renovating their home? The liability hazards decrease because the home is unoccupied. The policy needs to be cancelled and written under a builder’s risk policy. The increase in property taxes will have to be factored into the premium. The risk of a peril occurring is greater for a building under construction. Answer: D Explanation IIC - C130 Pass Guaranteed 4 of 7 Only Solution2Pass for Any Exam A. B. C. D. Renovation materially changes the property exposure because buildings under construction are more vulnerable to loss. Fire risk may increase due to hot work, temporary wiring, exposed framing, solvents, construction debris, and contractor activity. Water damage risk may rise when plumbing, roofing, or exterior walls are disturbed. Theft and vandalism risk may increase if the home is partially open, vacant, or accessible to trades. Liability exposure also increases because contractors, visitors, and occupants may be exposed to construction hazards. Option A is incorrect because liability hazards generally do not decrease simply because the home is under renovation. Option B is too absolute; some renovations may require a builder’s risk policy, vacancy permit, endorsement, underwriting approval, or revised terms, but not every renovation automatically requires cancellation. Option C is irrelevant to insurance rating in this context. The key issue is material change in risk. The intermediary must ask about renovations, notify the insurer when required, and ensure coverage remains valid. References/topics: Property Insurance—Exposures; renovations, buildings under construction, material change, increased hazard, underwriting notification. Question #:69 - [Automobile Insurance] Miro’s vehicle and Stephanie’s vehicle collide with each other in New Brunswick. Neither of them has loss or damage coverage, also known as collision coverage. The chart shows the physical damage and assigned fault. How would the payment be apportioned? Driver | Physical Damage | Fault Percent Miro | $4,000 | 50% Stephanie | $2,000 | 50% Miro can collect $2,000 from his insurer; Stephanie can collect $1,000 from her insurer. Miro can collect $2,000 from his insurer and $1,000 from Stephanie’s insurer; Stephanie can collect $1,000 from her insurer and $500 from Miro’s insurer. Miro can collect $2,000 from his insurer and $2,000 from Stephanie’s insurer; Stephanie can collect $1,000 from her insurer and $1,000 from Miro’s insurer. Miro can collect $4,000 from his insurer; Stephanie can collect $2,000 from her insurer. Miro’s insurer will subrogate against Stephanie’s insurer for $2,000 and Stephanie’s insurer will subrogate against Miro’s insurer for $1,000. Answer: A Explanation In a direct compensation property damage arrangement, each insured claims from their own insurer for the portion of vehicle damage for which they are not at fault. The absence of collision coverage does not prevent recovery of the not-at-fault portion where direct compensation applies. Miro’s total physical damage is $4,000 and he is 50 percent at fault. Therefore, he can recover the 50 percent not-at-fault portion: $4,000 × 50 percent = $2,000. Stephanie’s total physical damage is $2,000 and she is also 50 percent at fault. She can recover $2,000 × 50 percent = $1,000 from her own insurer. Option B and option C incorrectly involve recovery from both insurers, which is not how direct compensation is structured. Option D wrongly assumes full recovery despite the assigned fault and then subrogation between insurers. The correct settlement follows the fault percentage and each insured’s own insurer pays the recoverable not-at-fault portion. References/topics: IIC - C130 Pass Guaranteed 5 of 7 Only Solution2Pass for Any Exam A. B. C. D. A. B. C. D. Automobile Insurance; direct compensation property damage, fault apportionment, collision coverage, automobile physical damage claims. Question #:19 - [Automobile Insurance] In which Canadian province is compulsory automobile insurance purchased from a private insurer? Manitoba Saskatchewan British Columbia Newfoundland and Labrador Answer: D Explanation Newfoundland and Labrador is the correct answer because compulsory automobile insurance there is purchased through private insurers rather than a government automobile insurance corporation. Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and British Columbia are historically associated with public automobile insurance systems for compulsory basic coverage. This distinction matters to brokers and agents because the distribution model determines where clients obtain mandatory coverage, how optional coverages may be placed, and what role private insurers play. In private-insurer provinces, brokers and agents may quote and place automobile insurance with competing insurers subject to provincial rules, underwriting guidelines, rating structures, and coverage forms. In public-insurance provinces, compulsory basic coverage is typically administered through the government automobile insurer, while optional coverages may vary depending on the jurisdiction. The question is testing market structure, not policy coverage itself. Intermediaries must understand the provincial automobile insurance framework because automobile regulation, compulsory limits, benefits, rating, and claims handling are jurisdiction-specific in Canada. References/topics: Automobile Insurance; compulsory automobile insurance, private insurer provinces, public insurance systems, provincial automobile regulation. Question #:23 - [From Quote to Policy] When does a minimum retained premium apply to a policy? When the insured cancels the policy midterm When the insurer cancels the policy at any time When the policy has been voided for misrepresentation When the insured moves the policy at renewal to another insurer Answer: A Explanation A minimum retained premium commonly applies when the insured cancels a policy before expiry. The insurer retains a minimum amount to cover acquisition costs, policy issuance, administration, and the period during IIC - C130 Pass Guaranteed 6 of 7 Only Solution2Pass for Any Exam A. B. C. D. A. B. C. D. which coverage was provided. Midterm insured-requested cancellation may also be calculated on a short-rate basis, depending on the policy terms and jurisdictional rules, meaning the return premium may be less favourable than a pro rata refund. Option B is weaker because when the insurer cancels, return premium is typically calculated more favourably to the insured, often pro rata, subject to applicable law and wording. Option C involves voidance for misrepresentation, where ordinary cancellation premium rules may not be the issue. Option D is incorrect because moving coverage at renewal simply means the existing policy expires and is replaced; a minimum retained premium is not triggered by ordinary non-renewal or renewal placement elsewhere. Brokers must explain cancellation consequences before clients cancel midterm, especially when replacing coverage, because the client may expect a larger refund than the policy allows. References/topics: From Quote to Policy; cancellation, minimum retained premium, short-rate calculation, return premium. Question #:35 - [From Quote to Policy] An underwriter receives a submission for a restaurant. The base rate is $0.80 per $100. Due to the client’s loss history, the underwriter decides on a $0.15 loading. What premium would the underwriter charge for a building valuation of $200,000? $1,300 $1,600 $1,750 $1,900 Answer: D Explanation The premium calculation uses the rate per $100 of insured value. The base rate is $0.80 per $100, and the underwriter adds a $0.15 loading due to the client’s loss history. The adjusted rate is therefore $0.95 per $100. The building valuation is $200,000. Dividing $200,000 by $100 gives 2,000 rating units. Multiplying 2,000 by $0.95 produces a premium of $1,900. This is why option D is correct. Option B would apply if only the base rate of $0.80 were used: 2,000 × $0.80 = $1,600. However, that ignores the underwriting loading. Option C and option A do not match the rating formula. A loading is used when a risk presents worse-than-standard characteristics, such as adverse claims experience, hazardous occupancy, poor protection, or other underwriting concerns. The broker must understand these calculations to explain premium differences accurately and avoid misleading the client. References/topics: From Quote to Policy; rating, premium calculation, loading, underwriting judgment, property valuation. Question #:12 - [Property Insurance—Wordings] The insured has a property policy on his cottage with a $120,000 limit of insurance. What is the amount of coverage available for loss or damage to his $12,000 cottage boathouse under a typical policy? $0, boathouses are excluded under the policy $12,000, included in the limit on the cottage $12,000, in addition to the $120,000 on the cottage IIC - C130 Pass Guaranteed 7 of 7 Only Solution2Pass for Any Exam D. $120,000, the limit of the cottage policy Answer: B Explanation Under a typical property policy, detached private structures such as a boathouse may be covered up to a stated percentage of the dwelling or cottage limit. Here, 10 percent of the $120,000 cottage limit equals $12,000. The key point is that this amount is included within the overall cottage limit rather than automatically added on top of it. Option A is incorrect because boathouses are not necessarily excluded merely because they are separate structures, though eligibility depends on wording, location, and use. Option C is wrong because it treats the detached-structure amount as additional insurance, which is not the typical treatment reflected in this question. Option D is incorrect because the full $120,000 limit applies to the cottage building, not automatically to the boathouse. Brokers must explain detached-structure limits carefully, especially for cottages, garages, sheds, docks, boathouses, and other secondary structures, because clients often assume every structure is insured for full replacement cost. References/topics: Property Insurance—Wordings; detached private structures, cottage insurance, boathouse coverage, policy limits. About solution2pass.com solution2pass.com was founded in 2007. We provide latest & high quality IT / Business Certification Training Exam Questions, Study Guides, Practice Tests. We help you pass any IT / Business Certification Exams with 100% Pass Guaranteed or Full Refund. Especially Cisco, CompTIA, Citrix, EMC, HP, Oracle, VMware, Juniper, Check Point, LPI, Nortel, EXIN and so on. View list of all certification exams: All vendors We prepare state-of-the art practice tests for certification exams. You can reach us at any of the email addresses listed below. Sales: sales@solution2pass.com Feedback: feedback@solution2pass.com Support: support@solution2pass.com Any problems about IT certification or our products, You can write us back and we will get back to you within 24 hours.