[Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home 82 / 12 / 16 / 1 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 82 / 12 / 16 / 1 Delete Post: [ File Only] Delete Style: Yotsuba B [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home [a / c / g / k / m / o / p / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w] [vip / qa] [cm / lgbt] [3 / adv / an / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pw / qst / sci / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr x / xs] [Edit] /sci/ - Science & Math [Post a Reply] 08/21/20 New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/ 05/04/17 New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random 10/04/16 New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts [Hide] [Show All] Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam box! Self-serve ads are available again! Check out our new advertising page here. [Return] [Catalog] [Bottom] [Update] [ Auto] This thread has been pruned or deleted File: triggerd.jpg (281 KB, 2048x2048) Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:27:00 No.13022963 >>13022965 >>13022969 >>13022971 >>13022972 >>13022976 >>13022980 >>13023003 >>13023031 >>13023040 >>13023119 what do you think about science deniers? Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:30:31 No.13022965 >>13023242 >>13022963 (OP) I don't get the image. Is not liking Trump supposed to mean you're in a cult? Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:31:28 No.13022969 >>13022974 >>13022963 (OP) That you cannot deny science as its a method/ a mechanism and not a dogmatic Religion and that people who unironically use the term "science denier" should go Kill themselfs Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:32:24 No.13022970 That people that still post soijaks really need to go study for their AP exams Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:33:23 No.13022971 >>13022997 >>13023031 File: 1617967489008.jpg (321 KB, 1313x2026) >>13022963 (OP) Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:33:46 No.13022972 >>13022983 >>13022999 >>13022963 (OP) Just for clarification If i do not 100% belive the official narrative on climate or coof am i an evil denier? And if so how exactly is what you do not cult Behavior? Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:34:23 No.13022974 >>13022986 >>13022991 >>13023031 >>13022969 >That you cannot deny science as its a method/ a mechanism You sound a bit autistic. When people say someone is a denier in a scientific context, they are saying that person denies some result of the scientific method. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:34:47 No.13022976 >>13022963 (OP) The climate is just fine and comfy. When will they admit their "theory" has been falsified? Or it has never been falsifiable and never will be? Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:35:25 No.13022980 >>13022963 (OP) People who use the term "science denier" consume mostly popscience Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:36:08 No.13022983 >>13022999 >>13023031 >>13022972 Not evil, just stupid. You probably just got indoctrinated into some cult's dogma instead of following the evidence. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:36:31 No.13022986 >>13022990 >>13022974 Are you saying all results of scientific methods are undeniable? Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:38:33 No.13022990 >>13022998 >>13023031 >>13022986 Of course not, you can deny whatever you want. And other people will laugh at you for it. What is the problem? Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:38:51 No.13022991 >>13023006 >>13022974 Except that it is a core principle of the scientific method and community to constantly disagree and disprove each other and i promise you no climatesceptic or anti lockdown activist refuses the value of the scientific method itself Instead of "Science denier" you mean "holds minority opinion" which in your mind is evil which is literal cult Behavior Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:41:13 No.13022997 >>13022971 Wojak shows good reasoning at the seether in the first frame... And then engages in the same poor rhetoric the seether makes in the second frame. Maybe Seether doesn't have any old people in his life whom he cares about protecting. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:41:42 No.13022998 >>13023012 >>13022990 I don't see you laughing, you are just seething. You people can only resort to "PEER REVIEWED" and "ESTEEMED JOURNALS" which you have read none. You can never participate in a dialog following actual scientific methods. Boswell 04/24/21(Sat)11:41:54 No.13022999 >>13023004 >>13023007 >>13023026 >>13022983 >You probably just got indoctrinated lmao there are currently thousands of different viewpoints on those subjects that would count as "not 100% on board" as >>13022972 describes how do you know which 99.99% of those false and which one is correct? this is a fallacy in and of itself do you even have a degree in anything let alone done scientific research at a Uni? Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:42:37 No.13023003 >>13022963 (OP) I think OP is a faggot Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:42:58 No.13023004 >>13022999 Checked trips of truth fuck that retarded sperg Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:44:08 No.13023006 >>13023019 >>13023031 >>13022991 >Except that it is a core principle of the scientific method and community to constantly disagree and disprove each other Right, which is a result of the scientific method. Denial is outside of the scientific method. > i promise you no climatesceptic or anti lockdown activist refuses the value of the scientific method itself The difference between a skeptic and a denier is that the former follows the evidence while the latter ignores it. Only retards try to conflate the two. >Instead of "Science denier" you mean "holds minority opinion" Nope. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:44:15 No.13023007 >>13023011 >>13023031 >>13022999 >Boswell This guy doesnt even belive in climate change and he got BTFO by me in an argument a week ago dont listen to him hes a coal shill Boswell 04/24/21(Sat)11:45:38 No.13023011 >>13023007 >he got BTFO You just kept saying "i trust the evidence" and when i asked you to show me what evidence you went "haha do your own research" and then sperged around about clouds and left you had like 6 people in that thread calling you out for this Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:46:09 No.13023012 >>13023017 >>13023031 File: 001.jpg (51 KB, 600x467) >>13022998 >I don't see you laughing, you are just seething. Your delusions are entertaining. >You people can only resort to "PEER REVIEWED" and "ESTEEMED JOURNALS" Are those supposed to be bad? >which you have read none. You can never participate in a dialog following actual scientific methods. Your delusions are entertaining. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:47:32 No.13023017 >>13023032 >>13023012 You have to go back. Your rhetoric is unwelcome here. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:47:48 No.13023019 >>13023047 >>13023006 so at what point does dissent withing the scientific community turn into denial? When the media says so? I mean you just admitted yourself that dissent is necessary for the scienfic method so what is denial and what is "scientific disagreement" Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:49:58 No.13023026 >>13023036 >>13022999 >how do you know which 99.99% of those false and which one is correct? Because the evidence massively supports one of them and not the others. There are infinite scientific hypotheses but empirical reality only supports a few of them. It sounds like you actually are a "science denier" in the broadest sense. >this is a fallacy in and of itself Yes, your post is a fallacy of equivocation. >do you even have a degree in anything let alone done scientific research at a Uni? Yes and yes. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:50:47 No.13023031 >>13023067 >>13022963 (OP) >>13022971 >>13022974 >>13022983 >>13022990 >>13023006 >>13023007 >>13023012 you NEED to LEAVE 4chan and go BACK to R*DDIT get a load of this faggot Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:51:00 No.13023032 >>13023041 >>13023017 You're projecting. Take your meds. Boswell 04/24/21(Sat)11:52:26 No.13023036 >>13023059 >>13023026 >Because the evidence massively supports one of them but isnt it the scientists job to interpret the evidence? You are commiting circular reasoning here >Yes, your post is a fallacy of equivocation. you obviously dont know what this is >Yes and yes. unlikely Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:53:30 No.13023040 >>13023091 >>13023096 >>13022963 (OP) kill em with nuclear fire Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:54:00 No.13023041 >>13023052 >>13023065 >>13023032 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method go read this before posting further you retardation hurts Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:55:18 No.13023047 >>13023057 >>13023060 >>13023019 >so at what point does dissent withing the scientific community turn into denial? When it stops being about evidence and starts being dogmatic and pathological. >When the media says so? No. Why are you asking stupid rhetorixal questions? >I mean you just admitted yourself that dissent is necessary for the scienfic method so what is denial and what is "scientific disagreement" Didn't I just explain that? Read the post you're replying to. You are never going to convince me that schizophrenic conspiracy garbage is indistinguishable from science, but keep trying. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:56:21 No.13023052 >>13023041 Nope, stop projecting. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:57:15 No.13023057 >>13023064 >>13023047 Why are you even here? /r/science would be much more receptive to the way you write comments. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:58:02 No.13023059 >>13023078 >>13023036 >but isnt it the scientists job to interpret the evidence? Yes, so what? >You are commiting circular reasoning here How so? >you obviously dont know what this is What don't I understand? >unlikely Wrong. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:58:08 No.13023060 >>13023076 >>13023047 >dogmatic and pathological. okay so lets take coronavirus politics for example Texas, Missouri and Florida has lifted Mask Mandates yet their cases keep decreasing as much as before the mandate lift isnt this empirical evidence that masks are useless in that regard? And if not who has the authority to override this set of data and interpret it differently? Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:59:21 No.13023064 File: k0IGUXx.jpg (101 KB, 785x731) >>13023057 >Why are you even here? To annoy you. Cry more. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)11:59:35 No.13023065 >>13023069 >>13023041 >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method IS GOOD SOMETIMES BUT THE REAL Scientific_method IS GENOCIDE Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:00:10 No.13023067 >>13023031 Lmao imagine being this fucking butt hurt over a meme You ok kid? You act like you fucking own stock of 4chan or some shit Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:00:50 No.13023069 >>13023065 (You) >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method YES, ITS CA CULT BUT BEST AND STRONGEST AT THIS MOMENT Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:02:38 No.13023076 >>13023084 >>13023254 >>13023060 >isnt this empirical evidence that masks are useless in that regard? It depends on whether you've controlled for other relevant factors. Have you? Or are you just making simplistic assumptions to reach a specific conclusion you want to believe? >And if not who has the authority to override this set of data and interpret it differently? The people who have earned it by studying and understanding similar data in a systematic context, I guess? What exactly is your problem? Boswell 04/24/21(Sat)12:03:04 No.13023078 >>13023087 >>13023127 >>13023059 >Yes, so what? Well if Scientists need to interpret data first the same set of data can say many things depending which scientist you ask. In addition to that you are not forced to consider all existing data when writing a paper so you can cherrypick it to pick your narrative without what you call "denial" you just have a secular religion and no mechanism to determine truth >How so? because you say trust the evidence but evidence needs to be interpreted so you can disagree on the interpretation but when that doesnt suit you you say trust the evidence but evidence needs to be interpreted so you can disagree on the interpretation but when that doesnt suit you you say trust the evidence but evidence needs to be interpreted so you can disagree on the interpretation but when that doesnt suit you you say trust the evidence but evidence..... >What don't I understand? a fallacy of equivocation is misusing a word or abusing multiple meanings of that word noone here is doing this >Wrong. prove it link one of your papers Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:05:08 No.13023084 >>13023153 >>13023076 >It depends on whether you've controlled for other relevant factors. what would those be? enlighten me >The people who have earned it by studying and understanding similar data ok and who gets to decide who those are? Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:06:06 No.13023087 >>13023078 >no mechanism to determine truth THE mechanism IS WARFARE AND GONCIDE Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:07:07 No.13023091 >>13023096 >>13023040 (You) THIS Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:08:48 No.13023094 >>13023101 File: gretchen thunderburp copy.jpg (56 KB, 498x331) i don't see why people are considered dumb for not following the "science" that comes from a teenage girl who couldn't complete her coursework in high school. she still hasn't graduated from high school and the people who were in school with her said she couldn't do math. seems like about the least reliable scientist you could think up Boswell 04/24/21(Sat)12:09:20 No.13023096 >>13023110 >>13023040 (You) >>13023091 (You) >I AM ALWAYS RIGHT I FOLLOW THE SCIENCE I AM ON THE UNDISPUTABLE SIDE OF TRUTH ok prove it >LMAO DENIER ILL KILL YOU sure you are not a cult Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:11:29 No.13023101 >>13023105 >>13023112 >>13023094 She only gained fame because she literally bullied her parents into giving up their careers. Her mom gave up her international opera career to placate her whiny brat of a 13 year old. Truly pathetic. Boswell 04/24/21(Sat)12:12:35 No.13023105 >>13023123 >>13023101 Not sure but arent her parents antifa faggots that forced her to go vegan since age 3? Pretty sure they would be in on this Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:13:17 No.13023110 >>13023116 File: riot.jpg (154 KB, 864x486) >>13023096 >SCIENCE ITS NOT A TRUTH, IT A CULT BUT STRONGEST AND IT WILL KILL (You) AND ALL (You)R COMMUNITY IF IT REGECTS THE CULT Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:13:50 No.13023112 >>13023123 File: Gerta.jpg (1.15 MB, 3264x2448) >>13023101 >brat of a 13 year old. bruh she is 18 this is what veganism does to you Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:15:50 No.13023116 File: Rispolept.jpg (161 KB, 1200x900) >>13023110 (You) take your neurolepica Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:16:25 No.13023119 >>13023155 >>13023159 >>13023178 File: imagen_2021-04-24_001617.png (317 KB, 1300x1300) >>13022963 (OP) Their hatred as Trump is as irrational as your support for him. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:17:29 No.13023123 >>13023134 >>13023112 She is 18 now. She was 13. Her mom gave up opera a while ago. >>13023105 It's possible but she also threatened to literally starve to death if her parents didn't submit to her draconian fearmongering she learned in school. She literally started skipping her classes to protest. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:17:55 No.13023125 >>13023141 REMEBMER THE BIBLICAL GENOCIDES LIKE FIRE FROM SKY? MODERN SCICE CAN DO THE SAME, EXACTLY, WHRE IS (You)R SHITY GOD NOW? Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:18:29 No.13023127 >>13023136 >>13023146 >>13023161 >>13023078 >Well if Scientists need to interpret data first the same set of data can say many things depending which scientist you ask. So all interpretations are equally rational? Is that really what you want to argue? >In addition to that you are not forced to consider all existing data when writing a paper so you can cherrypick it to pick your narrative Yes, this is a common tactic among deniers. The only reason you would need to cherrypick is because the evidence isn't on your side in the first place. >without what you call "denial" you just have a secular religion and no mechanism to determine truth Again, you're confusing skepticism with denial. Retard. >because you say trust the evidence but evidence needs to be interpreted so you can disagree on the interpretation You can disagree, that doesn't mean your disagreement is rational. It's not that hard to understand, yet you seem to be having a very difficult time. >but when that doesnt suit you Why would something not suit me? >you say trust the evidence Huh? That's not my response to misinterpretation of the evidence. You fail. >a fallacy of equivocation is misusing a word or abusing multiple meanings of that word That's one meaning of equivocation. Mote generally, it's calling two different things the same thing or giving them equal weight when they are unequal. >link one of your papers No thanks. Boswell 04/24/21(Sat)12:19:30 No.13023134 >>13023123 I wouldnt belive the official narrative here she was clearly set up to be this retarded massiah figure Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:20:02 No.13023136 >>13023164 >>13023127 >Why Do you >Respond Like this >You utter Fucking plebbitor. You unironically have to go back. The way you write comments is the most toxic shit I've ever seen. Get a life, and learn how to socialize with humans. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:20:45 No.13023141 File: 593af232bf76bb72038b4c7a.jpg (100 KB, 1100x826) >>13023125 (You) REMEBMER THE BIBLICAL GENOCIDES LIKE FIRE FROM SKY? MODERN SCICE CAN DO THE SAME, EXACTLY, WHRE IS (You)R SHITY GOD NOW? Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:21:49 No.13023146 >>13023170 >>13023127 AGAIN: 1. SCIENCE ITS NOT A TRUTH, IT A CULT 2. IT NOT IDEAL BUT STILL STRONGET AT THIS MOMENT Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:23:46 No.13023153 >>13023173 >>13023084 >what would those be? What factors affect the spread of disease? Why don't you Google it? Or you could argue that masks are the only possible thing that could affect it. Either way, you're an idiot. >ok and who gets to decide who those are? No one decides, you either produce results or you don't. Why are you on the science board if you don't understand how science works? Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:24:12 No.13023155 >>13023178 File: 1606716355820.jpg (174 KB, 1202x1076) >>13023119 The logical inverse of supporting a politician isn't the bizarre, insane hatred we've seen since 2016. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:25:12 No.13023159 >>13023178 >>13023119 *much less irrational Boswell 04/24/21(Sat)12:26:11 No.13023161 >>13023203 >>13023352 File: greenland_temps1.png (371 KB, 1151x850) >>13023127 >So all interpretations are equally rational? By definition yes and they need to be allowed to go up against each other without retards like you screeching "denial" every time someone dissents >The only reason you would need to cherrypick is because the evidence isn't on your side in the first place. like how the IPCC only uses data gained from plants and algea and ignores ice cores and sediment analysis like pic related? >you're confusing skepticism with denial. well you seem to think all scepticism is denial when it challanges the core of the theory >that doesn't mean your disagreement is rational. so who gets to decide what is valid and what isnt those elusive "experts"? the media? >something not suit me? because you obviously draw a lot of pride from following cultlike bullshit science >That's not my response to misinterpretation of the evidence. yes it is >No thanks. so what is claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence i have no reason to belive you are in any way qualified to argue on anything Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:27:03 No.13023164 >>13023176 >>13023136 >>Why >Do you >>Respond >Like this >>You utter >Fucking plebbitor. I don't. >You unironically have to go back. Go back to where? You need to go back to your containment board. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:28:46 No.13023170 >>13023345 >>13023146 (You) >1. SCIENCE ITS NOT A TRUTH, IT A CULT Science is not about "truth," it's about modeling reality. It's always an approximation, not "truth." Dumb cultist. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:29:23 No.13023173 >>13023153 >What factors affect the spread of disease? Why don't you Google it? oh no i dont think you understand how this works i say masks are useless and have provided reference to cases shrinking in states without masks you claim otherwise and elude to "other factors" yet cannot provide me with specifics as of now i am correct because you are unable to provide a soild answer >No one decides, you either produce results or you don't. so if noone decides anything how is there even denial? i mean with that said literally everything is equally vaild >Why are you on the science board if you don't understand how science works? the irony Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:30:09 No.13023176 >>13023188 >>13023164 You know everyone can read your comments right? The ones where you break a long comment into clauses and subclauses, quote them all individually, and respond to them as if they're isolated arguments and not part of a holistic comment which you ignore the bulk of. Like, you know we can literally see it right? That is exactly how you write comments, and it's pathetic. I'm being as sincere as possible here: when's the last time you socialized with someone? When's the last time you actually hugged someone? Call your mom. Call someone who cares about you. You legitimately sound like a schizo. Boswell 04/24/21(Sat)12:31:33 No.13023178 >>13023195 >>13023217 >>13023119 >>13023155 >>13023159 Why is everyone still obsessed with this guy Joe Biden is literally finishing the wall and denied you fags minimum wage and loan forgiveness and all you think about is trump Boswell 04/24/21(Sat)12:32:57 No.13023188 >>13023176 i met this guy multiple times again hes on this board 24/7 for all i can tell Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:33:43 No.13023191 Mildly unrelated but Fallout New Vegas just wasn't very good. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:34:21 No.13023195 >>13023200 >>13023178 >The program of the Two Minutes Hate varied from day to day, but there was none in which Goldstein was not the principal figure. He was the primal traitor, the earliest defiler of the Party's purity. All subsequent crimes against the Party, all treacheries, acts of sabotage, heresies, deviations, sprang directly out of his teaching. Somewhere or other he was still alive and hatching his conspiracies. Boswell 04/24/21(Sat)12:36:08 No.13023200 >>13023195 k Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:38:31 No.13023203 >>13023205 >>13023211 >>13023161 >By definition yes LOL, no. >they need to be allowed to go up against each other They are allowed! You failing at basic logic and failing to provide evidence is how your idiotic religion goes up against science and loses. >without retards like you screeching "denial" every time someone dissents But I don't. You're confusing your denial with skepticism again. Retard. >like how the IPCC only uses data gained from plants and algea and ignores ice cores and sediment analysis LOL, you're delusional. The IPCC reports reference ice core data and results derived from ice core data all the time. You're literally spouting counterfactual nonsense and then complaining when people laugh at you. >like pic related? Fake graph, ice core data ends in the 1800s. This is why you get laughed at. We'll continue this in the morning, your stale denier garbage is not worth losing sleep over. Boswell 04/24/21(Sat)12:39:51 No.13023205 >>13023203 >when people laugh at you. the only poster laughed at in this thread is you and i wont waste more time arguing with you anymore Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:41:20 No.13023211 >>13023352 >>13023203 >Fake graph, ice core data ends in the 1800s. This is why you get laughed at. not the other poster but they literally just added mesured data after that the ice core ends in 1850 because there is no need to take data after that since you have actual real mesured data Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:45:01 No.13023217 >>13023241 >>13023178 I'm not even American, what you feel is some grand obsession is in this case entirely a figment of you imagination. The thread topic was related to Trump, as such he was mentioned and different people gave their opinion of him; completely naturally, people outside of echo chambers like /pol/ tend to have varied opinions. That is not to say that even I as a foreigner do not notice the democratic party's usual emotional appeals in place of actual arguments, and it's propaganda arm in the form of the mainstream media. They are simply using Trump as a scapegoat to distract from Biden's own unique shittiness. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:52:32 No.13023241 >>13023245 >>13023217 Put down the Fedora already its 2021 Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:52:54 No.13023242 >>13022965 Turning red, opening your mouth and bleeding from your eyes means you're in a cult. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:55:05 No.13023245 >>13023262 >>13023241 Go fuck your mother with a rake, you pice of shit. I sit down and actually put effort into responding to your points and you have the nerve to not even use a single brain cell in your reply. Daft faggot. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)12:59:13 No.13023254 >>13023076 Dude, you sound like a midwit reddit faggot that can't grasp that the msm would ever lie to him. Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)13:03:22 No.13023262 >>13023245 this was the first time i ever posted in this thread but seriously take the fedora off its really cringe Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)13:33:02 No.13023345 >>13023170 YES, BROTHER! Anonymous 04/24/21(Sat)13:35:42 No.13023352 File: file.png (215 KB, 928x907) >>13023161 IPCC uses reconstructions with ice core data what the fuck are you smoking? >>13023211 This is classic denier misdirection. Regional climate of a specific site does not reflect global climate. This is basic stuff. [Return] [Catalog] [Top] [Update] [ Auto] This thread has been pruned or deleted [a / c / g / k / m / o / p / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w] [vip / qa] [cm / lgbt] [3 / adv / an / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pw / qst / sci / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr x / xs] [Edit] All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster. About • Feedback • Legal • Contact ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ ▶ [Post a Reply]