Fatherhood Pastor David Ministries Ezekiel 34:10, 23 www.pastordavidministries.com Revised January 2026 God has given mankind numerous human relationships which are similar to spiritual relationships in order to help people understand those invisible spiritual rela- tionships. The most important of all is our relationship with God, the Father. God has decided to portray Himself as a father because He is the highest authority and also the one who has the greatest love, the same way that earthly fathers should be to their own children. However, the human relationship of “fatherhood” in the US has been so much changed, weakened, corrupted and twisted that it is very difficult to properly under- stand a relationship with God, the Father. The idea of a father being the highest authority in a family is completely absent from the modern society in America. In modern times, the US law itself has given the mother supreme authority over the children in a family, in the event of a marital separation. The US government has by forc e stolen the pants from the fathers and given them to the mothers. Most of the mothers, on the other hand, are usually more preoccupied with the advancement of their careers and/or making a lot of money than about doing any real fathering or mothering. As a result, most children in the US have grown up with an insufficient or warped understanding of “fatherhood” and “motherhood”. America is a fatherless country. The essence of the true nature of what a father is supposed to be has been taken by legal force away from the men, and given to the mothers. The results of this forceful removal of true “fatherhood” from the men has not yet been seen. But, at least, in part, it can be seen by the obvious instability of the young people brought up under this crazy condition. You would think that psycholo- gists could perceive that such a thing will definitely cause disaster. But, they don’t. The feminist movement is at the base of this thing, and it is now taboo to speak against the feminist movement. (See article listed below on: The Consequences of “Women's Liberation”. ) Anyone who attempts to battle against the taboo of contradict- ing feminism is labeled as a villain. Nonetheless, feminism is against God’s law, and when the witchcraft of feminism sinks, it will surely go down just like the Titanic did. Modern “feminism” is cursed of God. (See article listed below on: The Consequences of “Women's Liberation”. ) The removal of true “fatherhood” started from the influence of Lenin and Marx who had a philosophy that was very “humanistic”, “atheistic”, “anti-Christian” and 1 “socialistic”. The denial of all religions is their most important priority. Faithful Chris- tianity teaches: Eph 5:23,24 “For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.” Also Tit 2:4,5 “That they may teach the young women to be...... keepers at home, good, obe- dient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed .” The suppres- sion of male authority over women and children is primarily an anti-religious blasphe- mous movement against God. The people propagating this movement are satanic. They claim to be promoting “equality” in the home, but in truth, they are promoting fe- male dominance, better known as satanic “witchcraft”. In Satanism the woman is the leader (witch). Everyone who follows witchcraft and the sorcery thereof will not be saved; they will burn in hell for eternity. Rev 21:8 “But the fearful, and the unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whore- mongers, and sorcerers , and idolaters, and all liars, will have their part in the Lake burning with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.” Those people who follow Lenin and Marx used to call themselves “com- munists” as a corrupted counterfeit imitation of the New Testament “commune”. Acts 2:44,45 “And all that believed were together, and had all things common; And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.” The purpose of the false modern “commune” (communism) is a deceptive attack against Christianity, just like the suppression of all male leadership is an attack against Christianity. But more specifically, against the future prophesied “commune” during the final outpouring of the Holy Spirit, similar to the “commune” during the small outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost. ( Acts 2 ) (See article listed below on: The New World Order was Prophesied in the Bible.) It must also be stated here what the “socialists” are. They are all in the same group with the communists. The purpose of the name change is that the communists developed a very bad reputation by always, always, always, always having a very bad tyrannical government for many years. (Every one of them. No exceptions.) So, by using this tactic of switching the label they can fool innocent people into following their deceptive plans. After all, the communists also used a fake “good-guy” mask when they were first getting started, just like how now the “socialists” wear a “good- guy” mask now and say that they are different than the communists. The first time this “outpouring of the Holy Spirit” happened was on the day of Pentecost ( Acts 2 ), which was like a little Thanksgiving Day. It was a celebration of the small harvest of the “first fruits” of the year at the beginning of the summer. (50 days after the Passover, Easter) ( Exo. 34:22 ; Lev. 23:15 ) One of the things that happen as a result of this small “outpouring of the Holy Spirit” was that there came into existence history's all time best “commune” where all the new Christians willingly shared their possessions so that nobody went hungry. Acts 4:32 “And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the 2 things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.” Obviously, when the big Thanksgiving Day comes in autumn, with the “outpouring of the Holy Spirit” on all flesh, (just before the second coming of Jesus Christ) there will be the best “commune” in the history of the world, which will include the best sharing of possessions that the world has ever seen. The modern communist movement is a satanic counterfeit attack against this “outpouring of the Holy Spirit” with its accompanying commune, thus the name “com- munism”. They know it's coming. It was prophesied in the Word of God, so they've been fighting against it for many years now. Remember, communism is primarily a social and anti-religious movement, not a political movement. (They are mostly in- terested in dragging as many souls to eternal hell fire as they can.) However, don't forget that the communists will also experience the “outpouring of the Holy Spirit”...... and since the modern communists reject all religions, they will not have the contamination from corrupt modern lukewarm Christian habits and other corrupt religious habits. Most modern churches are being run by satanic “wolves in sheep's clothing”, who are very active at corrupting Christianity. This would imply that the communists could possibly serve God better than all those people who have been contaminated with the bad habits of modern Christian corruption, that is, when the outpouring of the Holy Spirit happens. Within the last century, all the countries that have adopted a “communist” or “socialist” type of government have always, always, always been very bad. The So- viet Union always had patrols around their borders to keep their own citizens from es- caping. North Korea even has electrified fences to kill anyone who attempts to escape. In the US, the patrol at the border is intended to keep people from entering, not escap- ing....... and they do not kill anybody. An influx of illegal immigrants causes many US citizens to lose their jobs. In the Soviet Union millions of their own people who would not submit were tortured and murdered. Back in those days it was very difficult for their citizens to leave (escape from) the Soviet Union. Over the years they have killed many more innocent people, by the millions, than the Nazis did in the Nazi death camps during WW2. (See documentary on youtube called: “The Soviet Story”.) When they were first getting started in Russia, they propagated themselves to the masses of poor people as the “good guys” against the horrible tyranny of the Rus- sian royalty. They had public marches with banners that said things like: “Brother- hood and Freedom”, “Justice, Equality and Bread”. Those marches usually ended by the Czar's police shooting down the people or the Czar's cavalry trampling the people, crushing them under their hooves, thereby motivating the revolution. The new com- munists were using the widespread poverty and the Czar's mistreatment that existed in those days as a tool to get the masses of gullible poor people to assist them rise up and take control of the government. But when they took control of the government after the Russian revolution they were worse tyrants than the previous Russian royalty. The poor people were poorer after the revolution than before. People starved to death by the millions. 3 In 1932 Stalin even sent an army to the Ukraine to forcefully remove all of the food and even take all the seed for the next years planting, and shoot anyone leaving or bringing food in. The enormous supply of confiscated food was sold outside of Russia to make Stalin and his fellow communist politicians rich. After the hunger took its effect, as they were removing the millions of dead bodies and dumping them into mass graves, occasionally there were a few who were still barely alive, but they were thrown in anyway and buried alive. Hitler was a small mass murderer compared to Stalin. After all this, why was the United States allies with Stalin during WW2? Stalin’s mass murders happened before Hitler’s mass murders. The truth is that the US has had undercover communist politicians for a long time now, who are satanic “wolves in sheep's clothing” that love to deceive, conquer and kill. (Like Bush's 9-11, see documentaries: “Loose Change” and “Fahrenheit 9-11”.) Obama’s socialist backing goes back at least to 1996, when he received the endorsement of the Chicago branch of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) for an Illinois state senate seat. According to Cliff Kincaid in Accuracy in the Media , Oba- ma endorsed openly Socialist Senator Bernie Sanders in 2006. Obama was later en- dorsed by the Communist Party USA in his run for President of the United States. President Obama has openly suggested Marxist ideologies and has surrounded him- self with numerous outspoken Marxists. Trump , on the other hand, supposedly had some communist interference com- puter hacking that supported him during his first election. He has a long history of being good friends with Soviets/Russians, kind of like how the Bush family was long standing friends with the Bin Ladin family. Trump does support “redistribution of wealth”, which has a clear communist origin. (Funny thing, people like Trump are wealthy, but people like him aren't interested in the “redistribution” of their own wealth, only in the “redistribution” of somebody else's wealth.) There has never been a US president so friendly and involved with the communists than Trump. (See 2018 documentary about Trump: “Active Measures”.) This communist movement has been world-wide. Now, they have their people infiltrating every country, influencing native communist citizens in every coun- try to seek positions of social leadership in every area of society. (They normally don't tell anyone that they are communists. Their people who actively influence others are normally native citizens, not foreigners.) They are the most powerful social movement in the world today. Communism used to be more political, but now they are concen- trating more on social, anti-religious changes. Make no mistake, the removal of true “fatherhood”, in the US, was propagated by satanic communistic philosophy by means of American communist politicians (who do not publicly call themselves communists). Their primary purpose is an attack against faithful Christianity. Communist philosophy is the number one social, political, media and educational influence in the world today, especially in America. They are very good at creating unwritten laws, in the form of 4 influential “ taboos ” against anyone who opposes their propaganda, like the taboo not to speak against feminism. People are very much influenced by their propaganda without even recognizing where it’s coming from or what the purpose/danger is. In modern USA, most people don’t even give it a second thought when they hear the word “propaganda”. Oh, they know what it means, all right. But, it doesn’t scare them. The first reason why it doesn’t scare them is that they usually think it’s only for stupid people who can’t figure it out. The second reason it doesn’t scare them is that they think they are immune from anything bad happening. This is exactly the same attitude as most Americans had for a long time before the attack on the twin towers. (This attack was NOT from foreigners. It was an internal attack from the same communist people who have been pumping America with their corrupt propaganda, like deceptive “feminism”, which has already destroyed fatherhood.) Most US citizens used to think that America is immune from such an attack. Then, after the attack, most people believed the phony dummy propaganda that said it was a foreign attack. NO, that was an attack from the US government. (See docu- mentary called: “Loose Change”.) By now, most Americans are back to thinking that the US is immune again. The scare was only short lived. The dummy propaganda is very effective at brainwashing most Americans to go back to sleep. They forget all about the great depression, which was also caused by the fellow-citizen internal communists, inside America. And they ignore the internal collapse of Venezuela, in recent years, which was also caused by home-grown com- munists inside their own country. However, in this case, the “attack” has already been made, in the form of the deceptive propaganda, which has already taken its effect. The collapse won’t need any physical attack. America will fall without any need for any gun-shot, just as Venezuela did. The poison has already been injected, and accept- ed. Fatherhood in America is already dead. America is a fatherless, insecure and unstable country. Half the young people are on drugs. America is like a Titanic that is so bad off that it doesn’t even need a big iceberg to sink it; it’ll sink all by itself. The US is like a run-down old shack leaning to one side; just a little bit of wind will blow it over. Since the supposed downfall of “communism” (the downfall of the iron curtain and the Soviet Union) many people mistakenly think that this horrible “communism” is dead. However, it has only been declining in a dominant political sense in Russia, not in a social sense. The communists have learned that they can make much more pro- gress by infiltrating socially and obtaining positions of leadership for social influence rather than keeping their own people prisoners and maintaining a bad political reputa- tion. They also have learned that they can hide under the tactical name-change of “socialist”, and pretend to be the “good guys”. The deceptive communist philosophy/ propaganda has never been stronger than it is right now, especially in America. When they were horrible tyrants, in the Soviet Union, they were showing their true character without any false mask like “wolves in sheep's clothing”. Now that they are concentrating on infiltrating socially, they need very professional “sheep's cloth- 5 ing”........ They are pretending to be the “good guys”. (See article listed below on: Wolves In Sheep's Clothing.) But their true character has not improved. They are still satanic wolves that love to deceive, brainwash and conquer or kill innocent gullible people. As primarily anti-Christian social spies, they want to drag as many souls to hell as they can. Their main purpose is anti-religious, not political. Their propaganda has successfully produced very powerful “ taboos ” which every American is very much aware of, and yet they can’t figure out the danger of it. There is a very strong taboo against men actually acting like true “fathers”. A “father” is an authority figure that the US government has now switched to the mothers. The men who attempt to stay at home and be “fathers” to their children usually end up being disrespected doormats...... and they can’t figure out why. Well, they lost the battle way back when they accepted the authority switch to the mothers, which was forced by the US government. The US is a free country and people can openly protest against unjust laws. But this legal discrimination against men is too disgraceful to manhood to even acknowledge its existence. So, most men just sugar-coat it by calling it something that it’s not. Because of the influence of Lenin and Marx, almost every modern university in the US has a “communistic” philosophy, but they don't call themselves “communists”. Likewise, almost every modern American politician has a “communistic” philosophy, but they don't call themselves “communists”. And, almost all the leaders of the media, TV and movies have a “communistic” philosophy, but they don't call themselves “com- munists”. Do “wolves in sheep's clothing” openly call themselves a “wolves”? If they did, then why would they bother wearing the sheep's clothing? (See article listed below on: Wolves In Sheep's Clothing.) The phrase “see article” means to “see article”. It’s amazing how people have questions and those questions have been answered in the designated article, and I tell them to “see article”, yet they don’t see the article which would answer their questions. Notice – it is possible that those politicians, media and university leaders are not really “communists” themselves, but they have been trained (brainwashed) by an abundance of satanic communist philosophy (propaganda) to adopt communist habits. Example: the elimination or minimization of “fatherhood”. They have influenced Ame- rican law so that the legal power of fathers and husbands has been switched to the mothers. “Communism” must be thought of as “anti-religion” or “anti-God”. “Father- hood” is an illustrative representation of God, the father. (See article listed below on: Wolves In Sheep's Clothing.) Even the name itself, “communism”, is a lie. They teach that they will one day make the whole world one great big “commune”. Everyone will all live together and share all their possessions like one big happy family in peace, love and harmony. They say that the government, the military and the police will eventually not be ne- cessary, because the human race will have evolved into the highest form of living: a 6 commune, where everyone is equal and they share all the wealth equally. Make no mistake, no communist government or their social influence has ever produced a good commune. Having a “government” is itself a denial and exposure of their own deceptive philosophy. The few “communes” that have been somewhat suc- cessful through history were more like a “democracy”. Notice that it is not “communes” which are bad, the “communist” movement is fake. They use that word “commune” as deceptive propaganda to deceive people into following them, pretending to be the good-guys, because a “commune” is supposed to be good. And, there have been a few people who have indeed created a good commune. It must also be kept in mind that pure “democracy” is impractical on a large scale. In a large government where hundreds of daily decisions must be made, it would be impossible to have a national citizen's vote every day on every detail. Not forgetting that managing a government also bears many similarities to managing a large busi- ness, and most of the common people are very incompetent business managers. Thus, there is the need for a more practical government in the form of a republic, with the spirit of “democracy” by the election of representatives who are capable managers. In the US, even when the democratic party wins the election, they still manage the government as a republic. Pure “democracy” is impractical on a large scale. True pure “democracy” is an unrealistic myth that can never be reality. The only “democracies” that could possibly exist are little tiny ones in small communities. Once they become larger, they must be converted into a republic. However, both democra- cies and republics on a large scale are usually false anyway. The real leadership is usually run behind the scenes by a secret group of people. Even though the “communists” or “socialists” claim to have many of the attributes of “democracy”, there are five main differences between “democracy” and “commu- nism”. (Besides their reputation for tyranny, brainwashing, torture and murder. The people who call themselves “socialists” do that to pretend that they are not the same as those “communists” who have a very bad reputation for abusiveness. But, the “communists” also wore a “good guy” mask when they were just starting out, too. It wasn’t until they were in power that they became horrible tyrants.) (Remember, the current movement is more “social” and anti-Christian than political. They try to influ- ence people’s thinking and habits through propaganda brainwashing. They get people to follow their system by getting them to except their unwritten “ taboos ”, and change people’s social habits.) First , “communism” is always atheistic. Their first priority is to remove all reli- gions, religious practices and religious teachings (like “fatherhood”, a father is a sym- bolic representation of God, the heavenly father) , because they are led by Satan. (Once they get the fathers out of the way, then they can brainwash the children any way they want.) They want to drag as many souls to hell as they can. Democracies and republics permit freedom of religion. Second , “communism” removes the automatic authority of men over women because that authority is taught in faithful Christianity. They claim to promote “equa- 7 lity”, but in family life it is very clear that they promote female dominance, which is satanic witchcraft. They have so badly corrupted the Christian churches in America that they don’t even know that the men are supposed to be the leaders. The people are following the witchcraft called “feminism”, if any man were to speak against “femi- nism”, he is labeled a villain. This is part of their “propaganda”, which has gotten just about everyone in America to follow along. All Satanic people are going to burn in hell for eternity. Before the modern infiltration of communism within “democracy”, in the US, each man was the head and representative of his family and the only one in each family to vote. Voting for women was not started until 1920 in the US, which was the result of the influence of satanic “communist” propaganda by “communist” politicians, who did not openly call themselves “communists”. The very essence of voting is that of deci- sion making. Women are supposed to obey the decisions of the men and not be telling the men what to do. Previously, husbands were the leaders and representatives of their families just as Senators are representatives of their states. It is no more an injustice for husbands to make decisions for their wives and children than it is for a senator to make decisions for the citizens of his state. Back when they started their propaganda to get people to follow along with these changes, their “propaganda” spread the rumors that those legal changes would stop men from abusing women, and promote “equality”. But the real purpose of these legal changes is not to prevent men from abusing women, nor to promote “equality”. And ..... most men back then were NOT abusive to women. The purpose is to eventually destroy marriage completely, in which they have been very successful up until now...... and, which has been a disadvantage to women by ruining any normal romance they otherwise could have had with their husbands. But even highly educated women can't figure out that modern “feminism” ruins ro- mance, marriage and family. Feminism turns women into men. (This comment is not intended to insult women. It is intended to take note that women need loving husbands to guide them and protect them from dangerous errors, so that they will be winners instead of losers.) (See article listed below on: The Consequences of “Women's Liberation”.) Third , “communism” requires (by force) that everyone share all possessions and living space, whereas in true “democracy” sharing possessions and living space is voluntary. The phrase “by force” indicates the absolute necessity of a governmental power in order to enforce communism. In the Soviet Union, after the Russian revolu- tion, people with large houses were forced to share them with other poorer families, without receiving rent. (And most of their household possessions got stolen in the process. See novel/film “Doctor Zhivago”.) Also, notice that the communist political leaders do not subject themselves to the same regulations as the people they are governing ...... or rather, as the gullible people they deceived and conquered. All of the communist political leaders have always lived in luxury and kept the best possessions and living space for themselves. 8 All their talk of “equality”, “brotherhood”, “democracy” and “redistribution of wealth” is a big fat lie intended to conquer and dominate the unsuspecting gullible masses. Fourth , “communism” must destroy the family unit. They cannot allow a mother- father-children family unit, because this also was established by God and is taught in correct Christianity. Most importantly, once they get the fathers out of the way and gain control of the children, then they can raise them (brainwash them) any way they want. As everyone is required, by force, to share their possessions and living space, likewise women and men and children must all be shared equally. Marital commitment (husbands and wives) and parental authority over their own children cannot be permit- ted. The destruction of marriage, up until now, has been a slow yet very successful process. Their final goal is to destroy marriage and family completely. They want people to live more like animals..... to live like dogs that roam the streets, and mate with whoever is convenient at the moment. The removal of the authority of the husband and father was the first and most important step toward the destruction of marriage and family. Permitting the women to vote was a denial that husbands were the leaders and representatives of their families. Voting, by its very nature, is masculine decision making which is not supposed to done by women. Almost all modern women are not nearly as happy as women were before “women's liberation”. Somehow, people have a hard time understanding that convert- ing women into men is not where happiness is found. (See article listed below on: The Consequences of Women’s Liberation.) Almost all modern women are deceived (brainwashed) into thinking that these changes (propaganda) are to their advantage. However, the “women's liberation” movement has already been equally as much a disadvantage to women as an “em- ployee's liberation” movement would be a disadvantage to employee's and busi- nesses. An “employee's liberation” movement would cause the biggest economic disaster in the history of the world. Despite the modern higher education of women, they can not figure out that modern “feminism” is a disadvantage to women. (This comment is not intended to insult women. It is intended to take note that women need loving hus- bands to guide them and protect them from dangerous errors, so that they will be win- ners instead of losers.) Happiness does not come from converting women into men. God has the true recipe for happiness, and God says that women are the happiest and healthiest (mentally and spiritually) when they are under the leadership, discipline and protection of good and loving men. The removal of the husbands' authority over their wives and the removal of pa- rental authority over their children are part of the same package. You cannot have the one without the other. Women cannot be “liberated” from the authority of their hus- bands without losing any normal control of their own children in the process. These changes are no more to the advantage of women than they are to the advantage of children. This is kind of like the story of the little hamster who was desperately struggling 9 trying to get out of her cage by opening the door. But she didn't realize that just out- side her door was a big dog staring intently at her and licking his chops, just waiting for her to get that door open. The poor little thing didn't know that she was much safer and happier inside the cage than outside. This example is even more applicable to “children's liberation” than it is to “women's liberation”. To some degree parental authority has already been removed. The US govern- ment spends enormous quantities of money on a gigantic agency that spends all of its time butting-in to family matters at the least little report of a neighbor or an acquain- tance. That agency claims to be protecting children from abuse, but in reality by sup- pressing parental authority over their own children by inhibiting the normal application of discipline, they have corrupted the family environment so that chaos, craziness and/or violence increase. When correct discipline is suppressed, children get out of control and chaos/tension escalates. Parents feel more and more under pressure until they're like a volcano ready to explode, and as a result, cases of child abuse increase. Check the statistics, since that agency started “protecting” people, cases of all kinds of abuse have gone up. Many parents live in constant fear that the government may, who knows when, remove their children from their home...... and if they ever want to get their children back, they are forced to attend certain lunatic “counseling” sessions. At first glance, those lunatic government “counselors” seem to be people who have never had children before and just don't seem to understand what it's like to manage children. But, in reality, when you realize that they're not interested in fixing any problems, they're in- terested in ruining everything, then the lunatic “counseling” starts to make sense...... and the parents won't get their children back unless they cooperate with that lunacy. As a result of these changes, family life, in the US, is much worse than it was before this movement started. If parents would only apply correct normal discipline with loving self-control and moderation at the beginning of their children' s misbehavior, then excessive tension, anger, screaming and violence would not happen. Pro 23: 13,14 “Withhold not correction from the child: for if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die. Thou shalt beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell.” Pro 22:15 “Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him.” Most parents in America are afraid to discipline their own children. And, in many cases, they claim that they don’t even believe in discipline, trying to con- vince themselves that discipline is never necessary. Well, in the previous verses, God says that it is necessary. Those people who reject God’s word are headed for disaster. When it happens that this type of discipline seems to not work properly, it is be- cause this discipline must be understood as only one side of a two-sided coin. On the other side must be an example by a quality role-model. Any disciplinarian who is re- bellious against their own correct authority figure cannot expect anything but rebellion in the child they are attempting to discipline. The most common case of this pheno- menon is when a mother is rebellious against the authority of her husband. This is clear evidence that nature itself dictates that God has selected the father as the correct 10 authority in a family. When a wife rebels in this manner, she should not expect to get anything but rebellion from her own children. It is a curse from God; she has rebelled against the authority which God has placed over her, so God has given her a child/children that rebel in the same manner against her. They are out of control, and will stay out of control as long as the mother refuses to obey her husband. It’s not by chance that America is number one in divor- ces and also number one in rebellious children. Even children who grow up with it, still seem to recognize that there is something wrong/abnormal with a mother who domi- nates her husband, as though she is his mother. Fifth , “communism” falsely claims to be fighting for the freedom of poor and op- pressed people. The communists call it: “revolution” or “class struggle”. Years ago in Russia, the communists were helping the poor oppressed people to fight for their free- dom from the tyranny of the rich Russian royalty. Supposedly, the communists were the “good guys”. Communism was something new at that time, and most of those poor people did not understand what it was. But really, the communists were using the widespread intensive poverty that existed in those days as a tool to fool the gullible masses of poor people into assisting them rise up and take control of the government. At the beginning, communism put a strong emphasis on economic equality, claiming that rich people had an obligation to share their wealth with the poor people. Anybody who would believe that is a real dope! Oh..... don’t forget, while they’re in the preliminary good-guy-mask stage of deception, they might do a little charity work to convince some people that they really are the good-guys. But, after they rise to power there’s never any more of that. This deception is now a common “socialist” practice for fooling many American young people. Later on, especially during the 1990's, the economy all over the world had chang- ed. That intensive poverty was not nearly as common by then, so it was necessary for the communists to change their battle tactics. The talk about “redistribution of wealth” has now become semi-obsolete. This is why the Soviet Union was deliberately dis- solved. They are now much more a social movement than a political one. It must be noted here that by taking control of the government they had lost view of their main purpose, which was not primarily political. (The way they have now taken control of the government in the US, as undercover political spies, was much more suited to their purpose and the achievement of their goals.) Their main purpose has always been to corrupt religions, change gender roles and destroy families and mar- riages...... and that is done better by infiltration secretly as socialistic spies, like wolves in sheep's clothing. (See article listed below on: Wolves In Sheep's Clothing.) Immediately after the Russian revolution, as soon as the “communists” took con- trol of the government, they were worse tyrants than the previous Russian royalty. But, that type of tyranny doesn't exist in the US...... or does it? Isn't the enforcement of charging enormous and unjustifiable quantities of “child support” or “alimony” tyranny against men? (“child support” is really kidnapping & extortion, but they can’t seem to tell the difference.) Meanwhile, most men in America go to work and at least one of 11 their bosses is a woman who earns more money than they do. Those laws demanding that men pay the cost of supporting the family were started back in the days when women could rarely get good-paying jobs. Now that women make much better pay (sometimes, more pay than the men do), it is an extreme injustice to over-charge men for paying and at the same time denying them any say in the matter. It has turned into tyranny against men. The poor men who are low income couldn't pay both the enormous “child sup- port” and also their own basic necessities even if they wanted to. They are usually struggling along just barely able to pay the mortgage on their house and car, with no possible way of paying for their wife and children to live in a different place. They are forced to either become street people (This has probably been a major reason for the high quantity of male street people in most cities in the US. And, without fathers, young people usually turn to drugs, which is the second generation cause of the high quantity of street people.)...... But, in order to survive, those men who can’t pay can change their jobs and move out of state. (thereby losing any good income they had previously) They are forced to take any low paying job available. And they have to move to a secret address and use mass transit. (In mass transit the police never ask for IDs.) So, they can move to another state and start life all over again. In some cases they can hire a lawyer, at high cost, to lower the outrageous “child support” or alimony. (This “child support” is really kidnapping & extortion. The main purpose is to break male leadership and fatherhood. Nothing could possibly be more effective at destroying fatherhood than this crime. It is exactly the same as “taxation without representation” which started the revolutionary war against England.) Why do men have no say about their own children, and at the same time are required to pay impossible amounts of money. That word “ impossible ” means “ impossible ”. It’s truly amazing how women hear that word, but they can’t understand that the only men who could possibly pay it are rich men, who have high income. [Now that more time has gone by, since they started this corrupt abusiveness against men, the most common cause of the high quantity of male street people is due to the drug problem of people who have grown up from childhood under the influence of this corruption, who turn to drugs in order to alleviate the emotional pain of their hor- rible family environment.] (See article listed below on: The Consequences of Women’s Liberation.) In order to survive, those men might also consider moving to another state, or to one of the oodles of English speaking countries around the world. But, they should get their passport before their “child support” or “alimony” debt surpasses the limit of money owed in order to get one. Canada is the closest to the US. However, they should do some Internet research about the laws in the country they want to go to, to make sure they don't fall into the same problem they have now, all over again. They also must check the requirements for getting permanent residence in the country they want to go to, in order to work there. They could also check out moving to another state. 12 They should avoid keeping money in a bank. The government can easily steal that. They're the real criminals, you know. It was the government that started this cor- ruption to ruin marriage and fatherhood. Unfortunately, the children who grow up un- der this corruption don’t seem to understand what or why this is happening. The chil- dren usually end up thinking that there is something wrong with their fathers. Some- how, they are completely oblivious to what their fathers are going through, especially the daughters. They always end up thinking that their father is at fault for everything. In addition to this disgrace of men at the hands of women, those men are also labeled as “criminals” or “dead-beats” or “abandoners of their own children”. (Notice – it is the women who are the most ungentlemanly, disc