Comparative Analysis of Radical Transparency: Alberto Daniel Hill’s Manifesto and the Evolving Topography of Cyber Resistance Theoretical Foundations of Digital Dissidence The philosophical matrix of computer hacking has transitioned from an academic pursuit of system optimization into a highly politicized, multi-factional arena of digital sovereignty, narrative warfare, and direct action 1 . Early computing groups, such as those navigating the Tech Model Railroad Club at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the 1950s and 1960s, formulated a series of unwritten principles later codified by Steven Levy as the classical Hacker Ethic 2 . This foundational ideology prioritized unrestricted access to machines, the free dissemination of information, a meritocracy based on technical skill, and a deep-seated mistrust of centralized authority 2 . Within this early paradigm, technology was viewed as a tool for world improvement, and locking mechanisms were treated as artificial barriers to human curiosity 2 As computing power decentralized throughout the late twentieth century, the hacker ethos fractured into highly distinct operational frameworks 3 . The arrest of second-generation hackers in the mid-1980s prompted a shift toward existential rebellion 6 . This was captured in the 1986 manifesto, "The Conscience of a Hacker," authored by Loyd Blankenship under the pseudonym "The Mentor" 6 . The Mentor framed hacking as an act of pure curiosity, establishing a post-national, meritocratic identity that transcended race, age, and religious bias 6 . This framework justified unauthorized access as a defense against the mundane incompetence of educational systems and the greed of commercial bureaucracies 6 Simultaneously, the early 1990s witnessed the emergence of the Cypherpunk movement, spearheaded by figures like Eric Hughes, Timothy C. May, and John Gilmore 9 . In his 1993 essay, "A Cypherpunk's Manifesto," Hughes articulated a pragmatic, engineering-focused philosophy 11 . He asserted that while privacy is essential for an open society, governments and corporations cannot be trusted to protect it 11 . The cypherpunk doctrine argued that privacy must be defensively engineered through cryptography and anonymous transaction systems, encapsulated in the famous maxim: "cypherpunks write code" 9 The contemporary landscape has mutated far beyond these early frameworks 1 . Today, independent researchers, state-aligned realpolitik actors, offensive hacktivists, and commercial threat intelligence firms operate in a complex web of narrative control and data exposure 1 . To map this modern topography, this report analyzes the "Manifesto of Radical Transparency" formulated by Alberto Daniel Hill, contrasting his ethical and forensic methodologies with historical and active actors in the cybersecurity ecosystem 1 Alberto Daniel Hill and the Manifesto of Radical Transparency Formulated on 10 July 2026 in Montevideo, Uruguay, Alberto Daniel Hill’s "Manifesto of Radical Transparency" (Manifiesto de la Transparencia Radical) represents a modern evolutionary leap in digital dissidence 1 . Hill, a dual Italian-Uruguayan citizen, cybersecurity researcher, and former INTERPOL computer forensic examiner, constructed this framework as a survivor of institutional violence and judicial retaliation 1 In 2017, Hill became the first individual in Uruguay to be wrongfully imprisoned for a computer-related crime under the country's legacy legal framework 1 . Having discovered a critical security vulnerability in a local medical provider's web application—characterized by a default "admin/admin" login and URL parameter tampering flaws that exposed over 200,000 sensitive patient records—Hill responsibly reported his findings to the national computer emergency response team, CERTuy, within fifteen minutes of discovery 1 Instead of addressing the systemic risk, state authorities and corporate actors chose to prosecute the reporter, utilizing police misconduct and media-driven spectacles to divert public attention from their own technical negligence 1 . This ordeal, documented in Hill's book Operación Bitcoins: Login to Hell and presented at his Ekoparty 2022 keynote address, laid the foundation for his manifesto 1 Philosophical Core Tenet Definition and Operational Application 1. Truth over Narrative Forensic metadata, mathematics, and verifiable evidence supersede official stories. The unredacted forensic dossier must be published to prevent corporate minimization 1 2. Universal Heritage Technical discoveries, systemic failures, and institutional incompetence are not proprietary assets; they must be shared globally so the public can defend itself 1 3. #HackNotCrime Ethical hacking and responsible disclosure are civic duties. Legally illiterate judicial systems possess no moral authority to punish those who expose system vulnerabilities 1 4. Asymmetric Integrity A single ethical actor armed with public truth and forensic clarity can defeat superior forces of opacity, wealth, and state power without violating any laws 1 5. Radical Authenticity Critics of the state must expose their entire personal spectrum—including trauma, medical histories, and vulnerabilities—to destroy the curated personas used by institutions to dismiss them 1 6. Weaponizing the Trauma Post-traumatic growth is operational doctrine. The very systems and experiences used to break the individual are repurposed as public evidence, warning tools, and fuel for resistance 1 7. Protect the Protectors Independent researchers, journalists, and whistleblowers who surface threats must be defended publicly and unconditionally from institutional retaliation 1 The Manifesto of Radical Transparency contrasts sharply with classical hacker philosophies 1 While classical hackers often hide behind anonymous handles and operate in underground networks 6 , Hill advocates for verified personal identity and open accountability 1 . He argues that operating transparently under one’s real name serves as a powerful shield against state attempts to frame independent researchers as malicious, faceless criminals 1 . Under this framework, transparency is not viewed as a vulnerability, but as an absolute prerequisite for digital sovereignty 1 Comparative Matrix of Historical and Active Hacker Manifestos To understand the positioning of Radical Transparency within the broader historical and contemporary landscape of digital resistance, the following matrix compares Hill’s manifesto with the core philosophical texts that have defined hacker culture over the last four decades: Strategic Dimension The Hacker Ethic (Steven Levy, 1984) The Conscience of a Hacker (The Mentor, 1986) A Cypherpunk's Manifesto (Eric Hughes, Manifesto of Radical Transparency (Alberto Daniel Hill, 1993) 2026) Core Axiom "All information should be free; yield to the hands-on imperative." 2 "My crime is that of curiosity; we seek knowledge." 6 "Privacy is necessary for an open society... cypherpunks write code." 11 "Radical transparency is the only viable defense against the Protocol of Silence." 1 Identity Paradigm Meritocratic, skill-based, disembodied pseudonymity 2 Anonymous, post-national, detached from physical demographics 6 Cryptographic ally pseudonymize d, self-sovereign actors 12 Fully verified, publicly accountable, radically authentic personal identity 1 Tactical Vector Playful system exploration, non-destructiv e optimization 3 Unauthorized network intrusion, phreaking, exploration 6 Development and deployment of privacy-enhan cing technologies 9 Forensic meta-analysis, real-time threat alerts, media exposure 1 Legal Posture Legally ambiguous; rejects intellectual property controls 3 Transgressive; accepts criminal status to defend curiosity 8 Defensive/Byp assing; uses code to route around state regulation 9 Strictly legal; leverages unredacted public evidence and OSINT 1 Response to State Promotes decentralizatio n and mistrust of bureaucratic structures 2 Condemns state hypocrisy, military violence, and social engineering 8 Rejects expectation of privacy from governments or corporations 10 Dismantles the "Protocol of Silence" and judicial/technic al illiteracy 1 The Adversarial Ecosystem: Phineas Fisher, Gov.eth, and PampaLeaks The operational methods of Radical Transparency can be contrasted with other prominent factions in the contemporary threat landscape, each representing a distinct interpretation of digital resistance 1 Offensive Hacktivism: Phineas Fisher and Direct Action The anonymous hacktivist known as "Phineas Fisher" represents an offensive, anti-capitalist interpretation of digital resistance 13 . Rejecting passive reporting, Fisher's philosophy is rooted in direct action and defensive "hacking back" 13 . This was demonstrated in high-profile intrusions against Gamma International in 2014 and Hacking Team in 2015—corporate surveillance entities accused of selling spyware to oppressive regimes 13 Fisher’s methodology involves systemic compromise, lateral movement, and full public data dumps 13 . For example, the Hacking Team compromise was executed by identifying a remote root vulnerability in a SonicWall SSL-VPN network appliance 13 . Fisher then pivoted to an unauthenticated MongoDB instance and a misconfigured Synology iSCSI backup storage device 13 . This exposure allowed the retrieval of an Exchange virtual machine backup, from which local administrator credentials were extracted, leading to Domain Admin access via mimikatz 13 . Fisher moved laterally using PSExec, Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI), and group policies, ultimately dumping the corporate mailspool and taking over the target's Twitter account 13 Fisher later published detailed "DIY Guides" to instruct and inspire others to carry out politically motivated intrusions against corporations in the public interest 13 . Unlike Hill's legal, verified approach 1 , Fisher actively advocates for illegal intrusions and established a "Hacktivist Bug Hunting Program" offering up to $100,000 in Bitcoin or Monero to incentivize attacks against extractive industries, banking networks, and spyware vendors 13 High-Visibility Hacktivism: The Gov.eth Precedent Active throughout 2024 and 2025, the Argentine hacktivist operating under the pseudonym "Gov.eth" targeted major state infrastructures, including Argentina's National Registry of Persons (Renaper), the Buenos Aires City Police, and the "Mi Argentina" app, alongside the SUBE transit card network 1 Gov.eth's philosophy was characterized by a high-visibility, clout-seeking posture, marked by public defacements and open mockery of state cybersecurity failures on social media 1 . This actor sought and received validation from cultural figures, including prominent Argentine rappers 1 Unlike Hill's humble, evidence-focused approach 1 , Gov.eth's operations were heavily driven by personal ego—a vulnerability that PampaLeaks and Hill note often leads to critical operational security (OPSEC) failures 1 . Gov.eth was eventually arrested by police forces in Spain 1 Cyber Realpolitik: PampaLeaks and Forced Auditing The threat actor collective known as "PampaLeaks" operates on a philosophy of Auditoría Forzada (Forced Auditing) 1 . They target critical state infrastructures, such as Uruguay's Civil Aviation Authority (DINACIA), the National Administration of Public Education (ANEP), and ANTEL's TuID digital identity platform 1 PampaLeaks view their intrusions not as criminal theft, but as forced penetration tests that lay bare the state's security gaps 1 . Their methodology relies on credential harvesting and API subversion to bypass official claims of robust security 1 . While they maintain an anti-institutional realpolitik stance—targeting systems across the political spectrum to expose incompetence—they also monetize exfiltrated assets by offering lookup services 1 Despite these commercial and clandestine elements, their operations occasionally intersect with Hill's. They have provided cryptographic validation of their leaks to Hill to help him dismantle the state's attempts to minimize breaches, while expressing respect for his transparent, independent analytical model 1 Institutional Repression and the Fabricated Threat Landscapes A critical second-order analysis of the digital ecosystem reveals a symbiotic relationship between state-corporate narrative control and the commercialization of threat intelligence 1 This dynamic frequently results in the prosecution of independent researchers and the creation of manufactured threat landscapes 1 The Protocol of Silence and Target Minimization When critical infrastructures are compromised, state-corporate actors typically deploy the "Protocol of Silence" to protect their reputation and preserve public trust 1 . This dynamic was demonstrated during the May 2026 TuID digital identity breach 1 . After PampaLeaks exfiltrated 8 GB of internal backend files and active API keys from ANTEL’s servers, the state-owned telecommunications company issued statements claiming that "no passwords or specially protected data were compromised" 1 Through his Cybermidnight Club meta-analysis, Hill exposed the technical fallacy of this narrative 1 . He demonstrated that access to plaintext OAuth credentials, internal backend directories, and metadata for advanced electronic signatures (idSignIdentityTx) made passwords irrelevant 1 . A threat actor possessing this level of backend access could bypass biometric validation checks entirely, effectively enabling identity fraud and the forgery of digital signatures 1 . ANTEL's refusal to immediately revoke compromised digital certificates and rotate exposed API keys was characterized by Hill as a dangerous gamble on the attacker's honesty, leaving citizens exposed while official channels maintained a narrative of safety 1 Similar patterns of minimization were observed during the late 2025 ransomware attack on the Mortgage Bank of Uruguay (BHU) by the Crypto24 group 1 . Despite the exfiltration of over 700 GB of financial and customer records, the bank initially characterized the outage as a minor technical problem 1 . Hill exposed the true scale of the breach prior to the hackers' public verification, challenging the state's narrative 1 Furthermore, during the 2026 compromise of Mexican firm Be Prime (Bitprim), which got breached due to a lack of basic multi-factor authentication, the company attempted to enforce silence through legal threats 1 . Hill exposed the firm's hypocrisy and technical failures on his podcast, refusing to comply with their demands 1 The Threat Intelligence Duplicity: BCA LTD and Mauro Eldritch The threat intelligence model pursued by private defense firms represents a stark contrast to Hill's Radically Transparent framework 1 . This is illustrated by the activities of Birmingham Cyber Arms LTD (BCA LTD) and its founder, Argentine hacker Mauro Eldritch (Mauro Cáseres) 1 Eldritch has demonstrated elite technical capabilities in global arenas, such as documenting the Lazarus Group's (Famous Chollima) IT worker schemes through collaborative research with NorthScan and ANY.RUN 31 . However, Hill's forensic investigations reveal a different pattern in local markets 1 . Here, the business model is characterized as "Profit from Fear," where threat intelligence firms monetize public anxiety by constructing or exaggerating threats 1 According to corporate registries, BCA LTD was established as a paper company in the United Kingdom with only £15 in capital, zero employees, and significant liabilities 28 . Yet, the firm positioned itself as a major cyber defense provider, issuing dramatic alerts regarding high-threat hacker collectives 1 Forensic analysis of these alerts revealed that groups like "ExPresidents" were largely manufactured 1 . BCA LTD hyped a 39.6 KB text file of aggregated, leaked credentials as a massive, sophisticated national breach 14 . This narrative was promoted in mainstream media outlets like El Observador by technology journalist Juan Pablo De Marco without technical verification 1 When state engineers denied a claimed breach at ANTEL subsidiary HG S.A., De Marco and Eldritch doubled down on the claims on social media and live streams 1 . They cited automated threat platforms like SOC Radar and unverified employee statements to attack the state's security engineers, preserving their narrative of a high-threat landscape to drive demand for commercial intelligence subscriptions 1 The Scapegoating Phenomenon To validate their threat narratives and resolve public relations crises, state actors and commercial threat intelligence firms often seek out scapegoats 1 . Following the TuID breach, Uruguayan police arrested 19-year-old Juan Manuel Lage Machi ("uruguayo1337" / "Vladi") 1 State investigators and media outlets paraded the teenager as the mastermind of PampaLeaks 1 . However, Hill’s forensic analysis revealed that the youth was merely a low-level reseller of automated Telegram search bots, possessing neither the access nor the capability to execute a backend compromise of ANTEL's cloud systems 1 According to cryptographic statements released by PampaLeaks, investigators used psychological coercion to force a confession, attempting to calm public panic and protect corporate interests 1 . This mirrors the exact pattern of prosecution Hill faced in 2017 1 When Hill exposed this duplicity in a 35-page forensic dossier, BCA LTD attempted to silence the investigation by filing a fraudulent trademark complaint with Cloudflare, using their UK company registration number (11935300) in place of a valid trademark 28 . This censorship attempt failed, ultimately resulting in global validation of Hill's dossier by the independent platform DataBreaches.net 1 Technical Comparison of the TuID and HG S.A. Breaches To highlight the difference between real infrastructure compromises and commercialized threat narratives, the following table contrasts the technical realities of the TuID breach with the media-hyped HG S.A. incident 1 : Operational Metric The TuID Platform Breach (May 2026) The HG S.A. Breach (BCA LTD / Dead Presidents) Primary Threat Actor LaPampaLeaks (Clandestine Forced Auditing group) 1 "Dead Presidents" / "ExPresidents" (Manufactured persona) 1 Technical Compromise Vector Exploitation of plaintext hardcoded OAuth credentials within server-side PHP scripts on ANTEL backend infrastructure 1 Aggregation of localized infostealer logs and scraped public front-end code assets 1 Payload Size & Integrity 8 GB of verifiable backend directories, configuration files, and system parameters 1 Claimed 12 GB/1 GB; verified to be a minor, uncoordinated 39.6 KB text file of old credentials 1 Exfiltrated Assets Citizen PII, biometric validation statuses, and advanced electronic signature verification metadata 1 Outdated, non-functional credentials from individual employees and legacy public systems 1 Institutional Response Immediate deployment of the "Protocol of Silence"; public denial of core system compromise 1 Aggressive official denial; state engineers publicly attacked by commercial analysts and media 1 Actual Public Risk Extreme; compromised the integrity of national digital identity, advanced signatures, and elections 1 Negligible; used primarily as a marketing mechanism to sell commercial threat intelligence platforms 1 Architectural Analysis: GSI and the FKI Framework To move beyond qualitative criticism of state secrecy and commercial duplicity, Hill developed mathematical and operational tools to quantify transparency and secure forensic integrity 1 The Global Secretism Index (GSI) The Global Secretism Index ( ) is a data-driven metric designed to quantify a state's propensity to obscure technical truth, minimize security breaches, and retaliate against independent researchers 1 . The index is calculated using the following formula: The variables are defined as: ● : Narrative Minimization , representing the degree to which state or corporate actors downplay, misclassify, or conceal critical security failures 1 ● : Regulatory/Judicial Retaliation , representing the frequency and intensity of legal actions, prosecutions, and state-backed media campaigns launched against ethical researchers 1 ● : Truth Disclosure Velocity , measuring the speed at which unredacted forensic indicators and breach notices are delivered to affected citizens 1 ● : Empirical Evidence Integrity , measuring the availability of raw metadata, cryptographic proof, and open-source data to verify official claims 1 ● : Systemic weighting coefficients adjusted for regional legal frameworks. Under this index, Uruguay ranks precariously high at 9.7/10, closely followed by Argentina at 8.8/10 1 . This is driven by a consistent historical pattern of minimizing critical breaches, relying on technically illiterate judiciaries, and prosecuting independent researchers under laws like Law 19.223 and Law 20.327 rather than establishing collaborative disclosure programs 1 The Forensic Knowledge Integration (FKI) Framework To counter the "Protocol of Silence" and safeguard independent analysis, Hill formalized the Forensic Knowledge Integration ( ) framework 1 . Designed as a lightweight, ISO-aligned practical scoring tool, the measures structural alignment between a state's claimed defensive posture and actual backend exposures 1 The framework evaluates three distinct technical dimensions: ● Payload Validity (PV): Assesses the mathematical and structural integrity of claimed data dumps, distinguishing between genuine backend compromise and aggregated stealer logs 1 ● Defensive Posture vs. Reality (DP): Evaluates the gap between an institution's stated security controls and its actual operational practices, exposing issues like hardcoded credentials and unpatched API endpoints 1 ● Response Behavior (RB): Scores an organization's response, penalizing narrative minimization, legal threats, and scapegoating while rewarding transparent updates and cooperation with independent researchers 1 [FKI Evaluation Matrix] │ ┌──────────────────┼──────────────────┐ ▼ ▼ ▼ [Payload Validity] [Posture vs Reality] [Response Behavior] (Verifies Data) (Exposes Bad OPSEC) (Exposes Silence) By formalizing the framework, Hill provides professional peers with a methodology to audit state-corporate narratives during cyber crises 1 . This tool helps ensure that the truth of a breach dictates the public narrative, rather than polished press releases or commercial interests 1 Conclusions and Future Outlook The comparative evaluation of contemporary hacker philosophies demonstrates that the digital landscape has entered a highly adversarial era 1 . While early hacker ethics and cypherpunk manifestos focused on technical access and cryptographic isolation 2 , the rise of state surveillance and commercialized threat intelligence has made narrative control the primary battlefield 1 Alberto Daniel Hill's Manifesto of Radical Transparency offers a distinct framework for this new reality 1 . By refusing anonymity and operating under a verified personal identity 1 , Hill demonstrates that "Asymmetric Integrity" can dismantle the institutional machinery of the "Protocol of Silence" 1 . His development of the Global Secretism Index and the Forensic Knowledge Integration framework moves beyond simple criticism, providing professional peers with actionable tools to verify forensic truth and protect ethical researchers from judicial retaliation 1 As state systems continue to centralize digital identity structures like TuID, the risk of technical failure and subsequent cover-ups will only escalate 1 . The findings of this report indicate that the traditional model of "responsible disclosure" is increasingly broken, frequently hijacked by legally illiterate authorities and profit-driven threat intelligence firms 1 In this environment, the defense of public safety demands a transition toward Hill's model of Radical Transparency 1 . Only by democratizing forensic metadata and standing publicly against institutional secrecy can the global tech community ensure that technology remains a tool for human empowerment rather than institutional control 1 Works cited 1. The LaPampaLeaks Compromise of Uruguay’s Digital Identity Infrastructure, uploaded:The LaPampaLeaks Compromise of Uruguay’s Digital Identity Infrastructure 2. Hacker ethic - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_ethic 3. Hacker ethic - Grokipedia, https://grokipedia.com/page/Hacker_ethic 4. The Hacker Ethic - DEV Community, https://dev.to/funkysi1701/the-hacker-ethic-4ikh 5. (PDF) It doesn't have to be this way - ResearchGate, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280492163_It_doesn't_have_to_be_this _way 6. Hacker Manifesto - Grokipedia, https://grokipedia.com/page/Hacker_Manifesto 7. Hacker Manifesto - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_Manifesto 8. The Hacker's manifesto By The Mentor, January 8th 1986 : r/Cyberpunk - Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/Cyberpunk/comments/5ndkxw/the_hackers_manifesto_ by_the_mentor_ january_8th/ 9. Cypherpunk History: Complete Guide to the Movement Behind Bitcoin [2026], https://fibo-crypto.fr/en/blog/cypherpunk-history-movement-bitcoin/ 10. Cypherpunk - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cypherpunk 11. Cypherpunk's Manifesto by Eric Hughes | PDF | Cryptography - Scribd, https://www.scribd.com/document/404968941/A-CYPHERPUNK-docx 12. Eric Hughes (cypherpunk) - Grokipedia, https://grokipedia.com/page/Eric_Hughes_(cypherpunk) 13. Phineas Fisher - Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phineas_Fisher 14. Operacion Bitcoin: Login to hell - Anghami, https://play.anghami.com/song/1020264117?lang=fr 15. Alberto Daniel Hill - To hell and back - Ekoparty 2022 - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wa-6owWEL5E 16. Books by Alberto Daniel Hill (Author of LOGIN TO HELL) - Goodreads, https://www.goodreads.com/author/list/18332197.Alberto_Daniel_Hill 17. The Confluence of Cypherpunks and Hackers: Exploring the Origins and Overlapping Ideals | by Cloaked Wireless - Private & Secure, https://blog.cloakedwireless.com/the-confluence-of-cypherpunks-and-hackers- exploring-the-origins-and-overlapping-ideals-f87d9c26b327 18. Decoding Bitcoin: A Cypherpunk's Manifesto for Financial Freedom - D-Central, https://d-central.tech/decoding-bitcoin-a-cypherpunks-manifesto-for-financial-f reedom/ 19. LoD – Darknet Diaries, https://darknetdiaries.com/transcript/168/ 20. The LaPampaLeaks Breach of Uruguay's TuID| Listen on Anghami, https://play.anghami.com/episode/1275646359 21. A Hacker Manifesto - Grokipedia, https://grokipedia.com/page/A_Hacker_Manifesto 22. Who Are the New Cybercriminals: Profile, Motivations and Tactics - Pasquale Pillitteri, https://pasqualepillitteri.it/en/news/180/who-are-cybercriminals-profile-motivatio ns-tactics 23. Phineas Fisher, Hacktivism, and Magic Tricks - Isosceles Blog, https://blog.isosceles.com/phineas-fisher-hacktivism-and-magic-tricks/ 24. An Analysis of Phineas Fisher and the 'Hacktivist' Threat to Critical Infrastructure - arXiv, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.14360 25. Phineas Fisher Offers $100,000 Bounty To Hack Banks and Oil Companies - JPT/SPE, https://jpt.spe.org/phineas-fisher-offers-100000-bounty-hack-banks-and-oil-co mpanies 26. In search of new hacktivism in cyber space | Stormshield, https://www.stormshield.com/news/where-did-hacktivism-disappear-to-in-cyber space/ 27. Identifican al autor del ciberataque de Antel - vtv noticias, https://noticias.vtv.com.uy/identifican-al-autor-del-ciberataque-de-antel/ 28. "The police made a mistake": The TuID Scapegoat, Fabricated Threats, and the BCA LTD Fraud - Storytel, https://www.storytel.com/tv/podcasts/darkweb-today-hackers-cyber-security-pi ercing-the-veil-empowering-the-secure-121153/the-police-made-a-mistake-the -tuid-scapegoat-fabricated-threats-and-the-bca-ltd-fraud-14671389 29. Hacking of ANTEL's TuID system in Uruguay: digital IDs obtained by LaPampaLeaks, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OeHxkNW2fVI 30. Mauro Eldritch - email - MyPublicInbox, https://www.mypublicinbox.com/MauroEldritch 31. Smile, You're on Camera: A Live Stream from Inside Lazarus Group's IT Workers Scheme | by ANY.RUN | Medium, https://medium.com/@anyrun/smile-youre-on-camera-a-live-stream-from-inside -lazarus-group-s-it-workers-scheme-fdc952c02bbf 32. Ciberdelitos y cibercriminalidad - Montevideo - Parlamento, https://pmb.parlamento.gub.uy/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=11 7552