BOB LAZAR – ELEMENTO 115 – UFO Propulsão – Comentários – dia 25 março 2022 Fonte: Pergunta: How likely are we to find a stable isotope of element 115 (Moscovium) that is non-radioactive and capable of redirecting gravity and light as Bob Lazar claims? 12 Answers https://www.quora.com/How-likely-are-we-to-find-a-stable- isotope-of-element-115-Moscovium-that-is-non-radioactive- and-capable-of-redirecting-gravity-and-light-as-Bob-Lazar- claims <1> ------------------------------------ <2> Related Answer Hannah Bayne , former UAP Researcher at Arcturiensis Project (2012-2019) Answered 1 year ago · Author has 1.3K answers and 484.3K answer views How do you disprove Bob Lazar's claims about UFOs? I wrote about this extensively whilst working for the Arcturiensis Project between 2012 and 2019. We didn’t set out to disprove Bob Lazar In fact, during our research, we found that he knew things that no one could have known back then - it’s just that b ecause it was totally new, not even Bob knew what it was, so he made a good guess which convinced a lot of people but recent developments in chemistry and physics have proven him wrong. We really want to point out, though, that he wasn’t completely wrong, just out of his depth for the amount of human knowledge at the time. Here are the details : His account of Element 115 is very convincing and at the time, it hadn’t been synthesized. Now it has, and it can’t be used as fuel or for propulsion, mainly becaus e it only lasts about 80 milliseconds before decaying! It would take more energy to keep it together than it would give you back. There’s also something very strange about his account of boarding the craft - when you ride Drop of Doom at Six Flags, just fo r a few seconds, you truly feel the Earth’s gravity. You are accelerating towards the Earth at 9.81m/s and nothing is stopping you! When you stand firmly on the Earth again, that acceleration is prevented by the fact that your feet are on the ground and, as Newton rightly said, the ground is pushing against you as much as you’re pushing against the ground. In between the two sensations, there’s something completely different: true weightlessness . This isn’t the sort of feeling you get in the Vomit Comet, OR Drop of Doom. You’re not accelerating, you’re not falling, but you’re not being prevented from falling either so you feel no pressure on any part of your body. The only place any human has ever felt like that is at a certain location between the Earth and Moon where the two gravitational fields are completely neutralized and you can be truly weightless, traveling at a constant speed, no acceleration, just blissfulness. It’s such an unusual sens ation that I would have personally thought it’s the FIRST thing a person who’d been on a craft which defies gravity would mention, but NOPE! Nothing. Just a description of the inside of the craft. Now to the positives: Bob mentioned UUP115 as a possible element from an Island of Stability where heavy elements can exist without decaying into lighter elements. He even mentioned a Second Island of Stability, long before chemists dreamed of it! But he was right. We now know that there is a 2nd Island of Stability, and although Bob thought it was in the 200s, it’s actually centered around the element UHQ164, or Arcturium as we named it. This element is stable although radioactive. It undergoes positronic radioactive decay which means that the positrons can be harvested and used in e+/e- Cascade Wakefield Laser Plasma Accelerators to create axiflavons, which in turn, can inflate spacetime, giving the craft the ability to ride a spacetime wave, independent of gravitational effects. Bob couldn’t have known that at th e time - it’s research which is still ongoing at CERN and Strathclyde. An advanced civilization, however, would have conquered any drawbacks long ago. Therefore, after a lot of deliberation, in answer to your question, “how do you disprove Bob Lazar?” You don’t. You just apply modern knowledge to his guesswork and it all makes perfect sense. The guy was a genius, ahead of his time, stuck in a human past without the background knowledge he needed. 4.9K views ------------------------ <3> Related Answer Lidija Tibor , Researcher at Chalmers University of Technology (2014-present) Updated Feb 11, 2022 What do real physicists have to say about Bob Lazar's claims? I am physicist and I sure know that our lack of knowledge is far greater then our knowledge. Bob Lazar might be speaking the truth , why not. He knew about element 115, gravitational waves were detected in 2015. If I understand it correctly he was harassed by various ppl from the goverment, why would this happened if he was lying? There a bunch of ppl trying to earn money selling UFO stuff that no one from government ever look at, let alone shot at. And he didn't earn money out of his statements he just got a lot of hate speech, for me this is quite a big plus. I must admit I heard about him couple of days ago and I just start reading about it. I am finding information's quite interesting. I love this kind of stuff. For me as a physicist it is statistically impossible not to have aliens. How do they look, what level of development are they, I have no idea but I am sure that they exist, simply because if we exist someone else exists as well. If event happened once it is statistically probable it will happen again. And do take in to account that universe is 14 billion years old, our Solar System is 4.5 billion years old So go figure how much would we evolved if we have some extra 9.5 billion years to evolve. How much we would evolve if had only one billion. And for sure electricity was once magick, and there were a bunch of “real physicists” that try to show that Einstein was wrong. I try to keep my mind open. I also read a paper (long time ago) about space travel done through bending space. So the idea exists in the science world; we only need to figure out how to do it. And I am sure at one point we will do it. Edit: The paper was “The wa rp drive: hyper- fast travel within general relativity” Miguel Alcubierre (1994). And in July 2021 in a paper: “Worldline numerics applied to custom Casimir geometry generates unanticipated intersection with Alcubierre warp metric” White et al. the warp bubble was documented, although small. Second edit: Let me list here why I thin Bob Lazar is telling the truth (story was told in 1989): Identimat (used on military sites like stealth F-117 secret development, we know now), gravitational waves (detected in 2015), Moskovium (detected 2003), Area 51 (confirmed through CIA declassified document 2013), and UFOs (Pentagon official videos of UFO released 2020). He went public with his story and then went to work at his firm not giving a rat ass what someone thinks of him. p.s. I edited the file to spell-checked the text (sorry guys for not doing it earlier ). Thank you Richard Dreiser for suggested edits 11.5K views ----------------------------- <4> JOHN COUPLAND Answered Mar 15, 2022 With current Earth technology the way to create a stable isotope of element 115 is out of sight. The more neutrons it has in proportion to the 115 protons the better the chance of stability. The isotopes with most created artificially have 173 and 174 neutrons and some say the magic number would be 184 that fills exactly 8 neutron energy levels. Maybe we could produce it in 100 years or 1000 or never. Then what if we don’t yet know how to use it, or it does not work in the way Bob Lazar says? There must be some planets in isolated parts of galaxies where the heaviest naturally occurring elements are Iron, (which Supernovae are sure to produce), Heavy elements such as Gold & Uranium may be impossible to find usable concentrations of deposits depending on the size and isolation of the Supernovae that spawned them, or maybe it needed merging neutron starts to produce useful amounts. Conversely it may have been possible for extra massive neutron star mergers to create naturally occurring elements above 108, (the heaviest natural element found on Earth), and some of these may have had some stable Isotopes which coalesced later into new planets. Some parts of galaxies and globular clusters are much more densely packed than our local so more likely for this to occur, (if it is a real atomic possibility). It’s easy to de -bunk the idea of a stable form of 115. I’m not convinced, but try to keep an open mind. Most Scientists would trash anything on the subject of UAP’s whether presumed to be Earth made or Extra Terrestrial, they can’t explain the physics of their trans -medium and gravity/momentum defying aerobatics, so they say they pretend that they don’t exist, unlike the current position of the Pentagon. 34 views ------------------------------------------------ <5> Matt Skourmallas , B.Eng (Materials) Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wollongong (2016) Answered 2 years ago Who thinks Bob Lazar is lying about his alleged work on UFO's for the government? Obviously no one knows the actual answer except Bob Lazar and the government. However i would consider the following points: Very detailed re-count of his story, 30 years apart, being almost identical. Understanding and working with element 115 approximately 15 years before it was created on Earth. This is by itself an impressive thing to do (if his story is false). His credibility is questioned, i mean in terms of education and employment, but there is evidence that the government (or someone) attempted to erase his history as Los Alamos. This is suspicious. If he didn’t know any significant details and was “creating rumours” th en why would anyone try to erase his history there? Doesn’t make any logical sense to consider he made it up. Is he insane? It is possible that the entire story is made up by someone with psychiatric issues? He could have an infinitely large imagination, mixed with high IQ and one or multiple psychiatric problems. He took a group of his friends to watch a Test Flight of the spacecraft (which was videoed in the 80’s and at night). Obviously the videoed footage cannot be relied on. But all the friends agree that Bob knew exactly what was happening and at the exact time, which if you dismiss Bob’s story, this is impressive. Going along with his story, he was investigated and followed by these Government officials after being “busted” at one of the Test Flight observations. After being watched a while he went to see George Knapp, a reporter in Las Vegas at the time, to tell him the story. The reason he went to the public was to play the “if i go missing, then it proves my story is true” card. This is a very cleve r move and might be the only reason he is alive today. My summary point: Go and research this guy yourself. Don’t just look at one side. Look at the points FOR Bob Lazar and the points AGAINST. You can’t analyse this story without exploring both sides with an open mind. IF Bob’s story is true, it’s an amazing story and the technology being hidden in Area 51 should be shared with research facilities to conduct reverse engineering. However there might be consequences in doing so. 5.8K views View upvotes View 1 share -------------------------------------------------- <6> Brian Damkjer , Biology and Physics (University of South Florida) Answered 1 year ago · Author has 506 answers and 113.6K answer views The nuclear shell model predicting "magic numbers" has existed since the 1940s, but physicists weren't calling it the "island of stability". That term wasn't used until much later. American physicist John Wheeler was credited with the first usage of the term "superheavy element" in 1955. In the 1960s William Myers, and Władysław Świątecki appear to have coined the term "island of stability". Estimates of the proton "magic number" have ranged from 114 to 126, and physicists still don't agree on an "island of stability". The gaps at Z = 82, 114, 120, and 126 correspond to shell closures, which have configurations with unusually high stability resulting in more stable nuclei. Moscovium (115) doesn't exhibit this configuration. Repeated tests show it can only exist for 650 milliseconds. Most current calculations point to Z=126 as possibly having a half life of X number of years. This would at least make it easier to study, and maybe have a practical use. Until this has been demonstrated, the island will remain a theory. -------------------------------------------- <7> Edward Leahy , BA in chemistry, MD Answered 2 years ago · Upvoted by Alisher Sanetullaev , Ph. D. Nuclear Physics, Michigan State University (2012) · Author has 8.7K answers and 3.7M answer views The likelyhood of finding a stable isotope of element 115 is exactly 0%. It does not exist. All elements above atomic number 82 (lead) are unstable. Bismuth 209 used to be considered the heaviest stable isotope but it was found to decay with a half life of 1.9x 10^19 years. As the elements get heavie r they generally get less stable. The “island of stability” is relative. Elements there are still unstable, just less unstable than their neighbors on the periodic table. 1.4K views View upvotes Jim Murphy , Amateur Science nerd Answered 2 years ago · Author has 4.6K answers and 4M answer views There is zero chance that element 115 will be stable and have he properties he claims. 108 views View upvotes JOHN COUPLAND Answered Mar 15, 2022 With current Earth technology the way to create a stable isotope of element 115 is out of sight. The more neutrons it has in proportion to the 115 protons the better the chance of stability. The isotopes with most created artificially have 173 and 174 neutrons and some say the magic number would be 184 that fills exactly 8 neutron energy levels. Maybe we could produce it in 100 years or 1000 or never. Then what if we don’t yet know how to use it, or it does not work in the way Bob Lazar says? There must be some planets in isolated parts of galaxies where the heaviest naturally occurring elements are Iron, (which Supernovae are sure to produce), Heavy elements such as Gold & Uranium may be impossible to find usable concentrations of deposits depending on the size and isolation of the Supernovae that spawned them, or maybe it needed merging neutron starts to produce useful amounts. Conversely it may have been possible for extra massive neutron star mergers to create naturally occurring elements above 108, (the heaviest natural element found on Earth), and some of these may have had some stable Isotopes which coalesced later into new planets. Some parts of galaxies and globular clusters are much more densely packed than our local so more likely for this to occur, (if it is a real atomic possibility). It’s easy to de -bunk the idea of a stable form of 115. I’m not convinced, but try to keep an open mind. Most Scientists would trash anything on the subject of UAP’s whether presumed to be Earth made or Extra Terrestri al, they can’t explain the physics of their trans -medium and gravity/momentum defying aerobatics, so they say they pretend that they don’t exist, unlike the current position of the Pentagon. 34 views ------------------