QUESTIO N S WHY ME N TIO N I N G BALA N ? Aglovale has breached its obliga 1 on of neutrality by exhibi 1 ng bias towards Balan, and as stated in the material facts, Balan reserves the right to bring subsequent ac 1 on against Ragnell. APOLOGIZI N G / COMPE N SATIO N ? Ragnell has taken more e ff ec 1 ve procedures than apologizing such as: allowing the families of the Aglovalean workers to fi le lawsuit in the courts of Ragnell which demonstrates Ragnell’s commitment and abidance to law. WHO IS RESPO N SIBLE FOR THE DEATHS OF CIVILIA N S? The only civilian casual 1 es that resulted in the deaths of civilians was the a F ack on Compound Ardan and it was due to Balan’s failure to inform Ragnell’s Department of Defense regarding their presence. IF OP. SHI N I N G STAR WAS TEMPORARY, WHY DID N ’T RAG N ELL’S ATTACKS STOP? The “OP. SHINING STAR” was set to be limited and temporary, BUT due to the ongoing and con 1 nuous danger and threat posed by the UAC, and the failure of BALAN and AGLOVALE to take ac 1 on, Ragnell was compelled to take e ff ec 1 ve measures in accordance with self-defense. HOW CA N YOU CALL THEM TERRORISTS? Ac 1 ons of terrorists are characterized around crimes aimed at causing harm to individuals and society to achieve their poli 1 cal and ideological goals. And these acts of terrorism de fi nes a terrorist.