Crowdsourced techniques - radu.catalin

Please enable JavaScript to view the full PDF

The 14th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education Bucharest, April 19-20, 2018 10.12753/2066-026X-18-263 Crowdsourced Techniques and Organizing Routines as Open Kinds of Education in e-Learning Environment Ramona MIHĂILĂ, Elena Grațiela DICU “Dimitrie Cantemir” Christian University, Splaiul Unirii 176, Bucharest, Romania [email protected], [email protected] Aurel PERA University of Craiova, Alexandru Ioan Cuza St. 13, Craiova, Romania [email protected] Gheorghe COJOCARIU “Spiru Haret” University, Ion Ghica St. 13, Bucharest, Romania [email protected] Ionel MOHÎRȚĂ Danubius University, Galați Bvd. 10, Galați, Romania [email protected] Abstract: Based on previous insights (e.g. Paulin and Haythornhwaite, 2016), the core of our article represents an extensive analysis of the manner numerous distance, online, and e-learning settings have embraced substantial concerted approaches, bringing about the demand to take into account the way novel techniques of online cooperation emerge over and into learning and instructive routines. As education succeeds in dealing with such directions, crowdsourcing and participative, peer-based proposals are impacting teaching and training, in addition to the advancement of curricula variously. A boundless array of available, first-rate open resources and materials are accessible online, furnished by groups of professionals, educators, and students. There has been a long-lasting controversy in the scholarly literature concerning how several crowdsourced, open resources end up into the curriculum via instructor assessment and choice as essential, demanded contents. Instructors may also include open resources in the curriculum as restorative, complementary, or advanced material. In countless learning frameworks, the masses of students suggest or reflect on external resources through course debates, including them into the curriculum. Crowdsourced proposals that adopt open educational routines and further flexible learning have become popular in both open online and established learning frameworks. The difficult tasks of tremendous numbers indicate the demand for an improved perspective of the way teamwork, community, and crowdsourcing may be made functional in MOOC- based instruction. While in line with prior research on the current topic, our results indicate that the convergence of massive online participation and courses stimulates the urgency to advance and embrace patterns of instruction that originate considerably from the establishment of virtual communities and the performance of online crowds in comparison with the one of classes. Keywords: crowdsourcing; participative; peer-based; open resources; e-learning environment. I. INTRODUCTION In accordance with preceding observations, the focal point of our research displays an all- embracing investigation of the way multifarious distance, online, and e-learning frameworks have taken up durable joint proposals [1–7], resulting in the exigency to be aware of the manner innovative techniques of online partnership materialize over and into educational practices. As instruction turns 351 out well in handling such objectives, crowdsourcing and collaborative, peer-based approaches are shaping education, along with the expansion of curricula heterogeneously. A tremendous set of feasible, topnotch open resources and materials are reachable online, supplied by clusters of experts, instructors, and learners. There has been an abiding bickering in the academic literature as regards how numerous crowdsourced, open resources culminate in the curriculum via tutor appraisal and option as key, required contents. [29] II. RELATED WORK Massive open online courses (MOOCs) co-last with a cohort brought up on social media who think it is pretty common that not only data, but also human resources may be identified online. Established in the assemblage of resources and routines, acquirements on and via the web are distinct types of experience [8–13] from attainments required by institutional fabrics. E-learners transfer into the learning practice their prevailing subject knowledge and their collaborative experiences. Therefore, learning settings are shaped and constituted in connection with current online routines. Crowdsourced techniques and guiding experiences [14–18] may be applied on MOOCs as novel, open types of instruction. While nearly all MOOCs share features of far-reaching cooperation and involvement amounts, open access and online supply, there are substantial disparities in both instructional procedures and interplay modes for learners and tutors. Participants consolidate a social arrangement of persons connected by education interplays and shared openness to course contents (whether trainer- regulated or user-generated). [29] Students have to pay for interaction with the teaching staff, for connections with instructors, and for accessing the process of knowledge production. III. METHODOLOGY We analyzed data from the Web of Science covering both MOOCs and crowdsourcing phenomena (2006–2017) and processed it so that we identify the evolution of crowdsourcing in distance education projects. We identified 354 articles and sent each (group of) author(s) an email asking them whether crowdsourced input is instrumental in improving e-learning quality in MOOCs. Then we calculated trends in online instruction/MOOCs and distance education for Central and Southern Europe countries. The design and processes supplied by or considered by course organizers impact the advancement of group attention. Thus, course organizers assist in establishing social norms and usages within the team by determining successful behaviors or attitudes with regard to acquirements, and by incorporating educational patterns in the curricula. A common grasp of group mechanisms clarifies that learning groups advance by stages, opting for and mediating their interplay routines [19–24], commitment to objectives and to other individuals. What takes effect in elaboration and support of the group influences confidence and commitment to the certain course or undertaking. Commitment does not set off thoroughly molded: cognizance of phases of advancement assists in indicating when and what types of design or backing are required to produce the suitable group and/or educational results. Shaping instrumental conduct impacts the kind of MOOC, that is, for cooperation between tutor and learner, or for synergy among participants and in addition with a broader series of individuals. Students who are instrumental in knowledge via conversation or other inputs focus on their own personal exigency for acquirements and are a catalyst for a more significant collective demand of co-systematization of knowledge and the educational practice of a collective of students. [29] IV. RESULTS AND FINDINGS MOOCs epitomize a cutting-edge type of learning that depends on open resources, collaborative educational routines, and an immense magnitude of individuals with a joint point of convergence on acquirements. Via debate and examination of other participants’ practices, thinking mechanisms, and knowledge, students are to grasp how content is transformed, integrated and made compatible to local assimilation. Via inspection of display of views and debate, aspects of line of reasoning are crowdsourced. Steadily growing learning settings necessitate unendingly budding evolution of conduct. In online education this encompasses setting up the norms that constitute a 352 certain course role (e.g. how frequently to comment, tone of voice, embracing of writing genres, etc.). Behaviors comprise supervising, policing and validation, each being regulated for the routine of MOOCs. Practices advances around the employment of technologies, e.g. the amount and extent of media used, the types of communication displayed through various media, and the experiences and transcriptions that cut down the collaborative labor of individuals. Machine–human partnerships may cooperate to undertake issues of quality control and processing [25–28] for the tremendous quantity of material that may appear from crowdsourcing mechanisms. The tutor, advised via observations provided via analytics, can be essential in handling the debate and endeavors of students towards bringing about judgment concerning resources, and furthering the distribution of peer-recommended contents throughout a learning community. [29] (Figures 1–4) Figure 1. The evolution of crowdsourcing in distance education projects Figure 2. Is crowdsourced input instrumental in improving e-learning quality in MOOCs? 353 Figure 3 Trends in assessment in online instruction/MOOCs (students from Southern Europe countries) Figure 4 Trends in assessment in distance education (students from Central Europe countries) V. DISCUSSION Educators may encompass open resources in the program of studies as corrective, integrative, or breakthrough content. In myriad learning schemes, the groups of students recommend or weigh up external resources via course discussions, adding them in the curriculum. Crowdsourced projects that endorse open educational patterns and back up flexible learning are prevailing in both open online and deep-rooted instructional fabrics. The burdensome undertakings of impressive numbers imply the insistence for an elaborated angle of the fashion partnership, groups, and crowdsourcing [30–35] may be instrumental in MOOC-based pedagogy. While consistent with preexisting analyses on the present matter, our outcomes clarify that the confluence of massive online engagement and courses intensifies the criticality to move up and take up criteria of learning that emerge noticeably from the building of virtual collectives and the effectiveness of online communities in contrast to the one of classes. [29] 354 VI. CONCLUSION Learning analytics together with the crowdsourced information that education analytics-based systems build on offer solutions and enhanced practices for far-reaching knowledge platforms. While learning opportunities distance from the established approaches of instruction in order to achieve open online webs of students at a considerable scale, the proposals and policies educators employ to evaluate instructional gains and supply purposeful criticism to students should also develop. The aspects of such approaches frequently entail a decrease or reorganization of time and endeavor between educators and students, and individuals and machines. The advantage is that students are exposed to more and various views and become more assimilated in the entire process of instruction, especially at a group level. MOOCs are the hub for wide-ranging online learning, being the outcome of an acme of expanded production and distribution of open material and resources online, enlarged commitment in accomplishing shared education on an impressive scale, and a propensity to supply learning opportunities at one’s discretion to all individuals who require them. The outcome has been large assemblies, brought together in unrivalled and tremendous scale, with a collective driving force of learning. [29] Reference Text and Citations [1] Acosta Price, O. (2017). “Strategies to Encourage Long-Term Sustainability of School-Based Health Centers,” American Journal of Medical Research 4(1): 61–83. [2] Androniceanu, A., and I.-V. Drăgulănescu (2016). “Survey on the Buyers’ Eco-responsibility and the Urban White Pollution,” Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 15(2): 481–487. [3] Androniceanu, A. (2017). “Hospital Management Based on the Relationship between Doctors and Patients,” Administratie si Management Public 29: 41–53. [4] Androniceanu, A. (2017). “The Three-dimensional Approach of Total Quality Management, an Essential Strategic Option for Business Excellence,” Amfiteatru Economic 19(44): 61–78. [5] Bratu, S. (2017). “The Inexorable Shift Towards an Increasingly Hostile Cyberspace Environment: The Adverse Social Impact of Online Trolling Behavior,” Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 9(2): 88–94. [6] Bolton, J. (2016). “Predicting and Managing Demand in Social Care,” American Journal of Medical Research 3(2): 152–187. [7] Brown, J. A. (2016). “The New ‘Southern Strategy:’ Immigration, Race, and ‘Welfare Dependency’ in Contemporary US Republican Political Discourse,” Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 8(2): 22–41. [8] Devine, N. (2017). “Aims of Education in a Post-Neoliberal Context,” Knowledge Cultures 5(6): 96–107. [9] Donnelly, R. (2017). “Blended Problem-based Learning in Higher Education: The Intersection of Social Learning and Technology,” Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management 5(2): 25–50. [10] Dvorsky, J., G. Sopkova, and M. Janoskova (2017). “Evaluation of the Social Environment and Access to Financial Resources for Business: Case Study of the Czech and Slovak Republic,” Ekonomicko-manazerske spektrum 11(1): 62–73. [11] Enderstein, A. (2017). “European Identity and Gender Equality Policies: Shaping the Practice of Gender Expertise,” Journal of Research in Gender Studies 7(2): 109–135. [12] Friedman, H. H., L. W. Friedman, and C. Leverton (2016). “Increase Diversity to Boost Creativity and Enhance Problem Solving,” Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management 4(2): 7–33. [13] Fujiwara, D., and R. N. Lawton (2016). “Happier and More Satisfied? Creative Occupations and Subjective Wellbeing in the United Kingdom,” Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management 4(2): 50–74. [14] Harris, E. C., and M. L. Estevez (2017). “The Role of Gender and Motherhood Ideologies in Perpetuating Workplace Inequality,” Journal of Research in Gender Studies 7(2): 67–85. [15] Hes, A., and M. Regnerova (2016). “Social Responsibility of Business Firm and (versus) Customer in the Czech Republic,” Ekonomicko-manazerske spektrum 10(2): 2–12. [16] Holzer, H. J. (2017). “Building a New Middle Class in the Knowledge Economy,” Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management 5(2): 96–126. [17] Hurd, H. M. (2016). “The Innocence of Negligence,” Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 8(2): 48– 95. [18] Kantarelis, T. D., and D. Kantarelis (2017). “In Search of the Criterion Standard Test in Diagnostic Testing,” American Journal of Medical Research 4(1): 118–140. [19] Kaplanova, P. (2016). “Public Goods as Factors of a Local Economic Development in Slovakia,” Administratie si Management Public 26: 6–24. [20] Klierova, M., and J. Kutik (2017). “One Stop Government – Strategy of Public Services for Citizens and Businesses in Slovakia,” Administratie si Management Public 28: 66–80. [21] Kliestikova, J., and K. Janoskova (2017). “Branding with Understanding: How National Profile of Consumer Influences Brand Value Perception,” Marketing and Management of Innovations 3: 149–157. [22] Laudan, D., E. Nica, and G. Lăzăroiu (2016). “Structural and Functional Abnormality in Particular Brain Regions and Connections in Subjects with Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD),” American Journal of Medical Research 3(2): 195–200. 355 [23] Machan, T. R. (2016). “The Morality of Gregarious Egoism,” Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 8(2): 7–29. [24] Mihăilă, R. (2016). “Is the Decrease in the Gender Wage Gap the Principal Driver of the Sustained Rise in Female Labor Market Participation?,” Journal of Research in Gender Studies 6(2): 146–152. [25] Moghtader, B. (2017). “Human Capital and Education of Desires after Michel Foucault,” Journal of Self- Governance and Management Economics 5(4): 35–52. [26] Nica, E. (2016). “The Effect of Perceived Organizational Support on Organizational Commitment and Employee Performance,” Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 4(4): 34–40. [27] Nordberg, D. (2017). “First and Second Drafts of History: The Case of Trump, Foucault and Pre-modern Governance,” Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 9(2): 107–117. [28] Orlova, A. V. (2017). “‘Public Interest,’ Judicial Reasoning and Violence of the Law: Constructing Boundaries of the ‘Morally Acceptable,’” Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 9(2): 51–80. [29] Paulin, D., and C. Haythornthwaite (2016). “Crowdsourcing the Curriculum: Redefining e-Learning Practices through Peer-generated Approaches,” The Information Society 32(2): 130–142. [30] Pera, A. (2017). “The Gendered Psychology of Political Revolution and Countercultural Dissent in Antonioni’s Zabriskie Point,” Journal of Research in Gender Studies 7(2): 86–92. [31] Peters, M. A., and T. Besley (2016). “‘We Never Expel a Foreigner’ – Globalism, Interconnectivity and the Experiment of the Open Society,” Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 8(2): 112–126. [32] Peters, M. A. (2017). “Ecopolitical Philosophy, Education and Grassroots Democracy: The ‘Return’ of Murray Bookchin (and John Dewey?),” Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 9(2): 7–14. [33] Plevný, M. (2017). “Influence of the Fare Funding Type on Public Transport Demand – Case of Pilsen,” Administratie si Management Public 28: 45–66. [34] Popescu, G. H. (2016). “Does Economic Growth Bring About Increased Happiness?,” Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 4(4): 27–33. [35] Vinczeova, M., and A. Kascakova (2017). “How Do Slovak Small and Medium-sized Enterprises Make Decision on Sources of Finance?,” Ekonomicko-manazerske spektrum 11(2): 111–121. 356