My Ideology Page 1 Contents Politics ................................................................................................................................. 3 Capitalism / Socialism / Communism ................................................................................... 9 Right and Left .................................................................................................................... 13 Racism ............................................................................................................................... 22 Hierarchy Structures .......................................................................................................... 28 Law & Security ................................................................................................................... 30 Death Penalty .................................................................................................................... 40 Resources.......................................................................................................................... 43 Industries/Companies ........................................................................................................ 47 Climate Change ................................................................................................................. 57 Abortion & Adoption ........................................................................................................... 59 Animals .............................................................................................................................. 62 Drugs & Alcohol ................................................................................................................. 66 Education ........................................................................................................................... 68 Euthanasia ......................................................................................................................... 70 Feminism ........................................................................................................................... 72 Gambling ........................................................................................................................... 77 Immigration ........................................................................................................................ 79 Ireland & UK ...................................................................................................................... 81 Mental Health..................................................................................................................... 88 Money or Currency ............................................................................................................ 94 Palestine and Israel ........................................................................................................... 96 Parenting ........................................................................................................................... 98 Religion ............................................................................................................................ 100 Safe Spaces .................................................................................................................... 103 Science ............................................................................................................................ 105 Sexual Orientation ........................................................................................................... 108 Space Race ..................................................................................................................... 113 War .................................................................................................................................. 115 Weapons.......................................................................................................................... 117 Whistleblowing ................................................................................................................. 120 Credit ............................................................................................................................... 122 My Ideology Page 2 Politics I suppose I should start off by saying everything within this ideology is my politics so you need to read all my opinions on all topics to grasp it all. However I wanted to share my political position and explain more about how I think a government should work first of all for each country but with a vision of, hundreds or even thousands of years in the future, there being one massive government that is responsible for every human being on Earth, protecting them from all issues and ultimately trying to reduce physical and mental harm on all human beings and all other life on planet Earth where humanly possible, including preserving or protecting the planet itself. Ok so let’s get a look at the political compass and you can do your own test here also (There are lots so google it). My position is the exact same place as Gandhi and Mandela, which may then give you the reasons why I think the way I do as their opinions are known throughout the world, although they had religious beliefs and I don’t. In my opinion as well there are many factors, I mention some on the racism page to for example, that lead a person to where they fall on this compass. If I give just a few examples as, formation of the brain in the womb, your parents/friends opinions, cultural events you go to through life (sometimes not by choice) and education (especially in countries where the education is heavily dictated by the government, North Korea as an example, in the UK it can be but mostly you can study anything and be open minded). Religion for example can dictate what your mind set might be and many more things as I am sure you know. Another thing that must be said is the picture below is a representation of someone else’s opinion I found on google. Everyone has different opinions on where these people would sit on the compass but I find this one to be the closest to what I believe, so please see below; My Ideology Page 3 So my position like I said is basically around Gandhi and Mandela mostly in most subjects but varies, it can go to authoritarian left as well depending, although I don’t want to be authoritarian, I feel like I am forced to be because of the far left and far right. However as I said above everyone has different opinions on this, so for example I have seen the far right say that you are a Nazi if you landed on the exact same spot as me, which is ridiculous as we don’t want to harm anyone and the Nazi’s wanted to harm anyone who was different to them, to name a few examples, bone structure, nationality, religion, sexual orientation, hair and eye colour, poor or wealthy. All things a human being has no control, well except religion when you reach the age of reason, and if your country has the death penalty for blasphemy then you better agree forever. Everyone with any education knows that all the above examples cannot be controlled by any individual, so the far right want to harm others for things you have absolutely no control over. Whereas people in my position want everyone in the entire world to have a global standard of living, treated the same, reduced as possible physical and mental harm, no poverty. So you can see a clear separation of opinion here. Now we have dealt with that, what do I think all governments on the planet should be like? Well apparently giving the fact there can be multiple variations in humans and chance of how their brain evolves and all the above examples there can never be two countries who are the same as each person in power has their own opinions or ideology of how the world should be. Obviously I think mine is the best and so do they as you would, but, can this be changed? Can we make it so that every government must have a certain list of things they must achieve for their people or they simply cannot have power, meaning all the other countries come together to remove anyone who does not achieve certain standards, below is what I think the basic package should begin to look like; Law – Basic universal law, please see law & security page for more detail. So basically a set ideology of justice for all crimes that will be followed all over the world, no religious doctrines will be considered. Housing – Government provides enough housing for every citizen who decides to come and live there, as everyone can move around freely. This may include electricity for free as we start to move into more clean and renewable energies. So homelessness does not exist, unless a person wants to live outside by their own choice. Food – We should find a basic universal list of what the body needs daily/weekly to survive, may differ between scientific discoveries over time, and provide that to every citizen daily as standard using food sources which have no resource issue, so basically like fruit and veg that will never run out as long as we have an environment which can grow these. Please see resource page Resources – See resources page for more detail, but all resources are shared between each generation. Take petrol as one an example, this is a resource which may run out one day so the world must use it in small parts for each generation and calculate how long that will last mankind before we need to find more on other My Ideology Page 4 planets for example. Although try and move away from non-renewable energy where possible all together to make the planet last longer for us. Water – Pretty much the same as food and see resources above. Transport – provided to everyone, especially between home and education building, this is providing you physically go to a school or college in the future, and all countries come together to ensure all places with humans in them are connected somehow, be that via train, car, bus, plane, futuristic travel. Holidays and other personal vacations remain the same as just now. Health – No insurance companies, all countries provide free health care to all as standard. Only insurance for death or critical illness or home and contents. All pharmacy prescriptions are free and mental health care provided. Technology shared between all countries as standard and the free sharing of information in any advancements in technology or medicine for example. Religion – Please see religion page but briefly this must eventually die out and no religion taught at all to future generations. Abortion – Please see abortion/adoption page. This should be a choice of the parents only and there can be a cut-off point where abortion cannot happen and adoption takes over, if chosen by the parents as another option to them. Gay marriage – Please see sexual orientation but this should not even be getting debated as long there is no physical or mental harm then the government cannot intervene at all. Education – Provided for free, basic package until 16 then study whatever you want after that age. The age is just an example. Please see education page Physical and mental health – Ensures this is reduced for all living species at all costs. With a view to be completely erased where possible. Gender Identity – I believe there should be an age where you can’t do anything physical to the body just in case you grow up and have a change of heart but from a certain age, like gay marriage says, as long as there is no physical or mental harm then governments must allow this, potentially free of charge where it effects your mental health too much after a certain age. My Ideology Page 5 Guns/weapons – For me no citizens should have guns at all or allowed access to them. Please see gun/weapons page for more in depth discussion. Death Penalty – Only in certain extreme circumstances. See death penalty page for this Birth control – Free of charge including other products for woman in public places. Safe Spaces – Absolutely should be provided by all companies and buildings. Please see mental health page and safe spaces page as well Euthanasia – Once all scenarios have been explored with mental health professionals and other professionals relevant to their reason then yes it can be allowed. War – In my opinion we should never need to go to war with anyone so it should not exist freeing up a huge budget for all to make sure this ideology can work, along with other things. Minimum Wage, basic income – Yes every person should receive a basic pay depending on circumstances. Multiple different packages everyone slots into. Please see currency page Taxes – Tax the rich, people who work and companies more, worldwide standard payments. Equal Pay – This should not even be discussed, its 2021 as I write this, of course they should. Corporate Tax – Tie in with two above. Welfare – Basic standard package to all humans Drugs – Pharmacy drugs free and anyone who gets an addiction. Please see drugs and alcohol page Currency – Eventually move to a planet currency and potential to remove money altogether. Social Media – Everyone connected and all information free to all humans, there can be no restrictions on information by any country. My Ideology Page 6 Voting system – Move to online, one vote per human, device on the law page might explain this. Science – Always adapt to the most up to date scientific point of view. Nato – Everyone together to make the reduction mental and physical harm more possible each day. To help those in need from far right/left groups Terrorism – Surely goes away when we end racism, war and nationalism and have world cultures, no guns, no hierarchy structures and no religion. Controlled by groups like Nato and the UN, as well as the groups like the red cross. The world structure, basically the world government ensures that every country complies with the list above and puts pressure on them to do so, eventually leading to the demise of nations and one place called “Earth” with no countries, potentially thousands of years in the future, which when we eventually have to leave this planet, will happen anyway regardless of your opinion, so we might as well work towards this now to get used to it, please see space page; The world Government Every Country Now I am not stupid, I understand everything you have read above and all expansions of them, in this lifetime, is totally unachievable, and especially given all the topics of discussion within all my ideology all rolled into one. What this is, is what I would call, a future vision for humans in terms of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of years in the future but this is what we must all work towards daily. The more people in my opinion who come on board with my ideology then you slowly see change throughout each generation over a long period, which might be too late for some resources, due to greed mainly. What we don`t need is more people saying this will never happen because then it won’t and you will be right, but with effort humans can achieve anything, especially when they all come together for a common cause. This can be a in a bad way as above, Nazi’s (who want to kill people with any differences), or my way where everyone is protected from physical and mental abuse regardless of differences. I suppose there can be happy mediums as well. I would probably mostly describe myself as a democratic socialist, although not 100%, which is described well in the picture below. To give you an example of some other famous democratic socialists would be Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela, Alexandria My Ideology Page 7 Ocasio-Cortez, Michael Parenti, Owen Jones (UK). This is just to name a few, although I am sure you can research more. I would say though that regardless of where you come on the left/right scale, ultimately all five categories splits in two as well, with either religious or not, so that makes ten. Although me, and Mandela might have similar moral ideas, he was working from fictional doctrines, I work with science and logic or evidence. So it will create clear differences of opinions in some areas. In order to see my full political views and the reasons why I think them, you will need to read pretty much every page to get a sense. I would end though with saying that most people see my views as being totalitarian, I would say regardless of your political views, we all can be accused of this. Only the centre left is the best in my opinion because everyone benefits. All the other ones have extreme anger against someone, which ultimately leads to anger and more death, maybe except dead centre political views. So the centre left actually plan on everyone receiving what they need daily and reduced physical and mental harm throughout life and where possible, even if you’re the furthest away from my political views, the far right for example. Although for the far right I usually take a more authoritarian position on. In my own country of Scotland I vote for the SNP as I agree with just about everything they do, however not everything. My Ideology Page 8 Capitalism / Socialism / Communism So the best place to start off with this topic is to ensure everyone knows at least the basics of what each mean and the fact each refer to how businesses or companies should run in your country. I have also added a few other points I wanted to discuss so gave brief descriptions on them as well. So please see below a brief description of these ideologies; 1) Capitalism - is an economic system in which private individuals or businesses own capital goods. The production of goods and services is based on supply and demand in the general market—known as a market economy—rather than through central planning—known as a planned economy or command economy. The purest form of capitalism is free market or laissez-faire capitalism. Here, private individuals are unrestrained. They may determine where to invest, what to produce or sell, and at which prices to exchange goods and services. The laissez-faire marketplace operates without checks or controls. Today, most countries practice a mixed capitalist system that includes some degree of government regulation of business and ownership of select industries 2) Socialism - Socialism is a populist economic and political system based on public ownership (also known as collective or common ownership) of the means of production. Those means include the machinery, tools, and factories used to produce goods that aim to directly satisfy human needs. Communism and socialism are umbrella terms referring to two left-wing schools of economic thought; both oppose capitalism, but socialism predates the Communist Manifesto, a 1848 pamphlet by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, by a few decades. In a purely socialist system, all legal production and distribution decisions are made by the government, and individuals rely on the state for everything from food to healthcare. The government determines the output and pricing levels of these goods and services. Socialists contend that shared ownership of resources and central planning provide a more equal distribution of goods and services and a more equitable society. 3) Communism - Communism is a political and economic ideology that positions itself in opposition to liberal democracy and capitalism, advocating instead for a classless system in which the means of production are owned communally and private property is non-existent or severely curtailed. 4) Marxism - Marxism is a social, political, and economic philosophy named after Karl Marx. It examines the effect of capitalism on labour, productivity, and economic development and argues for a worker revolution to overturn capitalism in favour of communism. Marxism posits that the struggle between social classes—specifically between the bourgeoisie, or capitalists, and the proletariat, or workers—defines economic relations in a capitalist economy and will inevitably lead to revolutionary communism. My Ideology Page 9 To me the key difference, and why I added this, between this and socialism is the far left want or would use violence to achieve this. Whereas a part socialist like myself does not want to resort to violence but instead push for this through government. Although recognise it may take much longer to achieve. 5) Peace Divided - A peace dividend is an economic boost a country will get from a peace that follows a war. In theory, at that time the government can afford to reduce defence spending and reallocate the money to domestic policy priorities. This assumes that the money recouped from defence spending is generally used for the good of society and human or sustainable development; projects that involve new housing, education, and healthcare, for example. 6) Anarchy - A state of disorder due to absence or non-recognition of authority or other controlling systems. Absence of government and absolute freedom of the individual, regarded as a political idea I personally don’t agree with the full removal of authority but use it in a different way as my law and security page suggests. Ok now I have taken a few descriptions from online, please read as much as you can about each and become better educated on them all as much as possible. You will start to see there are more ideologies than the above but I have taken the most or more frequently used or practiced. My opinion though, as you probably seen on the political page is that I am mixed between them all except capitalism and for good reasons as I will explain. Although one positive about some capitalist societies now a days is that the governments are starting to step in more to influence companies in certain ways. I.e. use of foods scientifically proven to harm humans, but not enough in my opinion. However it’s still a slow process which is being slowed down due the fact the owners of each company know it will spell the end of their free reign of terror. Basically capitalism is a hierarchy structure (See hierarchy structure page) where you at the top create as much jobs and products as possible, however profit from each one, given each employee just enough to keep them happy and coming back as a modern slave, filling their heads with propaganda that as a working class person they are somehow better than those who don’t work, also seeing yourself as above those lower in the structure. All while you get to live a fabulous life style which is even way beyond the reaches of the people you employ. The company then has the option to pay their money into a country with the least amount of tax, ensuring it does not even need to support the lower class of any country they settle in. This system also generates narcissists to position themselves with those at the top, knowing justice is dealt with internally, allowing them to ultimately treat others, lower class in that internal structure, as they want and get away with it. I suppose this is why in my political page I said there should be a world government and rules as all countries would have you taxed the exact same to benefit those who can’t work or lost their job in order for us all to live a basic standard of life. My Ideology Page 10 Capitalist societies also get to create any product without a scientific inspection of what it can do to the, planet, body, other life long term or short term. So you can take as much fossil fuels as you like without checking to see if the planet will end up like Venus and all life will die, cause cancer due to pollution, cause major earthquakes. Simply because it create jobs and wealth for everyone in one or two generations. So it thinks in the more short term rather than long term. Let’s take another couple of examples; Let’s take the soft drink/sweets market who load their products with sugar so it tastes nice and consumers will buy it to make them a billionaire or a living. One thing I remember thinking is even the smallest businesses who use sugar in their products should be competing to see who can make the healthiest food, not the best tasting. While people are dying and becoming diabetics, seeing a rise in hospital admissions. However, I happen to love chocolate, especially after dinner, and even the sugary kind. Although what I do understand is that because it’s available to me and has been since birth, that’s why I want it. If it was not then I would not miss it and everyone’s body would be better off for it. So my point being that a government must make these tough decisions and essentially force the planet to be healthier for future generations. This same thinking then can be applied to many more things, the slaughtering or genocide of animals and fish for example. Please see resources page for more on this. You can even think about this from a bacteria point of view as well, let’s think about the planet Earth and its diversity of life and ever evolving system. Well I don’t know if you know this but your body has billions of other living organisms on it. Who evolve and shape your form, sometimes even by what you eat. When sugars first arrived there was basically a war of cells in your mouth having to adapt to the new human diet and still is to this day. This is the types of things not considered by non- scientific thinking governments, religion or company/businesses. To use one other quick example, in terms of needless jobs and this slow evolution of production. Let’s take everyday house hold electrics or broadband, computers. Companies produce these knowing that they can produce more advanced versions but don’t to release them yearly or every few years to keep you buying and competing while they make huge profits. Creating a clear division or class structure, these companies slightly add on small features each time making it just that little bit better than the last generation. Why don’t they all just work together to continuously have the most advanced technology going out all the time and those who lose their job because of this go into a standard benefit package anyway, provided mostly by the companies who still are working on advancements in all areas. Basically when we moved on from coal for example, we could not do this overnight as people would lose their job, so we continued to use it simply because we had no idea what to do. Well a basic plan for those not working answers this question and allows you to advance in to new ideas that are better for humanity quicker. My Ideology Page 11 All those that lost their job could even get work on the new thing that replaces it or have a package anyway that allows them to still pay everything they need and have everything the body needs delivered to them. Please see mental health page which would explain how to live like this, especially using the pandemic as an example here. You will quickly find out I am not a fan of capitalism and hierarchy structures within humans, although like everything they do have a few advantages but I think mostly disadvantages. You will see from those other pages that I don’t think we should have a competing market and that all brands should come together in most categories to achieve a common goal. Which is making sure all living things have what they need and give less of a care to profit and essentially stealing from your fellow humans. I think one good thing to come from competing markets though is the advancement of each company, for some. So if you take the space race as one example where if you have two companies in different countries then they will naturally compete to build better space suits and rockets to make sure they do everything first. Which is good for mankind and in terms of advancing but not all companies can be branded the same. Take shampoo for example, do we really need a million different kinds or can we discover the best recipe for your hair and include them in a basic package for all. And instead of having a thousand different brands with human factories, you have all them come together and make a new shampoo and distribute this to all humans weekly/daily e.g. I mean, taking into consideration your head, like the rest of your body, is its own planet with millions of life. So what is also best for them to evolve as well? This goes for everything that goes into or on our body. I think a good way to conclude this, although everything can be expanded on and a lot more examples used, is that the government should be responsible for challenging things that all companies are doing that are causing major physical or mental harm to all humans and animals. It should also think about the health and wellbeing of living things and where necessary, make the harsh decisions to completely stop what we don’t need to be doing to survive. As I said above, I think capitalism creates companies where humans go into hierarchy structures which instantly separates everyone. You will see the right, mainly, especially narcissists, join companies and the first thing they do is befriend those in the highest positions so they can get away with their narcissistic behaviour and ultimately leads to causing mental health issues in others and getting away with it. Especially even to people like me who questions their behaviour. So of course these types of humans who see themselves as greater than the rest of the company will want the capitalist society to flourish. Mainly these would be the people you have to convince to change to a new structure, good luck with that. With their lack of empathy they will look to other countries to exploit cheap labour and resources. Some countries already recognise this issue and are starting to question if narcissists should get top positions as it becomes a game to them, I will treat those who I can benefit from good but those at the very bottom I won’t. My Ideology Page 12 Right and Left Ok so the way I see it is there are actually five categories, far right, centre right, centre, centre left and far left. All with different ideologies and as usual, giving the fact the world is completely random and it’s a simple game of chance, everyone can be on different ends of the scale on different topics and sometimes at different points of their life. However, there can also be people who sit in the one category for every view they have, but usually the way you’re categorised is where mostly you fit. So if I asked you 20 questions and 12 or 13 where more centre right then you would fall there, even though your other 7 answers could be left, centre or far right. I think another thing to assume is that if you’re centre left like me then you might be more sympathetic to far left ideology and the same as a centre right with the far right. Although it completely depends on the topic and what happened in a particular scenario for example. In my opinion a government and especially police or army should be dead centre and actually try to bring the far left and far right to a more central position and help stop both being violent. I must then say, showing my bias to the far left here, is that if we did stop the far right then or move them away from their angry ideology then the far left would not exist, as in my opinion they’re simply trying to defend others against the far right ideology mostly and move humanity forward, however trying to do this in a quicker more violent way sometimes. This page will relate to my political page where you will get a sense of the political scale. Although here I wanted to go more in depth on what is within each of the five categories and that also might give you a sense of where you fall and I want to talk about my opinions on each mostly. I should say that as usual it’s hard to categories things as everyone has different opinions, so if I said all racists are far/centre right then some would not agree for example, and I would agree with the centre right but maybe not the far right as they genuinely see themselves as superior to others, especially and not limited to, people with differences the person has no control over. If I give a basic description below though that you can google; Far right - Far-right politics, also referred to as the extreme right or right-wing extremism, are politics further on the right of the left–right political spectrum than the standard political right, particularly in terms of being anti-communist, authoritarian, ultranationalist, and having nativist ideologies and tendencies. Some example would be Nazi’s, Ku Klux Klan and nearly all death squads that have risen all over the world. Also include neo-fascism, neo-Nazism, the Third Position, the alt-right, racial supremacism, and other ideologies or organizations that feature aspects of ultranationalist, chauvinist, xenophobic, theocratic, racist, homophobic among more like anti global warming. Centre Right - Centre-right politics (British English) or center-right politics (American English), also referred to as moderate-right politics, lean to the right of the political spectrum, but are closer to the centre than others. I think are more sympathetic to the far right but are a lot more intelligent than them by a long way and understand the importance of the far right to keep the social system at play they take advantage of everyday. They want a more capitalised world so that they can keep a social system to benefit the upper My Ideology Page 13 class and themselves, including the over use of resources to those in upper classes and less to lower classes. The right and far right are also more cultural with an ancient ideology where they fail to change from and don’t like it being challenged. Usually need to feel higher in status or have higher wealth to function. They will use the far right as a tool to push back left ideology so they slow any change longer which might affect their hierarchy structure to have power longer. Centre – Centrism is a political outlook or position that involves acceptance and/or support of a balance of social equality and a degree of social hierarchy, while opposing political changes which would result in a significant shift of society strongly to either the left or the right. In my opinion the police, government & army for example, in terms of its agenda, should sit here for all countries. But given the fact they can all be made up of individuals in all categories makes it tough to achieve. Centre Left – also referred to as moderate-left politics, are political views that lean to the left-wing on the left–right political spectrum, but closer to the centre than other left-wing politics. Those on the centre-left believe in working within the established systems to improve social justice. The centre-left promotes a degree of social equality that it believes is achievable through promoting equal opportunity. The centre-left emphasizes that the achievement of equality requires personal responsibility in areas in control by the individual person through their abilities and talents as well as social responsibility in areas outside control by the person in their abilities or talents. Oppose the gap between the rich and poor and thinks everyone should be treated the same in terms of social status for example. Far Left – There are different definitions of the far-left. Some scholars define it as representing the left of social democracy while others limit it to anarchism, socialism, and communism (or any derivative of Marxism-Leninism). In certain instances, especially in the news media, the term characterizes groups that advocate for revolutionary anti-capitalism and anti-colonialism. Extremist far-left politics can involve violent acts to protect their ideology, so can the right, and the formation of far-left militant organizations meant to abolish capitalist systems and the upper ruling class. Far-left terrorism consists of groups that attempt to realize their radical ideals and bring about change through violence rather than established political processes. The centre left however, would agree but want change on a nonviolent way, so do it in a political way, or within existent companies that could take generations to achieve, whereas the far left want it changed now. They obviously don’t like the right wing ideology and maybe even the centre left for not wanting to use violence to push agendas. So for me this is similar to the far right on the centre right, they want to use violence to push their superiority, whereas the far left want to use violence to push equality and use of hierarchy structures or social classes. They are essentially anti-neo-fascism, anti-neo-Nazism, anti-racial, anti-chauvinist, anti- xenophobic, anti- racist, anti-homophobic. Although the funny thing is, so are centre left, some central and even some centre right. My Ideology Page 14 Religion – Ok, you might be wondering why religion is here, but I wanted to say that on the religion page it will show you what can happen, or the differences in people, who are religious but fall in each of the categories above. The difference in their behaviour at least and views. You will see examples of this on a few pages. Essentially though you will use and interpret fictional doctrines to justify why your ideology is correct and this can lead to not everything being included. Whereas some use science or evidence. For a quick example, If you’re Muslim and you’re far right politically then you will be more likely to take part in religious brutal acts (i.e. like circumcision, blasphemy), and think that Muslims are the superior religion and all else should die or be harmed, maybe even your own far left Muslims who try and stop you, although, if you’re Muslim and far left then you will want to stop that far right person from thinking like that and want to harm them or bring it to an end, also, may want to change the religion away from ancient traditions to more modern ways. If you’re Muslim and centre left you will understand why the far left want to stop far right Muslims harming others but you will want peace and no one to have violence due to your religion and be open minded to change within the religion. The centre right would be more sympathetic to the far right Muslims but would see a class system within all Muslims (understanding why far right see themselves as superior) and want to align themselves with those at the top for social status as well as keeping the ancient traditions of the religion going with everyone. A centre Muslim will look at all this and think, “Why can’t you just be Muslim without all the above scenarios” and help to try and control it all. I think also to bring racism in here, you could be a far right religious person who wants to harm others of a different religion but actually you could be left on skin colour, meaning you don’t necessary care about skin colour, or the same with nationalism, but you still want to harm them simply because they support a different religion. I think usually though they go hand in hand with most people, or more likely to be. So if you hate and want to harm because of different religion then you are more likely to think the same on other differences. This same logic can be applied to all religions and a number of other topics, political issues and companies for that matter. The whole planet is run the same. Brett Weinstein – Again, you might be wondering why I am randomly adding Brett Weinstein in here but I don’t know if you heard him on the Joe Rogan Experience? Anyway, he mentions that a government, America only I think, that it would be a good idea to have two presidents in the country. One who is centre left and one who is centre right to sort of try and bring a balance to the country that suits everyone and get that more central approach. Obviously you should go and watch it on Spotify to see what was actually said but I thought it was a good idea and should be applied everywhere, in all countries. Although my idea of a world government would try and put something like this in place in all countries anyway with it being more central. Capitalism/communism/socialism Again like every other thing in the world you can look it from the different categories. So look at North Korea for example, most people say this is a communist/socialist country, however I am a small socialist and communist thinking person but I don’t want there to be a certain class structure (Bit of capitalism in NK to), I don’t want everyone to be force fed education, propaganda and doctrines, I don’t want people to be killed for escaping my My Ideology Page 15 country, I don’t want everyone to follow one family forever and go over kill with the praise for it, I don’t want to pretend to my people that there is a huge threat so that I can spend money on a rocket rather than my own people. This is to me seems very authoritarian far right So basically can these three things, Capitalism/communism/socialism, can also be done in different ways depending on your leaders thinking. So a centre left communist world would be dramatically different to a far right communist world, or is a far right communist country achievable, is that North Korea? As usual then it’s more complicated than you think, the far right for example have a tendency to paint everyone with the same brush, even though there can be many different outcomes and examples, or randomness. Conclusion In my opinion though the far right just in terms of emotions first, experience anger and jealousy more than any other category. Maybe this comes from them supporting capitalism but never actually reaching the upper class social status the centre right do. I think I mention this in the racism page also, they seem to hate anyone who is different to them and for things you have no control over, the far left effectively act in defence of these groups of people against the far right initial aggressor. You can see an example of this on my UK & Ireland page where I see England as the initial aggressor for power and the rest in defence of that. Quick examples of the far right hating for reasons out with another’s control; Homophobic/LGBTQ+ – Please see sexual orientation page. This is decided at birth in the womb with the formation of the brain and sexual organ. Sometimes the two don’t align or see eye to eye due to cell formation. For example, you can have a penis but the brain formed as a female and vice versa. Racist – Please see racism page. The colour of one’s skin is determined by evolution and how close or far away from the sun you are and environment. Gender – Again, determined by its chromosome make-up at conception Nationality – You can’t help where you were born or have any control over this as all above That’s just a couple of example but you can start to see their whole ideology is because they either are not intelligent enough to grasp that people don’t have control over their gender, skin colour, nationality, sexual preferences and religion. Or they do know this but as they’re angry and violent by nature, and hate the knowing of death, feel like they need an excuse to be violent and then have some sort of excuse to back up their actions when queried about it? I don’t understand their actions though as you can tell, when large groups of people are murdered abroad it seems to be ok as longs as it was not them. They seem to not mind violence of any kind to anyone different to them in anyway. I think the centre right understand that they can use the right to spread propaganda to them which keeps them doing all the above and in turn can then be used to keep their own social status above them and everyone else. By making the far right you then keep far left busy as well, while you plunder all resources and keep the social status and power within My Ideology Page 16 your capitalist structure. Giving you the best life while everyone else suffers essentially, because of your far right sympathy and your own narcissistic nature, this fact does not bother you as you care more about social status and are more selfish thinking. Sometimes I think the difference between the far right and centre right is that the centre right will make decisions from a business point a view which leads to killing millions sometimes and not care because it does not affect you, because the centre right don’t need to see it, so it does not bother them. Whereas the far right want to be part of the killing and harm. The centre left obviously want all humans to be in the same social class and everyone on the planet to have a basic standard of life without harm of any kind where possible. Due to their intelligence and not understanding the right are sympathetic towards the left and their ideology to try and defend the humans who suffer from far right and centre right ideology. However don’t agree with the violence used to achieve this from the far left. The centre right benefit from this as well though as then progression is slowed down and they benefit longer then. The far left use violence to try and stop capitalist structures within governments and are branded by the far right and centre right as terrorists, even though they can see the control system over them and the far right which keeps a social class in place, and are in fact the initial aggressors, so of course the right will want to brand them as a terrorist to keep the far right hating them. The far left will also use violence to stop the far right from harming others due to things they have no control over. All in all the far left have the belief they’re defending themselves and others from this far right violence and they‘re also trying to speed a long human progression. It is also important to say that on the far left or centre left, if their family and friends for example is harmed or dead due to the far right ideology or because of a governments social structure then they’re likely to seek revenge for this, where as a centre left might go after the individual responsible only, the far left won’t care and actually take on a more far right role, in terms of now not caring about others and willing to kill anyone to achieve some sort of revenge/justice, essentially trying to speed up the progression of change with violence. This in turn is a perfect opportunity for the right to use a far left thinker for their own ideology and agendas as well, so if you’re far left on this mission of revenge then a far right or right will use that opportunity to have you kill any group they hate, that’s different to them. I think though that both the far right and far left are more likely to group up with their own kind to achieve their own agenda, so a far right person will find another far right person and instantly want to cause chaos together and feel happy doing it and similar with the far left. This can lead to very large groups though which ultimately creates the Nazi’s, in far right terms anyway, for example, where you now have enough people to essentially educate and force your ideology on others to achieve your agenda. The same goes for the centre right, although they will be grouped together at the top of ladder on a yacht extracting all of Earth’s resources from underneath us all, literally. Trying to create a better world for their friends at the top only. Whereas the centre left will be protesting all of the above, with nonviolence of course, taking them an age to achieve the change necessary for society and the planet. My Ideology Page 17 In terms of my own beliefs, I think just watching the far right being violent and understanding their aggression over nothing as well as the centre right exploiting everyone for their own benefit, makes my anxieties worse for example, which can see this expand into the mental health page as well. I think having the centre right above you in your company, you work for, can cause stress due to the fact you know you have to listen to that person and knowing they’re getting high off the power of control of the hierarchy structure. Although having another centre left above you can be the perfect thing. Whereas a far right or centre right might like that authority person above them as they may respect that. So should companies recognise this and move you around to suit as a more central idea? I will talk more on this in the safe spaces and hierarchy structures page. I also think that because of the far right and right it’s the sole reason why mankind can’t move as quickly as it would like on things. They want to hold on to ancient traditions, cultures and buildings and refuse to believe in things like climate change or science because of their own ignorance to educate themselves, or, although the centre right are well educated they see money, social status and resources as worth more to them than the Earth being here outside their lifetime as why should they care? They will be dead. I think Christopher Hitchens sums this up well when asked about, why he spends a lot of time refuting god. He says “He is trying to generate an opposition to theocracy and its depredation internationally. To help people in Afghanistan, Somalia, Iran and Israel resist those who sincerely want to in compose the destruction of civilization, and sincerely believe they have god on their side to do so”. He then continues to say something he, “finds repulsive about religion, saying that with a large part of itself it clearly wants us all to die, it wants this world to come to an end, you can tell the yearning for things to be over. Whenever you read any of its real texts or listen to any of its real spokesmen and not the pathetic apologists who sometimes mascaraed for it. There was a famous spokesman in Virginia who spoke about this, about the rapture that says those of us who have chosen rightly will be gathered to the arms of Jesus and everyone else who has not can go straight to hell…. If you don’t believe there is going to be an apocalypse or going to be an end then you’re not really a believer. They don’t want heaven cramped!” He says, “you can tell this when you hear the extreme Muslims talk, they cannot wait for death and destruction to overtake and overwhelm the world, and a final solution. When you look at the Israeli settlers, paid for often by American tax dollars, to steal enough land from other people and get all the Jews into the Promised Land and all the non-Jews out of it then finally, they will be worthy for the return of the messiah, and there are Christians in many countries who consider it their job to help this happen so that Armageddon can occur. So that the painful business of living, studying civilization, trying to inquire learning and knowledge, health and medicine can all be scrapped. So the cult of death can take over, this to him was a hideous thing. It’s a hatful idea and a hatful theory and should be opposed in our daily lives. Where there are people who sincerely want to ruin the good relationships between nations, countries and tribes. These people openly say that they love death more than they love life, and bet that with god on their side they’re right about that. Those people say we can’t be moral without big brother or without a totalitarian permission. We can’t be good to each other and must be afraid and love someone who we fear. Which is the essence of slavery and a master to slave relationship. They know that death is coming and can’t wait to bring it on, this is evil!” My Ideology Page 18 I think all of this is true, only I would say that those who think like that are the right or far right from each religion only and a basic practice and understanding of the right in general. I can prove that an existence where everyone can be treated equally and educated to certain level to try and stop this right way of thinking can be achieved as I am writing it right now. Although it is totalitarian also, it is the only one that helps everyone on earth avoid physical and mental issues as much as possible and wants mankind to at least and attempt to live forever and jump from universe to universe if needs be. No other ideology does this. So to me the fact that the right see the world as a thing that will end along with their life and the existence of mankind eventually (Which very well may happen). Leads them to hate and not see a point to life other than take everything I need for me and my own and that’s it, with no regards to others suffering. Maybe this is why they make up things like “Heaven”, to make them think they might be wrong and stopping them from destroying the world totally. The left however, even though mankind may end one day, still want all humans and living things to have the best possible life’s and share of resources up until that point comes, even if we can’t prevent it. I think also evolution, something else the right don’t believe in, although it has enough evidence. Will also stop the right as the brains on the left are the new more intelligent brains and theirs is the old brains trying the catch up. It will eventually. Totalitarian Ideology happens; Far right – We have lots of examples here to use but will use the Nazi’s as an example. Imagine they won the war and imagine they take over the world for a second. Imagine they achieve the total genocide of everyone they wanted to kill. So now everyone in the world is now white, blonde hair with blue eyes and think like them. What will start to happen is you would live in a world where the random cell formation and chance starts to kick in, so every baby born from then on, just because everyone in the world is now all the above, will not mean they have a baby who is all the above. Meaning if a baby comes out with brown eyes… “Sorry parents but this baby must die”. Imagine the kid gets to the age of 13 because it did have blonde hair and blue eyes at birth, but then starts to question the world, “oops sorry parents, must be killed”. What kind of world is that really and how long would it last? It just won’t because it’s based on zero intelligence, and that’s just a fact. So the Nazi’s where trying to create a world which is unachievable even if they won. It would be limited to the person in powers lifetime only, or a small amount of time after that until a new leader with new ideas comes along. Centre Right – I would say is what most developed countries live in just now. Where there is this social class structure and half the world is rich and half are poor, meaning still a lot of suffering going on. So welcome to this world, although starting to move more central slowly but surely. Centre – I would say that right now this may eventually where we will all end up hopefully. So if you take Brett’s idea above, which I expand on slightly, will we all eventually have more central thinking governments with more than one leader thinking for both sides and more balanced approach? Hopefully, and this is why in politics page I said I think there should be a world government who is ultimately trying to push this idea on all nations to come more central and would be responsible for stopping any outbreak of too many far right or far left effectively. This should also stop cronyism cultures. My Ideology Page 19 Centre Left – I think the only way to achieve mine would be to have less far right, which I understand can’t happen and will never be achieved, well I have an evolution theory that may or may not happen. So that’s why we want to create a world with better laws and structures in place to best crack down on it as much as possible using non-violent techniques where possible. If you see security and law page then this will give you an idea of the two differences in centre left, being one authoritarian and one not so much. Ultimately I would think mine is the best idea for all living things in my opinion, for them to have the best experience and less chance of violence throughout life. Far left – Are like the centre left but want to use violence and wipe out far right ideology altogether. It may then even use genocidal ideas to achieve this. Which in a way makes them the same as the right? They won’t like that I said that. Mostly in my experience dealing with the far left is that they hate the fact I am willing to be more accepting of the far right, in fact maybe wrong choice of words, I mean be less violent to them and play the waiting game on evolution or mankind’s development for example. So in my opinion the far left don’t even fully agree with the centre left at all. I think if they’re perfect world happened then they may not necessary want to kill everyone like the far right, they would just be more likely to use propaganda and education system to try and achieve a total loss of racism for example. Although when the far right gets too many, then obviously willing to go the extra mile. Your consciousness is just the host within a huge brain that has been created by a random formation of cells in the womb and is sometimes dictated to out with your control by other parts of the brain, so it certainly is not your fault what you become, I believe we can put things in place to try and help or reduce certain things. However, humans have certain rules that, I would say, over 50% agree with, no murder or abuse as much as possible for example or you may be punished for it and maybe even removed from society (prison or other thing similar) to help best protect it where necessary. My way of thinking about this whole thing is ultimately you should be able to think in your head what you want, so even murder, hating people for being a different colour, hating people for being a different nationality or you want to sleep with the neighbours Mrs e.g. Whatever it may be as it’s in your head and bouncing around your consciousness you don’t even have full control over anyway plus no one knows as we can’t read minds. However, what your consciousness does have control over is your ability to keep that in there and not judge because of it or physically or mentally harm because of it. So if you do act on those thoughts then you must receive punishment or some sort of reminder not to again for me. I think to finish up this page, the best idea I have is to take all of the above, have it expanded on to be more accurate to the most scientific reasoning and mostly world recognised to the best point you can. Then teach it to every children within the curriculum. Then they have a breakdown of each category and when they get older will know what category they belong to, although far left don’t want labelled. Obviously teaching them that it’s not necessary wrong or right regardless of what category or label you fall under and certainly your brain, in a way, you don’t have full control over. I believe the right have the old brains and the left have a brain most evolved. Sometimes this may even be by a few cells, but the impact on your thinking can be huge. As the quantum world is mostly random then not two left will spawn another left and vice versa. It My Ideology Page 20 is just a random chance in the womb as the evolution process happens. So some humans can think far back in time and follow that same thing and the other more advanced or forward thinking for example. The right can think their intelligent when they make them and others more money, possessions or achieve cheap labour. Although I think I am intelligent for wanting equality and equal things for all. There is always this constant thing then where the right are so far behind and the left want to move on it creates conflict with both thinking they’re right. We need both though as the right push the left through anger and emotions which leads to change and some wonderful revolutionary things. Although the far left want to push change through violence, remember Ghandi said “An eye for an eye will leave the whole world blind” My Ideology Page 21 Racism First of all this will also relate to Religion, immigration issues or left/right wing ideology, or expand into that, or rather from that. Ok so as humans we believe, due to that fact we found bones in Africa that have the longest age of any other bones found, that life may have originated there. Especially in evolutionary terms, what we or close to what we look like now. “The oldest known evidence for anatomically modern humans (as of 2017) are fossils found at Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, dated about 300,000 years old. Anatomically modern human remains of eight individuals dated 300,000 years old, making them the oldest known remains categorized as "modern" (as of 2018)” As this may be true it does not fully evidence that’s where life actually originated, it could have started in multiple different places on the planet, or, if it did start in Africa then those individuals could have got to Europe/Asia somehow and that’s where we all come from, but what we do know is it has to be one or the other. If we look at both scenarios in more detail as below; 1. Life started in Africa - Meaning the very first humans had a “black/brown” skin tone is my point here, or certainly because of the heat there and when they lose hair, their skin cells and bacteria would have evolved to be more dark in order to deflect some of that heat over time, chimpanzees for example are mostly white except face and hands/feet probably because the hair lets less sunlight through. This also means all white people came from those evolved Africans, but due to evolution and being further away from the sun when some Africans enter Europe, their skin tone changed over time. So basically my main point being that a right wing (Please see right/left wing page) white or Asian racist actually hates his own ancestors, should you not be thankful? And an African racist hates his ancestor’s evolved race. Which would be just plain stupid from all sides and shows a lack of education in my opinion. I am not saying I am the most educated person ever but at least I do some research. What could have also happened in this scenario is that some Africans got to Europe but never came back, so when they evolve to a white skin tone, both sides when they eventually meet up again in the future and more intelligent, now never knew this happened. By the way you can say the same for Asians and the Middle East, both have different temperatures and environments which means evolution affected them differently as well, in terms of the evolution of skin tone and features. So basically we all originated from Africa, were all black at one point, but then due to some Africans at the time managing to migrate north and evolution taking place for them in different environments, we all now look different and never knowing where it began. “But humans are not descended from monkeys or any other primate living today. We do share a common ape ancestor with chimpanzees. It lived between 8 and 6 million years ago. But humans and chimpanzees evolved differently from that same ancestor. Chimpanzees have the widest range of any great ape. Though many populations live in tropical rainforests, they can also be found in woodlands and grasslands spanning from central to western Africa” My Ideology Page 22 2. Humans evolved in different points all over the globe from the common ancestor as highlighted above – If it happened like this, which I must say is unlikely due to the fact most chimpanzees come from Africa, our closest relative. Anyway, it is possible that same ancestor us and chimpanzees share did not only belong to Africa. However, life would have evolved as above determined mainly by the sun and environment at the time. Although could it be Asians evolved from orangutans who are close relatives and are mainly found in Asia, just as an example. But isn’t it funny then how we all look the exact same, in terms of internal organs and bone structure, among loads more. Meaning it had to have been from the same common ancestor? Regardless of point 1 or 2 above being true, at some point in the future humans come to be different in skin tone and features. And then eventually meet each other. This is the point where humans start to question each other. I have always said that if a black left wing person and a white left wing person met then there would be less chance of violence and more chance of acceptance and sharing of resources. Although if one is right wing and more selfish, then they automatically see themselves as being superior and they deserve the resources more then. Also that leads to them being less likely to feel emotion or grieve if they had to kill you for example. I sort of get the start, so if you imagine back when humans where much less intelligent and obviously you may never have seen or even know people of another colour exist yet. So therefore when you first meet one you are hesitant, which I would imagine also might be similar if mankind ever met aliens for example. You would be like, is this person going to harm me or should I have phobias here or not. Please also see left/right wing paper. I would say a right wing person is more likely to want to not take a chance and ensure they prevail, if you like, and kill the other. Which is not exactly bad or good, it’s just a game of chance at that point on how that individual’s brain chose to react. The left wing brain would be more likely to test the water and try and communicate to see what they should do, and obviously if attacked then react potentially, if it’s me or them scenario, then kill to survive or defend themselves. Ultimately the left would try and avoid that scenario as much as possible and try to help instead and if possible to. The brain is obviously a very complex organ which we don’t fully understand but we do understand enough now to see, or, categories (right/left) this more, but not then. I don’t really see either scenario being right or wrong at this particular point in time due to the lack of intelligence by humans at that point in history. Although when we enter the slavery point, to help build empires, land and wealth that is very much wrong as by this point you know most are good people who want left alone. Funnily enough still happens today with the clear gap in wealth and social class. At this point I want to try and tackle the argument of would Asians/Africans do the same to white people if they could have? Asia - I don’t think I know enough about Asian history although I know enough to know they had many dictators and factions/regions who would battle one another for land and power, I think they did try to get as far as Europe a couple times in My Ideology Page 23 history but mostly would fight amongst themselves, and they were the most advanced and intelligent for many years before the west caught up. Although they tried to enter Europe at a point when the west was advanced enough to fight back. If they tried earlier then the west would have surely fallen, Asians obviously never thought about that at the time or knew the size of Earth in general. Meaning their geography skills may not have been us advanced enough to know where to attack or the scale of population in each area they were attacking. So basically they are for me, the most likely to have tried what the white race achieved. Many texts confirm the advancement of Asians over the rest of the world, maybe check Wikipedia if you want to study this more? African – The Africans for the most part were more tribal, passing local knowledge to each generation only, and in fact culturally are more known for being more of a happy and accepting species of their surroundings. Never really looking to expand or progress, kind of like a far right person does with culture, they were happy to be as they were and in fact to this day have ancient tribes who do the same. As a normal person or group would though, they were caution when meeting other tribes in Africa and would fight a lot between themselves, especially due to revenge, that never ending cycle. They were not really interested in owning as much resources or land as possible. Only surviving and adapting to their environment. Usually only moving on to find more water or food but never really to gain or steal resources from others, trying to avoid conflict where necessary for the good of the tribe. It would only be when the west came and money was invented some would adopt this thinking. I would say because of all this they were much less likely to ever do as the whites did, because they were also less likely to invent boats for example, to explore and conquer, only to reach food or water would be their main objective, again taking this from online/documentaries on what humans know about their history to date. When the western world however, started to invent and educate on geography. It’s as if their first thoughts were to take over the world and use all of its resources for themselves as they discovered new places. Especially when money or trade and fossil fuels were discovered/invented. This started a right wing culture with the elite, who then ultimately think like this and begin the annexation or annexing. It’s about having all resources for you to live a more expensive life than everyone else in your own lifetime. Sharing some with your own race, and spreading right wing propaganda (the people we are attacking are less than us or bad people who will harm us), so they comply and agree with what you’re doing but ultimately your own goal is to keep most of it for yourself and live a more glamourous life than your own people. Keeping a hierarchy structure in terms of possessions (See hierarchy structure page). And with no regards to the planet or population at that point in history, or even now in fact. The spreading of this propaganda leads to the white race not only seeing Africa as a place to steal resources but to use the people there as a resource as well, meaning slavery, to then use them for sex, torture for pleasure, use to mine resources and fight their battles to win more land and resources on their global mission, which ultimately takes them to the American continent to fight for this land with their new slaves, against the Spanish mostly with South America. My Ideology Page 24 The spread of this propaganda continues today so that if we ever need to attack anywhere then we have enough of our population agreeing to it then it is more likely to go unchallenged and be more accepted, or if it is challenged by the left, you have enough right to fight your battles for you. In fact the African population is still affected by this and ultimately have less and gain less than everywhere else for their labour apart from their now a days elite, who we pay more to accept this and keep this structure in place. What happens though, when the whites start taking all the resources north, is that leads to the Africans and Asians, to start migrating (Please see immigration). I don’t know if the white race expected this at the time but is an obvious outcome that the Asians/Africans would want to come to the place with the most wealth and this started a huge resistance from the right as they stole your land and resources for themselves and not to share it. I think this is what started the elite at the time to start the propaganda and this in turn controls the amount who enter as now the far right mostly, will make your life hell for coming, which obviously leads Africans/Asians to be more hesitant about coming and controls the migration as much as possible. Eventually overtime the left especially and maybe up to centre right, start to question this which slowly, over hundreds of years, leads to today’s society. One other point the far right in each country tend to make is that other people come to steal their jobs and resources. Even though they are victims of annexing or propaganda. Anyway this leads them to believe this being true, me being from Scotland, I will explain briefly from our perspective here although please see UK and Ireland page as well for more detail. Basically the western world has it so good that they have systems in place, and rightly so, for people who don’t work or can’t work to still have an income. The culture here is getting that drinking alcohol from a young age or social life in general can sometimes be more important than studying or educating yourself or going to school, I also understand for some people, due to the random way the brain in the womb develops can see people not being able to be well-educated no matter how much they try, this is not their fault though and can be seen as a disability in some but not others and hence why the systems in place are good. Anyway, due to our low population as well, because we were victims of annexation in the past, and the education issue above, we can’t really as a nation have any choice but to allow more educated people to come in and work as we need more doctors because we can’t produce enough needed. So regardless of your right/left opinions it needs to happen here. I don’t think the far right here understand this though, so basically the country they now want to be in union with are responsible for the fact we need to allow more immigrants in. One more thing we should touch on is attraction to other races, so my left wing brain finds most woman on planet earth as beautiful and is not limited to any race. However, for the far right, do they not? If you are attracted to someone then I would say your brain then is more likely to accept them, or is the far right just angry that they`re attracted to a race they see themselves as more superior to? American issue – Before I continue with this part I know that there is issues with far right Asians and Africans as well, for example in Mongolia there is a far right movement who dress in Nazi outfits and basically attack people from other Asian nations, never mind My Ideology Page 25 whites. Similar stories in Africa also, but I feel due to population the numbers are higher in America and I know a bit more about the history, a huge amount of Africans, Latinos/Hispanic migrated there which deserves more attention in my opinion. Ultimately Europe take over the North America with the help of Africans and, you could say mostly, catholic Spanish take over the South America at a point in history. America becomes a more advance and attractive nation which leads to white Europeans, or the UK mostly to take over. Some South Americans, mostly Spanish, migrating there in to a nation which is already a black/white nation as a very basic description of the history. Obviously after reading all the above you can see how this would lead to issues, especially by the far right or central right at first. The left in all areas would more likely be indifferent about the situation and welcome this fact but due to the violence and gun culture in America, please see “gun culture in America” for more detail, this would lead to the left in each area, mainly due to revenge or defence of their family/friends, to engage in this gang culture, if you like, because in my opinion, when the far right start the killing of each other, this leads to a never ending spiral of revenge and to what we see today, I believe though that the removal of guns, over hundreds of years, would start a slow process of change there, as well as the other issues mentioned in this part of the ideology. One more thing I think is vital is that looking through my opinion I realised I had mostly singled out the far right or central right but to be honest the left can be racist to. I mean I understand that the right think the left are being racist to them for challenging their racism, which I don’t understand at all and makes no sense to me as they’re trying to stop violence against another human being for no reason other than something they have no control over, but, It has been known, and I must say usually only in times of extreme anger, (mainly caused by someone of a different colour harming their family or friend) that the left can in these times go more far right and either use racial slurs to try and degrade the person as a revenge act to make them feel bad for their actions. The difference though between left and right here is that the right will do this for no reason required, it would simply be because they are a different colour only and don’t need a revenge act to spark their racism. Whereas the left would only even think about doing this during extreme anger, especially when a loved one has been killed. If you look at my war page you will see that this is when right wing minded people see an opportunity to recruit the left. Conclusion - I suppose, thinking about human behaviour in general and following on from the last paragraph is that there is many things like racism then, in terms of people having something different to you. As a few examples; so do you have a bigger house than me, better body, longer legs, and bigger car, more money, prettier girlfriend, better job, did you leave 10 minutes earlier than me one day from work? I think you get the point, basically jealousy of all differences between you and another person can be a part of racism, especially if someone of a different colour has a better life than you. My opinion here though is that the right are more likely to hate because of these things in general with no revenge act required, they will be the initial aggressor, whereas the left usually only pick up on this stuff and bring it up on times of extreme anger or for some not at all, ever, especially central minded thinkers. I understand that from the right and left point of view your way of thinking is not entirely within your control sometimes and although the right thinking here needs to be controlled My Ideology Page 26 more, for me the only way of doing that is better politics to try and stop needless physical or mental harm on all species, which is a centre lefts ultimate goal after all. I will finish up by saying that in my opinion the Earth is for all humans and I think all humans should have free reign to go where they like without question or judgement and be treated the same everywhere with no physical or mental harm. In terms of the nationalism problem, we should not see ourselves as any nationality, we should all be “Earthlings” that’s all, but as a centre left I would say that. Also, I made this point earlier as well, some people that develop the need to think their superior can come from pressure (parents, upbringing and politics of the country) Although as someone who is centre left and wants no violence or mental/physical harm to come to anyone then I believe the propaganda, nationalism, politics who defend this needs to stop and punishment for constant aggressive racial behaviour should be more severe. Please see law and security pages to expand on this, but, I think in terms of the far right, given the issue is worse there and in terms of punishment, that as long as the racist thought is in your head then no one knows about it, so that’s fine as how can you be punished unless we have a brain reading device? Anyway it’s when you act on those thoughts and cause mental or physical harm then it should be punished and stopped. Also in order to understand this more it might be worth while looking at or studying yourself – capitalism/socialism/communism, politics or Hierarchy structures and law and security to understand a bit more as they can tie into and effect racism. My Ideology Page 27 Hierarchy Structures You will see from the resources and Capitalism - Socialism – communism a basic understanding of my ideology on this one. A social class is a set of concepts in the social sciences and political theory centred on models of social stratification which occur in a class society, in which people are grouped into a set of hierarchical social categories, the most common being the upper, middle and lower classes. Let’s google a few examples of these; Upper – Upper class in modern societies is the social class composed of people who hold the highest social status, usually are the wealthiest members of class society, and wield the greatest political power Middle – The middle class is a class of people in the middle of a social hierarchy. Its usage has often been vague whether defined in terms of occupation, income, education or social status. The definition by any author is often chosen for political connotations. Lower – In developed nations across the world, the lower middle class is a subdivision of the greater middle class I will give a couple of big examples here that I think show how this system should not be in place. Let’s take the royal family as an example, recently discovering that in fact the queen is not in control in the UK. Back in ancient times the Queen or King was the final say in everything. Now they are a pawn who get told where to turn up and what to say by their own internal company hierarchy structure. Like most companies it has a structure, HR, finance and the likes, you get the picture. It’s actually these people who use the monarchy as a way to make money that they benefit from, so you can forget disbanding the ancient monarchy system here if it means these people will be out a job. That’s probably why the propaganda in the UK and world-wide is the way it is then, money again. The monarchy now then is a propaganda tool to the far right of the country, getting them to buy products for example to keep them in power. Another example is the NHS (Health care) system here, set up as a free health care service for all. What happens when you think of the royal family as above, Kings and Queens probably come to mind? Well here in the NHS you would think surgeons, Dr’s and nurses? Who, if you think about it, are centre left like me on the political scale in terms of its agenda. Meaning when a patient comes in, they don’t care about gender, social class, sexual orientation, colour and many more. They only care about, how they can help, for free, to make you better. However not all people in hospital’s share these same views. When you look at the whole thing there is obviously some more right wing in there who want to exploit and use their knowledge for money and social status, this is the only reason why it’s even considered to go private and have insurance companies like America. Again like the royal family, it is run by HR, finance, essentially heads of service or higher middle class who understand that by changing to private, they can extract more money from society for themselves as most of them now are medically trained. You can start to see a filter down system where the top want to remain there and not share anything to keep it. Also they will spread propaganda to the middle class of hopes of My Ideology Page 28 joining them someday as well as keeping the lower class people so you can tell the middle class, “oh look, you better stay there and work hard or you end up like them, you’re better than them”. The right middle class suck this up like a sponge and continue being a slave to the upper class like we all are. In fact if you look at the Nazi’s as an example here, they convinced everyone that you must kill all Jews and spread this down through the ranks and generation, it then gets to a point where you belittle someone for questioning this idea, like “why would you not want to kill Jews, everyone does it” type of mentality spreads. This is the same with my ideology that questions today’s society, we are asked “Why would you want to question the system”? What this creates though, lower middle class, is them wanting to impress those above to go higher and put petty systems in place to do so and effectively abuse power to belittle those below them when challenged, copying what they see above. More left wing thinking people however are smart and treat everyone the same but again as this is the way the system works, also want to get higher as well, because they realise they need to work this way to better their family’s income and life. They won’t bully others on the journey though, which is a bonus. In my opinion if you’re going to have a system like this then at least make it so no one in each department can befriend anyone in other departments as this leads to bias and not a natural decision, its cronyism basically, which your union and occupational health should not be doing for example as they should have neutral decisions on all things, however, even they will protect the narcissist at the top. If you have narcissists coming in and befriending all these people then they will all just bounce of each other to stamp authority and show a lack of empathy doing so. You could maybe even take the Jimmy Saville story as an example here, that same system, where you can do whatever you want leads to them doing exactly that. We need to take into consideration as well the type of people who get to be the upper class. They most likely come from rich families and are shaped to be the next generation. They then have the money to get any education they want and this leads to them being upper class and making the decisions for the country. Although we as humans must not get mixed up between education and intelligence. Remember the right will see themselves as intelligent if they make a company more profit, which lead to a million deaths, but because of their lack of empathy don’t care and celebrate anyway. Is this intelligence? Or is intelligence trying to make mankind survive for as long as possible including all individuals? Bob Marley would ask, “Do possessions make you rich, or should your riches be life itself?” One thing I can work out though from this is that you can have all the education in the world but still make all the wrong decisions due to greed and selfishness. Which might be a correct decisions for an elite few but not for life or the planet or any group you deem to be insignificant. If you look at my resources page you will see I think all resources should be shared and everyone with a basic standard of life, this will put everyone into the same category. The only difference being you either work or you don’t. Although there would be no need for higher class products to make the middle class and upper class feel more special. My Ideology Page 29 Law & Security This page will link to a lot of other pages. My basic theory to life on Earth is that we should try and reduce the amount of physical and mental abuse to others as humanly possible. I say humanly possible deliberately as we are the ones with the consciousness (apparently) and more advanced species in general in terms of communication and the likes, so how we run the Earth affects everything from our own species survival to other eco systems. So if you view my mental health page you will see my outlook on life is that every issue is viewed on a 1-10 scale for example. So how much mental health issues did you cause and who to and where does that fit on the scale, the exact same with physical harm applies. I think each crime should be categorised in this way and punished in this way depending on where in the scale it sits. To use murder as an example, if you murder someone then you have obviously caused a 10 on physical abuse and to the family a 10 on mental abuse, so you should receive a maximum sentence (25 years in UK but can be changed), I go into more detail in this document as there is many different forms of killing someone and many scenarios. If you steal from a supermarket for example then you have not exactly caused any physical harm or mental harm on any one, but, this could be different to a small business, but you should be ordered to pay it back or return regardless. This is where some of my ideas start to become more futuristic but in modern society, definitely achievable, well depending on the right wing moving on. Ok, so this is the part where instantly half the planet will hate my idea, but here goes, I think all humans, like a phone for example, should have a device on them or inside them (chip for example), which is personal to them, also we could do both. So if you take the mobile idea as an example, they have one phone number throughout life, unique to them. I also think that every single building or house on Earth, going forward, we should make it mandatory that they have cameras everywhere outside and inside the building, maybe apart from the toilets or changing rooms, mostly. So companies like “RING” as an example although there is a few competing products, which should all come together. Create a camera in main lounge areas inside and outside every house built going forward and every house existing today. The same would go for all buildings past, present and new. They provide these security systems that can pick up the device, as below, including improving camera quality overtime, although as it can pick up a device then the quality can take its time to develop. The way this company makes their money is every house, building must pay them a yearly/monthly/quarter subscription for their services. Obviously unemployed get tickets to pay this. So for the sake of evidence the police or authorities will work closely with these companies to complete the law ideology explained below. The idea here would be that the cameras are programmed, and I did IT at college as well as learn programming languages, so probably what led to my thinking, would be to design the cameras to detect your phone/chip. So if we use python as an example, although more programming languages can be used if you google more examples. Some of the things this would do is below; My Ideology Page 30 Camera Would detect device and know who it is Would show your crime Provides investigation team with evidence and all your details about you, including but not limited to, name, address, location, mental history, bank account because of your device Device Would be linked to police/court and provide them with all your details as above Would be a means of communication between the investigation team/court and you. Records voice all day (Only used for investigation purposes, so not listened to all day for privacy reasons, only voice clips that relate to investigations can be used) The reason for all of this is because I think in terms of law and to reduce the amount of physical or mental abuse this is the only way forward. Let’s take a few examples here to show you the power of what we can achieve here in terms of law as below; 1. Homicide – If committed in front of a camera then the person’s device will tell you who it was, then follow my process below. Even if not in front of a camera then where did you find the body, whose device was last in that location then, especially near the time of death? 2. Paedophilia – Any complaints from a minor (under 16 in UK, can be changed) are checked to the exact time and potentially voice recordings listened to. Track who has been there at this time as well as any DNA (Which all humans should provide at birth). Signs of physical harm checked. Please also follow my process as below 3. Rape – As above only 16+ (age can be changed). Also voice recording may provide evidence or stop false allegations. Also see domestic violence in general in case the accused is a partner/husband. 4. Domestic violence – Cameras in and around the house as well as voice recordings. So when complaints come in they are checked and instantly punished if true after investigation. Device can be programmed to detect anyone with an interdict located near or within the agreed zone instantly alarms police until this is lifted, if it is ever lifted. If suspect needs to enter this zone for a good reason then it should be pre- arranged (potential escort) or even shorten the zone to accommodate. Please see process as below also 5. Mental abuse – Again as above any complaints checked via voice recording of time and date of event. This will be judged on a scale level agreed by the world government with potential compensation to victim. This can also work similar to domestic violence with interdicts of people not allowed near another. Please also see below for examples and mental health page. My Ideology Page 31 6. Theft – Any theft should be picked up by cameras and device when reported. You can then instantly send the accused a message demanding the item back or payment made via bank in instalments which is instantly set up via direct debit. If item is too much then claim can be made via crime insurance who the accused then pays back as below process of punishment section. 7. Damage to property – Again like theft above it would be a similar process. 8. Car theft – Again like theft and damage to property above it would be a similar process and because of the device you will know who took it, especially if every car has a device to. 9. Drugs – Please see drug page also. I don’t think drugs should be sold by drug dealers. Instead all addicts should have free drugs with intention to stop and reduce with help. Drugs should be used by professionals only. 10. Assault – When an assault of any kind is committed and reported it is instantly checked and categorised as below. So basically looking at the above, the police just become people who communicate with you via your device and camera company but don’t actually have to come and find you unless you don’t comply they would then just come and get you to bring you in for your jail term by tracking your location. Except for car chases, as an example, as they would obviously need to do pretty much as they do now although you know who is in the car and can communicate with them. So if they get away or are too reckless then you back off and send them their compensation bill along with a sentence and court date/time. Any other damage caused gets billed and punished separately. Now I don’t want to go over every crime, as it’s not my job to, but you can start to see what can be achieved and I think the process for each should be as below; Essentially though even gang violence is stopped or greatly reduced because there is no way to commit a crime without knowing everyone who was there, who will be instantly punished accordingly? So you could still be in a gang and commit a crime but on your drive home or by the time you get home, you could have already what the compensation is along with your court date or jail sentence sent to your device. This may also stop cronyism type structures or narcissists within companies as when you think it has happened to you, the conversations can be listened to and investigated. Process of punishment As I said above with the physical and mental scale, it should be the job of the world government working with relevant professionals to decide where everything falls on the scale and what the punishment should be that all countries governments must follow as a standard, every living person should have crime insurance for any payments or compensation that they will pay back to the insurance company from their basic income or My Ideology Page 32 wage every month, sometimes for the rest of their life depending on the amount; but I can give more examples below; Punishment scale (Can be extended to more than 10) How you work out a standard punishment is below and like I said it would be the world government based on science and all other advice from professionals, not religion in any way, to what the standard would be. I have just given examples which are randomly selected and not necessary where I think they should be. Physical 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Rape Murder £100 £500 £5000 3 No jail month 10 time jail years time Mental 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Assault Murder £500 £5000 Rape 3 month 10 jail years time Compensation and jail time is payed to wherever on the scale your crime falls, which is decided by the world government as standard. When a person commits a crime or accused of one then they should receive a crime number linked to their device. Everything from the evidence, to police reports, hospital reports, social work reports, council reports or anything else should all be linked to this number for the investigation team to decide where on the scale the crime fits if indeed one was committed. If crime committed - Details of crime and punishment sent to individual who then has to work out how compensation (could link directly to crime insurance) will be paid and will also be sent date, times of when to attend court, police station, jail. All of these reports determine where on the scale the crime fits. I should say as science evolves, then the scale overtime could change. Meaning past crimes could be over punished or under punished and anyone over punished should be compensated back by the government for over time spent inside jail or over compensation paid, with money or currency of some kind. And under punished can receive more for their My Ideology Page 33 crime, or maybe it should be a rule that only crimes committed after the date it was changed should receive the new version and not those before. I also have a suggestion on, or have thought about, multiple crimes. So what happens if you are assaulting people like 50 times in your life or murder more than one person or even have a lot of domestic violence offenses (Should be linked to their dating profiles for example for all to see). I think the device would show this straight to the investigation team who then, in my opinion could create another scale from. So should your punishment increase? I touch on this on the death penalty page. Basic example from there; You murder in cold blood and is fully evidenced > 25 years plus compensation to victims family > you come out and kill again > should you then be killed because your next sentence will take you to death anyway and a way to save money and resources? > would this cause mental health issues in the criminals family > should we respect that and let them stay alive forever in jail and then can be visited then by their family? This scenario would be better worked by professionals from many different fields but again a standard package in place to punish this. Homicide Ok so there is loads of different types of homicide as below and I am not an expert, like on all the topics discussed, but as usual I can give opinions and examples of how I think it should work, or my ideology as below; Murder – I touch on this above also, it gets more complicated with multiple murders but ultimately with the device in place then all murders should be solvable and punished accordingly Manslaughter – Would be a lesser sentence and compensation but multiple manslaughters may see this rise, which in turn may lead to a life time sentence anyway when all added up. Justifiable homicide – I am guessing here this might cover self-defence, so someone was coming to kill, harm you and you killed them instead. I think the device would be proof of this and also with cameras everywhere the punishment you decide to give the person can depend on how this is judged. So for example below; The person comes at you with a knife, clear intentions of killing you or at least attempt to but you kill them first in order to stop them from killing you. In my opinion there should be no jail time but free counselling to the persons family should be available or maybe some of the payment payed by you for their mental health. The person just punched you and you decided to kill them or even beat them to a certain point near or close to death, maim or disfigure, then that’s over defence and will have its own category of punishment but will involve compensation to the victim (if alive) as well as them compensating you for their action. War Crime – See war page, there should be none, basically, unless a government does not comply with the world government’s basic package and leads to the physical or mental harm of its citizens, then it should be over thrown. In this case the world army steps in to My Ideology Page 34 remove those in power in the best way possible and with the least harm to civilians. Any crime committed though by the world army’s individuals though, will be dealt with the same as all other crimes. No one is above these laws, not queens, kings, emperors FBI, Secret agencies or even presidents. Euthanasia – See Euthanasia page Capital punishment - See death penalty page Missing People - You can see where there device is, if device was removed then you can see who’s device was last near it at the point the signal went or where you found it. Suicide – One other thing good about the device is that you will see a person’s heart rate and if it stops. Meaning an ambulance can be sent to that person’s device location instantly. Depending on the way they committed suicide this fast response could stop some deaths as well. I also mention suicide in other pages. So if a person has a heart condition and low heart rate, then the team monitoring this in every country will know this and may regard it as normal until obviously it goes to near death rate then emergency services sent. It could even be the device has an impulse sent to the heart to try and restart it? Maybe too far. Paedophilia I find it hard with the cameras in every house (except bathrooms or changing rooms) that these crimes would be happening as much around the world. Especially if every citizen had a device attached to them and your DNA is already on record. However, when it does occur like murder above, it would be more easily solved and punishable. Like murder also it should be punished more if it happens multiple times. Although if you read the “What should happen in jail” section it does expand there for all crimes. I think due to the high nature of mental health troubles caused to the victim, the initial crime for this in the first instance should be much higher. So close to the 25 years for murder. Then follow “What should happen in jail” to see if they eventually get released or not. Rape I think it’s very similar to the above in terms of punishment. I don’t know if the sentence should go to 25 necessary (think it’s up to 12 years in the UK? can be changed) but certainly the compensation money owed should be high for both rape and above topic. Also voice recording may provide evidence or stop false allegations completely. I also touched on it above in terms of what can happen if it was a partner who was accused, in domestic violence sections and below. Domestic Violence Process Marriage can be ended instantly at victims discretion as well as partner being re homed with basic facilities as per standard package ASAP, as well as arrangement for any children agreed between parents, pick up zone might need to be outside interdict zone. If no agreement reached then this will be advised by professionals. Any parent who are deemed with proof of potentially causing physical or mental harm to their child will not My Ideology Page 35 have access until deemed otherwise by professionals at a later date, so if both parents can fall into this then other family members are asked to keep the children or adoption considered but please see adoption page for more details. You will see from above there is a better way to deal with this, especially with the device around. It means woman (and men) don’t need to be as scared to remove their partner from their life anymore and worry about consequences from them. The device would tell the police if the person with an interdict enters a danger zone for example, unless previously arranged with police or other professional, especially if they need to enter to collect or bring back their child as an example. Mental Abuse This is a tricky subject because first of all we need professional’s in this area to tell us what would constitute an impact on one’s mental health, and, this will most likely be subject to change over time as we learn more, especially about the brain. So like a system as above what needs to be punished and what does not. So if I call you a “prick” once would that be enough, I don’t think so, but if I do it over and over again everyday could that be considered bullying and lead to mental health issues. Maybe yes, depending on where they lie on the left/right scale perhaps. I also think that kind of thing is human nature to be sad when someone calls you something you don’t like. Again If I was to say your religion is full of shite and you have lived a lie your whole life, there is no evidence to suggest its true or not, so therefore why would you get upset about it and say I was affecting your mental health due to an opinion. Please see mental health page where I hope to expand on how this might be dealt with and decided. So take racism, same as above, I throw a racial slur to one person, could that be like a 2 on emotional scale so instant compensation to that person from me. If I do it multiple times then fine goes up each time for multiple offences. Drugs So obviously when I say drugs I mean people selling them illegally, or it could even link to those being forced to grow drugs for low wages and forced labour I suppose. Keeping in mind if all confessed addicts are getting their drugs for free (in a safe space) then the street market goes down. The device would see who is constantly meeting others and too much outside of a normal routine and can be questioned if necessary for example. My plan though would be to eradicate all illegal drug use and to stop illegal drug dealing of any kind. Again multiple times would be more of a sentence. Any deaths linked to your drugs (device or cameras might show where it was bought) would lead to a murder investigation and compensation to the victims (including any non-death harm done), which would be uploaded to a person’s device via hospital reports that drug use was the cause. Assault So how much damage and mental harm was caused, this can mean waiting on a report from hospital which is tied to the persons device that police instantly have access to when provided by the hospital to then decide punishment. From the report you can see as per the punishment scale above where this particular issue sits. So that why assault is in them My Ideology Page 36 all for physical and mental because it can be on so many different levels depending on the damaged caused. Does the victim now have a disfigurement or scar/change for life, how should this be compensated for both the mental and physical harm done? Protest/riots Obviously anyone can protest at any time about anything they like as well. However any physical harm caused to anyone will be picked up by cameras or device and punishment sent straight to their device. Including looting costs to be paid to the owner of property ect. There is a way to protest, in fact my whole ideology is one big protest of how the world works, but, I do it in a non-physical way like this, and so should you. Unless of course you have a government or group of people harming people then you need to defend yourself from them and the world government should set this up, not you as an individual. The difference in children (Under 16) I don’t think you have fully matured until you’re 16, in fact for some can be longer or shorter. So it’s difficult to pin point where they enter the adult world for some. Basically my thinking is that children should be taught the above scale so they know it for when they become adults and know what to expect, including education on mental and physical abuse to see why we are doing what we do, they should be giving past examples like war, religion, Nazi’s e.g. There should be a different scale for them and punishments, obviously not money related unless it is rape, murder or severe bullying from which they can start paying with their basic package or wage when they’re older and, finished, or even during their sentence, I think like now any sentence should be served in a different environment until they reach the age of an adult then transferred to a jail. This scale again should be worked out similar to adult one above but obviously most punishments can be worked out between school and parents for the most part. Unless it was more serious crimes. What should also happen in jail? Education classes on your crime and why you were punished the way you were. Exactly why it was decided that you were in the categories for physical and/or mental health. Ways to try and change the mind-set of the person to make them not re-offend. Although in a free world they can if they want but the same punishment would occur or more. Psychological reports done by more than one person to evaluate if you should be released or not. Especially on murder and paedophilia/rape, what should happen is multiple reports over their sentence time by multiple phycologists or mental health professionals (so there is no biased opinions) to evaluate if the person would re-offend. If it says they would then we need to consider their release, and some might never be released. Crime Insurance I understand this may be difficult to put in place. Especially given the fact there may need to be monthly payments by everyone from their wage or standard package in order for My Ideology Page 37 those who don’t commit crimes to essentially make sure the crime insurance makes enough to pay staff, and for those people who don’t commit crimes, it would be their money also that pays a person’s compensation bill until the person who committed the crime can pay it back. So lots to work out here but I think it could happen, so as we lead on to the death penalty, is this another reason why we should have it. We will pay as a society for one of your major crimes like, rape or murder to give you a second chance but maybe not two or three. Police brutality To be honest they would be under the same rules as above, the issue now is that the police and their agenda as a group are and should be central thinking. Trying to be non- biased and essentially protect everyone against the far right and far left groups especially. In fact they should be trying to produce a world similar to what I want, which is reduce violence and mental abuse where possible. However, right now there is individuals within the police who want to use their power for their own far right or far left beliefs and will harm others to do so, like inflict racism or harm people to stop their racism. So as my system above clearly does, is stop this. It effectively has every cop like every citizen, with a device which can record voices and be checked when any allegations arise against the police or citizen of any social class or social status. There is no bias. I think one of the worst things we do is give cops guns and citizens because then they feel like they are at war with each other and need it for protection. My world though sees police as just someone who comes to collect you, and only when you don’t come in yourself, for your crime which has been clearly evidenced via the device and cameras. They will use your location to come and get you and that’s it, your argument as a citizen should not be with the cops and the cops should not be biased towards you either. This then greatly reduces any police brutality, however we need to do the same with the citizens. Take football stadiums for example with right wings fans who chant racist abuse or throw objects. Your camera will detect what you have said or that you have thrown something on the cameras and before you even get home your punishment will already be in place and detailed to you, whereas right now due to the size and numbers it would be impossible to know who has done this or punish individually. So the police don’t even need to get involved, it all happens behind the scenes. They would just be there to stop any physical fighting, which also will be picked up with device and cameras. Left and right police brutality – follow the left and right page, this also applies to cops who can be either or. We need to force them to the more central agenda it should be, where they don’t formulate opinions on the person they’re talking to or brining into be sentenced. They simply enforce the law by making sure you attend court for example. You do need both though, as a left wing thinker, if they are coming to lift a murderer might be at the door going, “ok come with me sir”, the guy says “no”. A left wing thinker who My Ideology Page 38 does not want to harm you is then stumped and maybe even hesitant. Whereas a right wing thinking will just be like “ok Ill force you”, instantly. So both are good but not too far left or too far right. Every building entry Should it also be that every building or door in the planet know what device has walked under it and what time and have this recorded constantly as well? Including houses. My Ideology Page 39 Death Penalty This might be the part where you read my politics and start see some contradictions, because at the beginning I said I would prefer a world where the least amount of physical or mental harm is done on all mankind. Yet I agree with the death penalty to a certain extent and special circumstances which we will go into. First of all while we are talking about contradictions, there is another one which fits into this slightly. So let’s look at the Nazi’s for example, who I detest as it’s a hatful far right non educated ideology. Anyway if I am someone who would always push for the least deaths or harm in any situation then one thing I have always asked my self is this; What if the Nazi’s managed to slaughter all Jews, now they wanted to slaughter more than that, so my question is already answered, but let’s pretend for a minute that it was only Jews. Think about the population size of the Jews back then, which is estimated to be 9.5 million (Europe only – 1933/1945) and it’s said that 6 million died during the holocaust, again lets imagine that all 9.5 million were killed and that was the full population of Jews, so now Jews don’t exist. Now if we move on to the conflict in Israel/Palestine. Where apparently only 14,000 lives have been taken since 1987 but obviously it would be more than that but not into the millions per say. So if you killed all the 9.5 million Jews then you’re only saving a few thousand lives in comparison, although those 14,000 people now can’t have any more kids so that potentially is more lost, although neither can the 6 million Jews. So in this particular case, for me, using my logic, the comparison should be made between Jews and Nazi’s only. Now let’s take a look at the Nazi population back in these times – This was about 66 million at that point I believe, using numbers online (Could be wrong), anyway, way more than the Jews. So by using my logic, obviously none of these scenarios happening would be best, which should go without saying, but if one had to happen then the way it did has to be the only way. Although when you look at the amount of total lives lost in WW2, estimated 70-85 million, and you had a magic wand, then would we have been better off killing all the Nazi’s before the war for an overall less death count? My point being if there was less Nazis than Jews/deaths in WW2 then you maybe say ok, killing all Nazis would have been less deaths, or, if the Jews went on to kill like 80 million Muslims (Pretend the population would fit) during the Palestine conflict then you might have said killing all the Jews would have been less deaths. So my ultimate point being that sometimes people being killed, can lead to less deaths overall. And I don’t necessary, like a right wing person does, burden myself with categories, like what religion, nationality or gender a person is. To me all this is forced on them with no choice, but anyway, I just see them as human beings and treat them as such. So if you take one serial killer who kills 20 people, he maybe even has one long term in jail in between, then kills more. This is the type of smaller scale scenario we must stop as well. Now the big debate here is keeping this guy in jail forever after he is first caught leads to no more deaths and I am fine with that, but, in my opinion when we start to bring resources and potential for this person to kill inside jail, now that he/she knows they are in forever is much greater. So why keep them alive? My Ideology Page 40
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-