[a / c / g / k / m / o / p / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w] [vip / qa] [cm / lgbt] [3 / adv / an / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pw / qst / sci / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Edit] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home /g/ - Technology Thread archived. You cannot reply anymore. [Return] [Catalog] [Bottom] Archived / 116 / 11 File: 1627675821639.jpg (49 KB, 750x517) Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:01:14 No.85486005 ▶ >>85486285 >>85486323 >>85486368 >>85486437 >>85486564 >>85486856 >>85486908 >>85487170 >>85487273 >>85487299 >>85487340 >>85489447 >>85490222 >>85495244 >>85495438 >>85495464 >>85495477 >>85495583 >>85495609 >>85495620 >>85496951 >>85498228 >>85500636 is fermat last theorem the new fizzbuzz? come on, if you can't solve it you are not gonna make it >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:07:15 No.85486072 ▶ >>85486100 >>85486548 >>85490209 >>85493382 >>85495638 a, b=0 c=1 >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:09:59 No.85486100 ▶ >>85487309 >>85490209 >>85498183 File: 1623194317044.jpg (27 KB, 558x614) >>85486072 >0+0=1 >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:12:57 No.85486132 ▶ >>85486254 please someone post a solution >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:13:54 No.85486140 ▶ File: uc82upz3yrw71.png (160 KB, 1467x1440) >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:23:15 No.85486254 ▶ >>85486283 >>85486132 The theorem is true, no such equation exists >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:25:51 No.85486283 ▶ >>85486479 >>85493074 >>85486254 Now prove it on this whiteboard in Python >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:26:07 No.85486285 ▶ >>85486319 >>85486354 >>85486798 >>85487307 >>85489450 >>85493131 >>85486005 (OP) It's simple >enumerate all tuples (a, b, c, n) with n > 2 >stop when you find one that satisfies the equation Then you just prove that the program won't halt. Easy. I could do it, but it wouldn't quite fit in this post. >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:27:12 No.85486300 ▶ File: whiteboard.jpg (130 KB, 1000x1000) Whoops, forgot the whiteboard. Here you go, let me just erase the last guys answer... >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:28:47 No.85486319 ▶ >>85486408 >>85486285 >>enumerate all tuples Will that itself not take forever >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:28:59 No.85486323 ▶ >>85486342 >>85486345 >>85486005 (OP) a=0 b=0 c=0 >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:30:41 No.85486342 ▶ >>85486364 >>85486323 Read the statement, nigger Positive integers >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:30:50 No.85486345 ▶ >>85486364 >>85486323 >0 >positive integer single digit IQ >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:31:34 No.85486354 ▶ >>85486408 >>85487224 >>85486285 if a, b, c and n are {1..100}, then you will have 100^4 combinations which is 100 million >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:32:51 No.85486364 ▶ >>85486401 >>85486342 >>85486345 0 are positive >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:33:08 No.85486368 ▶ >>85486398 >>85486401 >>85486407 >>85486005 (OP) 32 + 42 = 52 >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:35:09 No.85486398 ▶ >>85486440 >>85486368 Fuck 3^2 + 4^2 = 5^2 >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:35:16 No.85486401 ▶ >>85486570 >>85486368 >>85486364 another special education preschool group seems to browse /g/. sad >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:35:50 No.85486407 ▶ >>85486368 n>2 bro Holy shit why is reading comprehension of /g/ so shit >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:35:59 No.85486408 ▶ >>85487248 >>85486319 Hence the 'stop' condition. >>85486354 Yes, and? It's about the proof, not about running the program. Seriously, does no one even read anymore? >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:37:50 No.85486426 ▶ only Coq solutions accepted >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:38:31 No.85486437 ▶ >>85486005 (OP) whats the use case of this besides doing 1 python script in 1 obscure math class in universtiy? >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:38:37 No.85486440 ▶ >>85486398 Nice basic reading skills >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:41:26 No.85486467 ▶ >>85491834 I found a nice proof but unfortunately the character limit on 4chan is too low to post it. >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:42:29 No.85486479 ▶ >>85486283 this >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:48:39 No.85486548 ▶ >>85490209 >>85486072 0 isn't positive, and even if it was, it would be all 0, why tf would c be 1. >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:50:13 No.85486564 ▶ >>85486005 (OP) if only there were exist a pythagorean triple where every integer is a quadratic number >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:50:42 No.85486570 ▶ >>85486587 >>85486590 >>85486669 >>85486677 >>85486690 >>85499398 >>85486401 0 can be thought of as both positive and negative >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:51:29 No.85486582 ▶ only Coq solutions accepted >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:51:57 No.85486587 ▶ >>85486650 >>85486570 >0 can be thought of as both positive and negative That's it. I'm done with this board. Have fun with your retard circlejerk. >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:52:08 No.85486590 ▶ >>85486650 >>85486570 i hate this board >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)19:59:31 No.85486650 ▶ >>85486674 >>85486677 >>85486587 >>85486590 Wait, why is that incorrect? 0>= 0 and 0<=0 >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)20:01:12 No.85486669 ▶ >>85486570 you can be thougt as both a retard or a Retard >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)20:02:02 No.85486674 ▶ >>85486650 lol >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)20:02:13 No.85486677 ▶ >>85486695 >>85486650 not him, but officially 0 isn't positive or negative. that said, I see where >>85486570 is coming from as it has some properties of both positive and negative numbers >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)20:02:59 No.85486690 ▶ >>85486727 >>85486847 >>85486570 Mathematically zero is not a number. It's a placeholder for the absence of a number. >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)20:03:22 No.85486695 ▶ >>85486712 >>85486727 >>85486677 >officially 0 isn't positive or negative based on declaration made by The Number Council at United Nations >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)20:05:09 No.85486712 ▶ >>85486741 >>85486695 that's subjective you retards >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)20:06:40 No.85486727 ▶ >>85486690 your brain is a placeholder for the absence of one >>85486695 yes, precisely >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)20:08:31 No.85486741 ▶ >>85486712 Language is. The definition doesn’t even matter as its implications aren’t that interesting, it’s just that it’s more convenient if everyone agrees so you don’t have to preface every statement with ”we (don’t) treat zero as a positive number”. >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)20:10:26 No.85486768 ▶ For n=thrembo there exist non-trivial solutions. >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)20:13:24 No.85486798 ▶ >>85486285 The halting problem is not a solution >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)20:18:18 No.85486847 ▶ >>85486690 That would be the empty set >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)20:19:12 No.85486856 ▶ >>85486005 (OP) >not implementing a statistical method that calculates the likelihood of it being unsolvable >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)20:26:15 No.85486908 ▶ >>85487033 >>85486005 (OP) Retard, the proof for this is literally 100 pages long, and I bet you couldn't find a single fag on /g/ who could understand it. >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)20:38:00 No.85487033 ▶ >>85487092 >>85486908 filtered >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)20:43:58 No.85487092 ▶ >>85498273 >>85487033 the guy who wrote the proof literally had to hold conferences for other mathematicians to be tutored in how to understand the proof he had written >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)20:51:28 No.85487170 ▶ >>85486005 (OP) >um, so, we need a new fizzbuzz, let's do a task like one of those simple-looking-but-actually-not-done-by-anyone-yet excercises in SICP! >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)20:55:45 No.85487224 ▶ >>85486354 you missed the point >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)20:57:08 No.85487248 ▶ >>85486408 i read it bro no problem i got you it s a nice joke, for real >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)20:59:25 No.85487273 ▶ File: 1640995256865.jpg (16 KB, 421x463) >>85486005 (OP) >cannot be solved >if you can't solve it you are not going to make it Legit. >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)21:02:03 No.85487299 ▶ File: gigachad.jpg (6 KB, 200x200) >>85486005 (OP) Amazing bait. Love seeing bootcamp/compsci grads babbies seethe and blabber around. >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)21:02:53 No.85487307 ▶ >>85486285 No because then you’ve pushed the proof of FLT on to proving your program doesn’t halt. So your program itself hasn’t proven anything. Programs can in fact prove some things, but only those things provable with constructivist logic, which FLT doesn’t fall under >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)21:02:59 No.85487309 ▶ >>85486100 Yes. >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)21:05:16 No.85487340 ▶ >>85486005 (OP) the accepted proof for fermat's indicates this is impossible. >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)21:06:41 No.85487357 ▶ >>85487473 >>85489310 >>85495196 File: math problem.jpg (19 KB, 367x255) You should be able to solve this. Use any language. >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)21:17:16 No.85487473 ▶ >>85487492 >>85487495 >>85487521 >>85496882 >>85487357 >One equation and three unknowns Does that even have a unique solution? >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)21:18:55 No.85487492 ▶ >>85488318 >>85487473 we leave it as an exercise for the reader :^) >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)21:19:07 No.85487495 ▶ >>85487473 >unique Nice reading skills. >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)21:21:37 No.85487521 ▶ >>85487473 There are multiple. Given a solution you can multiply all the numbers with the same factor to get another solution. Any one solution is fine. >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)22:25:42 No.85488318 ▶ >>85488440 File: Screenshot from 2022-02-0(...).png (86 KB, 778x614) >>85487492 >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)22:36:09 No.85488440 ▶ >>85488318 topkek >> Anonymous 02/01/22(Tue)23:53:14 No.85489310 ▶ >>85487357 -5,9,11 >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)00:01:34 No.85489431 ▶ >>85489987 1, 0.00000000001, 1 checkmate faggot >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)00:02:48 No.85489447 ▶ >>85486005 (OP) Exactly how is this analogous to a fizzbuzz? This is mathfag shit, go back to >>>/sci/ >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)00:02:54 No.85489450 ▶ >>85493131 >>85486285 >I could do it, but it wouldn't quite fit in this post Based. Retarded /g/ undergrads wouldn't understand. >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)00:49:44 No.85489987 ▶ >>85489431 >integers >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)01:07:42 No.85490209 ▶ File: 1643716974508.png (207 KB, 436x317) >>85486072 >>85486100 >>85486548 Holy fucking kek >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)01:09:10 No.85490222 ▶ >>85491855 >>85491882 >>85493259 >>85495292 >>85486005 (OP) Fermat was fucking retarded, the solutions aren't even that big public class FermatRetard { public static void main(String[] args) { for (int n = 3; n < 6; n++) for (int a = 1; a < 1000; a++) for (int b = 1; b < 1000; b++) for (int c = 1; c < 1000; c++) if ((a ^ n + b ^ n) == (c ^ n)) System.out.println(String.format("% d^%d + %d^%d = %d^%d", a, n, b, n, c, n)); } } >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)02:58:51 No.85491834 ▶ >>85494278 >>85486467 Nice reference, but judging by the post quality of this thread, I don't think anyone will get it. >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)03:00:33 No.85491855 ▶ >>85495629 >>85490222 >what is overflow >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)03:02:16 No.85491882 ▶ >>85491895 >>85491898 >>85490222 Why the fuck are using the XOR operator? >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)03:03:09 No.85491895 ▶ >>85493888 >>85491882 Whats the XOR operator? >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)03:03:27 No.85491898 ▶ >>85493848 >>85494071 >>85491882 It's more efficient >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)04:31:22 No.85493074 ▶ >>85486283 That is 99% discrete maths proving and 1% writing code to describe the discrete maths >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)04:35:14 No.85493131 ▶ >>85486285 >>85489450 you need to post on /sci/ for them to get it >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)04:44:59 No.85493259 ▶ >>85490222 lol >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)04:52:02 No.85493382 ▶ >>85486072 Found the rust "programmer" >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)05:29:20 No.85493848 ▶ >>85491898 based and lolpilled >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)05:32:40 No.85493888 ▶ >>85491895 cuckcuckgo and jewgle are free as in free beer anon. >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)05:45:57 No.85494071 ▶ >>85494328 >>85491898 efficiency is critical in your exponential time algorithm, yes. >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)05:59:06 No.85494278 ▶ >>85491834 you are a dumb faggot retard who thinks recognizing a reference to a thing that has been very well-known for 400 years puts you in the special big boy club >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)06:01:12 No.85494328 ▶ >>85494071 >exponential It's merely quartic >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)06:03:43 No.85494371 ▶ What's with these demoralization threads? >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)07:08:48 No.85495160 ▶ only Coq solutions accepted >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)07:11:25 No.85495178 ▶ Math.pow(18014398509481984, 3) + Math.pow(1, 3) == Math.pow(18014398509481983, 3) Try it in your browser console if you want. >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)07:11:31 No.85495179 ▶ >>85495201 File: 1634360228495.png (15 KB, 361x139) >mfw y'all can't even into hypermath ngmi past the heat death of the universe >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)07:13:12 No.85495196 ▶ >>85487357 kek >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)07:13:36 No.85495201 ▶ >>85495179 I fucking hated calc II >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)07:14:16 No.85495210 ▶ a^n + b^n - c^n = 0 a + b - c = log_n(0) a + b - c = -infinity >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)07:18:07 No.85495244 ▶ >>85486005 (OP) I don't need to know this to get a job in IT Stay mad subhuman, no amount of leetcode will turn you into a well adjusted human being >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)07:22:54 No.85495292 ▶ >>85490222 >Checked Also, ngl, that's funny. Even for this humorless shithole. >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)07:35:44 No.85495438 ▶ >>85495454 >>85486005 (OP) If there's a language that could solve the equation, probably it's JavaScript with something like Math.pow() * [] - {} or whatever... >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)07:36:56 No.85495454 ▶ >>85495560 >>85495438 javascript could take a lot of time you need a high performance language and maybe it's running time will fit into margin of our reality >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)07:38:22 No.85495464 ▶ >>85486005 (OP) If you didn’t learn this in 11th grade… ngmi >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)07:39:30 No.85495477 ▶ >>85486005 (OP) import wiles Print(wiles.proof) E-z >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)07:39:50 No.85495478 ▶ function solve(a, b, c, n) { return (Math.pow(a, n) + Math.pow(b, n) == Math.pow(c, n)); } function randInt(max = 9999) { return Math.round(Math.random() * max) + 1; } while(true) { let a = randInt(), b = randInt(), c = randInt(), n = Math.round(1.79E+308); console.log("Is op a fag with a, b, c = " + [a, b, c].join(', ') + "?"); if(solve(a, b, c, n)) { console.log("==> Yes!!! OP is a fag!"); } } >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)07:47:56 No.85495560 ▶ >>85495454 >maybe it's running time will fit into margin of our reality kek >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)07:50:00 No.85495583 ▶ >>85486005 (OP) Proof that nobody in /g/ actually works. >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)07:52:10 No.85495609 ▶ >>85486005 (OP) Didn't the Simpsons find a solution? >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)07:53:06 No.85495620 ▶ >>85486005 (OP) Andrew Wiles gently smiles, does his thing and voila! QED, we agree and we all shout "hurrah!" As he confirms what Fermat Jotted down in his margin ....which could have used some enlargin'... >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)07:54:30 No.85495629 ▶ >>85491855 something that's not happening in that image, look again retard >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)07:55:26 No.85495638 ▶ >>85486072 kek I bet this guy thought he was being really smart >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)09:52:29 No.85496882 ▶ >>85487473 What about the denominators that can't be 0, you have 3 more there. God why is this board so retarded, american education it seems. >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)10:01:43 No.85496951 ▶ >>85486005 (OP) this isn't something to be solved. this is a fact. how do you solve a fact? there is no question. >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)12:43:53 No.85498183 ▶ >>85500406 >>85486100 >positive integers Thanks for coming in, we'll call you >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)12:49:28 No.85498228 ▶ File: 1643780968289.png (21 KB, 560x168) >>85486005 (OP) meanwhile slavs designing EГЭ be like >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)12:56:22 No.85498273 ▶ >>85500419 File: japan-collatz.jpg (19 KB, 224x346) >>85487092 it's not his fault most mathematicians are grade-inflated diversity hires. japan has knocked out the abc conjecture and pic related in just the past five years. don't expect people to hold your hand if you want to do anything in life. >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)15:30:27 No.85499398 ▶ >>85500214 >>85486570 >0 can be thought of as both positive and negative 0 is also both odd and even. Take a moment to think about that. >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)17:14:34 No.85500134 ▶ >>85500895 /g/ is really dull nowadays >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)17:24:15 No.85500214 ▶ >>85499398 >0 is also both odd and even. Don't even joke about that. Someone is sure to believe it. >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)17:49:02 No.85500406 ▶ >>85498183 -0 >unsigned >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)17:50:55 No.85500419 ▶ >>85500665 >>85498273 japan proved the fucking collatz conjecture? goddammit >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)18:14:31 No.85500636 ▶ >>85486005 (OP) >do my homework for me or you are a retard >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)18:18:03 No.85500665 ▶ >>85500419 Don't see reference to a proof on wikipedia. Terence Tao has a plebs guide to the collatz conjecture. The problem is still unsolved. https://terrytao.files.wordpress.com/2020/02/collatz.pdf >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)18:39:22 No.85500862 ▶ This thread has served as a mathematical proof that this board is a mentally handicapped Linux and PC gaming board. Nothing more. >> Anonymous 02/02/22(Wed)18:42:53 No.85500895 ▶ >>85500134 Yes, the threads are uninspired >inb4 make your own Shit doesn't get bumped [Return] [Catalog] [Top] Archived / 116 / 11 Delete Post: [ File Only] Delete Style: Yotsuba B [a / c / g / k / m / o / p / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w] [vip / qa] [cm / lgbt] [3 / adv / an / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pw / qst / sci / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Edit] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster. About • Feedback • Legal • Contact
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-