FINAL WARNING: Dr Mike Yeadon Interview (4K) | Oracle Films I assume most people have not heard of me, most people. I am a lifetime research scientist. I worked for 32 years in the pharmaceutical industry and biotech. My most senior positions were at Pfizer. I was vice president and worldwide head of research in allergic and respiratory diseases. Since 2020, I have been speaking out against the fraudulent pandemic and the intentionally dangerous injections. And my experience has been to have been censored and smeared largely. So if you've not heard of me before, that's the reason that censorship and smearing is the experience of people who try and tell you true things that the authorities don't want you to hear. I don't want to give up because I've got nothing to say. But I think I've said enough that if anyone is looking at what I've said or looking for me, they can find me easily enough. And if they're not, putting out another 10 videos or 100 videos is not going to reach them. So I think there'll be things for me to do. I think this is this could easily be a year of major change. But I need to I can't see the point in doing that much more. Frankly, I've done over 300 video and audio interviews. And I'm more more concerned than I was in 2020, 21. I'm more certain, unfortunately, I wish I wasn't. I'm more certain of the tentative concerns I have. Then I've got a much better understanding of the the history behind what I call the nonsense. The 2020 lies of the not pandemic and to inject people with the not vaccines. I got a much better understanding of all of the work that's preceded it. When I first spoke or when I when I did a major interview in 2021, I was at that point. Sure, there wasn't a pandemic or at least whatever was happening had been deliberately and through planning exaggerated to frighten people. And I focus very much because of my history as a research executive in pharma for over 30 years. I was very concerned about the injections because I knew there wasn't a public health threat. So why would you want to be injected? My thinking has advanced quite a lot since then, which I may talk about later in this interview. But it's it's not possible for the injections to be of help to anybody. It's literally not possible. Every medicine, every molecule and atom and constituent of every medicine is in there because somebody chose to put it in there, hopefully for good reasons. But they put it in there for a purpose to stabilize something or make it big enough to swallow in the form of a tablet. If you just have the active ingredients in some drugs, it's too small to see. So you need to formulate it with what are called excipients. So but when I spoke before, I could see multiple features in the so-called vaccines that were was not necessary. Even if I believe the lies about what I was being told about these things, even if you believe them, it would not be necessary to incorporate certain features about them. And so my bottom line is, I think, and I'm well qualified to make this claim, probably better qualified than any other single person speaking out. They have been designed intentionally to injure, kill and reduce fertility. I've never claimed it would do it to a lot of people or that it would be quick. In fact, specifically, I remember saying at the time, I don't think they want to risk injuring and killing too many people early on because people will spot it. What I expected once I started looking around and noticing other things like there was a talk of electronic money getting rid of cash and there was talk of digital ID. Remember Tony Blair trying to do that in the 90s? And frankly, I joined the dots and I could see a world in which you were required to have digital ID that cash was removed. So you have to spend only using digital money. And I thought, you know what? If I was the evil person, I would say that your digital ID will not be valid unless you're up to date with your injections. And I came across a document from the EU. It's called EU VARBICO, V-A-B-E-C-O. And it's a scheme that started in 2018. Bottom line is the EU commission anticipates a future in which every EU citizen has a digital ID whose validity is governed by whether or not they've been injected with the latest mRNA based vaccine. So they anticipate regular injection for the rest of your life. And the idea is it'll improve health and safety as you travel around, which is a lie. It's a lie. You being vaccinated doesn't protect anybody. In fact, I would recommend no one has any vaccines at all from what I've discovered in the last year or so. But, you know, honestly, when have governments ever given a flying one about your health and safety? You must know that a claim that you must do something for your health and safety is what is called an excuse. It's an ostensible reason. These people who are trying to take our lives away from us always use two things. It's always two things. They'll tell you about something using the excuse, the ostensible reason. So in this case, it'll be you have to be jabbed to protect you from marauding viruses. The real reason is they I'm afraid they want to make you ill and kill you. That is the truth. It's absolutely clear. There's really only one senior institution. It's a group of people who you can see as supranational groups from the UN, WHO, the International Panel on Climate Change, the World Economic Forum, you know, Bilderberg. You should see them as the same. They're different manifestations, trilateral commission. Keir Starmer is a member of the trilateral commission. The only elected British politician who's a member of this, this globalist group is that particular one. They're all founded by the same group of people. They've been running for decades to much longer than a century. And I believe they believe that their destiny is to control all us little people, all us. They see us as useless eaters, useless eaters. Where have you heard that phrase before? What happens to useless eaters, do you think? I think they believe it's their destiny. Maybe their obligation to take control of everyone, everywhere, forever using digital means. So digital ID, digital money, geolocation and an obligation to be injected, something like that. You don't need much more than that. The control mechanism is so frighteningly simple. I warn people and I'm not going to sign up for digital ID. I'm probably going to regret that statement. But you don't need a new global single format editable digital biometric ID. That's what digital ID means. Single global editable biometric digital ID. I'm warning you. I'm trying to help. It's the last really important decision you will get to make. If you sign up for it, the people who are taking over do not require your consent, your collaboration, you to do anything after that. And this is why I'm going to tell you why. Even I, as someone who's not involved in finance, I'm clever enough to see that the debts of all major countries have been deliberately piled on and escalated to the point where it's obvious to all of us that the debts can never be repaid. We're struggling even to service the interest on the loans. So at some point, I predict with great confidence that an event like 2008, the global financial crisis, only a thousand times worse, will occur. And that will mean every country is bankrupt at the same time. All businesses would be bankrupt at the same time. And to find out what will happen to you, if like me, you're sort of comfortable, middle class, early retired and you've got a bit of saving, you should be really frightened what I'm going to tell you. David Rogers Webb. David Rogers Webb. He is my soul, my matching half in finance. He's a retired hedge fund manager who discovered that the laws pertaining to private property rights have been altered over the last 50 or 60 years surreptitiously in every country on the planet. So when you think you own something, I invite you to look in. If you've got an investment account, you will find now you won't find any statements to do with ownership. You'll only find the phrase beneficial owner, beneficial ownership. It makes no difference most of the time. You can buy it and sell it. Let's say it shares stocks, bonds. You can receive dividends and so on. But the small print says, in the event of a large enough default, all the financial intermediaries who own money to the people they borrowed it from and then they owe money to the people they borrowed it from. In the event of a large enough default, the senior secured creditors, the people at the top, may seize the assets ever pledged as collateral by the layers below them. That includes your house, your pension. Any stocks and shares you have in an account with an intermediary like Hargreaves Lannister and AJ Bell and the like, JP Morgan. Basically, legal theft of all of your assets will occur, I think, within hours of a large enough financial crisis that I've just discussed. So even if you didn't think anyone was plotting against you, I think you would agree with me that, in fact, I factored in it when I was doing retirement planning. I assumed there would be at least one other 2008 during my life when I set out my affairs so that I would probably be able to survive that. But we can't survive this. So, yes, I think there will come a time between now and 2030 where, legally, all your assets will be stolen. I remember there's a lady called Catherine Austin Fitz, who's a finance lady. She says, I believe that possession, where we're talking about objects, not humans, but when it comes to objects, you really only own it if you can sit on it and defend it at the point of a gun. And I know she says it to get a laugh, but there is something to that. If you've left any assets with a third party, maybe you own some gold and it's in the bank. Maybe you do have a large pension with a financial intermediary upon a large enough financial crisis that is being engineered because, as I'll explain in a moment, look how useful this is. At the moment of that big enough financial crisis, all of the institutions will be bankrupt and all of the assets will be moved legally, stolen legally, and they will belong to the senior secured creditors because those assets have at some point been used in a financial transaction. There's no point you protesting that they haven't told you they borrowed it and it's not really theirs. This has been tested in a major court in New York where one financial institution was both the custodian and acting on behalf of senior creditors. So it stole the assets of another of its clients and it went to court and I'm afraid it was found that they were legally able to do that. So David Rogers Webb, a free book called The Great Taking is my gift to you. You should go and read that. So that's part of the takeover. It is a takeover. It's a global coup. And I've explained that if you sign up for digital ID, it'll be the last really important decision you make because your digital ID will be the only thing that your governments, institutions, and anybody authorized by those holding power will recognize you through. So you won't exist anymore. You'll be replaced by a QR code. You are not a number. You're an address to some resources. And that makes it particularly dangerous because those resources can be edited. And one of those fields for sure will be your vaccination status. And I'm absolutely sure because I've seen it written down in multiple documents that your digital ID will only remain valid if you comply with the conditions of validity. So one of them will be have you had your latest recommended or mandated jabs. And because of the fact I'm qualified in toxicology and worked for decades in with others in what's called rational drug design. When I look at these jabs, the constituents, I am certain, formally certain that they were designed to hurt you. And so the digital ID will lose validity unless you roll your sleeve up. You must see that's designed to injure and I believe ultimately kill you. But you won't be able to escape that because all your money will also be associated with your digital ID. So let's say you've gone to a supermarket, you want to buy a drink and a sandwich. You'll beat them through it and it'll say, how do you pay? And it'll say, present your digital ID. And the cash register, as it were, the cashless system won't proceed until you show it your QR code. And if you're not vaccinated and if that means your digital ID is not valid, it will say, sorry, transaction refused. The merchant will not be able to sell you the product. You can see how difficult this is. Now, a valid digital ID, just like a valid passport, is today required to cross a border. And I have no problem with a passport, of course. But I'd be pretty cross if, to buy petrol, I had to show my passport. Or to buy a bottle of water, I had to show my passport. But that is what's coming. You'll have to show your digital ID. If you said hurty words on the internet, you might find that your digital money doesn't work. If you're outside of your 15-minute zone and you're not authorized to be, you will not be able to buy anything. See, that's what's coming. It's the ultimate tool of slavery, the digital. It's called the digital gulag by other people. I think that's not a bad phrase. And the way to stop that happening is to put your foot down and don't sign up for it. If they tell you, say you're, you know, if it's the government, they might say we're not going to give you benefits unless you sign up for digital ID. I can't help that. I'm going to tell you, you at this point have to choose. Obviously going to engineer it so that you'll feel you can't refuse. If you sign up for it, your life is going to end. Your free life is going to end. So I would say, like I always did with the jams before I really knew what was going on, I would say, don't decide anything now. Defer your decision a month, maybe in another month. Same with digital ID. When it's first put to you, and especially if they threaten you, we'll have to fire you if you won't sign up for this. This is good for you, is it? Why would they threaten you? Why would they punish you for not doing something that's supposedly good for you? And the answer is, I mentioned earlier, always two reasons, the ostensible reason, the excuse or the real reason. And the threats come because the real reason is what I've been telling you. It's for bad. So if they tell you they won't pay your benefits if you don't sign up for digital ID, I'm going to ask you to swallow hard and not sign up. You might have to sign up in a month or three months. Don't sign up. The more people who don't sign up, the more likely we are to be able to defeat this, because other people will be taking their lead from you. So if you've got children, I think you should be willing to go hungry for a bit. If I have to, I will, in order to stop this happening. So I made the bold statement, I'm not going to take on a digital ID. And some people have said, you will lose access to your money and your bank accounts. Do you know what? So be it. If I sign up for it, what's going to happen is what I've outlined to you. Money is not going to matter. One, they'll steal it. And secondly, I don't want to survive in a world in which I'm beeping my way into and out of shops and beeping my way to buy some mouldy bread with insect flour. Right? I'm not going to live in that world. So I'm just going to stop. And the worse the punishment threatens are brought upon me, the worse the retribution, the more sure you should be that this is a bad thing. So even if they say, we're going to fire you, say respectfully, I don't trust this system. I'm going to defer my decision. I'm not going to sign up this month. Let them fire you. I think they'll have to give up. Remember NHS 100K when they said, we're going to jab you all or you'll lose your job. And 100,000 of them campaigned on the street. The government actually gave in the next week. So there's enough power if we only just take our courage in our hands. And you only need courage when you're threatened. You need some courage now. You need some courage now. I'm not frightened. I don't look frightened because I'm not frightened. Everyone's life comes to an end eventually. I don't want it earlier than necessary. But if I do what I think these evil tyrants want me to do, the end of my free life has been reached. Honestly, I think we can defeat this if enough of us are reasonably brave. You don't need to fight anybody. It would be pointless. They'd love you to get young, strong men if you get fighting on the street. I bet the government would love that. Never been my style. But the way to fight it is literally not to comply. Don't sign up for digital ID. I would say if they tell you there's another scary event and you need to go home and stay in, go out for a long walk. Go and find several friends and go for a long walk. If you believe at this point what you're being told on the mainstream media, I've lost all sympathy for you. So you don't have to do the research I've done. You don't have to be a conspiral loon at this point to work out that something very bad is happening. So don't let them inject you with anything is my recommendation. And don't allow yourself to be locked down or forced to wear masks or frightened by anything. It's all lies, all of it. And you've got to take the courage in your hand now and think, Do I trust the BBC or this guy, Dr Mike Eden, who warned you about the toxicity of the expected toxicity of the injections I warned about in writing before they were authorised in December 2020? And every day I wished I was wrong, but I'm not wrong. And having been right about that for four years, then I think at least do me the honour of exploring some of these things. So I've talked about David Rogers Webb. Another person I recommend, Ben Rubin. Again, I recognise a brother. He was in corporate. He was in corporate consulting in one of these KPMG or PricewaterhouseCoopers. And he has discovered that 20 years of his career was to do with globalising corporate systems, information systems and so on. And I think when he realised that he'd been part of preparing an unpleasant scenario, a bit like me with Pharma. Luckily, I'd retired before I realised what was going on. But just to be clear, I would not take a commission in pharmaceuticals or biotech anymore. I wouldn't work in that sector anymore. I don't trust it and I don't think it's a good thing. So look at what Ben Rubin is saying. Ben is a guy who spends a lot of time looking at whole of governments, looking at whole of corporations, looking at integrated systems. And so he will do a much better job of explaining, as it were, politically how we got here. But I think I'm pretty good at telling you, don't take the vaccine and don't be frightened by the lies they're going to give us. That's what I would say. And for goodness sake, don't sign up for digital ID. If you feel compelled to, I'm really asking you, defer the decision to do it and watch the punishment. And know that if it's genuinely good for you, why the dickens would they punish you? Why would the threats escalate until they might even say, if you won't take it, we're going to imprison you? They won't start there. They will literally start there with a financial disincentive. So defer the decision, even if you think you're going to have to sign up, please, because I think we can defeat them with that one move. And the other one is, don't believe the lies anymore. There's nothing much to be frightened of other than other humans, really. Other plotting humans are the thing you should really worry about. And there are plenty of them, and I'll name one of them, our former prime minister, Tony Beelier. He's not a good person. He's really not a good person. So we came into government, you will remember, not left, not right, but the third way. Do you remember the third way? What it involved was public-private partnerships, which meant we'll borrow money from private financiers and we'll spend it on public services. So that means your country will improve without you having to pay any taxes. And when I heard that, I thought the chickens will come home to roost. And so we got lots of new hospitals. We didn't have to pay for them at the time. We were just servicing the loans, something like that. Chickens have come home to roost. The government, the country now has enormous structural debts. And I think debt repayment is either the second or the third largest item on the budget already. It's more than we spend on education. Next year it'll be even more. And it will become the largest budget item if the country survives long enough. So Blair, we voted him in. Blair has, and all the other countries in the West, have been guided to do this. So they've all borrowed so much money that they are effectively bankrupt. There's probably no hiding from that, but let's not make it easy for them. So yeah, they've bankrupted the country and they've hidden that, but it's very clear to people like David Rogers Webb. And I anticipate we'll have other scares like, honestly, if they tell you about bird flu, it's like a chicken with a cold. Have you ever seen a chicken with a cold? Have you ever seen them coughing, sneezing? Birds don't get flu. Birds do not get influenza. They don't. They do not get influenza. Spend five minutes looking at the bird, the respiratory tract. Look at the lungs of a bird. You realize it's so different from a mammal's lungs. It's like you would realize why they can't get colds or flu. So they're lying to you about these illnesses. Birds can get sick, but they haven't got flu and it's not contagious. And the PCR test is a measure of nothing. It's fraud. And when they tell you, oh, we found bird flu in a flock in Aldermaston or something, they will have used PCR, which is fraudulent, to get that result. And they could make the birds sick in any number of ways just by treating them badly. If they overcrowd them, that will make them sick. If they stress them, that will make them sick. And if they then come in and test them, they can claim bird flu in the flock. Then they can kill all the birds. And then they can say, oh, look, bird flu is going around. Then they'll lie and say, first case of bird to human transmission. It doesn't even exist because, like I told you, birds don't get colds. Birds don't sneeze. Have you ever seen a bird coughing? Please, you must know they're lying to you. And I wouldn't think monkeys get pox either, really. They're hairy. Anyway, I haven't looked at that one in any great detail. But what I have looked at since I last gave a substantial interview, this one's often very difficult. When I was younger and I was taught biology and so on, so I didn't work in virology, so I remember being taught things and then I remembered them. And I'll come back to what knowledge is in a minute. So I was taught that colds and flu are caused by submicroscopic infective particles called viruses. That's what I was told. They float around. You inhale one. If you're susceptible, you get a cough or you get a cold, whatever it is. And that model seemed OK. I didn't work in the field, so I never examined it again. And this is an example. I'm asking you to ask yourself what you know, what you really know. I've had to do that. I thought I knew quite a lot, and I've realised over the last five years I don't really know anything. So knowledge. I think there may be multiple kinds. I'm not a philosopher, but there's at least two different kinds. One is things you know because you yourself have done the work. Maybe if you grew some crops or had cared for an animal or another person. Things you know from things you've done personally. You've verified them. Then there's the other knowledge, which is most of what we call knowledge, which is I would characterise it as someone told you and you chose to believe them. If you ask yourself honestly about what you know, how much of what you know belongs to the second group? Someone told you and you chose to believe them. I think it's most. So I had to be humble. Not the big man, you know, big clever scientist. I realised most of what I've been taught is a lie. It wasn't an easy thing to come to grips with. It's partly why I wouldn't work again in the sector. I couldn't even do an honest job because I don't trust the literature. But here's the thing. So I was told this is how flu and colds work, that flu and colds were due to submicroscopic infective particles called viruses and that you caught them from another person, you could give them to a person. That's what I was told. That's the model, that's the scary thing they tell you. That has been tested in formal settings. A clinical trial in a case like this would involve volunteers who've got colds or flu spending a few hours in a room with a healthy person. And then the two people would go their separate ways and the experimenters would follow up the healthy person over the next days and weeks. Now, if contagion transmission was occurring, you would expect over time the people who've spent a few hours with someone with a cold or flu would get colds and flu more often than the people who didn't spend time in the room with a person with cold and flu. And they had matching controls. People spent time with someone who was perfectly well, so they were the controls. They went off. The people who spent time with a person with a cold, they went off. And here's the thing. For 100 years of these clinical experiments, the people who spent a few hours with the person with a cold or flu got colds and flu no more often than the people who spent a couple of hours in the room with a well person. Contagion of acute respiratory illnesses does not happen. Now, many of you will protest and think, I'm certain I got it from my brother-in-law or I gave it to my workmates. I will say those observations are consistent with contagion. They're not proof of it. There is another explanation, and I don't have the whole answer, but I believe I've got a good alternative. If you're a person who gets headaches, especially a migraine, when you've got a migraine, how often do you ask yourself, I wonder who gave me that migraine? Who did I catch that headache from? You probably think, what are you talking about, Eden? Everybody knows that you don't catch them, you develop them, whatever. How about this one then? If you're unfortunate enough to have angina, maybe occasional chest pain, maybe from stress, maybe from not very fit, the next time you get pain in your chest, do you think, I wonder who infected me with that angina? It's like, no, the headache and the chest pain result from things going awry inside you, equilibriums being lost inside you. I believe, as a respiratory expert, that colds and flu are the result of a loss of normal equilibrium inside you. And so they occur from time to time. If you go from cold to warmer environments, dry to wet environments and vice versa. If you're stressed, if you haven't slept, if you've slept with your mouth open, your nose is a fantastic filter. And I think those are the things that trigger colds. We get colds quite often. I probably get a couple of minor colds a year. Flu I've only ever had twice. So colds happen so frequently. This is how it works psychologically. The next time you get a cold, because you've been told you catch them, you'll think, who did I see that had a cold? It's like, I wonder if that guy in the checkout was coughing. Or no, it's Dave at work, or my sister-in-law had it. And you will attribute your symptoms to those encounters. Because that's what we do. Humans are great at pattern forming patterns. And I'm telling you, it looks like that, but that actually isn't how it works. And so next time you spend time with someone with a cold and flu and don't get a cold in the week or so afterwards, remember, Mike did tell us, you don't catch these things from other people. So that means you shouldn't be frightened if they lie to you and said that there's a bird flu or influenza or whatever it was called, COVID. Because it doesn't work like that. These diseases do not work like that. They're normal illnesses. Your experience of them is a good guide to what will happen to you if you get one, which is mostly you spend a few days feeling a bit rubbish and then you get better. If it's flu and you're not old and ill, you might have several days where you're really unwell and in bed, but then you get better. So honestly, there's nothing to be frightened of but your other human beings. Do not get vaccinated. Contagion is a lie. And yeah, you don't have to be paranoid if they really are after us. I would like to come back to something very, very important that I've discovered. It was absolutely horrifying. And when I tell you, and it's right in my field of expertise, I was the vice president for years of new therapeutics for allergic and respiratory diseases, ANR. I will credit the terrific work of two Americans, Sasha Latipova, L-A-T-Y-P-O-V-A. Sasha Latipova, like me, a retired pharma executive. She worked in development. I was in research. And a legal scholar called Catherine, with a K, Watt. Catherine Watt, W-A-T-T. They write on the sub stack. They have uncovered the fact that vaccines have never been intended to reduce diseases or to help you. They have always been what I have determined the COVID shots to be, which is materials that harm you and do you no good. And of course that's so horrifying that you think, oh my word, all of them? Yep, all of them. I'm not saying they're all as dangerous as COVID jabs, but none of them were good. And rather than trusting me, go and read the work of Sasha Latipova and Catherine Watt, and then it's up to you to decide, okay? If you think that's wrong, that's fine. But one thing Sasha and others discovered, and they shared it with me before they even published it. And as soon as they told me, I knew it was right. Can you remember a time, those of you who are over 60, I'm nearly 65. Can you remember a time when you were young when very few people were allergic to peanuts and very few people were allergic to anything? You probably can, can't you? Older folk like me. What we discovered is that if you inject a person with a foreign protein like peanut oil, if you inject a person with tiny doses of that, especially if you do it two or three times, that person becomes fiercely allergic for life to peanuts. Imagine if you were to inject a whey protein from milk in a tiny dose, so small that you probably wouldn't even notice it on the ingredients list. And if you injected that into your child a couple of times, when they grew up, they might end up, not all of them, but many of them will grow up allergic to milk and milk products and anything that's got whey protein in it. Imagine if they injected you with a beef protein that came from plasma, for example. You often see that in products. A tiny dose, a really tiny dose, so small it'll be off the bottom of the ingredients list and you injected that person twice with it, they'll become intolerant to meat. Unfortunately, that is all true. All of those ingredients have been found in at least one of the vaccines on the vaccine schedule in America and they're pretty much global products. These diabolical people have included components in the jabs that your children have been given and that you may have received that were designed to sensitize you to every single basic food item. To wheat, to corn, to beef, to chicken, to milk. That's why the number of people, I think one in three people has some kind of allergy. They didn't when I was young. They didn't. Sasha Latipova was born in the USSR and as she said in her Fruity Russian, she said, when I was young, no one had allergies. When she came to America, I think in the 80s, it was like, what gives? She was probably perfectly poised to spot this and so she discovered this and she noticed that a scientist called, I think it was Charles Richet, something like that, 1902, 1905, given a Nobel Prize for discovery of this mechanism. If you give tiny doses of foreign protein into a person separated by two weeks, they become violently and permanently allergic to that substance. Even if you touch it on the skin or put it just in your mouth on your tongue or certainly if you eat it, you've got a worse than even chance of having an allergic response to it. These people have sensitized you, those of you who've been vaccinated, to large amounts of the natural environment. I mean, how diabolical is that? And it's exactly the same mechanism as I called out in 2020 about the COVID jab. Remember I said that if you ask the human body to make a protein that doesn't belong in you, a non-self protein, a so-called spike protein, wherever it came from, I said if you do that, your body will cause an autoimmune reaction or your body will then make foreign material, your immune system will say, what the hell is that? And will attack it. So it's like a failed organ transplant. It's autoimmunity. That's what has happened through the whole history of vaccination back from the late 1700s to the present day. And that's pretty bad. That's what I wanted to tell you about vaccines. And as a result of that, I am proudly anti-vaccine of all kinds. Remember, I've told you at least when it comes to acute respiratory illnesses, they are not contagious or infectious. They're not caused by viruses because there's no scientific evidence for the existence of respiratory viruses. I know this. I've done the work now. I've studied all of the literature. I've studied the clinical side. I've looked at the cell culture side and as soon as I did, it's so obvious to me that each of the so- called pillars of evidence are fraudulent. They are fraudulent. I haven't personally looked at every virus, but if you're going to speak, if you're going to look at recordings by people like Stephan Lanker, Samantha and Mark Bailey, Andrew Kaufman. Anyway, there are several brilliant people. I reached my own conclusion by doing the work in respiratory and allergy. I have to say, I'm going to leave it to other people to do the work in their own fields, but that has allowed me with confidence to say the things I now say. If any former colleagues please want to talk to me about that, if they think I'm wrong, I'm not wrong. I can show you the chapter and verse, all the literature references going back to acute anaphylaxis. I've used these models in vitro in industry. How do we achieve them? You administer foreign proteins twice about 14 days apart. It's amazing how I didn't spot it. People don't spot things. I didn't spot things. Even in what the Americans call your own wheelhouse, because you're not suspecting people are out to harm you, you literally don't interpret this action, which is bad, because you're not looking for bad motives. Now I am. I can see so many things. I understand some people don't want to even tackle this topic, and I've been warned by people that if I say acute respiratory illnesses, colds and flu, are not caused by infectious particles, they're not contagious, if I say that, that people will not believe me, well, I'm not going to lie. There's no point in me sitting here and telling you anything if I don't tell you the truth. I'm sure it's true. Some people will reject everything I've said because of what I've just said. But I can't help that. But I am qualified to have done the work. And you may note, I restrict my remarks to acute respiratory illnesses, because that's where I've done all of the work. I've read all the papers. I can show any other scientist, I can send them a list of the papers if they want. So if someone thinks, no, no, no, he's wrong, if you're a qualified scientist and you think I'm wrong, contact me and we'll have a phone call and I will send you the papers. And I think you will have to conclude as I do, that contagion isn't a thing. Obviously, those illnesses are real. I've had two bouts of flu, and dozens of colds. But basically, all I'm telling you is that the attribution, the mechanism of them happening is not what we were told. It's something else. I've spent a lot of time working with others in designing therapeutic aerosols, things that you can inhale and will land in the airway. So I know a little bit about the internal architecture of the lungs. You may have heard statistics like the inside surface of your lungs, if spread out flat, is about the size of a tennis court. I mean, whether that's exactly right, I don't know. But it's big. It's a big surface area. And every part of that internal surface is covered with a thin layer of liquid, which has got little mucus in it. Imagine your body, all day and all night, for a whole life, has to regulate the thickness, the depth, of that little layer of water. If it's too thick, or if it's too thin, or if it dries out, your lungs won't work properly. But I think occasionally they do veer off course. Patches of your lung lose control of what's called airway surface liquid, the wetness on the lining of bits of your lung. I think that's what a cold is. You know, seriously, I'll also offer one last piece of evidence, just to show I've done the work in my own area. You may know some people with cystic fibrosis, CF. It's a very unpleasant disease. It varies, though, in severity, from, oh, I didn't know you had CF, to poor babies that don't make a year old. What's the key problem in CF? It's to do with regulation of the state of hydration of your lungs, and also your gut to some extent. People who made adulthood with cystic fibrosis, not the most severe cases, what's the most common thing that happens to them? They get colds very often. They can't regulate the airway, surface, liquid layer very well, because the cystic fibrosis problem they've got, that's part of the machinery for regulating it, is broken. When I thought of that, I thought, oh, my word, that is why. You know, so basically, your health excursion, you know, getting worse, and then getting better again, is very similar to the episode that some people with cystic fibrosis have, because I think it's fundamentally the same mechanism. It's not caused by floating particles called viruses. It's caused when you, it's not a conscious thing, but when you lose control of the balance, it's called homeostasis, when you lose control of the balance inside health of your lung, you might just get a scratchy throat, bit of a cough, and you bounce back. Oh, I thought I was getting a cold there. Or you might get a bit of a cold, or you might really go down with something chesty, or you might have to take to your bed. And I think those are like a nested series of excursions from health and back to health. All right, that's what I think colds and flu are. They're not contagious. They're not caused by viruses. And I've given you, I've given you a better explanation for what a cold is than the official story. So I invite you to take that on board. So yeah, I understand people not wanting to speak about viruses, but I think if you know the truth, you just have to speak it or get off the stage. In many interviews, I've been keen to tell people that there wasn't a pandemic, there wasn't a public health emergency, there was nothing unusual happening. Sometimes I'll refer to the numbers of people, you know, going into hospital or dying of things. But I've got something I think is more useful. In order for an emergency to be declared like a fire or like a shark approaching a public beach, a holiday beach, would you agree with me, ladies and gentlemen, that before you would call out the fire engines, you'd probably be smelling smoke somewhere, someone would be, or a smoke alarm will go off. Before you would call shark alerts and get everybody off the beach, you would thin